Search by Keyword:
Start Date:
End Date:
Tip: Wrap text in quotation marks when searching for phrases (e.g. "motion to dismiss").

1651 Results

Location: San Bernardino x
2024.04.23 Motion to Disqualify Counsel 918
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ortiz, Joseph T S17
Hearing Date: 2024.04.23
Excerpt: ... this is a br each of fiduciary duty case. Plaintiffs own one unit of a triplex that is subject to the Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) of Defendant Lake Chalet Homeowners Association (HOA). Plaintiffs assert that Defendant HOA violated the CC&Rs and rel evant Bylaws by failing to maintain and repair common areas; not maintaining proper financial records; allowing Defendants Prine to make unilateral decisions concerning the devel...
2024.04.23 Motion to Compel Responses 708
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ortiz, Joseph T S17
Hearing Date: 2024.04.23
Excerpt: ...uto Manufacturer. Plaintiffs allege the vehicle developed defects related to brakes, steering control buttons, the infotainment system, back- up camera, blind-spot monitoring sensors and the reduced power mode. Although it was taken for repairs, it was not conformed to its warranty, and Plaintiffs filed suit on August 29, 2023, alleging breach of express and implied warranties under the Song -Beverly Consumer Warranty Act. The Complaint also all...
2024.04.23 Motion to Compel Further Responses 078
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ortiz, Joseph T S17
Hearing Date: 2024.04.23
Excerpt: ...2, Plaintiffs purchased the subject vehicle with a warranty from the Defendant Auto Manufacturer. Plaintiffs allege the vehicle developed defects related to steering and braking. Although it was taken for repairs, it was not conformed to its warranty, and Plaintiffs fi led suit December 6, 2022, alleging (1) violation of Civil Code, section 1793.2(d); (2) violation of Civil Code, section 1793.2(b); (3) violation of Civil Code, section 1793.2(a)(...
2024.04.22 Motion for Leave to File Complaint in Intervention 900
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Cabrera, Carlos
Hearing Date: 2024.04.22
Excerpt: ...le 8.) Tent ative rulings for each law & motion will be posted on the internet (https://www.sb -court.org) by 3:00 p.m. on the court day immediately before the hearing. If you do not have internet access or if you experience difficulty with the posted tentative ruling, you may obtain the tentative ruling by calling the Judicial Assistant. You may appear in person at the hearing but personal appearance is not required. (See www.sbcourt.org/general...
2024.04.18 Special Motion to Strike, Demurrer, for Sanctions 603
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Cabrera, Carlos
Hearing Date: 2024.04.18
Excerpt: ...D On October 30, 2020, InvestorsAlly, Inc. filed a breach of contract action against Defendants Marvin Lindholm and Marina Resort, Inc. (“Marina Resort”) (CIVSB2025501). Plaintiff successfully moved for an order compelling arbitration. On December 2, 2022, Arbitrator L inda Miller (Judge-retired) issued her arbitration award in favor of Defendants. She denied Plaintiff's claims and awarded $116,967.54 in attorney fees and costs to Defendants...
2024.04.18 Motion to Compel Further Responses 068
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ortiz, Joseph T S17
Hearing Date: 2024.04.18
Excerpt: ...Plaintiff is a contractor and alleges that, on or about October 2, 2020, it entered into a written agreement to perform repairs on a property for Defendant. There were subsequent additions and modifications to the contract. Plaintiff alleges that it finished all necess ary work and met all its obligations under the contract, but remains unpaid on a large portion of the agreed -upon amount. As such, it filed a mechanic's lien on July 20, 2022, ...
2024.04.18 Motion to Compel Arbitration 515
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ortiz, Joseph T S17
Hearing Date: 2024.04.18
Excerpt: ... Court would DENY, without prejudice. Case Summary This is an individual and representative1 wage -and -hour case. In essence, Plaintiff alleges that, as an employee of Defendant, she and other employees were shorted wages; did not received proper meal -and -rest periods; were not properly reimbursed for cell phone usage; were not properly paid overtime; and were not paid for work during non- work time. She asserts that after she made complaints,...
2024.04.18 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 302
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Cabrera, Carlos
Hearing Date: 2024.04.18
Excerpt: ...ario Lalama and Noemi Lalama (hereinafter “The Lalmas”) filed their original Complaint against defendants, Emmanuel Jonathan Sanchez, City of Fontana, and A&A Auto Sales alleging causes of action for negligence and dangerous condition of public property. Subsequently , The Lalmas filed several amendments to the Complaint naming: (a) Ahmad Salamah as “Doe 1”; (b) Roy L. Tyra as “Doe 2”; (c) The Tyra Family Trust as “Doe 3”; (d) L...
2024.04.17 Motion to Compel Deposition of PMK 639
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Cabrera, Carlos
Hearing Date: 2024.04.17
Excerpt: ... Judge Carl os M. Cabrera This court follows California Rules of Court, rule 3.1308(a) (1) for tentative rulings. (See San Bernardino Superior Court Local Emergency Rule 8.) Tentative rulings for each law & motion will be posted on the internet (https://www.sb -court.o rg) by 3:00 p.m. on the court day immediately before the hearing. If you do not have internet access or if you experience difficulty with the posted tentative ruling, you may obtai...
2024.04.17 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 154
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ochoa, Gilbert G S24
Hearing Date: 2024.04.17
Excerpt: ...d. An affidavi t that fails to meet both of these criteria must be disregarded in summary -judgment proceedings.” (49 C.J.S. Judgments § 333.) “In the context of summary judgment proceedings, the required personal knowledge of an affiant is that based on facts as would be admissible in evidence, not mere conclusions, meaning personal knowledge based on what the affiant actually saw or heard, as opposed to what the affiant learned second hand...
2024.04.16 Demurrer 707
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Cabrera, Carlos
Hearing Date: 2024.04.16
Excerpt: ...ess of the complaint; and for purposes of the ruling on a demurrer, all facts pleaded in the complaint are assumed to be true however improbable they may be. (Aubry v. Tri -City Hosp. Dist. (1992) 2 Cal.4th 962, 966 -967.) However, the Court does “not accept as true co ntentions, deductions, or conclusions of fact or law.” (In re Ins. Installment Fee Cases (2012) 211 Cal.App.4th 1395, 1402, citing Moore v. Regents of University of California ...
2024.04.15 Demurrer 777
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ortiz, Joseph T S17
Hearing Date: 2024.04.15
Excerpt: ... to amend. Case S ummary This is a breach of contract, business dispute. The Plaintiff is the trustee of his father's trust and brings the suit in that capacity. His father is deceased but is alleged to have been a medical practitioner who owned a clinic. He alleges that, a fter his father passed on July 5, 2021, he acted in his capacity as trustee to try and sell the clinic to Defendant Best Health. Defendants Correa and Gutierrez were ostensibl...
2024.04.15 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 017
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ortiz, Joseph T S17
Hearing Date: 2024.04.15
Excerpt: ...or file a new memorandum of costs in compliance with rule 3.1700 of the Rules of Court. Case Summary This is limited collections matter. Plaintiff filed a judicial council form complaint on July 25, 2023, alleging causes for (1) breach of contract (written); (2) breach of contract (implied in fact); (3) -(4) common counts (money lent, paid and expended for defendant); and (5) -(6) common counts (open book & account stated). The complaint seeks ...
