Search by Keyword:
Start Date:
End Date:
Tip: Wrap text in quotation marks when searching for phrases (e.g. "motion to dismiss").

1687 Results

Location: San Bernardino x
2023.01.10 Demurrer, Motion to Strike 736
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ortiz, Joseph T S17
Hearing Date: 2023.01.10
Excerpt: ... Causes of Action. 2. SUSTAIN without leave to amend Defendant District's Demurrer as to the Eighth Cause of Action. As to the Motion to Strike: 1. GRANT without prejudice Defendant District's contemporaneous Motion to Strike as to the prayer for treble damages but DENY the motion as to the prayer for attorneys' fees. Case Summary Plaintiff in this matter filed suit on July 11, 2022, alleging essentially sexual abuse of a minor by a middle school...
2023.01.10 Demurrer to FAC, Motion to Strike 598
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Keh, Winston 33
Hearing Date: 2023.01.10
Excerpt: ...iff's original complaint asserted causes of action for: (1) Motor Vehicle Negligence/Negligence Per Se, and (2) Gross Negligence and Recklessness. Defendant demurred and moved to strike the punitive damages allegations. At the hearing on August 17, 2022, the court sustained the demurrer with 45 days' leave to amend and the motion to strike was deemed moot. The Register of Actions is not showing the first amended complaint (FAC) to have been filed...
2023.01.09 Motion to Compel Individual Arbitration and Dismiss Action 612
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ortiz, Joseph T S17
Hearing Date: 2023.01.09
Excerpt: ... 56 Cal.App.4th 819, 831 [trial court rulings have no precedential value].) As to Plaintiff's Objections to Defendant's Evidence1 Objection 1 – Plaintiff objects plainly to the entire declaration, claiming lack of foundation and personal knowledge, conclusory, and improper opinion and speculation. There are many portions of the declaration which are obviously not objectionable – like the declarant stating her name and position. OVERRULED. Obj...
2023.01.09 Motion to Compel Arbitration 605
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Cohn, David S26
Hearing Date: 2023.01.09
Excerpt: ...upp. Rogina Decl. ¶6.) There is no dispute regarding whether the broad arbitration provision contained in the employment handbook, if enforceable, would cover Plaintiffs' wage and hour claims. It provides for mandatory arbitration of “any claim, complaint, or dispute that relates in any way to the Parties' employment relationship . . . .” (See Ex. C at § 10.1BC.) Defendant submitted receipt and acknowledgment forms indicating each Plaintiff...
2023.01.09 Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action and PAGA Settlement 557
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Cohn, David S26
Hearing Date: 2023.01.09
Excerpt: ....App.4th 322, 337.) The court has “broad discretion in making this determination.” (In re Microsoft I‐V Cases (2006) 135 Cal.App.4th 706, 723.) Relevant factors the court may consider include “the strength of plaintiffs' case, the risk, expense, complexity and likely duration of further litigation, the risk of maintaining class action status through trial, the amount offered in settlement, the extent of discovery completed and the stage o...
2023.01.05 Motion to Strike or Tax Costs
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ochoa, Gilbert G S24
Hearing Date: 2023.01.05
Excerpt: ...h ‘costs' and ‘expenses.' Examining the language of the statute [citation], it is clear the Legislature intended the word ‘expenses' to cover items not included in the detailed statutory definition of ‘costs.'” (Jensen v. BMW of North America, Inc. (1995) 35 Cal.App.4th 112, 137.) Costs are recoverable Page | 2 by the plaintiff if they were “reasonably incurred by the buyer in connection with the commencement and prosecution” of the...
2023.01.05 Motion to Compel Further Responses 498
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Keh, Winston 33
Hearing Date: 2023.01.05
Excerpt: ...n response, Justin objected on relevancy and privacy grounds. Lewis then attempted to meet and confer, but after no resolution was reached it filed the pending motion to compel a further response to ROGS No. 2.8. The motion is supported by a declaration from Matthew J. Marnell; the discovery and discovery responses; a separate statement; and the meet and confer correspondence. In opposing the motion, Justin concedes that he had a prior conviction...
2023.01.05 Demurrer to SAC 993
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Keh, Winston 33
Hearing Date: 2023.01.05
Excerpt: ...at Cobian's mother and sister are only nominally referenced in the SAC; there is no indication that the contract was written and the breach occurred more than two years before suit was filed; the agreement violates the statute of frauds; and since no conversations between Garfias, Chavez, or Odaliz are alleged then there can be no fraud. The demurrer is supported by a declaration from attorney Gregory D. Angus. The demurrer is opposed by Garfias....
2023.01.04 Motion to Tax Costs
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ochoa, Gilbert G S24
Hearing Date: 2023.01.04
