Search by Keyword:
Start Date:
End Date:
Tip: Wrap text in quotation marks when searching for phrases (e.g. "motion to dismiss").

225 Results

Clear Search Parameters x
Location: San Bernardino x
Judge: Frangie, Janet M S29 x
2024.01.11 Motion to Vacate Renewal of Judgment 046
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Frangie, Janet M S29
Hearing Date: 2024.01.11
Excerpt: ...hat Defendant Mays has not established any legal basis to vacate the judgment. Under Code Civ. Proc. S 683.170, subd. (a), "[t]he renewal of a judgment pursuant to this article may be vacated on any ground that would be a defense to an action on the judgment, including the ground that the amount of the renewed judgment as entered pursuant to this article is incorrect, and shall be vacated if the application for renewal was filed within five years...
2023.11.03 Motion to Compel RFAs 150
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Frangie, Janet M S29
Hearing Date: 2023.11.03
Excerpt: ...ng party perm-ts. (b) Each answer shall: (1) Admit so much of the matter inwlved in the request as is true, either as expressed in the request itself or as reasonably and clearly qualified by the responding party. (2) Deny so much of the matter involved in the request as is untrue. (3) Specify so much of the matter involved in the request as to the truth of which the responding party lacks sufficient information or knowledge. (c) If a responding ...
2023.10.30 Motions to Compel Further Responses, Deem RFAs Admitted 548
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Frangie, Janet M S29
Hearing Date: 2023.10.30
Excerpt: .... The motion is denied as to Form Interrogatory No. 17.1 based upon the Court's ruling on the Request for Admissions. 2. Motion to Compel Further Responses to Special Interrogatories (Set 1) Against Defendant Yiming Qiu: Defendant Yiming Qiu is ordered to serve a answers, without objections, to Special Interrogatory Nos. 3, 4, 6-9, and 11-25 on or before November 30, 2023. Defendant Yiming Qiu is ordered to serve further answers, without objectio...
2023.10.25 Motion for Summary Judgment 647
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Frangie, Janet M S29
Hearing Date: 2023.10.25
Excerpt: ... law and policy a defendant owes no duty to protect a plaintiff from particular harm. Avila v. Citrus Community college Dist. (2006) 38 cal.4th 148, 161 ["Avila"]; Knight v. Jewett (1992) 3 cal.4th 295, 314-15 ["Knight"]. The court does not ask what risks a particular plaintiff subjectively knew of or chose to encounter, but evaluates "the fundamental nature of the sport and the defendant's role in or relationship to that sport in order to determ...
2023.10.24 Discovery Motions 851
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Frangie, Janet M S29
Hearing Date: 2023.10.24
Excerpt: ...sel represented that they had reserved a motion to be relieved from a waiver of their objections. Based upon these representations, the Court ruled on one of the motions to compel and continued the remaining four motions to compel and ordered the parties to meet and confer and for Plaintiff to file a revised Separate Statement by October 11, 2023 and any further Opposition by October 16, 2023. The Court did not receive the required further Separa...
2023.10.23 Demurrer to TAC 647
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Frangie, Janet M S29
Hearing Date: 2023.10.23
Excerpt: ...e not necessary to dispose of Defendants' demurrer. Demurrer: The demurrer to the First Cause of Action is sustained, without leave to amend. The cause of action is barred by the two year statute of limitations. (See Gatto v. County of Sonoma (2002) 98 Cal.App.4th 744, 750; Kent v. Cal. DeVt of Consumer Affairs (E.D. cal. June 28, 2011) 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 69676, at *9; Thomas v. Sonoma county (N.D. cal. July 21, 2013) 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 102...
2023.10.19 Motion to Strike Punitive Damages 752
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Frangie, Janet M S29
Hearing Date: 2023.10.19
Excerpt: ...inadequate service or notice of motion]; See also Alliance Bank v. Murray (1984) 161 Cal.App.3d 1, 7 ["It is well settled that the appearance of a party at the hearing of a motion and his or her opposition to the motion on its merits is a waiver of any defects or irregularities in the notice of moton"].) The motion is granted, with thirty (30) days leave to amend. In the alternative, should Plaintiff decide not to amend at this time, the motion i...
2023.10.19 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 150
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Frangie, Janet M S29
Hearing Date: 2023.10.19
Excerpt: ...tention that under cases such as Williams v. Horvath (1975) 16 Cal.3d 834, 838 (Williams), and State of California v. Superior Court (Bodde) (2004) 32 Cal.4th 1234, 1240 (Bodde), sovereign immunity only is waived if the requirements of the Government Claim Act, including compliance with the claim presentation requirement, are met. It argues that the claim presentation requirement is a substantive element for a cause of action against a public ent...