2024.04.15 Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Proceedings 006
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Cabrera, Carlos
Hearing Date: 2024.04.15
Excerpt: ...t”) which represented tha t the vehicle had not been in any accidents and had no existing mechanical issues. Moss answered on December 20, 2022. Defendant FCA US, LLC answered on February 1, 2023. At the Trial Setting Conference on February 21, 2023, the parties, upon no objectio n, were ordered to mediation, to be completed by January 23, 2025. Both sides have engaged in the discovery process. Plaintiff filed four Motions to Compel Further Re...
2024.04.11 Motion for Summary Adjudication 587
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Driscoll, David E 22
Hearing Date: 2024.04.11
Excerpt: ..., 2021, Plaintiff checked himself in to Defendant's facility located at 239 West 9th Street, Upland California 91786 (the Facility). At the time he checked in, Plaintiff had an undiagnosed perforated ulcer, which rapidly became worse during his residency at the Facility. Plaintiff's condition became so painful and incapacitating that he was unable to provide for his own basic needs, including seeking medical care. Despite numerous pleas for help ...
2024.04.11 Motion for Alternative Service 849
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Keh, Winston 33
Hearing Date: 2024.04.11
Excerpt: ...tract with Defendant in which Plaintiff agreed to provide storage and maintenance service for Defendant's aircraft —a Boeing 737 -300. Pursuant to the contract, Plaintiff has performed maintenance and stored the aircraft (and is still storing it in San Bernardino). Although Defendant has incurred charges of $124,498.07 for the maintenance and storage fees, it has only paid Plaintiff $4,403.31. That single payment was made on September 13, 2021....
2024.04.11 Demurrer, Motion to Strike
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ochoa, Gilbert G S24
Hearing Date: 2024.04.11
Excerpt: ...sues must be admitted or denied, and any remaining questions could easily be answered or given more explanation under the discovery process. Thus, this pleading is not subject to a special demurrer. First (Negligence – Premises Liability/Failure to Warn – Negligen ce Per Se) and Second Causes of Action (Nuisance) In attacking the nuisance cause of action, Defendant argues (1) it is duplicative of the negligence cause of action and (2) nuisanc...
2024.04.10 Motion to Compel Arbitration 976
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ortiz, Joseph T S17
Hearing Date: 2024.04.10
Excerpt: ... she was ini tially disciplined for not reporting the accident and injury. She eventually took time off and then came back with medical restrictions. She asserts that she was sent home and told she would not be allowed to return until she was free from all restrictions . On April 12, 2022, Plaintiff asserts she presented a doctor's note, lifting the restrictions, but that Defendants would not accept it since it was not authored by her treating ph...
2024.04.09 Motion to Dismiss 402
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Cabrera, Carlos
Hearing Date: 2024.04.09
Excerpt: ...ovides in pertinent pa rt, Notwithstanding any other law, including Code of Civil Procedure section 583.310, for all civil actions filed on or before April 6, 2020, the time in which to bring the action to trial is extended by six months for a total time of five years and six m onths. This rule will sunset on June 30, 2022, unless otherwise amended or repealed by the Judicial Council. This sunset does not nullify the effect of the extension of ...
2024.04.09 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ochoa, Gilbert G S24
Hearing Date: 2024.04.09
Excerpt: ...objection #1 but SUSTAIN objection #2 (Lab. Code, §6304.5). Plaintiffs Navarro object to (1) Way's Declaration, entirely, because states in support of Opposition to RND's MSJ, (2) Dunn's Deposition at 13:7 -28, 14:2 -7, 15:13- 24, 16:26- 17:4, & 23:3- 5 Page | 5 becaus e not cited in the Separate Statement, and (3) Dunn's Deposition at 13:7 -28 because irrelevant: OVERRULE. Analysis Initially, Plaintiff Muro argues the Separate Statement is defe...
2024.04.09 Motion for Attorney Fees 076
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ortiz, Joseph T S17
Hearing Date: 2024.04.09
Excerpt: ...lighting, an d mechanical systems. Despite being covered by express and implied warranties, the vehicle's manufacturer (Defendant) was unable to fix the vehicle, despite a reasonable number of attempts. Defendant also allegedly failed to replace the vehicle or make res titution. As a result, Plaintiff filed the instant suit against Defendant on May 2, 2022, for (1) violation of Section 1793.2 of the Song Beverly Consumer Warranty Act (Act), whi...
2024.04.09 Demurrers 192
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Driscoll, David E 22
Hearing Date: 2024.04.09
Excerpt: ...0 days leave to amend. Alami then filed the operative first amended complaint (“FAC”) consisting of a form complaint with attachments on October 3, 2023 alleging the same causes of action. Plaintiff alleges that on or about July 14, 2022, an oral contract with “subsequent written confirmation and/or text message agreement” was made between defendants Adebola, Toyin, and Prado. (FAC. p. 3, ¶ PC -1; Attachment BC -1, ¶ 1.) Plaintiff al...
2024.04.09 Demurrer, Motion to Strike 705
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Cabrera, Carlos
Hearing Date: 2024.04.09
Excerpt: ...d by Concealment against defendants Louie Atilano, Yvonne Atilano, Atilano, Inc. (hereinafter collectively, “Atilano” or “the Sellers”), Nancy “Nancee” Herrera, Natalie Brewer, and RMA/Realty Masters & Associates (hereinafter “RMA”). On November 9, 2023, Plaintiffs fi led the operative First Amended Complaint (hereinafter “FAC”). In the FAC, they allege the following nine causes of action: (1) Breach of Contract, (2) Breach o...
2024.04.08 Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ochoa, Gilbert G S24
Hearing Date: 2024.04.08
Excerpt: ...der Code of Ci vil Procedure section 473 for an order permitting the filing of the proposed SAC attached as Exhibit 1 to the Motion. The Motion lists amendments to the FAC including additional general allegations, the addition of a primary residence allegation under the HBOR Page | 2 claim, removal of the one action rule allegations, identification of the “rights of Mrs. Reece” for the wrongful foreclosure claim, amendments to the slander o...
2024.04.05 Demurrer 487
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Driscoll, David E 22
Hearing Date: 2024.04.05
Excerpt: ...) (operative pleading) against the County and Anderson (“Defendants”). Plaintiffs allege the following: Brad Wicks is the sole owner of Wicks Brewing. (FAC ¶8.) On March 31, 2022, Ryan Wicks, who is Brad Wicks' son and an employee of Wicks Brewing, was involved in a collision. As the result of the collision, Ryan was arrested and charged with an alcohol -related homicide. The District Attorney issued a press release incorrectly identifying R...
