Search by Keyword:
Start Date:
End Date:
Tip: Wrap text in quotation marks when searching for phrases (e.g. "motion to dismiss").

597 Results

Clear Search Parameters x
Location: Los Angeles x
Judge: Scheper, Barbara M x
2023.08.30 Demurrer to FAC, Motion to Strike 351
Location: Los Angeles
Judge: Scheper, Barbara M
Hearing Date: 2023.08.30
Excerpt: ...to strike is granted. Defendant is ordered to answer within ten (10) days of today's date. In reviewing the legal sufficiency of a complaint against a demurrer, a court will treat the demurrer as admitting all material facts properly pleaded, but not contentions, deductions, or conclusions of law. (Blank v. Kirwan (1985) 39 Cal.3d 311, 318 (Blank); C & H Foods Co. v. Hartford Ins. Co. (1984) 163 Cal.App.3d 1055, 1062.) It is well settled that a �...
2023.08.29 Motion to Advance Trial Date 858
Location: Los Angeles
Judge: Scheper, Barbara M
Hearing Date: 2023.08.29
Excerpt: ...rs pursuant to Section 1170 [by appearance, answer, or demurrer], trial of the proceeding shall be held not later than the 20th day following the date that the request to set the time of the trial is made.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 1170.5, subd. (a).) “The court may extend the period for trial upon the agreement of all of the parties. No other extension of the time for trial of an action under this chapter may be granted unless the court, upon it...
2023.08.24 Motion for Summary Judgment 186
Location: Los Angeles
Judge: Scheper, Barbara M
Hearing Date: 2023.08.24
Excerpt: ...s to whether an opposing party can show evidentiary support for a pleading or claim and if not to enable an order of summary dismissal without the need for trial. (Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co. (2001) 25 Cal.4th 826, 843 (Atlantic Richfield).) Code of Civil Procedure Section 437c, subdivision (c) “requires the trial judge to grant summary judgment if all the evidence submitted, and ‘all inferences reasonably deducible from the evidence' a...
2023.08.24 Demurrer to SAC, Motion to Strike 038
Location: Los Angeles
Judge: Scheper, Barbara M
Hearing Date: 2023.08.24
Excerpt: ...t. In reviewing the legal sufficiency of a complaint against a demurrer, a court will treat the demurrer as admitting all material facts properly pleaded, but not contentions, deductions, or conclusions of law. (Blank v. Kirwan (1985) 39 Cal.3d 311, 318 (Blank); C & H Foods Co. v. Hartford Ins. Co. (1984) 163 Cal.App.3d 1055, 1062.) It is well settled that a “demurrer lies only for defects appearing on the face of the complaint[.]” (Stevens v...
2023.08.23 Demurrer, Motion to Strike 493
Location: Los Angeles
Judge: Scheper, Barbara M
Hearing Date: 2023.08.23
Excerpt: ...red to answer within ten (10) days of today's date. In reviewing the legal sufficiency of a complaint against a demurrer, a court will treat the demurrer as admitting all material facts properly pleaded, but not contentions, deductions, or conclusions of law. (Blank v. Kirwan (1985) 39 Cal.3d 311, 318 (Blank); C & H Foods Co. v. Hartford Ins. Co. (1984) 163 Cal.App.3d 1055, 1062.) It is well settled that a “demurrer lies only for defects appear...
2023.08.10 Motion for Protective Order 223
Location: Los Angeles
Judge: Scheper, Barbara M
Hearing Date: 2023.08.10
Excerpt: ...“The court, for good cause shown, may make any order that justice requires to protect any party from unwarranted annoyance, embarrassment, oppression, or undue burden and expense. The protective order may include, but is not limited to, one or more of the following directions . . . (6) That a party or a side reduce the list of employed or retained experts designated by that party or side under subdivision (b) of Section 2034.210.” (Code Civ. ...
2023.08.09 Demurrer, Motion to Strike 143
Location: Los Angeles
Judge: Scheper, Barbara M
Hearing Date: 2023.08.09
Excerpt: ...within ten (10) days of today's date. In reviewing the legal sufficiency of a complaint against a demurrer, a court will treat the demurrer as admitting all material facts properly pleaded, but not contentions, deductions, or conclusions of law. (Blank v. Kirwan (1985) 39 Cal.3d 311, 318 (Blank); C & H Foods Co. v. Hartford Ins. Co. (1984) 163 Cal.App.3d 1055, 1062.) It is well settled that a “demurrer lies only for defects appearing on the fac...
2023.08.02 Motion to Compel Compliance with Deposition Subpoena 223
Location: Los Angeles
Judge: Scheper, Barbara M
Hearing Date: 2023.08.02
Excerpt: ...scovery, subject to restrictions, by taking the oral deposition of any person, including any party to the action. (Code Civ. Proc., § 2025.010.) A properly served deposition notice is effective to require a party or party-affiliated deponent to attend and to testify, as well as to produce documents for inspection and copying. (Code Civ. Proc., § 2025.280, subd. (a).) The motion to compel deposition “shall set forth specific facts showing good...
2023.07.31 Motion for Attorney Fees 558
