Excerpt: ...i-SLAPP motion against an amended complaint if it could not have been brought earlier, but to prohibit belated motions that could have been brought earlier (subject to the trial court's discretion to permit a late motion). This interpretation maximizes the possibility the anti-SLAPP statute will fulfill its purpose while reducing the potential for abuse.” (Newport Harbor Ventures, LLC v. Morris Cerullo World Evangelism (2018) 4 Cal. 5th 637, 65...

Excerpt: ...ums, (3) unpaid rest period premiums, (4) minimum wages, (5) untimely final wages, (6) untimely wages, (7) wage statements violations, (8) payroll records violations, (9) reimbursements, and (10) violations of the unfair competition law. Plaintiff seeks to represent Defendant's California hourly and non-exempt employees who worked during the statutory period. On September 14, 2021, Plaintiff separately filed a single cause of action Private Attor...

Excerpt: ...to compel arbitration pursuant to Viking River Cruises, Inc. v. Moriana (2022) 142 S.Ct. 1906. Before Viking River, PAGA claims were not subject to arbitration under any circumstances. (See e.g. Iskanian v. CLS Transp. Los Angeles LLC (2014) 59 Cal.4th 348.) In Viking River, however, the Court held, contrary to Iskanian, that under the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C., section 1 et seq. (FAA), a PAGA action is divisible into “individual” and...

Excerpt: ...eved employees.” On the one hand, the basic coverage provision in the agreement is broad, covering all claims the employee may have against the company unless otherwise excluded. (See Arbitration Agreement, p. 1, ¶ 1 (“Claims Covered by the Agreement.”) On the other hand, the agreement also provides: These claims are not covered under the Agreement: …(iv) representative actions for civil penalties filed under the California Private Attor...

Excerpt: ..., adequate and reasonable.” (Kullar v. Foot Locker Retail, Inc. (2008) 168 Cal.App.4th 116, 126; Reed v. United Teachers Los Angeles (2012) 208 Cal.App.4th 322, 337.) The court has “broad discretion in making this determination.” (In re Microsoft I-V Cases (2006) 135 Cal.App.4th 706, 723.) Relevant factors the court may consider include “the strength of plaintiffs' case, the risk, expense, complexity and likely duration of further litigat...

Excerpt: ...rest break violations; (5) reimbursement violations; (6) final pay violations; (7) wage statement violations; (8) unfair competition law violations; and (9) civil penalties pursuant to the Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA). The LWDA was given notice of Plaintiff's claims as of September 11, 2022. Plaintiff sought to represent all of the hourly, non-exempt current and former California who worked at Defendant's lumber and building supplies busi...

Excerpt: ... settle. As such they have argued, in the alternative to denying the motion, the Court may continue the matter past the pending mediation and motion to stay. Page 4 Defendant roofing company's overspray blew silicone adhesive on to nearby properties and various nearby tractors, trucks, and automobiles. The proposed class are “all persons whose vehicles were damaged by silicone overspray on October 18, 2018, at 1901 Raymer Ave., Fullerton, CA 92...

Excerpt: ..., Inc. (2008) 168 Cal.App.4th 116, 126; Reed v. United Teachers Los Angeles (2012) 208 Cal.App.4th 322, 337.) The court has “broad discretion in making this determination.” (In re Microsoft I-V Cases (2006) 135 Cal.App.4th 706, 723.) Relevant factors the court may consider include “the strength of plaintiffs' case, the risk, expense, complexity and likely duration of further litigation, the risk of maintaining class action status through tr...

Excerpt: ...laws.” (Moniz v. Adecco USA, Inc. (2021) 72 Cal.App.5th 56, 77.) The court must find that the plaintiff “has adequately represented the state's interests, and hence the public interest.” (Id. at p. 89.) The LWDA must have been notified of the settlement and given an opportunity to object. The court finds that the settlement is fair, reasonable, and adequate under Moniz. The court further finds that all representative plaintiffs with the exc...

Excerpt: ... alleged facts are insufficient to support punitive damages. Defendants argue that California does not recognize a cause of action for gross recklessness. The Court agrees. “‘Ordinary negligence'—an unintentional tort—consists of a failure to exercise the degree of care in a given situation that a reasonable person under similar circumstances would employ to protect others from harm. [Citation.] [¶] ‘Gross negligence' long has been def...

Excerpt: ..., adequate and reasonable.” (Kullar v. Foot Locker Retail, Inc. (2008) 168 Cal.App.4th 116, 126; Reed v. United Teachers Los Angeles (2012) 208 Cal.App.4th 322, 337.) The court has “broad discretion in making this determination.” (In re Microsoft I-V Cases (2006) 135 Cal.App.4th 706, 723.) Relevant factors the court may consider include “the strength of plaintiffs' case, the risk, expense, complexity and likely duration of further litigat...

Excerpt: ...to arbitrate the controversy exists. . . .' ([Code Civ. Proc.,] § 1281.2) The statute does not require the petitioner to introduce the agreement into evidence.” (Condee v. Longwood Management Corp. (2001) 88 Cal.App.4th 215, 218.) “A plain reading of the statute indicates that as a preliminary matter the court is only required to make a finding of the agreement's existence, not an evidentiary determination of its validity.” (Condee v. Long...

Excerpt: ... current resume of 7 employees. In their initial responses, Walmart's initial responses consisted of boilerplate objections: relevancy, privacy, Page | 2 vague and ambiguous, and unduly burdensome. Subsequently, Walmart served identical supplemental responses to Request Nos. 57-65, each of which states: There are no documents responsive to this request in Defendant's possession, custody, or control. Plaintiff argues that relevancy is not a valid ...