2024.04.05 Motion to Compel Arbitration 189
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Driscoll, David E 22
Hearing Date: 2024.04.05
Excerpt: ...nor, Ltd dba Braswells Yucaipa Leisure Manor (esa Braswell Leisure Manor) [“Braswell”]. The Complaint pleads 3 causes of action: (1) elder abuse/neglect (wrongful death & survival) by all, (2) wrongful death by Plaintiffs Johnson, Andrew, Joseph, and Sorrell, and (3) negligent infliction of emotional distress (NIED) by Plaintiff Johnson. Defendant Braswell answered. Defendant Braswell moves to compel arbitration and stay the action under the...
2024.04.04 Motion to Strike or Tax Costs 285
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Driscoll, David E 22
Hearing Date: 2024.04.04
Excerpt: ...nd awarded attorney's fees in the amount of $139,566.90. A Notice of Entry of Judgment was filed on July 5, 2022. On January 2, 2024, the judgment for Defendant Lennar Communities was reversed/ remitted. On remand, among other things, the trial court was to decide the computation of damages anew and Casa Verde was entitled to recover its appeal costs pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 8.278, subdivision (a)(1). On January 9, 2024, Casa ...
2024.04.04 Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlements in General 730
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ortiz, Joseph T S17
Hearing Date: 2024.04.04
Excerpt: ....App.4th 116, 12 6; Reed v. United Teachers Los Angeles (2012) 208 Cal.App.4th 322, 337.) The court has “broad discretion in making this determination.” (In re Microsoft I- V Cases (2006) 135 Cal.App.4th 706, 723.) Relevant factors the court may consider include “the streng th of the plaintiffs' case, the risk, the expense, complexity and likely duration of further litigation, the risk of maintaining class action status through trial, the a...
2024.04.04 Motion for Final Approval of Class Action Settlement 072
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ortiz, Joseph T S17
Hearing Date: 2024.04.04
Excerpt: ...llowing the deat h of the original plaintiff, a Second Amended Complaint (SAC) was filed on January 11, 2023, to substitute in Plaintiff Santos. The operative SAC alleges violations related to (1) meal periods; (2) rest breaks; (3) overtime wages; 3Counsel must provide a f ull lodestar analysis in the motion for final approval. 4Costs must be documented. The court does not award costs for LEXIS or Westlaw usage (which are considered items of ov...
2024.04.04 Demurrer, Motion to Strike 391
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Driscoll, David E 22
Hearing Date: 2024.04.04
Excerpt: ...z), Lorena Arias -Aguilar (Aries -Aguilar, esa Lorena Aguilar), and Tracy Miller (Miller). The operative first amended complaint (FAC) alleges causes of action for (1) negligence against all; (2) negligent hiring, supervision, and retention against Cucamonga District, Superintendent, and Central District (collectively, District Defendants); (3) assault by Minor against Hernandez; (4) battery by Minor against Hernandez; (5) violation of Civil Cod...
2024.04.04 Anti-SLAPP Attorney Fees 299
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Keh, Winston 33
Hearing Date: 2024.04.04
Excerpt: ... attorney's fees pursuant to Code Civ. Proc. § 425.16(c). Plaintiff seeks fees in the amount of $21,600.00 and costs in the amount of $736.71. Defendant/Cross -Complainant opp oses the motion. Plaintiff/Cross -Defendant replies. Anti -SLAPP Attorneys' Fees Discussion Code Civ. Proc. § 425.16(c) states that “a prevailing defendant on a special motion to strike shall be entitled to recover that defendant's attorney's fees and costs ”. “Atto...
2024.04.03 Motion for Final Approval of Class Action Settlement 211
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ortiz, Joseph T S17
Hearing Date: 2024.04.03
Excerpt: ...solidated the matte rs. The operative claims are for violations relating to (1) overtime; (2) meal periods; (3) rest breaks; (4) minimum wages; (5) final pay; (6) wage timeliness; (7) wage statements; (8) payroll records; (9) reimbursements; as well as (10) violations of the unfair competition law; and (11) civil penalties pursuant to PAGA. Per the terms of the currently proposed settlement, Plaintiffs would represent all of Defendant's current ...
2024.04.02 Motion to Compel Further Responses 431
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Keh, Winston 33
Hearing Date: 2024.04.02
Excerpt: ...oduction of Documents, Set No. Three Plaintiffs Roland Schuh, Michaelann Ingraham, Dustin Ingraham, Shenghao He, Leticia Urbina, Yaquelin Flores, Mario Juarez, and Alberto Marquez (“Plaintiffs”) Defendant California D epartment of Transportation (“DOT”) __________ Before the Court are three (3) discovery motions filed by the Plaintiffs against DOT. The Court has reviewed and considered the voluminous moving papers, Oppositions and Replie...
2024.04.02 Motion for Attorney Fees 578
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ortiz, Joseph T S17
Hearing Date: 2024.04.02
Excerpt: ...red. As such , they brought a petition to release the lien on or about May 13, 2021. Defendant answered on November 19, 2021. Relevant here, Plaintiffs moved for judgment on the pleadings due to the answer being unverified. The Court granted that motion on S eptember 12 , 2023, with thirty (30) days of leave to amend. More than thirty (30) days passed with no amended answer and this motion followed. However, upon leave of the Court, a verified ...
2024.03.28 Motion to Quash Service of Summons 105
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Cabrera, Carlos
Hearing Date: 2024.03.28
Excerpt: ...ing a 2 012 Freightliner Tractor and 2015 Vanguard Trailer at the same time. Singh ultimately collided with other vehicles stopped on the roadway (themselves involved in an accident) and his trailer detached as a result. That trailer struck Du causing him injuries . Du then commenced suit against Singh and A&A on February 22, 2021, for negligence. On September 20, 2021, Singh and A&A filed a Cross -Complaint against William Fink, Barbara Radowit...
2024.03.28 Demurrer, Motion to Strike 200
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Cabrera, Carlos
Hearing Date: 2024.03.28
Excerpt: ...on of Song -Beverly Act – breach of implied warranty; (3) violation of Song -Beverly Act Section 1793.2; and (4) fraud – fraudulent inducement/concealment. Plaintiff alleges that on November 7, 2020 he purchased a 2021 Chevrolet Silverado (hereinafter “Subject Vehicle”) from Rotol o Chevrolet Inc., an authorized GM dealership. Plaintiff claims that the Subject Vehicle was manufactured with a defective Hydra- Matic 8L90 transmission. Plain...
2024.03.25 Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint 188
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Driscoll, David E 22
Hearing Date: 2024.03.25
Excerpt: ...) violation o f section 226(A) of the Labor Code; and (5) violation of sections 200 -204 of the Labor Code. Plaintiff alleges on September 21, 2021, Airport Mobil hired him as a tow truck driver. As part of the hiring process, Plaintiff submitted to a criminal backgrou nd check. Plaintiff alleges during his employment, he would repeatedly miss or have to take his lunch past the sixth hour. Further, when he tested positive for COVID -19 on Februar...
2024.03.25 Motion to Compel Arbitration 071
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Keh, Winston 33
Hearing Date: 2024.03.25
Excerpt: ...vering the engine and transmission in addition to various emissions warranties. (Compl. ¶ 9.) The Subject Vehicle had serious defects and nonconformities to the engine and transmission systems. (Compl. ¶ 10.) On September 21, 2023, Harrison filed her Complaint against defendant Hyundai Motor America (“Hyundai”) alleging the following three causes of action pursuant to the Song -Beverly Act: 1) Breach of Express Warranty; 2) Breach of Imp l...
