Excerpt: ...4th 116, 126; Reed v. United Teachers Los Angeles (2012) 208 Cal.App.4th 322, 337.) The court has “broad discretion in making this determination.” (In re Microsoft I-V Cases (2006) 135 Cal.App.4th 706, 723.) Relevant factors the court may consider include “the strength of the plainti
¯s case, the risk, the expense, complexity and likely duration of further litigation, the risk of maintaining class action status through trial, the amount o...

Excerpt: ...n November 2, 2020, Plainti
¯ sought to represent all non-exempt current and former employees in California during the stator period. Plainti
¯ served the LWDA with a notice of violations, and Þled a 3 Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) complaint on January 11, 2021. The two matters were consolidated on November 15, 2021. After commencing litigation, the parties informally exchanged policy and payroll documents and other information su
¯ici...

Excerpt: ...nt since Foldcraft was the designer and manufacturer of the booth Plainti
¯ was seated on before the incident occurred. Foldcraft does not dispute that it designed and manufactured the wall mount booth, but contends the table at issue was not a Foldcraft product. At the time of this Þling, no parties have been able to identify the designer or manufacturer of the table (as opposed to the booth). Foldcraft's general commercial liability insurance...

Excerpt: ...“Rodriguez”) stood in ront o Plainti
¯s o
¯ice doorway e
¯ectively blocking it as Plainti
¯ tried to exit. When Plainti
¯ asked Rodriguez to move, he laughed and asked her, “Tienes miedo?” which translates to “Are you araid?” Plainti
¯ replied, “Araid o what?” as she stepped back and asked Rodriguez to move again so she could exit. Not moving away rom the door Rodriguez replied, “Dejame darte una nalgada con esos pa...

Excerpt: ...corporation; v. VAHAK VARTANIAN, an individual doing business as Vartanian on Wheels and VOW Automotive; and DOES 1 through 35, inclusive. VAHAK VARTANIAN, an individual v. 3 ARSEN H. VARTANIAN, an individual; EDGAR PORTILLO, an individual; and ROES 1-20, inclusive. Motion: Motion to Strike and Demurrer to Cross-Complaint Movant: Cross-Defendants Arsen H. Vartanian and Edgar Portillo Respondent: Cross-Complainant Varak Vartanian Case No. CIVSB221...

Excerpt: ...y-one days after receipt of his right-to-sue letter from the EEOC and thus, the instant action under federal law would be barred under the applicable statute of limitations. The Complaint's Þrst, second, third and fourth Causes of Action Under Title VII The running of the statute must appear “clearly and a
¯irmatively” on the face of the complaint. It is not enough that the complaint might be time-barred. (Committee for Green Foothills v. S...

Excerpt: ...opposition. Plainti
¯ Derek Þled a joint reply. Analysis Procedurally, the parties met and conferred. (Walton Decl. at ¶¶3b-4b, 5-6, Exhs. DG.) Furthermore, the motions are timely in light of the granted 2-week extension. (Walton Decl. at ¶4b, Exh. E.) Substantively, the Þrst issue is the lack of veriÞcations from Defendant ZamÞr. To RFAs #39, 46, 52- 53, and 61-63, ZamÞr either admitted or denied the RFA, and to RFAs #45, 47-48, 57, & 5...

Excerpt: ... a wage-and-hour class action. Plainti
¯ alleges he worked or Deendants Changing Lives Sta
¯ing (a sta
¯ing company) and Nongshim (a ood manuacturing company) as a non-exempt employee until December 10, 2022. On May 11, 2023, he Þled suit seeking to represent all similarly situated non-exempt, hourly employees working or D e e n d a n t s i n C a l i o r n i a d u r i n g t h e s t a t u t o r y period. His suit alleges violations rela...

Excerpt: ...“Ford”). (Complt. ¶15.) The vehicle allegedly incurred defects and nonconformities and was delivered to Fords repair facility, Defendant Ford of Upland, LLC (hereinafter, “Upland Ford”) for repair, but neither Ford nor Upland Ford (hereinafter, collectively, “Defendants”) were able to conform the vehicle to the warranty terms after a reasonable number of attempts. (Id. at ¶¶ 16-19, 41-43.) Ford also allegedly failed to repurchase ...

Excerpt: ...Plainti
¯ renders this part of the Demurrer moot. Page | 2 1) Whistleblower Argument – 4th cause of action (Retaliation) The second theory asserted in the 4th cause of action for Retaliation, is that Plainti
¯ was retaliated against for her whistleblowing activities, citing Labor Code, section 1102.5 in ¶81 of the Complaint. In ¶79, Plainti
¯ alleges: Defendants Liberty and Independence, acting through Lashley, whom they had given de facto...

Excerpt: ...emoval. A certiÞed copy of the order of remand shall be mailed by the clerk to the clerk of the State court. The State court may thereupon proceed with such case. (28 U.S.C. § 1447(c) [emphasis added].) 3 add two additional representative plainti
¯s2 and to allege class claims for (1) wage violations; (2) wage statement violations; (3) waiting time penalties; (4) failure to reimburse; (5) FLSA minimum wage violations; (6) unfair competition in...

Excerpt: ...y of their burden. It is still the moving party's burden to prove he or she is entitled to judgment. (Villa v. McFerren (1995) 35 Cal.App.4th 733, 743-745; FSR Brokerage, Inc. v. Superior Court (Blanco) (1995) 35 Cal.App.4th 69, 73-74, fn. 4.) Page | 2 Request for Judicial Notice Best asks to the Court to take judicial notice of the following pursuant to Evidence Code, sections 452 and 453 (without further clariÞcation). “Judicial notice is th...

