Excerpt: ...cal error” is shown, the judgment is corrected nunc pro tunc, i.e., the correction dates back to the when the judgment was entered. (Ames v. Paley (2001) 89 Cal.App.4th 668, 673; Bell Farmers Ins. Exch. (2006) 135 Cal.App.4th 1138, 1144.) A “clerical error” results when the order or judgment misstates the court's actual intent, i.e., an error in recording the judgment rendered. (Burch v. CertainTeed Corp. (2019) 34 Cal.App.5th 341, 346; Mar...

Excerpt: ... records of any court of this state]; See Sosinsky v. Grant (1992) 6 Cal.App.4th 1548, 1564-1569; also see Fremont Indem. Co. v. Fremont Gen. Corp. (2007) 148 Cal.App.4th 97.) Here, Defendant requests the Court take judicial notice of the prior lawsuit, but it is not relevant based on the sole argument presented – that the Court lacks jurisdiction over the matter because it is barred by the two-year statute of limitations in C.C.P., § 338.1. A...

Excerpt: ...this state].) Upon the petition/motion of a party to an agreement to arbitrate, the court must grant a petition to compel arbitration unless it finds: no written agreement to arbitrate exists; the right to compel arbitration has been waived; grounds exist for revocation of the agreement; or litigation is pending that may render the arbitration unnecessary or create conflicting rulings on common issues. (CCP § 1281.2.) A proceeding to compel arbi...

Excerpt: ...e motion, order a continuance to permit affidavits to be obtained or discovery to be had, or make any other order as may be just.” “A party seeking a continuance under that subdivision must show: (1) the facts to be obtained are essential to opposing the motion; (2) there is reason to believe such facts may exist; and (3) the reasons why additional time is needed to obtain those facts.” (Combs v. Skyriver Communications, Inc. (2008) 159 Cal...

Excerpt: ...d 6th causes of action; sustained with leave to amend as to the 1st, 4th, 7th, 8th and 10th causes of action and sustained without leave to amend as to the 9th, 11th and 13th causes of action. (The previous demurrer was overruled as to the 2nd, 5th and 12th causes of action.) The Demurrers of Defendants Schneider and Nimmo is overruled as to the 3rd cause of action; sustained with leave to amend as to the 4th, 6th, 7th, 8th and 9th causes of acti...

Excerpt: ...) A defendant moving for summary judgment bears the initial burden of proving that there is no merit to a cause of action by showing that one or more elements of the cause of action cannot be established or that there is a complete defense to that cause of action. (CCP § 437c(p)(2); Cucuzza v. City of Santa Clara (2002) 104 Cal.App.4th 1031, 1037.) Once such a showing has been made, the burden shifts to the plaintiff to show that a triable issue...

Excerpt: ...urt, upon motion reasonably made by the party, the witness, any consumer, or employee whose personal records are sought, “or upon the court's own motion after giving counsel notice and an opportunity to be heard, may make an order quashing the subpoena entirely, modifying it, or directing compliance with it upon those terms and conditions as the court may declare, including protective orders.” (Code Civ. Proc., §1987.1(a).) Also, the court m...

Excerpt: ...� 452(d).) A general demurrer lies where the pleading does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. (CCP § 430.10(e).) In evaluating a demurrer, the court gives the pleading a reasonable interpretation by reading it as a whole and all of its parts in their context. (Moore v. Regents of University of California (1990) 51 Cal.3d 120, 125.) The court assumes the truth of all material facts which have been properly pleaded, of fac...

Excerpt: ...t within 15 days from the order; and (3) a prefiling order is issued against Appellant, prohibiting him from “filing any new litigation in the court of this state in propria persona without first obtaining leave of the presiding justice or presiding judge of the court where the litigation is proposed to be filed” (Code Civ. Proc., § 391.7), as the term “litigation” is defined under Code of Civil Procedure section 391, subdivision (a). De...

Excerpt: ...endant in resisting the plaintiff's claims; or to demand anything adverse to both parties. (CCP § 387(a).) The purposes of intervention are to obviate delay, avoid multiplicity of suits, and protect the interests of those who will be affected by the judgment. (People v. Superior Court (Good)(1976) 17 Cal.3d 732, 736.) There are two types of intervention, permissive and mandatory. (CCP § 387(a), (b).) Mandatory intervention requires the court to...

Excerpt: ...FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE: Defendant requests judicial notice of numerous court documents, including: two unlawful detainer complaints filed by Erma Kerrigan Trust against William Hewett; a wrongful foreclosure against filed by William Hewett against the Trust; the unlawful detainer judgments; the Complaint in the present action; the April 30, 2021 Answer filed by Colleen as Trustee of the Trust and as a representative of the Trust; the April 25, 2022 ...

Excerpt: ... fee and cost incurred in bringing the instant motion must made through a separate motion for fees. “The Legislature enacted…anti-SLAPP statute [strategic lawsuit against public participation]…to provide a procedural remedy to dispose of lawsuits that are brought to chill the valid exercise of constitutional rights. [Citation.]” (Rusheen v. Cohen (2006) 37 Cal.4th 1048, 1055.) Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16 provides a two-step tes...