2024.03.21 Motion to Quash Subpoena 478
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ortiz, Joseph T S17
Hearing Date: 2024.03.21
Excerpt: ...rican and We lls Fargo. However, the Court would DENY Defendants' request for monetary sanctions. Case Summary This is a post -judgment collection effort. On February 28, 2022, Judgment Creditor file a renewal of judgment against Defendants. Relevant here, on in the fall of 2023, the Judgment Creditor sent a number of subpoenas to the Defendants' relevant business entities. On November 29, 2023, Defendants filed a motion to quash the fifteen s...
2024.03.21 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 465
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Cabrera, Carlos
Hearing Date: 2024.03.21
Excerpt: ...reinafter Collectively “Johnson,” individually by their first names). On March 10, 2021, Captan filed the operative First Amended Complaint (hereinafter “FAC”) pleading 2 causes of action: (1) premise liability and (2) general negligence. Defendants answered. The FAC alleges that on August 19, 2019, Plaintiff Jihad N. Captan was an invitee at Defendants' property. Plaintiff, while walking along a concrete pathway in the backyard, tr...
2024.03.20 Demurrer, Motion to Strike 277
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ortiz, Joseph T S17
Hearing Date: 2024.03.20
Excerpt: ...semi from Defendants on March 15, 2022. They allege that Defendant's agent asserted that the vehicle was in conformity with emissions guidelines and had a successful DOT inspection. (FAC, ¶17.) Plaintiffs assert they relied on those representation. Despite the representations, they assert that the vehicle began smoking a week later, and that it was later determined to be inoperable. After attempting to have Defendants address the issues, Plainti...
2024.03.20 Demurrer to SAC 406
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Cabrera, Carlos
Hearing Date: 2024.03.20
Excerpt: ...contract, th e manufacturer, Ford Motor Company (hereinafter “Ford”) failed to fulfill its obligations under the Song- Beverly Consumer Warranty Act (hereinafter “The Act”). As a result, Plaintiffs commenced suit against Ford on November 21, 2022, for (1) breach of expr ess warranty under the Act, (2) breach of implied warranty under the Act, and (3) violation of section 1793.2 of The Act, and (4) negligent repairs as against Defendant S...
2024.03.19 Motion to Deem RFAs Admitted 567
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ortiz, Joseph T S17
Hearing Date: 2024.03.19
Excerpt: ...y 2, 2022, P laintiff filed his first suit (Complaint #1) for (1) setting aside a fraudulent trustee's sale; (2) fraudulent conveyances; (3) fraud and conspiracy to commit fraud; (4) declaratory relief; (5) conspiracy to commit fraud; (6) slander of title; (7) intentio nal misrepresentation; (8) unconscionability; (9) fraudulent conversion; (10) cancellation of false documents; (11) quiet title; (12) intentional interference with economic advan...
2024.03.19 Demurrer 489
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Driscoll, David E 22
Hearing Date: 2024.03.19
Excerpt: ...'s original complaint included three causes of action: (1) negligence/vicarious liability; (2) premises liability; and (3) public nuisance. On November 13, 2023, the Court sustained a demurrer filed by the City to P laintiff's first and third causes of action, with leave to amend; the Court overruled the demurrer as to Plaintiff's second cause of action. On December 4, 2023, Plaintiff filed her operative First Amended Complaint (FAC), which in...
2024.03.18 Motion to Strike 405
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Cabrera, Carlos
Hearing Date: 2024.03.18
Excerpt: ...nsive pleading is due. Under Code of Civil Procedure section 435.5, subdivision (a)(3), the demurring party must file a declaration stating either: (A) The means by which the moving party met and conferred with the party who filed the pleading subject to the motion to s trike, and that the parties did not reach an agreement resolving the objections raised by the motion to strike. (B) That the party who filed the pleading subject to the motion ...
2024.03.18 Motion to Compel Further Responses 598
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Keh, Winston 33
Hearing Date: 2024.03.18
Excerpt: ...concern Defendant's policies and procedures for handling Song -Beverly Act cases, and requests Nos. 30 to 31 concern similar customer complaints in vehicles of the same year, make, an d model as the subject vehicle. (Counsel Gregory Sogoyan Decl., at ¶ 21; Exhibit 8.) As background, Plaintiffs served these requests around September 15, 2023, and Defendant served responses around October 31, 2023. (Sogoyan Decl., at ¶¶ 14- 15; Exhibits 3 & 4.) ...
2024.03.18 Demurrer, Motion to Strike 275
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ortiz, Joseph T S17
Hearing Date: 2024.03.18
Excerpt: ...the Motio n to Strike: The Court would DENY as moot given its ruling on demurrer. Case Summary This is a sexual abuse case. Plaintiff alleges that she was sexually abused in 1988, when she was eight years old, by “Doe 3,” who was later identified as a teacher at the Defendant School District. At the time, Plaintiff was in foster care and under the custody and control of a statelicensed foster home. The abuse allegedly was extensive and conti...
2024.03.18 Demurrer 405
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Cabrera, Carlos
Hearing Date: 2024.03.18
Excerpt: ... for purpose s of the ruling on a demurrer, all facts pleaded in the complaint are assumed to be true however improbable they may be. (Aubry v. Tri -City Hosp. Dist. (1992) 2 Cal.4th 962, 966- 967.) However, the Court does “not accept as true contentions, deductions, or conclusions of fact or law.” (In re Ins. Installment Fee Cases (2012) 211 Cal.App.4th 1395, 1402, citing Moore v. Regents of University of California (1990) 51 Cal.3d 120, 125...
2024.03.15 Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement 220
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ortiz, Joseph T S17
Hearing Date: 2024.03.15
Excerpt: ...e settlement is fair, adequate and reasonable.” (Kullar v. Foot Locker Retail, Inc. (2008) 168 Cal.App.4th 116, 126; Reed v. United Teachers Los Angeles (2012) 208 Cal.App.4th 322, 337.) The court has “broad discretion in making this determination.” (In re Microsoft I- V Cases (2006) 135 Cal.App.4th 706, 723.) Relevant factors the court may consider include “the strength of the plaintiffs' case, the risk, the expense, complexity and likel...
2024.03.14 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ochoa, Gilbert G S24
Hearing Date: 2024.03.14
Excerpt: ...18 Ford Fusion ( “Subject Vehicle”) from Citrus in Ontario, California. Defendants' Separate Statement of Undisputed Facts (UF) #1. Only Ojeda is named on the sales contract. UF #2. The Song -Beverly Act allows only the buyer of consumer goods to seek redress for breac hes of the implied or express warranties. (Civ. Code, §1794, subd. (a); Atkinson v. Elk Corporation of Texas (2006) 152 Cal.App.4th 212, 222.) A buyer is “any individual who...
