Excerpt: ...ished in the Senate Daily Journal, dated July 29, 2004. These Requests are unopposed, and the Court GRANTS them. As to the Motion for Approval: The Court's tentative is to GRANT. Standards Settlements under PAGA at Labor Code sections 2698, et seq., do not require preliminary approval. The court must find, however, that the PAGA settlement is “fair, reasonable, and adequate in view of PAGA's purposes to remediate present labor law violations, d...

Excerpt: ... law violations, deter future ones, and to maximize enforcement of state labor laws.” (Moniz v. Adecco USA, Inc. (2021) 72 Cal.App.5th 56, 77.) The court must find that the plaintiff 5 “has adequately represented the state's interests, and hence the public interest.” (Id. at p. 89.) The LWDA must be notified of the settlement and be given an opportunity to object. The court may looks to parallel class action guidelines to determine what is ...

Excerpt: ...ndant” or “Honda”) filed a demurrer which the Court sustained on June 7, 2022 with leave to amend. Plaintiff did not file an opposition to the demurrer. Plaintiff filed a first amended complaint (“FAC”) on June 27, 2022 asserting the same single cause of action. On September 26, 2022, Honda filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings. The Court sustained the motion for judgment on the pleadings with leave to amend. On November 18, 2023...

Excerpt: ...endant Flowers, who made an abrupt and unsafe left turn, causing a crash that injured Plaintiff. Plaintiff further alleges that Defendant Flowers was operating his shuttle during the course and scope of his employment and that the shuttle was leased, entrusted or owned by the various other Defendants (collectively, Defendants). Plaintiff filed suit on December 3, 2021, alleging (1) motor vehicle negligence; (2) common carrier negligence; and (3) ...

Excerpt: ...rson is sought. Therefore, no privacy interest is invaded. DENY further responses to Special Interrogatories #30-33. There is no demonstration that every Pipeline Carrier driver of Latino or Hispanic descent is a witness to Plaintiff's allegations to justify the disclosure of their identities. Regardless of the number of drivers involved in this request, without additional information demonstrating that these individuals are witnesses, releasing ...

Excerpt: ... Inc. (2008) 168 Cal.App.4th 116, 126; Reed v. United Teachers Los Angeles (2012) 208 Cal.App.4th 322, 337.) The court has “broad discretion in making this determination.” (In re Microsoft I-V Cases (2006) 135 Cal.App.4th 706, 723.) Relevant factors the court may consider include “the strength of plaintiffs' case, the risk, expense, complexity and likely duration of further litigation, the risk of maintaining class action status through tri...

Excerpt: ...l.App.4th 116, 126; Reed v. United Teachers Los Angeles (2012) 208 Cal.App.4th 322, 337.) The court has “broad discretion in making this determination.” (In re Microsoft I-V Cases (2006) 135 Cal.App.4th 706, 723.) Relevant factors the court may consider include “the strength of the plaintiffs' case, the risk, the expense, complexity and likely duration of further litigation, the risk of maintaining class action status through trial, the amo...

Excerpt: ... USA, Inc. (2021) 72 Cal.App.5th 56, 77.) The court must find that the plaintiff “has adequately represented the state's interests, and hence the public interest.” (Id. at p. 89.) The LWDA must have been notified of the settlement and given an opportunity to object. Counsel seeks $45,333.00 as an attorney fee. While counsel stated the number of hours worked on the case, which allows the court to calculate the hourly rate, no lodestar analysis...

Excerpt: ...ent in the underlying eminent domain proceeding related to the Archibald Avenue Improvement Project, which was intended to improve traffic and interchange operations by making improvements to Archibald Avenue between East Oak Hill Drive and Monticello Place near State Route 60. In entering the judgment, the Court determined that defendants Kuzina Development, LLC (Kuzina) was entitled to $206,475.50 for the San Bernardino County Transportation Au...

Excerpt: ...iscretion in making this determination.” (In re Microsoft I-V Cases (2006) 135 Cal.App.4th 706, 723.) Relevant factors the court may consider include “the strength of plaintiffs' case, the risk, expense, complexity and likely duration of further litigation, the risk of maintaining class action status through trial, the amount offered in settlement, the extent of discovery completed and the stage of the proceedings, the experience and views of...

Excerpt: ... Cal.App.4th 116, 126; Reed v. United Teachers Los Angeles (2012) 208 Cal.App.4th 322, 337.) The court has “broad discretion in making this determination.” (In re Microsoft I-V Cases (2006) 135 Cal.App.4th 706, 723.) Relevant factors the court may consider include “the strength of the plaintiffs' case, the risk, the expense, complexity and likely duration of further litigation, the risk of maintaining class action status through trial, the ...

Excerpt: ...ers. Petitioner claims damages arising from the alleged use of excessive force by police sometime between April 27 and 30, 2020. Respondents oppose the petition. Analysis The motion is supported by the declaration of attorney Steven Parnell Weaver (Weaver), and opposed by the declaration of Fontana Police Lieutenant Matt Kraut (Kraut). While these declarations do reveal some minimal discrepancies in the timeline of events, none are significant en...