Excerpt: ... of the motion. Objections to evidence that are not ruled on for purposes of the motion shall be preserved for appellate review.” Given the disposition of this motion, the ruling on the objections are not relevant to the ruling on this motion. SUMMARY JUDGMENT/ADJUDICATION “On motion for summary judgment, the issues are framed by the pleadings since it is those allegations to which the motion must respond.” (Scolinos v. Kolts (1995) 37 Cal....

Excerpt: ...suant to CRC 3.110(b & f) FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION An agreement for the sale of any interest in real property is invalid unless it is in writing. (Civil Code § 1624(a)(3); Alameda Belt Line v. City of Alameda (2003) 113 Cal.App.4th 15, 20-21.) FOURTH CAUSE OF ACTION No representation. Representations concerning future events – e.g., predicting future conditions in the real estate market – are generally not actionable, whereas representations of...

Excerpt: ...ned with leave to amend within 20 days. Motion to Strike is moot. A demurrer also lies where the pleading does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. (Code Civ. Proc., § 430.10(e).) In evaluating a demurrer, the court gives the pleading a reasonable interpretation by reading it as a whole and all of its parts in their context. (Moore v. Regents of University of California (1990) 51 Cal. 3d 120,125.) The court assumes the tru...

Excerpt: ...rty expects to offer in evidence at trial. CCP § 2034.280 provides that a party may submit a supplemental list of experts who will express an opinion on a subject to be covered by an expert designated by the opposing party. Failure to comply with these rules is grounds to exclude the expert. (CCP §2034.300.) To properly amend an expert witness list, a party must seek leave from the court. (CCP §2034.610.) The issue is whether Plaintiff was aut...

Excerpt: ...cial notice of the Notice of Entry of Dismissal and Proof of Service filed in the Sacramento Superior Court in the Felisilda v. FCA US LLC (Exhibit B) is denied, as the document will not aid the court in resolution of the present motion. (See Aquila v. Superior Court (2007) 148 Cal.App.4th 556, 569 [only relevant material may be noticed].) EVIDENTIARY OBJECTION With her opposition, Plaintiff includes a single evidentiary objection to the RISC att...

Excerpt: ...he plaintiff does not have the burden to disprove affirmative defenses. (Id.) At that point, the burden shifts to the defendant to show that a triable issue exists. (Id.) Plaintiff fails to meet her initial burden. Whether or not Plaintiff is an employee or an independent contractor does not demonstrate that Plaintiff is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, i.e. it does not address the elements of each cause of action. The 1st cause of action...

Excerpt: ...; Watts v. Crawford (1995) 10 Cal.4th 743, 749.) In order to obtain an order permitting service by publication, a plaintiff must submit the declaration of a competent witness to show: that reasonable attempts have been made to serve the defendants by some other authorized method; and (2) the existence of a cause of action or interest in property. (CCP § 415.50(a).) Reasonable diligence means a thorough, systematic investigation and inquiry condu...

Excerpt: ...an be exercised only if the moving party establishes a proper ground for relief, by the proper procedure, and within the proper time limits. (Cruz v. Fagor America, Inc. (2007) 146 Cal.App.4th 488, 495.) Defendant brings this motion on the ground that, although there is a proof of service, it is not properly executed by a licensed process server, and he was not actually served. C.C.P., § 473(d) permits the court to vacate a void judgment. “[C]...

Excerpt: ...torney's fees is denied. Defendants' DLJJ, DDS and Stuart Rubin Motion for Joinder is denied. As a general rule, when a cause of action arises out of the furtherance of a defendant's right of petition or free speech in connection with a public issue, it is subject to a special motion to strike. (CCP § 425.16(b)(1).) An “act in furtherance of a person's right of petition or free speech” … includes … any written or oral statement or writin...

Excerpt: ...o the court by noticed motion for an order requiring the plaintiff to file an undertaking if the plaintiff resides out of the state. The undertaking would secure an award of costs and attorney's fees that might be awarded in the action. (C.C.P., § 1030(a); see also Shannon v. Sims Service Center, Inc. (1985) 164 Cal.App.3d 907, 914 [constitutionality upheld].) The statute serves a legitimate purpose of securing costs in the face of the difficult...

Excerpt: ...ling party is entitled as a matter of right to recover costs in any action or proceeding.'” (Santisas v. Goodin (1998) 17 Cal.4th 599, 606.) In determining whether a party is a prevailing party which could recover costs, trial court determines whether the party succeeded “at a practical level [by] realiz[ing] its litigation objectives” and whether “the action yielded the primary relief sought” in the case. (Friends of Spring Street v. N...

Excerpt: ...tion to Compel Further responses (Int. 25 and 26) is granted. A party may move for an order to compel a further response if it deems the responding party's objections are without merit or too general. “Absent a claim of privilege or attorney work product, the party who seeks to compel production has met his burden of showing good cause simply by a fact‐specific showing of relevance.” (Kirkland v. Superior Court (2002) 95 Cal. App. 4th 92, 9...

Excerpt: ...available. (Abbott, et. al., Cal. Civil Discovery Practice (4th ed. Cal. CEB 2022) § 15.91 citing, CCP §§2023.010(g), 2023.030.) For example, CCP §2030.300(e) provides that if a party fails to obey an order compelling further responses to interrogatories, "the court may make those orders that are just, including the imposition of an issue sanction, an evidence sanction, or a terminating sanction," in addition to the imposition of further mone...