2024.03.14 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 754
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Cabrera, Carlos
Hearing Date: 2024.03.14
Excerpt: ...s, Inc.; Prim e Healthcare Garden Grove, LLC, dba Garden Grove Hospital Medical Center; and Garden Grove Hospital. As a result, Ornelas commenced suit against those defendants, and the purported harasser Liza Martinez, on June 4, 2020. Ornelas contends that she began wo rking for Defendants in their hospital facilities as a certified nurse's assistant and her duties included basic patient care, such as feeding, changing clothes, bathing, etc. Or...
2024.03.14 Motion to Compel Deposition 904
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Cabrera, Carlos
Hearing Date: 2024.03.14
Excerpt: ...nst Esqueda and Call Pros Inc. On November 7, 2022, Plaintiff filed an amendment to the Complaint naming Rooter Hero Plumbing, Inc. in place of “Doe 1.” On November 7, 2022, the Court issued an Order Re: Discovery Conference, which stated that prior to filing any discovery motion, the moving party must schedule a telephonic or video discovery conference (also known as an Informal Discovery Conference, or “IDC”) with all parties and the ...
2024.03.13 Motion for Summary Judgment
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Raphael, Tony R17
Hearing Date: 2024.03.13
Excerpt: ...clude and/or identify the correct legal description of the Subject Property and that it was through mistake, error and/or inadvertence (through no fault of Plaintiff) that the NewRez DOT did not include and/or identify the correct full legal description to the Subject Property.” Plaintiff further argues all allegations of the complaint must be accepted because Miranda's purportedly responsive pleading does not appear to controvert any material ...
2024.03.12 Motion to Tax Costs 671
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ortiz, Joseph T S17
Hearing Date: 2024.03.12
Excerpt: ...e accident by running a red light and sought monetary damages at trial. Defendant contested the nature and extent of Plaintiff's claimed injuries and damages. Relevant here, Defendant served Plaintiff an offer to compromise pursuant to Section 998 of the Code of Civil Procedure on March 16, 2023. That offer sought to resolve the matter for $50,001. Plaintiff did not accept that offer and the matter proceeded to a jury trial. As a result, on Febru...
2024.03.12 Motion to Quash Service of Summons 601
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Cabrera, Carlos
Hearing Date: 2024.03.12
Excerpt: ... Johns Pizz a, Aylin (Last Name Unknown), and Juan “Johnny” (Last Name Unknown)(collectively, Defendants). Martinez filed a first amended complaint (FAC) on July 7, 2023, against the same defendants but correcting “Carvu 2, Inc.” to “Cravu 2, Inc.” (Cravu). The FAC a lleges Martinez is a Hispanic male approximately 59 years old at the time his employment with Cravu ended. Martinez began working for Cravu as a delivery driver in July...
2024.03.12 Motion to Dismiss 818
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ortiz, Joseph T S17
Hearing Date: 2024.03.12
Excerpt: ...ees, missing items, un paid laundry use, legal and office expenses, travel time[,] gas and expenses to Court, postage, etc., as well as for Malice, Abuse, Libel, Slander, Defamation, Nuisance 1161(4) 4 [and] Conspiracy to Defraud.” (Compl., 1:22 -24.) Defendant Scott filed a “M oti on to D i s mi ss” o n D ec emb er 22, 203, and the pro per Defendants all filed general denials on February 6, 2024. The “Motion to Dismiss” is also writt...
2024.03.12 Demurrer, Motion to Strike 972
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Keh, Winston 33
Hearing Date: 2024.03.12
Excerpt: ...es both motions, and Luong replies to both as well. The Court finds that the parties have met the meet and confer requirements under Code Civ. Proc., §§ 430.41, subd. (a)(3) an d 435.5, subd. (a)(3). Analysis Luong demurs to the Breach of Contract cause of action in the Cross -Complaint contending that it is a conclusory pleading. He demurs for failure to state a cause of action as well as uncertainty. Namely, Luong states that Frontier fails ...
2024.03.12 Demurrer 692
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Driscoll, David E 22
Hearing Date: 2024.03.12
Excerpt: ...ra Inc. filed a Cross- Complaint against Cross -Defendant Cavaniola. The Cross- Complaint pleads 4 cross- claims: (1) breach of contract, (2) open book acc ount, (3) account stated, and (4) reasonable value. Cross -Defendant Cavaniola answered. The pleadings allege that Cavaniola owns the property at 74221 Rocky Rd., City of 29 Palms. Cavaniola entered into a contract with Ficara Inc. to complete excavatin g, grading, and hauling on the property...
2024.03.12 Demurrer 603
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Cabrera, Carlos
Hearing Date: 2024.03.12
Excerpt: ... 2, 2022, Arbitrator Linda Miller (Judge-retired) issued her arbitration award in favor of Defendants. She denied InvestorsAlly's claims and awarded $116,967.54 in attorney fees and costs to Defendants Lindholm and Marina Resort. (See Ex. 1 to RJN Ex. 3 InvestorsAlly's verified motion to vacate arbitrator's award in CIVSB2025501 .) On February 2, 2023, the Court confirmed the arbitration award. InvestorsAllythen filed a motion to vacate the arbit...
2024.03.11 Demurrers to TAC 275
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ortiz, Joseph T S17
Hearing Date: 2024.03.11
Excerpt: ...ation. Plai ntiff will have thirty days to leave to amend. Case Summary This is an insurance coverage dispute. Plaintiffs are married homeowners. Defendants Bamboo and Catlin are insurers. Other defendants are various adjusters and administrators for the atissue claim . Plaintiffs maintained a policy with Defendant Catlin for the period March 2, 2020, through March 2, 2021. Plaintiffs allege Defendant Bamboo is co -insurer or alter ego of Defenda...
2024.03.11 Demurrer 887
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Driscoll, David E 22
Hearing Date: 2024.03.11
Excerpt: ...r to the complaint filed by Defendant Shenzhou Xingyu Global. There is also an unopposed demurrer by Defendant Christopher (Chris) Currie. This proceeding was commenced on June 30, 2023, by Plaintiffs Lesly Zamora (“Lesly”) and Zaira Zamora, by and through her Guardian ad Litem, Karla Zamora Duran (“Zaira”, collectively “Plaintiffs”), asserting causes of action for: (1) negligence; (2) assault and battery; (3) premises liability; and...
2024.03.11 Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement 382
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ortiz, Joseph T S17
Hearing Date: 2024.03.11
Excerpt: ....4th 116, 126; Reed v. United Teachers Los Angeles (2012) 208 Cal.App.4th 322, 337.) The court has “broad discretion in making this determination.” (In re Microsoft I -V Cases (2006) 135 Cal.App.4th 706, 723.) Relevant factors the court may consider include “the strength of the plaintiffs' case, the risk, the expense, complexity and likely duration of further litigation, the risk of maintaining class action status through trial, the amount ...
2024.03.11 Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Action 888
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Driscoll, David E 22
Hearing Date: 2024.03.11
Excerpt: ...ilure to Pay Compensation Due Upon Termination/Waiting Time Penalties; 6) Discrimination Based Upon Disability in Violation of the FEHA; 7) Failure to Accommodate Disability; 8) Retaliation in Violation o f FEHA; 9) Failure to Take All Reasonable Steps Necessary to Prevent Discrimination, Retaliation, and Hostile Work Environment in Violation of FEHA; 10) Aiding and Abetting in Violation of FEHA; 11) Failure to Prevent Unlawful Discrimination in ...