Location: Los Angeles
Judge: Scheper, Barbara M
Hearing Date: 2023.07.31
Excerpt: ...plainants). The Court awards Cross-Defendants attorney's fees in the amount of $162,772.50 and costs of $513.78. “Except as otherwise expressly provided by statute, a prevailing party is entitled as a matter of right to recover costs in any action or proceeding.” (Code Civ. Proc. § 1032, subd. (b).) “Prevailing party” includes the party with a net monetary recovery. (Code Civ. Proc. § 1032, subd. (a)(4).) “[A]s a general rule, attorne...
2023.07.28 Motions to Quash Service of Summons 577
Location: Los Angeles
Judge: Scheper, Barbara M
Hearing Date: 2023.07.28
Excerpt: ...ot been proper service of process. (See Ruttenberg v. Ruttenberg (1997) 53 Cal.App.4th 801, 808.) “[C]ompliance with the statutory procedures for service of process is essential to establish personal jurisdiction. [Citation.]” (Dill v. Berquist Construction Co. (1994) 24 Cal.App.4th 1426, 1444.) On a motion to quash service of summons, “the plaintiff bears the burden of proof on the validity of service and the court's jurisdiction over the ...
2023.07.28 Motion to Compel Arbitration 361
Location: Los Angeles
Judge: Scheper, Barbara M
Hearing Date: 2023.07.28
Excerpt: ... a written agreement to arbitrate a controversy and that a party thereto refuses to arbitrate such controversy, the court shall order the petitioner and the respondent to arbitrate the controversy if it determines that an agreement to arbitrate the controversy exists, unless it determines that: (a) The right to compel arbitration has been waived by the petitioner; or (b) Grounds exist for the revocation of the agreement.” (Code Civ. Proc. § 12...
2023.07.26 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 308
Location: Los Angeles
Judge: Scheper, Barbara M
Hearing Date: 2023.07.26
Excerpt: ...Stacie Williams, individually and as successor trustee of the Thomas P. Williams Revocable Trust (Plaintiff), as to the sixth and seventh causes of action in Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint, and as to the first, second, and third causes of action in Movants' Cross-Complaint. The motion is granted. The function of a motion for summary judgment or adjudication is to allow a determination as to whether an opposing party can show evidentiary sup...
2023.07.25 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 912
Location: Los Angeles
Judge: Scheper, Barbara M
Hearing Date: 2023.07.25
Excerpt: ...a motion for summary judgment or adjudication is to allow a determination as to whether an opposing party can show evidentiary support for a pleading or claim and if not to enable an order of summary dismissal without the need for trial. (Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co. (2001) 25 Cal.4th 826, 843 (Atlantic Richfield).) Code of Civil Procedure Section 437c, subdivision (c) “requires the trial judge to grant summary judgment if all the evidence...
2023.07.20 Motion to Compel Discovery 466
Location: Los Angeles
Judge: Scheper, Barbara M
Hearing Date: 2023.07.20
Excerpt: ...es. A party in a civil proceeding may gain access to police officer records and citizen complaint records through the procedures established in Evidence Code sections 1043 and 1045. (See Haggerty v. Superior Court (2004) 117 Cal.App.4th 1079, 1085 (Haggerty).) Evidence Code section 1043 requires a written motion and notice to the governmental agency which has custody of the records sought, and affidavits showing good cause for the discovery or di...
2023.07.20 Motion for Summary Adjudication 773
Location: Los Angeles
Judge: Scheper, Barbara M
Hearing Date: 2023.07.20
Excerpt: ...tion for summary judgment or adjudication is to allow a determination as to whether an opposing party can show evidentiary support for a pleading or claim and if not to enable an order of summary dismissal without the need for trial. (Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co. (2001) 25 Cal.4th 826, 843 (Atlantic Richfield).) Code of Civil Procedure Section 437c, subdivision (c) “requires the trial judge to grant summary judgment if all the evidence sub...
2023.07.12 Demurrer to SAC, Motion to Strike 310
Location: Los Angeles
Judge: Scheper, Barbara M
Hearing Date: 2023.07.12
Excerpt: ...gal sufficiency of a complaint against a demurrer, a court will treat the demurrer as admitting all material facts properly pleaded, but not contentions, deductions, or conclusions of law. (Blank v. Kirwan (1985) 39 Cal.3d 311, 318 (Blank); C & H Foods Co. v. Hartford Ins. Co. (1984) 163 Cal.App.3d 1055, 1062.) It is well settled that a “demurrer lies only for defects appearing on the face of the complaint[.]” (Stevens v. Superior Court (1999...
2023.07.11 Demurrer 215
Location: Los Angeles
Judge: Scheper, Barbara M
Hearing Date: 2023.07.11