Excerpt: ...intiff claimed $536.80 for filing the complaint. Defendants seek to tax $101.80 from the complaint filing fee as in excess of the first paper filing fee of $435.00. Plaintiff concedes the filing fee is $435.00, but she is claiming $101.80 for messenger and copying fees for filing with the court. Messenger fees are Page | 2 not expressly authorized by statute, but may be allowed in the court's discretion. (Ladas v. California State Auto. Assn. (19...
2023.01.04 Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement 052
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ortiz, Joseph T S17
Hearing Date: 2023.01.04
Excerpt: ... Locker Retail, Inc. (2008) 168 Cal.App.4th 116, 126; Reed v. United Teachers Los Angeles (2012) 208 Cal.App.4th 322, 337.) The court has “broad discretion in making this determination.” (In re Microsoft I‐V Cases (2006) 135 Cal.App.4th 706, 723.) Relevant factors the court may consider include “the strength of the plaintiffs' case, the risk, the expense, complexity and likely duration of further litigation, the risk of maintaining class ...
2023.01.04 Motion for Approval of Representative Action Settlement 140
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ortiz, Joseph T S17
Hearing Date: 2023.01.04
Excerpt: ...resent labor law violations, deter future ones, and to maximize enforcement of state labor laws.” (Moniz v. Adecco USA, Inc. (2021) 72 Cal.App.5th 56, 77.) The court must find that the plaintiff “has adequately represented the state's interests, and hence the public interest.” (Id. at p.89.) The LWDA must be notified of the settlement and be given an opportunity to object. The court may looks to parallel class action guidelines to determine...
2023.01.03 Motion to Compel Further Responses 403
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ochoa, Gilbert G S24
Hearing Date: 2023.01.03
Excerpt: ...ising to provide further responses to the interrogatories at issue and to also provide a substantive response to Plaintiff's extensive meet and confer efforts to narrow the disputes. According to the Declaration of Plaintiff's attorney, Melinda Jane Steuer, these promises were also made to the Court at the IDC. (Steuer Supp. Decl. [filed 12/23/22], ¶ 2.) Yet now, with a motion pending, Mr. Crosby filed a single‐page Page | 2 Opposition pointin...
2023.01.03 Motion to Quash Deposition, for Sanctions 448
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Frangie, Janet M S29
Hearing Date: 2023.01.03
Excerpt: ... (5) United Site Services, Inc. and Sanctions (continued from 11/09/ and 11/15/22) Tentative Ruling: The motions are granted in part and denied in part. Plaintiff's Evidentiary Objections: The objections are overruled. Like motions to strike at trial, evidentiary objections must be specific and particularized. It is not the Court's burden to guess which portions of the proffered evidence are subject to the objection; the burden is on the objectin...
2022.12.20 Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Proceeding 316
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Cohn, David S26
Hearing Date: 2022.12.20
Excerpt: ... Before Viking River, PAGA claims were not subject to arbitration under any circumstances. In Viking River, however, the Court held, contrary to Iskanian v. CLS Transp. Los Angeles LLC (2014) 59 Cal.4th 348, that under the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C., section 1 et seq. (FAA), a PAGA action is divisible into “individual” and “non‐ individual” components. In the Viking River lexicon, an “individual” PAGA claim is one based on La...
2022.12.20 Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlements in General 904
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Cohn, David S26
Hearing Date: 2022.12.20
Excerpt: ...012) 208 Cal.App.4th 322, 337.) The court has “broad discretion in making this determination.” (In re Microsoft I‐V Cases (2006) 135 Cal.App.4th 706, 723.) Relevant factors the court may consider include “the strength of plaintiffs' case, the risk, expense, complexity and likely duration of further litigation, the risk of maintaining class action status through trial, the amount offered in settlement, the extent of discovery completed and...
2022.12.20 Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlements in General 129
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Cohn, David S26
Hearing Date: 2022.12.20
Excerpt: ...(2012) 208 Cal.App.4th 322, 337.) The court has “broad discretion in making this determination.” (In re Microsoft I‐V Cases (2006) 135 Cal.App.4th 706, 723.) Relevant factors the court may consider include “the strength of plaintiffs' case, the risk, expense, complexity and likely duration of further litigation, the risk of maintaining class action status through trial, the amount offered in settlement, the extent of discovery completed a...
2022.12.16 Motion to Compel Physical and Mental Exams 196
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Keh, Winston 33
Hearing Date: 2022.12.16