2024.03.08 Motion for Summary Adjudication 504
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Cabrera, Carlos
Hearing Date: 2024.03.08
Excerpt: ...e was “run over ” by a forklift that was being operated by Mr. Jones while he was in the course and scope of his employment with Gebruder, Staffmark and Does 1 -100. On November 12, 2021, Staffmark filed in the operative Cross -Complaint against Gebruder and Roes 1 -2 5 alleging four causes of action: (1) total or comparative equitable indemnity; (2) declaratory relief; (3) breach of contract and (4) express indemnity. On November 27, 2023, ...
2024.03.07 Demurrer, Motion to Strike 325
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Driscoll, David E 22
Hearing Date: 2024.03.07
Excerpt: ...mination in violation of public policy. Defendant has demurred to all causes of actions on grounds that, inter alia, the causes of action are time -barred and/or fail to allege facts sufficient to state a cau se of action. Defendant also filed a motion to strike requested punitive damages. As to her opposition to the demurrer to the third and fourth causes of action, the plaintiff contends that the causes of action are not time barred because th...
2024.03.06 Motion for Summary Judgment 275
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ortiz, Joseph T S17
Hearing Date: 2024.03.06
Excerpt: ...tion.. Case S ummary This is a personal injury case. Plaintiff alleges that on or about April 26, 2019 he was injured when he stepped onto a nail that was exposed on a pallet at Defendant Home Depot's store. Plaintiff alleges that Defendant's negligence in handling and maintaining the pallets led to the injury. On May 6, 2021, Plaintiff filed a single cause for negligence. On June 3, 2022, Intervenor Amerisure Insurance filed a Complaint -in -I...
2024.03.05 Motion to Set Aside Default 503
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Cabrera, Carlos
Hearing Date: 2024.03.05
Excerpt: ...t so long as the moving party establishes the grounds for relief, the relief has been raised in a procedurally proper manner, and the motion is made within any applicable time limits. (Cruz v. Fagor America, Inc. (2007) 146 Cal.App.4th 488, 495.) Code of Civil Procedure §473, subd. (b) provides a court may, upon any terms as may be just, relieve a party or his or her legal representative from a judgment, dismissal, order or other proceeding take...
2024.03.04 Motion for Final Approval of Class Action Settlement 420
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ortiz, Joseph T S17
Hearing Date: 2024.03.04
Excerpt: ...(2) minimum wag es; (3) meal periods; (4) rest breaks; (5) final pay; (6) accurate wage statements; as well as (7) violation of the unfair competition law. By October 26, 2022, Plaintiff had filed his First Amended Complaint (FAC) to add a claim for civil penalties under the Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA). Plaintiff seeks to represent all non -exempt employees working in California during the statutory period. (FAC, ¶22; compare Settleme...
2024.03.04 Demurrer
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ochoa, Gilbert G S24
Hearing Date: 2024.03.04
Excerpt: ...e the objections to the pleading. The parties Page | 2 must meet and confer at least five days before the responsive pleading is due, but if they are unable to do so, an automatic 30 -day extension of time within which to file the responsive pleading will be granted by filing and serving a declaration on or before the date the response would be due, stating a good faith attempt was made to meet and confer. The moving party then must file and ...
2024.03.01 Motion to Stay
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ochoa, Gilbert G S24
Hearing Date: 2024.03.01
Excerpt: ... o f Electronic Protected Health Page | 2 Information and (b) 45 C.F.R. section 165.524 (right to access), and breach of the notification rule. He asks the stay be pending the investigation and any subsequent criminal proceedings. Now, civil litigations may be appropriately stayed when a party (generally the defendant) is subject to a criminal prosecution that may result in the party invoking his 5th Amendment privilege. (Pacers, Inc. v. Superio...
2024.03.01 Motion to Set Aside Post-Judgment Attorney Fees, Default Judgment 592
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Driscoll, David E 22
Hearing Date: 2024.03.01
Excerpt: ...ugust 23, 1994, and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive: (1) Violation of Civil Code section 789.3; (2) Wrongful Eviction; (3) Breach of the Warranty of Habitability; (4) Breach of Covenant of Quiet Enjoyment ; (5) Unjust Enrichment; (6) Breach of Contract; and, (7) Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress. Plaintiff alleged that she was wrongfully evicted from real property (“the property”) owned by the Donald and Barbara Atkinson Revocable Tr...
2024.03.01 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 489
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Driscoll, David E 22
Hearing Date: 2024.03.01
Excerpt: ...threatened by Debbie's boyfriend and, despite having notice of the abuse, Del Taco simply transferred R.G. to another store and continued to employ Debbie. After being transferred, R.G. left the employmen t, only to seek reemployment two years later. R.G. was informed he could be rehired on the condition that he did not tell anyone about the abuse. (Compl. at ¶¶ 10 - 13.) Based on Del Taco's failure to terminate or discipline Debbie, transferri...
2024.03.01 Demurrer 727
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Driscoll, David E 22
Hearing Date: 2024.03.01
Excerpt: ... warranty; and (3) negligent repair. The first two causes of action are asserted against Defendant Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.; the third cause of action for negligent repair is asserted against demurring Defendant, Riverside Metro Auto Group, LLC d/b/a Riverside Volkswagen (“Riverside VW”). Plaintiffs' complaint alleges that they purchased a 2022 Volkswagen Atlas on January 31, 2022 and that the vehicle manifested defects and nonconfo...
2024.02.27 Motion for Final Approval of Class Action Settlement 282
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ortiz, Joseph T S17
Hearing Date: 2024.02.27
Excerpt: ...Private Attor neys General Act (PAGA). Per the terms of the currently proposed settlement, Plaintiff would represent a class of current and former nonexempt workers in Defendant's California operations from April 21, 2018 through September 17, 2023. (Settlement, ¶¶6 [“C lass”] & 10 [“Class Period”].) The PAGA period would be a year from the LWDA filing. After commencing the litigation, the parties engaged in discovery, with Defendant p...
2024.02.27 Motion to Compel Further Responses, for Leave to File FAC 789
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Driscoll, David E 22
Hearing Date: 2024.02.27
Excerpt: ...enn -Star”), alleging causes of action for: (1) Breach of Contract, (2) Breach of the Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing (Failure or Delay in Payment), (3) Bad Faith and Breach of the Implied Covenant of Goo d Faith and Fair Dealing (Failure to Properly Investigate Claim), and (4) Unfair Business Practices. According to the Complaint, between November 1, 2019 and November 1, 2020, Defendant provided insurance coverage for real prop...
2024.02.27 Motion to Deem RFAs Admitted 576
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ortiz, Joseph T S17
Hearing Date: 2024.02.27
Excerpt: ...e the General Manager of the project. PETI delegated many of its duties to Defendant Facility Services Management Company (FSMC). On September 29, 2021, FSMC entered a contract for Plaintiff's benefit for the purchase of a pre -engineered steel 3 building from Defenda nt 98 Leaf dba “Flex Plus”. While Plaintiff made various deposits in satisfaction of its obligations and served Flex Plus with a demand for assurances to obtain the status of m...