Excerpt: ...rson is sought. Therefore, no privacy interest is invaded. DENY further responses to Special Interrogatories #30-33. There is no demonstration that every Pipeline Carrier driver of Latino or Hispanic descent is a witness to Plaintiff's allegations to justify the disclosure of their identities. DENY further responses to Special Interrogatories #34 to 43. Responses to interrogatories #34 and 39 indicated that the missing records have now been locat...

Excerpt: ...s and ages not connected with any specific person is sought. Therefore, no privacy interest is invaded. DENY further responses to Special Interrogatories #27-30 (misnumbered in Defendant's response as 30-33). There is no demonstration that every Pipeline Carrier driver of Latino or Hispanic descent is a witness to Plaintiff's allegations to justify the disclosure of their identities. DENY further responses to Special Interrogatories #31 to 40 (mi...

Excerpt: ...-hour class action asserted by a mechanic against his former employer. On March 3, 2022, Plaintiff filed this matter seeking to represent all of Defendant's current and former hourly, non-exempt California employees during the statutory period. His suit alleges (1) wage violations; (2) wage statement violations; (3) waiting time penalties; and (4) violation of the unfair competition law. Relevantly, Olid v. Westrux International, Inc., et al, Cas...

Excerpt: ...d. The discrepancy covers approximately three months. Defendant's motion is overly broad, seeking to strike portions of the amended complaint that go far beyond the narrow issue and would result in portions of the pleading being stricken which Defendant does not challenge. Defendant clarifies, however, that if the court were to agree with Defendant's view of the issue, the court could grant the motion and allow Plaintiff to amend the complaint to...

Excerpt: ...bitration Act (FAA) governs because Vista's business, and presumably the work performed by Muldrew, involve interstate commerce. The agreement, however, specifically provides otherwise. It states: “The arbitration shall conducted in the city and state of my employment and shall be governed and conducted in accordance with the laws of that state including all matters related to discovery, form of decision, procedures and remedy and relief availa...

Excerpt: ...126; Reed v. United Teachers Los Angeles (2012) 208 Cal.App.4th 322, 337.) The court has “broad discretion in making this determination.” (In re Microsoft I-V Cases (2006) 135 Cal.App.4th 706, 723.) Relevant factors the court may consider include “the strength of plaintiffs' case, the risk, expense, complexity and likely duration of further litigation, the risk of maintaining class action status through trial, the amount offered in settleme...

Excerpt: ...2012) 208 Cal.App.4th 322, 337.) The court has “broad discretion in making this determination.” (In re Microsoft I-V Cases (2006) 135 Cal.App.4th 706, 723.) Relevant factors the court may consider include “the strength of plaintiffs' case, the risk, expense, complexity and likely duration of further litigation, the risk of maintaining class action status through trial, the amount offered in settlement, the extent of discovery completed and ...

Excerpt: ...ctions 2 6. Motion to Compel Resp. to Special Interrogatories, Set Two & for Sanctions 2/9/23, 8:30 a.m., Dept. S17 Preliminary: The underlying discovery was all served via email, but the submitted declarations do not indicate why such service is appropriate. (See Rules of Court, rule 2.251(b).) However, the Court notes the parties prior filings have utilized also uniformly used email service, and thus the Court will inquire regarding the appropr...

Excerpt: ...ockton v. Superior Court (2007) 42 Cal.4th 730, 734.) The purposes of the claim presentation is to provide public entities with sufficient information to enable them to investigate the merits of claims while the evidence is still fresh and the witnesses are available; to prevent public funds from being consumed in “needless” litigation by affording public entities an opportunity to settle claims before incurring litigation expenses; to provid...

Excerpt: ... (2012) 208 Cal.App.4th 322, 337.) The court has “broad discretion in making this determination.” (In re Microsoft I-V Cases (2006) 135 Cal.App.4th 706, 723.) Relevant factors the court may consider include “the strength of plaintiffs' case, the risk, expense, complexity and likely duration of further litigation, the risk of maintaining class action status through trial, the amount offered in settlement, the extent of discovery completed an...

Excerpt: ...SA, Inc. (2021) 72 Cal.App.5th 56, 77.) The court must find that the plaintiff “has adequately represented the state's interests, and hence the public interest.” (Id. at p. 89.) The LWDA must have been notified of the settlement and given an opportunity to object. The court is unable to make these findings because counsel has not provided the number of aggrieved employees who will participate in the settlement (actual or even estimated). The ...

Excerpt: ...rse parties at “all known addresses”; and (2) all owners of record shown in the “latest county assessment roll.” (Code Civ. Proc., §§ 405.22, 405.23). Here there is no dispute that the lis pendens was served after its recordation. Substantial compliance in Biddle involved the manner of mail service and waiver of defects, and thus, distinguishable from the case at hand. Biddle v. Superior Court (1985) 170 Cal.App.3d 135. CCP § 405 is cl...

Excerpt: ... failed to demonstrate any unreasonable delay, obstruction, or lack of substantial justification in producing the deponent. The delay resulted from deponent being on medical leave. In fact, the deposition was taken by Zoom while the deponent was still on medical leave, bedridden. The moving party has failed to establish substantial justification for filing the unmeritorious motion. Sanctions are therefore awarded to the City, assessed against cou...