Excerpt: ...a written agreement to arbitrate a controversy and that a party thereto refuses to arbitrate such controversy, the court shall order the petitioner and the respondent to arbitrate the controversy if it determines that an agreement to arbitrate the controversy exists, unless it determines that: (a) The right to compel arbitration has been waived by the petitioner; or (b) Grounds exist for the revocation of the agreement.” (Code Civ. Proc. §1281...

Excerpt: ...h causes of action with ten (10) days leave to amend. The demurrer is overruled as to the second and third causes of action. In reviewing the legal sufficiency of a complaint against a demurrer, a court will treat the demurrer as admitting all material facts properly pleaded, but not contentions, deductions, or conclusions of law. (Blank v. Kirwan (1985) 39 Cal.3d 311, 318 (Blank); C & H Foods Co. v. Hartford Ins. Co. (1984) 163 Cal.App.3d 1055, ...

Excerpt: ...sis not inconsistent with the Constitution of this state or of the United States.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 410.10.) Code of Civil Procedure section 410.10 “manifests an intent to exercise the broadest possible jurisdiction, limited only by constitutional considerations.” (Sibley v. Superior Court (1976) 16 Cal.3d 442, 445.) The United States Constitution permits a state to exercise jurisdiction over a nonresident defendant if the defendant has...

Excerpt: ...an arbitration agreement alleging the existence of a written agreement to arbitrate a controversy and that a party thereto refuses to arbitrate such controversy, the court shall order the petitioner and the respondent to arbitrate the controversy if it determines that an agreement to arbitrate the controversy exists, unless it determines that: (a) The right to compel arbitration has been waived by the petitioner; or (b) Grounds exist for the revo...

Excerpt: ...se with the Third Amended Complaint (TAC). The motion is denied. This is an improper motion for reconsideration supported only by Plaintiffs' counsel's improper alterations to the already filed proofs of service. “The court may in its discretion dismiss an action for delay in prosecution pursuant to this article on its own motion or on motion of the defendant if to do so appears to the court appropriate under the circumstances of the case.” (...

Excerpt: ...nium House, Inc. (collectively, Defendants). The motion is granted. While pretrial discovery of a defendant's financial condition is generally not permitted, “[u]pon motion by the plaintiff supported by appropriate affidavits and after a hearing, if the court deems a hearing to be necessary, the court may at any time enter an order permitting the discovery otherwise prohibited by this subdivision if the court finds, on the basis of the supporti...

Excerpt: ...ave to amend. A motion for judgment on the pleadings may be made after the time to demur has expired and an answer has been filed. (Code Civ. Proc., § 438, subd. (f).) A motion by a defendant may be made on the grounds that the complaint or cross-complaint “does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against that defendant.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 438, subd. (c)(B)(ii).) A motion for judgment on the pleadings has the same f...

Excerpt: ...oday's date. In reviewing the legal sufficiency of a complaint against a demurrer, a court will treat the demurrer as admitting all material facts properly pleaded, but not contentions, deductions, or conclusions of law. (Blank v. Kirwan (1985) 39 Cal.3d 311, 318 (Blank); C & H Foods Co. v. Hartford Ins. Co. (1984) 163 Cal.App.3d 1055, 1062.) It is well settled that a “demurrer lies only for defects appearing on the face of the complaint[.]” ...

Excerpt: ...complaint against a demurrer, a court will treat the demurrer as admitting all material facts properly pleaded, but not contentions, deductions, or conclusions of law. (Blank v. Kirwan (1985) 39 Cal.3d 311, 318 (Blank); C & H Foods Co. v. Hartford Ins. Co. (1984) 163 Cal.App.3d 1055, 1062.) It is well settled that a “demurrer lies only for defects appearing on the face of the complaint[.]” (Stevens v. Superior Court (1999) 75 Cal.App.4th 594,...

Excerpt: ...tion is to allow a determination as to whether an opposing party can show evidentiary support for a pleading or claim and if not to enable an order of summary dismissal without the need for trial. (Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co. (2001) 25 Cal.4th 826, 843 (Atlantic Richfield).) Code of Civil Procedure Section 437c, subdivision (c) “requires the trial judge to grant summary judgment if all the evidence submitted, and ‘all inferences reasona...

Excerpt: ... and 14-17. The motion is otherwise denied. Defendant shall produce documents and make the PMK available within thirty (30) days of today's date. Any party may obtain discovery, subject to restrictions, by taking the oral deposition of any person, including any party to the action. (Code Civ. Proc., § 2025.010.) A properly served deposition notice is effective to require a party or party-affiliated deponent to attend and to testify, as well as t...

Excerpt: ...al facts properly pleaded, but not contentions, deductions, or conclusions of law. (Blank v. Kirwan (1985) 39 Cal.3d 311, 318 (Blank); C & H Foods Co. v. Hartford Ins. Co. (1984) 163 Cal.App.3d 1055, 1062.) It is well settled that a “demurrer lies only for defects appearing on the face of the complaint[.]” (Stevens v. Superior Court (1999) 75 Cal.App.4th 594, 601.) “The rules by which the sufficiency of a complaint is tested against a gener...

Excerpt: ...s to the second, sixth, and tenth causes of action with ten (10) days leave to amend and, overrules the demurrer as to the seventh cause of action, and denies the motion to strike. In reviewing the legal sufficiency of a complaint against a demurrer, a court will treat the demurrer as admitting all material facts properly pleaded, but not contentions, deductions, or conclusions of law. (Blank v. Kirwan (1985) 39 Cal.3d 311, 318 (Blank); C & H Foo...