2024.02.26 Motion to Compel Further Responses 495
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Keh, Winston 33
Hearing Date: 2024.02.26
Excerpt: ...rogatories—was apparently rejected due to a filing irregularity. On January 30, 2024, the Court heard and granted the other six discovery motions. The Court ordered Defendants to resubmit their motion to compel Mauricio's further responses to s pecial interrogatories, which Defendants did that same day. Mauricio filed an opposition (one court day late). Defendants filed a timely opposition. A. Analysis At issue are Mauricio's responses to Sp...
2024.02.26 Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement 480
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ortiz, Joseph T S17
Hearing Date: 2024.02.26
Excerpt: ...App.4th 116, 1 26; Reed v. United Teachers Los Angeles (2012) 208 Cal.App.4th 322, 337.) The court has “broad discretion in making this 3 determination.” (In re Microsoft I -V Cases (2006) 135 Cal.App.4th 706, 723.) Relevant factors the court may consider include “the s trength of the plaintiffs' case, the risk, the expense, complexity and likely duration of further litigation, the risk of maintaining class action status through trial, the ...
2024.02.23 Motion to Compel Further Responses 697
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Raphael, Tony R17
Hearing Date: 2024.02.23
Excerpt: ...T he Pleadings and Allegations The underlying litigation arises from a dispute over the ownership of an automotive business. The action was commenced on May 26, 2022, by Plaintiffs Arsen H. Vartanian (“Arsen”) and AV Automotive, Inc. (“AVA”) against Defendan t Vahak Vartanian dba Vartanian on Wheels and VOW Automotive ( “Vahak”). Following consecutive demurrers, the operative second amended complaint (“SAC”) was filed on Septembe...
2024.02.23 Motion for Sanctions 277
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ortiz, Joseph T S17
Hearing Date: 2024.02.23
Excerpt: ...Summary T his is a real estate dispute. Plaintiff owns property within a shopping center. Defendants also have interests in that center. The shopping center is subject to a declaration of restrictions and reciprocal easements that are binding on all parties. Plainti ff alleges that Defendants interfered with Plaintiff's property rights. For example, Plaintiff alleges that Defendants imposed time limits on certain parking spots, locked access to t...
2024.02.23 Demurrer, Motion to Stay 178
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ortiz, Joseph T S17
Hearing Date: 2024.02.23
Excerpt: ...ative action for civil penalties pursuant to the Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA). Plaintiff alleges she worked for Defendants as a non- exempt Parts Sales Manager from 2019 to 2022. (Compl., ¶10.) On August 3, 2023, Plaintiff filed her PAGA action alleging violatio ns relating to (1) overtime; (2) meal periods; (3) rest breaks; (4) final pay; (6) wage statement requirements; (7) reimbursements; (8) vacation pay; and (9) the provision of a...
2024.02.23 Demurrer to SAC 176
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ortiz, Joseph T S17
Hearing Date: 2024.02.23
Excerpt: ...ement for thre e (3) storage units, owned and operated by 3855 IH 35 North, LLC (sued as “Phelan Self -Storage”). (SAC, ¶32.) The storage units were necessary to store “personal property,” including various family heirlooms. The units were being paid by automatic withdraw al from an account jointly owned by Plaintiffs' grandmother; their mother; and their aunt, Defendant Sheli Young. On or about January 16, 2021, Plaintiffs' mother passe...
2024.02.20 Motion for Leave to File Complaint 500
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ochoa, Gilbert G S24
Hearing Date: 2024.02.20
Excerpt: ...tion of Emotional Distress. Kassing provides a noticed motion, declaration of counsel, Declaration of Cesar Olvares (“Olvares”) (Exhibit A), points and authorities, and a copy of the proposed cross -complaint. These causes of action must be raised by cross -com plaint as failure to plead them will bar defendants from asserting it in any later lawsuit (The Rutter Group, Cal. Prac. Guide Civ. Pro. Before Trial Ch. 6 -D, § 6:511 [citing CCP §4...
2024.02.20 Demurrer 539
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ochoa, Gilbert G S24
Hearing Date: 2024.02.20
Excerpt: ...gence o n conclusions versus the ultimate fact. To plead negligence, the plaintiff must allege (1) legal duty, (2) breach of the legal duty, (3) causation, and (4) damages. (Brown v. USA Taekwondo (2021) 11 Cal.5th 204, 213.) An NIED claim is a general neglig ence claim. (Burgess v. Superior Court (Gupta) (1992) 2 Cal.4th 1064, 1072; Delfino v. Agilent Technologies, Inc. (2006) 145 Cal.App.4th 790, 796, fn. 4.) It is analyzed under either a byst...
2024.02.16 Motion to Dismiss 995
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Raphael, Tony R17
Hearing Date: 2024.02.16
Excerpt: ...ROUND On June 15, 2021, Plaintiff Omar Muro filed his complaint in Case No. CIVSB2116995 against multiple defendants, including LGMK Engineering, Inc. d/b/a/ Hadley Engineering [esa “Thomas Hadley d/b/a Hadley Engineering”]. In his complaint, whic h includes causes of action 23 for negligence and premises liability, Muro alleges the defendants were negligent in relation to the design and construction of a building, which resulted in the coll...
2024.02.16 Demurrer 453
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Raphael, Tony R17
Hearing Date: 2024.02.16
Excerpt: ...rucki ng Health Benefit, et al. Respondent(s): Plaintiff THC -Orange County, LLC Case No. CIVSB2305453 CASE BACKGROUND This is a breach of contract litigation by Plaintiff THC Orange County (“Plaintiff”) against Defendants Gardner Trucking Health Benefit P lan, et al. (collectively “Defendants”). Complaint. On February 2, 2023, Plaintiff filed its Complaint alleging the (1) Breach of Written Contract; (2) Fraudulent Misrepresentation; ...
2024.02.16 Demurrer 152
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Raphael, Tony R17
Hearing Date: 2024.02.16
Excerpt: ...�led its initial Complaint against Prefab Granite & Tile Depot, Inc. (Prefab) and Zabi Kader (collectively, Defendants). On June 1, 2023, Defendants filed a Demurrer to that Complaint's secon d cause of action for intentional interference with prospective economic advantage and the third cause of action for negligent interference with prospective economic advantage. Rexford failed to oppose the Demurrer. At the July 11 27, 2023 hearing on the De...
2024.02.15 Motion to Compel Compliance with Order 249
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Keh, Winston 33
Hearing Date: 2024.02.15
Excerpt: ...e untimely so the objections were stricken but the responses remain. (Aiso Decl. at ¶5, Exh. A; Bergerson Decl. at p. 2:7 -24; 10/5/23 Minute Order.) Since no documents were produced, Plaintiffs Taylor and El la move to compel compliance with the October 5, 2023 Order (“10/5/23 Order”). Defendant Avis opposes. Plaintiffs Taylor and Ella reply. DISCUSSION Plaintiffs are seeking an order to compel Avis to produce documents per the 10/5/23 Orde...