2023.10.11 Motion for Attorney Fees 552
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Frangie, Janet M S29
Hearing Date: 2023.10.11
Excerpt: ... compensation for an attorney who has rendered services in connection with a legal proceeding, the trial court has broad discretion and wide latitude, and the court may make its own determination of the value of the services contrary to, or without the necessity for, expert testimony. P LCM Group, Inc. v. Drexler (2000) 22 Cal. 4th 1084, 1095. The burden is on the party seeking attorney fees to prove that the fees it seeks are reasonable. (Center...
2023.10.09 Demurrer, Motion to Strike 946
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Frangie, Janet M S29
Hearing Date: 2023.10.09
Excerpt: ...hould this occur again, the Court will continue the hearing and consider the issuance of sanctions against the non-complying party. Motion to Strike: Cross-Defendant's Request for Judicial Notice: The Request is denied as irrelevant to the determination of these motons. Cross-complainant's Request for Judicial Notice: The Request is denied as unnecessary; if the statutes and comments are relevant, they will be considered. The motion to strike is ...
2023.10.09 Demurrer, Motion to Strike 096
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Frangie, Janet M S29
Hearing Date: 2023.10.09
Excerpt: ...n 377.32. Specifically, Plaintiffs did file the Declaration of Successor in Interest Wesley McKinley pursuantto Code of Civil Procedure secton 377.11 and Welfare & Institutions Code section 15657.3 along with their Complaint on October 31, 2022, and the declaration has Estella lola McKinley's Death Certificate attached thereto as Exhibit A; 2. Defendants' Demurrer to Plaintiffs' First Cause of Action for Elder Abuse and Neglect based upon insuffi...
2023.09.26 Demurrer to FACC 952
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Frangie, Janet M S29
Hearing Date: 2023.09.26
Excerpt: ...d confer may subject that party to sanctions by the Court. Demurrer: 1. Statute of Limitations Re First through Third Cross-claims: The demurrers are overruled. It is not clear from the face of the pleading whether or not fraudulent or negligent conduct of Plaintiff, Cross-Defendant Zhu is alleged with respect to the quiet title, breach of fiduciary duty and accounting claims. These are subject to different statute of limitations. (See Code Civ. ...
2023.09.25 Motion to Compel Compliance with Business Records 248
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Frangie, Janet M S29
Hearing Date: 2023.09.25
Excerpt: ...must make himself available to oral and telephonic communications from defense counsel if he remains self-represented. Plaintiff is urged to seek legal representation in this acton. Plaintiff filed exhibits in his Opposition to the Demurrer. This is improper as the Court may only consider the Complaint and matters to which it can properly take judicial notice. Therefore, the Court did not consider these exhibits. Motion to Compel Deposition Subpo...
2023.09.13 Motions in Limine 546
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Frangie, Janet M S29
Hearing Date: 2023.09.13
Excerpt: ...ssume, to some extent, what evidence will presented and that issues are germane, which may not turn out to be the case. The Court reserves the right to exclude any such evidence upon proper objection during the trial depending upon what at trial. The denial or grant of these motions is without prejudice. Where either party has sought to limit argument of the other party, the motion is denied. Motons in limine are used to preclude evidence. Many o...
2023.09.12 Motion to Compel Further Responses 548
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Frangie, Janet M S29
Hearing Date: 2023.09.12
Excerpt: ... to the interrogatory. If she does not, she must state that in her interrogatory response. Defendant must respond based on the information she has at the time she responds to the interrogatory. To the extent Defendant's responses are based on vague, blanket assertions of privilege without production of a privilege log, they lack merit because "if an objection to a document request is based on a claim of privilege or work then the response to the ...
2023.09.08 Motion for Reconsideration 547
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Frangie, Janet M S29
Hearing Date: 2023.09.08
Excerpt: ...trated to be relevant or helpful to the dispute where the published appellate decision of Randy's Trucking controls the issue. Motion for Reconsideration: On July 25, 2023, the Court issued a detailed ruling in which the Court granted Defendant's motion for a mental examination, subject to certain provisions and a Protective Order and continued the hearing on the motion for the parties to meet and confer over the date and time of the examination ...
2023.09.08 Motion for Attorney Fees 648
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Frangie, Janet M S29
Hearing Date: 2023.09.08