Excerpt: ...��On petition of a party to an arbitration agreement alleging the existence of a written agreement to arbitrate a controversy and that a party thereto refuses to arbitrate such controversy, the court shall order the petitioner and the respondent to arbitrate the controversy if it determines that an agreement to arbitrate the controversy exists, unless it determines that: (a) The right to compel arbitration has been waived by the petitioner; or (b...

Excerpt: ...ounsel. The motion is granted. “A trial court may order a party, the party's attorney, or both, to pay the reasonable expenses, including attorney's fees, incurred by another party as a result of actions or tactics, made in bad faith, that are frivolous or solely intended to cause unnecessary delay.” (Code Civ. Proc. § 128.5, subd. (a).) “An order for sanctions pursuant to this section shall be limited to what is sufficient to deter repeti...

Excerpt: .... Defendant Moore is ordered to answer Request No. 2 within ten (10) days of today's date. A party may move for an order compelling further response to a request for admission if the demanding party deems that responses are incomplete, evasive, or contain meritless objections. (Code Civ. Proc., § 2033.290, subd. (a).) “For discovery purposes, information is relevant if it ‘might reasonably assist a party in evaluating the case, preparing for...

Excerpt: ...ill treat the demurrer as admitting all material facts properly pleaded, but not contentions, deductions, or conclusions of law. (Blank v. Kirwan (1985) 39 Cal.3d 311, 318 (Blank); C & H Foods Co. v. Hartford Ins. Co. (1984) 163 Cal.App.3d 1055, 1062.) It is well settled that a “demurrer lies only for defects appearing on the face of the complaint[.]” (Stevens v. Superior Court (1999) 75 Cal.App.4th 594, 601.) “The rules by which the suffic...

Excerpt: ...out the name of any party, or correcting a mistake in the name of a party, or a mistake in any other respect. (Code Civ. Proc., § 473, subd. (a)(1).) California courts are required to permit liberal amendment of pleadings in the interest of justice between the parties to an action. (Code Civ. Proc., § 473, subd. (a); Dieckmann v. Superior Court (1985) 175 Cal.App.3d 345, 352.) “Public policy dictates that leave to amend be liberally granted.�...

Excerpt: ... after the time to demur has expired and an answer has been filed. (Code Civ. Proc., § 438, subd. (f).) A motion by a defendant may be made on the grounds that the complaint or cross-complaint “does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against that defendant.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 438, subd. (c)(B)(ii).) A motion for judgment on the pleadings has the same function as a general demurrer but is made after the time for dem...

Excerpt: ...84.40. A prevailing party in litigation may recover costs, including but not limited to filing fees. (Code of Civ. Proc. §1033.5, subd. (a)(1).) Under Code of Civil Procedure section 1033.5, subdivision (c)(2), allowable costs are only recoverable if they are “reasonably necessary to the conduct of the litigation.” Even mandatory costs, when incurred unnecessarily, are subject to section 1033, subdivision (c)(2). (Perko's Enterprises, Inc. v...

Excerpt: ...6, and finds that the mileage offset deduction under the 998 Offer is equal to $5,538.84. “[A]s a general rule, attorney fees are not recoverable as costs unless they are authorized by statute or agreement.” (People ex rel. Dept. of Corporations v. Speedee Oil Change Systems, Inc. (2007) 147 Cal.App.4th 424, 429.) In a lemon law action, costs, and expenses, including attorney fees, may be recovered by a prevailing buyer under the Song-Beverly...

Excerpt: ...olution of the appeal in the related case, BC661231. In reviewing the legal sufficiency of a complaint against a demurrer, a court will treat the demurrer as admitting all material facts properly pleaded, but not contentions, deductions, or conclusions of law. (Blank v. Kirwan (1985) 39 Cal.3d 311, 318 (Blank); C & H Foods Co. v. Hartford Ins. Co. (1984) 163 Cal.App.3d 1055, 1062.) It is well settled that a “demurrer lies only for defects appea...

Excerpt: ..., and Millennium House, Inc. (collectively, Defendants). The motion is denied. While pretrial discovery of a defendant's financial condition is generally not permitted, “[u]pon motion by the plaintiff supported by appropriate affidavits and after a hearing, if the court deems a hearing to be necessary, the court may at any time enter an order permitting the discovery otherwise prohibited by this subdivision if the court finds, on the basis of t...

Excerpt: ...for Production (Set One), and Interrogatory Nos. 6-7 in each Plaintiff's Special Interrogatories (Set One). The motion is granted as to Special Interrogatory Nos. 6 and 7. The motion is denied as to Request for Production Nos. 5-7 and 17. Defendant is ordered to provide supplemental answers to Interrogatories 6 and 7 within ten (10) days of today's date. A party may move for an order compelling further response to a request for production of docu...

Excerpt: ... party may move for an order compelling further response to a request for admission or request for production of documents if the demanding party deems that responses are incomplete, evasive, or contain meritless objections. (Code Civ. Proc., §§ 2031.310, subd. (a); 2033.290, subd. (a).) A motion to compel further responses to an inspection demand “shall set forth specific facts showing good cause justifying the discovery sought by the inspec...