Excerpt: ...s; (3) meal periods; (4) rest breaks; (5) Þnal pay; 5 (6) wage statements; as well as for (7) violation of the unfair competition law. Plainti
¯ also sent a letter to the LWDA in order to perfect her Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) claim, and on August 17, 2022, she Þled a First Amended Complaint (FAC) to add an additional cause for (8) civil penalties available pursuant to PAGA. On April 12, 2023, Plainti
¯ Þled a Second Amended Compla...

Excerpt: ...respond to Question 5. She is also ordered to serve an objection-free response to RFP 6 within Þfteen (15) days. However, she need not respond to RFP 14. The Court would further GRANT sanctions. Plainti
¯ will pay Defendant JBGC $1,500, within thirty (30) days. 3 Relevant Facts This matter is, in essence, an emotional distress claim. After Plainti
¯s' minor daughter passed, they sought casket and funeral services from Defendants. They allege t...

Excerpt: ...ehalf of Arthur Lozano (“Arthur”). The complaint alleges that as a result of the negligence of the Defendants, Karen was rendered neurologically impaired and no longer able to care for herself, work or support her family. The Complaint alleges, prior to and on April 22, 2021, Karen was evaluated for complaints of pain relating to her cervical spine. She was admitted to Victor Valley Global Medical Center (“Victor Valley” or “VVGMC”) b...

Excerpt: ... Amy Chacon Þled this sexual harassment action against her landlord, Defendant Rajbir S. Husson. Plainti
¯'s o p e ra t i v e F i r s t Amended Complaint (FAC), Þled February 10, 2023, includes six causes of action: (1) sexual harassment/discrimination 4 (Gov. Code, §12955); (2) violation of Civil Code section 51.9; (3) violation of the Unruh Act (Civ. Code, §§51, 52); (4) assault; (5) battery; and (6) intentional inßiction of emotional di...

Excerpt: ...omponent repair codes (No. 39). Plainti
¯s also seek, without any limitation, documents su
¯icient to show all customer complaint codes from 2018 to present (No. 40), and operation codes provided to authorized dealerships from 2018 to present (No. 41). GM responded with objections, including the requests seek conÞdential, proprietary, and trade secret information, and stated that no documents will be produced. The Court denies the motion to RF...

Excerpt: ...ntive programs to lower their tax burdens. It asserts that it maintained trade secret, proprietary, and conÞdential systems to further its business. It further alleges that it hired Defendant Gan on April 9, 2018, via a Membership Admission Agreement and that, despite contractual obligations to maintain the conÞdentiality of those systems, Defendant Gan accessed and copied company Þles and secretly applied for employment at Specialty Tax Group...

Excerpt: ...te demur on the grounds of Code of Civil Procedure section 430.10, subdivision (c). This provision provides a demurrer lies when another action is pending between the same parties on the same cause of action. (Code Civ. Proc., §430.10, subd. (c); Plant Insulation Co. v. Fibreboard Corp. (1990) 224 Cal.App.3d 781, 787 [“Plant Insulation”].) If the Court sustains a demurrer under this subsection, the proper order is not dismissal, but abatemen...

Excerpt: ... action. Plainti
¯ alleges a variety of wage-and-hour violations which allegedly occurred during his employment for Defendant. On January 25, 2019, Defendant removed this matter to the federal District Court. On June 11, 2019, Plainti
¯ Þled his operative First Amended Complaint (FAC), which alleges violations relating to (1) meal periods; (2) rest breaks; (3) overtime wages; (4) minimum wages; (5) Þnal pay; (6) maintenance of required record...

Excerpt: ...hicle was sold to Defendant Kheterpal and that he was not paid any portion of the sales price. He alleges that he did not learn of the sale until midFebruary 2021. Despite promises to pay, he alleges the sales money was never provided. On that basis, he reported the vehicle stolen on March 1, 2021. The vehicle was thereafter retrieved at Defendant Kheterpal's residence. Plainti
¯ asserts damage while in Kheterpal's possession and necessary repai...

Excerpt: ...llenge to the correctness of the order itself, but Spring Valley's proper course would have been to seek appellate review of the order. (Code Civ. Proc., § 904.1, subd.'s (a)(11)-(12) and (b).) The purported erroneous nature of the order does not excuse a failure to obey with its terms. (Marriage of Niklas (1989) 211 Cal.App.3d 28, 34-35.) The RFA No.'s 79-80, 82-83, 85- 86, 88-89, 91-92, 94-95, 97-98, 100-101, 134, 136, 140, 154, 191, and 296 A...

Excerpt: ... actions. In the Ruiz matter, the proposed class includes all of Defendant Bright Sky's hourly, non-exempt employees for statutory period of four years prior to Þling. Ruiz Þled suit on August 15, 2022, alleging violations related to (1) minimum wages; (2) overtime; (3) meal periods; (4) rest breaks; (5) reimbursements; (6) Þnal pay; (7) wage statements; as well as claims for (8) violation of the unfair competition law, and (9) civil penalties...

Excerpt: ... (7) Compel further responses to requests for admission [from Mauricio & Federico / unopposed] Movants: Defendants Valley Transmission and Auto Repair, Inc., Edward Whittingslow, and Robert Larsen Respondents: Plainti
¯s Federico Martinez and Mauricio Martinez I. RELEVANT PROCEDURAL/FACTUAL BACKGROUND At issue are seven discovery motions Þled by Defendants—motions to compel each plainti
¯'s further responses to form interrogatories, special ...

Excerpt: ...ainty. First Cause o Action – Inverse IndemniÞcation Page | 2 An inverse condemnation claim arises when “there [is] an invasion or an appropriation o some valuable property right which the landowners possesses and the invasion or appropriation must be directly and specially a
¯ect the landowner to his injury.” (Border Business Park, Inc. v. City o San Diego (2006) 142 Cal.App.4th 1538, 1548.) A claim or inverse condemnation requires t...