Excerpt: ...of the services contrary to, or without the necessity for, expert testimony. PICM Group, Inc. v . Drexler (2000) 22 Cal. 4th 1084, 1095. The Court should consider the nature of the litigation, its difficulty, the amount involved, the skill required and the skill employed in handling the litgation, the attention given, and the success of the attorney's efforts and his or her experience in the particular type of work demanded. Contractors Labor Poo...
2023.09.07 Motion to Compel Compliance with Court Order 949
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Frangie, Janet M S29
Hearing Date: 2023.09.07
Excerpt: ...ledge, did not comply with this Order. Therefore, the Court sets an OSC Re Sanctons against Plaintiff Humberto Aranda and his attorneys, CONSUMER LAW EXPERTS, P.C. and Nancy Zhang, Attorney at Law, set for October 24, 2023, at 8:30 a.m. in Department S29. No appearance is required by Defendant at this hearing. The judicial assistant shall give notice of this OSC. Motion: The motion is granted. With respect to compelling compliance where the respo...
2023.08.29 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 550
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Frangie, Janet M S29
Hearing Date: 2023.08.29
Excerpt: ...f their factual content"].) Defendant's Evidentiary Objections: 1-3 overruled Moton: The motion is denied. In order to prevail on this motion, Defendant would have to show that Plaintiff cannot prove she suffered from organophosphate poisoning. But that is a disputed issue of fact. Plaintiff's medical records show she was admitted for treatment for "organophosphate (Def's Exh. H at pp. 1, 2; see also id. at p. 8 ["Could not rule out possibly orga...
2023.08.29 Demurrer 152
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Frangie, Janet M S29
Hearing Date: 2023.08.29
Excerpt: ...nsurer, a demurrer must be overruled if any valid theory is stated and in this case the alter ego allegations are sufficient to impose liability on all three defendants if proven at trial. (See Compl. at "1 9- 10; Rutherford Holdings, LLC v. Plaza Del Rey (2014) 223 Cal.App.4th 221 [reversing judgment of dismissal following demurrer after concluding the alter ego allegations, analogous to those in this case, were sufficiently statedl.) b. In conc...
2023.08.10 Demurrer, Motion to Strike 452
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Frangie, Janet M S29
Hearing Date: 2023.08.10
Excerpt: ...ntly connected to unlawful conduct within the limitations period." (Richards v. CH2M Hill, Inc. (2001) 26 Cal.4th 798, 802.) An employer's series of unlawful actons "should be viewed as a single, actionable course of conduct if (1) the actions are sufficiently similar in kind; (2) they occur with sufficient frequency; and (3) they have not acquired a degree of 'permanence' so that employees are on notice that further efforts at informal conciliat...
2023.08.07 Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Litigation 548
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Frangie, Janet M S29
Hearing Date: 2023.08.07
Excerpt: ... a stay of these proceedings pursuant to Code Civ. Proc. 51281.4 which requires the court to impose a stay of litigation whenever a court has ordered arbitration of a controversy that is an issue in the litigation. (See, e.g., MKJA, Inc. v. 123 Fit Franchising, LLC (2011) 191 Cal.App.4th 643, 647.) In the acton that was ordered to arbitration, Petitioner Garrick's claims that he is being denied access to corporate information. In paragraph 90 of ...
2023.08.07 Demurrer, Motion to Strike FAC 552
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Frangie, Janet M S29
Hearing Date: 2023.08.07
Excerpt: ...nsider the issuance of sanctions against the non-complying party. DEMURRER: 1. All Causes of Action are uncertain: The demurrers for uncertainty are overruled. 2. First through Third Causes of Acton: The demurrers are sustained with thirty days leave to amend. The Plaintiff has not properly alleged respondeat superior or ratification. The generalized allegations in paragraph 15 and 16 are not enough to impute the intentional torts of Defendant Ch...
2023.08.04 Motion for Summary Judgment 551
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Frangie, Janet M S29
Hearing Date: 2023.08.04
Excerpt: ...ising from those risks deemed inherent in a sport; as a matter of law, others have no legal duty to eliminate those risks or otherwise protect a sports participant from them"]; Knight v. Jewett (1992) 3 Cal.4th 296, 314-15.) However, a defendant has a duty to use due care not to increase the risks to a participant over and above those inherent in the activity. (Kahn v. East Side Union High School Dist. (2003) 31 Cal.4th 990.) Furthermore, a defen...
2023.08.02 Motion to Strike 146
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Frangie, Janet M S29
Hearing Date: 2023.08.02
Excerpt: ...efendants intend to strike Plaintiff's entire cause of action for punitive damages/exemplary damages. Defendants are not required to c:ite specific language in the Complaint. Defendants' motion complies with the California Rules of Court. In this action, Plaintiff's allegations in support of her punitive damages claim is inadequate. Absent any aggravating factors such as allegations of a prior history of substance abuse, prior arrests for driving...

225 Results

Per page

Pages