Excerpt: ...e legal sufficiency of a complaint against a demurrer, a court will treat the demurrer as admitting all material facts properly pleaded, but not contentions, deductions, or conclusions of law. (Blank v. Kirwan (1985) 39 Cal.3d 311, 318 (Blank); C & H Foods Co. v. Hartford Ins. Co. (1984) 163 Cal.App.3d 1055, 1062.) It is well settled that a “demurrer lies only for defects appearing on the face of the complaint[.]” (Stevens v. Superior Court (...
2023.07.10 Motion to Compel Arbitration 851
Location: Los Angeles
Judge: Scheper, Barbara M
Hearing Date: 2023.07.10
Excerpt: ...agreement to arbitrate a controversy and that a party thereto refuses to arbitrate such controversy, the court shall order the petitioner and the respondent to arbitrate the controversy if it determines that an agreement to arbitrate the controversy exists, unless it determines that: (a) The right to compel arbitration has been waived by the petitioner; or (b) Grounds exist for the revocation of the agreement.” (Code Civ. Proc. §1281.2, subds....
2023.07.10 Motion for Reconsideration 909
Location: Los Angeles
Judge: Scheper, Barbara M
Hearing Date: 2023.07.10
Excerpt: ...or in part, or granted, or granted conditionally, or on terms, any party affected by the order may, within 10 days after service upon the party of written notice of entry of the order and based upon new or different facts, circumstances, or law, make application to the same judge or court that made the order, to reconsider the matter and modify, amend, or revoke the prior order. The party making the application shall state by affidavit what appli...
2023.06.30 Motion to Set Aside Default 009
Location: Los Angeles
Judge: Scheper, Barbara M
Hearing Date: 2023.06.30
Excerpt: ...elief is made no more than six months after entry of judgment, is in proper form, and is accompanied by an attorney's sworn affidavit attesting to his or her mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or neglect, vacate any (1) resulting default entered by the clerk against his or her client, and which will result in entry of a default judgment, or (2) resulting default judgment or dismissal entered against his or her client, unless the court finds that th...
2023.06.30 Motion for Summary Judgment 819
Location: Los Angeles
Judge: Scheper, Barbara M
Hearing Date: 2023.06.30
Excerpt: ...ff”) filed his Complaint alleging causes of action for motor vehicle negligence and general negligence against Defendant Julie Calilung (“Julie”) and Does 1-20. The accident at issue occurred on July 14, 2018. On April 25, 2022, Plaintiff named Erlan Calilung (“Erlan”) as a Defendant in this action as Doe 1. On December 30, 2022, Plaintiff filed a second Doe Amendment naming Erlan as Doe 11 in this action. On December 20, 2022, Erlan Ca...
2023.06.30 Demurrer 566
Location: Los Angeles
Judge: Scheper, Barbara M
Hearing Date: 2023.06.30
Excerpt: ...ill treat the demurrer as admitting all material facts properly pleaded, but not contentions, deductions or conclusions of law. (Blank v. Kirwan (1985) 39 Cal.3d 311, 318 (Blank); C & H Foods Co. v. Hartford Ins. Co. (1984) 163 Cal.App.3d 1055, 1062.) It is well settled that a “demurrer lies only for defects appearing on the face of the complaint[.]” (Stevens v. Superior Court (1999) 75 Cal.App.4th 594, 601.) “The rules by which the suffici...
2023.06.29 Demurrer to FACC, Motion to Strike 577
Location: Los Angeles
Judge: Scheper, Barbara M
Hearing Date: 2023.06.29
Excerpt: ... to strike is granted. In reviewing the legal sufficiency of a complaint against a demurrer, a court will treat the demurrer as admitting all material facts properly pleaded, but not contentions, deductions or conclusions of law. (Blank v. Kirwan (1985) 39 Cal.3d 311, 318 (Blank); C & H Foods Co. v. Hartford Ins. Co. (1984) 163 Cal.App.3d 1055, 1062.) It is well settled that a “demurrer lies only for defects appearing on the face of the complai...
2023.06.28 Motion to Compel Further Discovery Responses 095
Location: Los Angeles
Judge: Scheper, Barbara M
Hearing Date: 2023.06.28
Excerpt: ...s to Request No. 39. Cross-defendant is ordered to supplement its response to request 40 within ten (10) days of today's date. A party may move for an order compelling further response to a request for admission if the demanding party deems that responses are incomplete, evasive, or contain meritless objections. (Code Civ. Proc., § 2033.290, subd. (a).) “For discovery purposes, information is relevant if it ‘might reasonably assist a party i...
2023.06.28 Motion for Reconsideration 414
Location: Los Angeles
Judge: Scheper, Barbara M
Hearing Date: 2023.06.28
Excerpt: ...e motion is denied. “When an application for an order has been made to a judge, or to a court, and refused in whole or in part, or granted, or granted conditionally, or on terms, any party affected by the order may, within 10 days after service upon the party of written notice of entry of the order and based upon new or different facts, circumstances, or law, make application to the same judge or court that made the order, to reconsider the mat...

597 Results

Per page

Pages