Excerpt: ... and implied warranty under the Song-Beverly Act. In essence, Plaintiffs allege they purchased the 2020-year subject vehicle from Defendant, that express and implied warranties existed, and that there were various defects and non-conformities that arose during the warranty period. Plaintiffs sent the vehicle in for repairs but Defendant was unable to successfully repair it after a reasonable number of attempts. Plaintiffs also alleges that, after...

Excerpt: ...to compel arbitration pursuant to Viking River Cruises, Inc. v. Moriana (2022) 142 S.Ct. 1906. Before Viking River, PAGA claims were not subject to arbitration under any circumstances. (See e.g. Iskanian v. CLS Transp. Los Angeles LLC (2014) 59 Cal.4th 348.) In Viking River, however, the Court held, contrary to Iskanian, that under the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C., section 1 et seq. (FAA), a PAGA action is divisible into “individual” and...

Excerpt: ...ment is fair, adequate and reasonable.” (Kullar v. Foot Locker Retail, Inc. (2008) 168 Cal.App.4th 116, 126; Reed v. United Teachers Los Angeles (2012) 208 Cal.App.4th 322, 337.) The court has “broad discretion in making this determination.” (In re Microsoft I-V Cases (2006) 135 Cal.App.4th 706, 723.) Relevant factors the court may consider include “the strength of plaintiffs' case, the risk, expense, complexity and likely duration of fur...

Excerpt: ...ust demonstrate that “the settlement is fair, adequate and reasonable.” (Kullar v. Foot Locker Retail, Inc. (2008) 168 Cal.App.4th 116, 126; Reed v. United Teachers Los Angeles (2012) 208 Cal.App.4th 322, 337.) The court has “broad discretion in making this determination.” (In re Microsoft I-V Cases (2006) 135 Cal.App.4th 706, 723.) Relevant factors the court may consider include “the strength of plaintiffs' case, the risk, expense, com...

Excerpt: ...tice of Errata regarding their motion. As threshold matter, both the motion and errata are unsigned and should have been rejected by the court. The notice of motion and the accompanying motion, filed on September 6, include a designation “/s” on the signature line, which in other contexts is sometimes used to indicate an electronic signature, but this court does not yet utilize electronic filing. Therefore, these documents are both unsigned. ...

Excerpt: ...ce to Yudo Inc., and it has been paying death benefits due to the death of Yudo's employee, Manuel Ortega, who died in an auto accident in New Mexico on July 18, 2019. Plaintiff further alleges Lancer and Palma were the legal and proximate cause of the accident and Ortega's death. Plaintiff's complaint includes two causes of action: (1) general negligence; and (2) motor vehicle negligence. On April 19, 2022, the Court (Judge Robinson) signed and ...

Excerpt: ...ntenot v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (2011) 198 Cal.App.4th 256, 264, disapproved on other grounds in Yvanova v. New Century Mortg. Corp. (2016) 62 Cal.4th 919, 939, FN.13.) As to the Motion for Summary Judgment: The Court would DENY the motion. Case Summary This matter is an Unlawful Detainer. The Complaint alleges that Plaintiff purchased the real property that was previously owned by Defendants. Defendants failed to vacate the property after the s...

Excerpt: ... Class Action Settlements Settlement of a class action requires court approval. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.769.) The moving party must demonstrate that “the settlement is fair, adequate and reasonable.” (Kullar v. Foot Locker Retail, Inc. (2008) 168 Cal.App.4th 116, 126; Reed v. United Teachers Los Angeles (2012) 208 Cal.App.4th 322, 337.) The court has “broad discretion in making this determination.” (In re Microsoft I-V Cases (2006) 1...

Excerpt: ...p.4th 322, 337.) The court has “broad discretion in making this determination.” (In re Microsoft I-V Cases (2006) 135 Cal.App.4th 706, 723.) Relevant factors the court may consider include “the strength of plaintiffs' case, the risk, expense, complexity and likely duration of further litigation, the risk of maintaining class action status through trial, the amount offered in settlement, the extent of discovery completed and the stage of the...

Excerpt: ...ves the right to exclude any such evidence upon proper objection during the trial depending upon what occurs at trial. The denial or grant of these motions is without prejudice. Where any motion is granted, the Court orders the parties and their attorneys to advise all witnesses: 1. Not to mention, refer or attempt to convey to the jury any evidence excluded or limited; and 2. Not to make any reference to the fact that any Order was made on a mot...

Excerpt: ...ers Los Angeles (2012) 208 Cal.App.4th 322, 337.) The court has “broad discretion in making this determination.” (In re Microsoft I-V Cases (2006) 135 Cal.App.4th 706, 723.) Relevant factors the court may consider include “the strength of plaintiffs' case, the risk, expense, complexity and likely duration of further litigation, the risk of maintaining class action status through trial, the amount offered in settlement, the extent of discove...

Excerpt: ...(2012) 208 Cal.App.4th 322, 337.) The court has “broad discretion in making this determination.” (In re Microsoft I-V Cases (2006) 135 Cal.App.4th 706, 723.) Relevant factors the court may consider include “the strength of plaintiffs' case, the risk, expense, complexity and likely duration of further litigation, the risk of maintaining class action status through trial, the amount offered in settlement, the extent of discovery completed and...