Excerpt: ...scovery responses, Conston purportedly suffered a traumatic brain injury (TBI) with loss of consciousness; post‐concussion syndrome secondary to the TBI with memory loss, photophobia, and insomnia; multiple fractures to her face, nose, and jaw, which have necessitated extensive facial reconstructive surgery, bone grafting, and the need for her mouth to be wired shut; permanent blindness in her left eye, and loss of hearing in the left ear; and ...
2022.12.16 Motion to Compel Further Responses 645
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Frangie, Janet M S29
Hearing Date: 2022.12.16
Excerpt: ...ond by one of the following: (1) an agreement to comply; (2) a representation of inability to comply; or (3) a legitimate objection to all or part of the demand. (Code Civ. Proc., § 2031.210, subd. (a).) A representation of a party's inability to comply must state: (1) that a diligent search and reasonable inquiry has been made in an effort to locate the item demanded; and (2) the reason the party is unable to comply: e.g., the document: never e...
2022.12.16 Motion to Compel Arbitration 556
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Cohn, David S26
Hearing Date: 2022.12.16
Excerpt: ...laims were not subject to arbitration under any circumstances. In Viking River, however, the Court held, contrary to prior California precedent, 1 that under the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C., section 1 et seq. (FAA), a PAGA action is divisible into “individual” and “nonindividual” components. In the Viking River lexicon, an “individual” PAGA claim is one based on Labor Code violations allegedly suffered by the named plaintiff, wh...
2022.12.16 Motion for Prejudgment Possession 399
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Keh, Winston 33
Hearing Date: 2022.12.16
Excerpt: ...ied as Assessor's Parcel Numbers 1049‐101‐40; 1049‐131‐02; and 1049‐131‐ 03]. The subject property is a part of the construction of the West Valley Connector Project (“Project”), a zero‐emission Bus Rapid Transit system project. Phase 1 of the Project is 19 miles long and will add 3.5 miles of center‐running, dedicated bus‐only lanes. Phase 1 of the Project will add 21 stations which will provide improved transit connection ...
2022.12.16 Motion for Final Approval of Class Action Settlement 071
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ortiz, Joseph T S17
Hearing Date: 2022.12.16
Excerpt: ...ure to provide compliant wage statements; and 7) unfair business practices under B&P 17200. On October 25, 2022, Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint (FAC) adding a Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) claim for penalties. In essence, Plaintiff alleges that she was employed by Defendant medical provider in San Bernardino County as an hourly, non‐exempt employee from October 2020 to approximately February 2021. She is joined by a class of 9...
2022.12.16 Motion for Final Approval of Class Action and PAGA Settlement 729
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Cohn, David S26
Hearing Date: 2022.12.16
Excerpt: ...ement is fair, adequate and reasonable.” (Kullar v. Foot Locker Retail, Inc. (2008) 168 Cal.App.4th 116, 126; Reed v. United Teachers Los Angeles (2012) 208 Cal.App.4th 322, 337.) The court has “broad discretion in making this determination.” (In re Microsoft I‐V Cases (2006) 135 Cal.App.4th 706, 723.) Relevant factors the court may consider include “the strength of plaintiffs' case, the risk, expense, complexity and likely duration of ...
2022.12.15 Motion to Strike FAC 576
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ochoa, Gilbert G S24
Hearing Date: 2022.12.15
Excerpt: .... Proc., § 472, subd. (a).) However, once an answer has been filed, the plaintiff must file a noticed motion for leave to amend in order to make substantive amendments. (See id., § 473, subd. (a)(1).) Here, Plaintiffs filed their FAC without first obtaining leave of court. Plaintiffs' FAC adds three causes of action and new theories of liability. Because Plaintiffs failed to follow the noticed motion procedure, their FAC was not filed in confor...
2022.12.15 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 534
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Keh, Winston 33
Hearing Date: 2022.12.15
Excerpt: ...of action must fail because Perez was terminated due to a legitimate and non‐discriminatory purpose as QAI suffered a financial slow down towards the second half of 2019. QAI further argues Perez's 4th and 5th causes of action fail because the evidence shows, and Perez admits, he was provided accommodations. Last, QAI argues Perez's 8th, 9th, and 10th causes of action must fail as QAI did not need “good cause” to terminate Perez and QAI pai...
2022.12.15 Motion for Prejudgment Possession 295
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Keh, Winston 33
Hearing Date: 2022.12.15
Excerpt: ...sessor's Parcel Numbers 1011‐141‐07]. As alleged, Defendants hold the following interests in the property at issue:  Grace Property Management, LLC (Fee Owner);  Del Monte Irrigation Company (Easement). The subject property is a part of the construction of the West Valley Connector Project (“Project”), a zero‐emission Bus Rapid Transit system project. Phase 1 of the Project is 19 miles long and will add 3.5 miles of center‐runni...

1687 Results

Per page

Pages