2024.02.14 Demurrer 950
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Keh, Winston 33
Hearing Date: 2024.02.14
Excerpt: .... He died (¶¶6163, 65, 67-70, 76). Defendant Sigma demurs to the 1st - 3rd causes of action. Plaintiff Michalski opposes. Defendant Sigma replies. DISCUSSIONS Judicial Notice Defendant Sigma requests judicial notice of two Superior Court ruling s from Los Angeles Superior Court and Sacramento Superior Court (Exhs. 1 -2). The Court DENIES the request as no applicable ground exists to judicially notice a superior court ruling. Analysis Procedural...
2024.02.13 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 504
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ochoa, Gilbert G S24
Hearing Date: 2024.02.13
Excerpt: ...retention and supervision. Alternatively, Sta¯mark motions under section 437c(f) of the Code of Civil Procedure for summary adjudication, alleging the two causes of action are without merit. The Complaint's General Negligence Cause of Action “The rule of respondeat superior is familiar and simply stated: an employer is vicariously liable for the torts of its employees committed within the scope of the employment.” (Lisa M. v. Henry Mayo New...
2024.02.13 Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement 331
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ortiz, Joseph T S17
Hearing Date: 2024.02.13
Excerpt: ...4th 116, 126; Reed v. United Teachers Los Angeles (2012) 208 Cal.App.4th 322, 337.) The court has “broad discretion in making this determination.” (In re Microsoft I-V Cases (2006) 135 Cal.App.4th 706, 723.) Relevant factors the court may consider include “the strength of the plainti¯s case, the risk, the expense, complexity and likely duration of further litigation, the risk of maintaining class action status through trial, the amount o...
2024.02.13 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 697
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Raphael, Tony R17
Hearing Date: 2024.02.13
Excerpt: ...corporation; v. VAHAK VARTANIAN, an individual doing business as Vartanian on Wheels and VOW Automotive; and DOES 1 through 35, inclusive. VAHAK VARTANIAN, an individual v. 3 ARSEN H. VARTANIAN, an individual; EDGAR PORTILLO, an individual; and ROES 1-20, inclusive. Motion: Motion to Strike and Demurrer to Cross-Complaint Movant: Cross-Defendants Arsen H. Vartanian and Edgar Portillo Respondent: Cross-Complainant Varak Vartanian Case No. CIVSB221...
2024.02.13 Motion for Final Approval of Class Action Settlement 742
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ortiz, Joseph T S17
Hearing Date: 2024.02.13
Excerpt: ...n November 2, 2020, Plainti¯ sought to represent all non-exempt current and former employees in California during the stator period. Plainti¯ served the LWDA with a notice of violations, and Þled a 3 Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) complaint on January 11, 2021. The two matters were consolidated on November 15, 2021. After commencing litigation, the parties informally exchanged policy and payroll documents and other information su¯ici...
2024.02.13 Motion for Determination of Good Faith Settlement 605
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ochoa, Gilbert G S24
Hearing Date: 2024.02.13
Excerpt: ...nt since Foldcraft was the designer and manufacturer of the booth Plainti¯ was seated on before the incident occurred. Foldcraft does not dispute that it designed and manufactured the wall mount booth, but contends the table at issue was not a Foldcraft product. At the time of this Þling, no parties have been able to identify the designer or manufacturer of the table (as opposed to the booth). Foldcraft's general commercial liability insurance...
2024.02.13 Demurrer 124
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Driscoll, David E 22
Hearing Date: 2024.02.13
Excerpt: ...“Rodriguez”) stood in ront o Plainti¯s o¯ice doorway e¯ectively blocking it as Plainti¯ tried to exit. When Plainti¯ asked Rodriguez to move, he laughed and asked her, “Tienes miedo?” which translates to “Are you araid?” Plainti¯ replied, “Araid o what?” as she stepped back and asked Rodriguez to move again so she could exit. Not moving away rom the door Rodriguez replied, “Dejame darte una nalgada con esos pa...
2024.02.08 Demurrer 006
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ochoa, Gilbert G S24
Hearing Date: 2024.02.08
Excerpt: ...y-one days after receipt of his right-to-sue letter from the EEOC and thus, the instant action under federal law would be barred under the applicable statute of limitations. The Complaint's Þrst, second, third and fourth Causes of Action Under Title VII The running of the statute must appear “clearly and a¯irmatively” on the face of the complaint. It is not enough that the complaint might be time-barred. (Committee for Green Foothills v. S...
2024.02.07 Motion to Compel Further Responses, for Sanctions 197
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Keh, Winston 33
Hearing Date: 2024.02.07
Excerpt: ...opposition. Plainti¯ Derek Þled a joint reply. Analysis Procedurally, the parties met and conferred. (Walton Decl. at ¶¶3b-4b, 5-6, Exhs. DG.) Furthermore, the motions are timely in light of the granted 2-week extension. (Walton Decl. at ¶4b, Exh. E.) Substantively, the Þrst issue is the lack of veriÞcations from Defendant ZamÞr. To RFAs #39, 46, 52- 53, and 61-63, ZamÞr either admitted or denied the RFA, and to RFAs #45, 47-48, 57, & 5...
2024.02.07 Motion to Compel Arbitration and Strike Class Claims, for Joinder 354
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ortiz, Joseph T S17
Hearing Date: 2024.02.07
Excerpt: ... a wage-and-hour class action. Plainti¯ alleges he worked or Deendants Changing Lives Sta¯ing (a sta¯ing company) and Nongshim (a ood manuacturing company) as a non-exempt employee until December 10, 2022. On May 11, 2023, he Þled suit seeking to represent all similarly situated non-exempt, hourly employees working or D e e n d a n t s i n C a l i o r n i a d u r i n g t h e s t a t u t o r y period. His suit alleges violations rela...
2024.02.07 Motion for Protective Order 470
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Driscoll, David E 22
Hearing Date: 2024.02.07
Excerpt: ...“Ford”). (Complt. ¶15.) The vehicle allegedly incurred defects and nonconformities and was delivered to Fords repair facility, Defendant Ford of Upland, LLC (hereinafter, “Upland Ford”) for repair, but neither Ford nor Upland Ford (hereinafter, collectively, “Defendants”) were able to conform the vehicle to the warranty terms after a reasonable number of attempts. (Id. at ¶¶ 16-19, 41-43.) Ford also allegedly failed to repurchase ...
2024.02.07 Demurrer 015
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ochoa, Gilbert G S24
Hearing Date: 2024.02.07
Excerpt: ...Plainti¯ renders this part of the Demurrer moot. Page | 2 1) Whistleblower Argument – 4th cause of action (Retaliation) The second theory asserted in the 4th cause of action for Retaliation, is that Plainti¯ was retaliated against for her whistleblowing activities, citing Labor Code, section 1102.5 in ¶81 of the Complaint. In ¶79, Plainti¯ alleges: Defendants Liberty and Independence, acting through Lashley, whom they had given de facto...

1651 Results

Per page

Pages