Search by Keyword:
Start Date:
End Date:
Tip: Wrap text in quotation marks when searching for phrases (e.g. "motion to dismiss").

1617 Results

Location: San Bernardino x
2024.03.11 Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Action 888
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Driscoll, David E 22
Hearing Date: 2024.03.11
Excerpt: ...ilure to Pay Compensation Due Upon Termination/Waiting Time Penalties; 6) Discrimination Based Upon Disability in Violation of the FEHA; 7) Failure to Accommodate Disability; 8) Retaliation in Violation o f FEHA; 9) Failure to Take All Reasonable Steps Necessary to Prevent Discrimination, Retaliation, and Hostile Work Environment in Violation of FEHA; 10) Aiding and Abetting in Violation of FEHA; 11) Failure to Prevent Unlawful Discrimination in ...
2024.03.11 Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement 382
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ortiz, Joseph T S17
Hearing Date: 2024.03.11
Excerpt: ....4th 116, 126; Reed v. United Teachers Los Angeles (2012) 208 Cal.App.4th 322, 337.) The court has “broad discretion in making this determination.” (In re Microsoft I -V Cases (2006) 135 Cal.App.4th 706, 723.) Relevant factors the court may consider include “the strength of the plaintiffs' case, the risk, the expense, complexity and likely duration of further litigation, the risk of maintaining class action status through trial, the amount ...
2024.03.11 Demurrers to TAC 275
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ortiz, Joseph T S17
Hearing Date: 2024.03.11
Excerpt: ...ation. Plai ntiff will have thirty days to leave to amend. Case Summary This is an insurance coverage dispute. Plaintiffs are married homeowners. Defendants Bamboo and Catlin are insurers. Other defendants are various adjusters and administrators for the atissue claim . Plaintiffs maintained a policy with Defendant Catlin for the period March 2, 2020, through March 2, 2021. Plaintiffs allege Defendant Bamboo is co -insurer or alter ego of Defenda...
2024.03.11 Demurrer 887
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Driscoll, David E 22
Hearing Date: 2024.03.11
Excerpt: ...r to the complaint filed by Defendant Shenzhou Xingyu Global. There is also an unopposed demurrer by Defendant Christopher (Chris) Currie. This proceeding was commenced on June 30, 2023, by Plaintiffs Lesly Zamora (“Lesly”) and Zaira Zamora, by and through her Guardian ad Litem, Karla Zamora Duran (“Zaira”, collectively “Plaintiffs”), asserting causes of action for: (1) negligence; (2) assault and battery; (3) premises liability; and...
2024.03.08 Motion for Summary Adjudication 504
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Cabrera, Carlos
Hearing Date: 2024.03.08
Excerpt: ...e was “run over ” by a forklift that was being operated by Mr. Jones while he was in the course and scope of his employment with Gebruder, Staffmark and Does 1 -100. On November 12, 2021, Staffmark filed in the operative Cross -Complaint against Gebruder and Roes 1 -2 5 alleging four causes of action: (1) total or comparative equitable indemnity; (2) declaratory relief; (3) breach of contract and (4) express indemnity. On November 27, 2023, ...
2024.03.07 Demurrer, Motion to Strike 325
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Driscoll, David E 22
Hearing Date: 2024.03.07
Excerpt: ...mination in violation of public policy. Defendant has demurred to all causes of actions on grounds that, inter alia, the causes of action are time -barred and/or fail to allege facts sufficient to state a cau se of action. Defendant also filed a motion to strike requested punitive damages. As to her opposition to the demurrer to the third and fourth causes of action, the plaintiff contends that the causes of action are not time barred because th...
2024.03.06 Motion for Summary Judgment 275
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ortiz, Joseph T S17
Hearing Date: 2024.03.06
Excerpt: ...tion.. Case S ummary This is a personal injury case. Plaintiff alleges that on or about April 26, 2019 he was injured when he stepped onto a nail that was exposed on a pallet at Defendant Home Depot's store. Plaintiff alleges that Defendant's negligence in handling and maintaining the pallets led to the injury. On May 6, 2021, Plaintiff filed a single cause for negligence. On June 3, 2022, Intervenor Amerisure Insurance filed a Complaint -in -I...
2024.03.05 Motion to Set Aside Default 503
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Cabrera, Carlos
Hearing Date: 2024.03.05
Excerpt: ...t so long as the moving party establishes the grounds for relief, the relief has been raised in a procedurally proper manner, and the motion is made within any applicable time limits. (Cruz v. Fagor America, Inc. (2007) 146 Cal.App.4th 488, 495.) Code of Civil Procedure §473, subd. (b) provides a court may, upon any terms as may be just, relieve a party or his or her legal representative from a judgment, dismissal, order or other proceeding take...
2024.03.04 Motion for Final Approval of Class Action Settlement 420
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ortiz, Joseph T S17
Hearing Date: 2024.03.04
Excerpt: ...(2) minimum wag es; (3) meal periods; (4) rest breaks; (5) final pay; (6) accurate wage statements; as well as (7) violation of the unfair competition law. By October 26, 2022, Plaintiff had filed his First Amended Complaint (FAC) to add a claim for civil penalties under the Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA). Plaintiff seeks to represent all non -exempt employees working in California during the statutory period. (FAC, ¶22; compare Settleme...
2024.03.04 Demurrer
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ochoa, Gilbert G S24
Hearing Date: 2024.03.04
Excerpt: ...e the objections to the pleading. The parties Page | 2 must meet and confer at least five days before the responsive pleading is due, but if they are unable to do so, an automatic 30 -day extension of time within which to file the responsive pleading will be granted by filing and serving a declaration on or before the date the response would be due, stating a good faith attempt was made to meet and confer. The moving party then must file and ...
2024.03.01 Demurrer 727
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Driscoll, David E 22
Hearing Date: 2024.03.01
Excerpt: ... warranty; and (3) negligent repair. The first two causes of action are asserted against Defendant Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.; the third cause of action for negligent repair is asserted against demurring Defendant, Riverside Metro Auto Group, LLC d/b/a Riverside Volkswagen (“Riverside VW”). Plaintiffs' complaint alleges that they purchased a 2022 Volkswagen Atlas on January 31, 2022 and that the vehicle manifested defects and nonconfo...
2024.03.01 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 489
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Driscoll, David E 22
Hearing Date: 2024.03.01
Excerpt: ...threatened by Debbie's boyfriend and, despite having notice of the abuse, Del Taco simply transferred R.G. to another store and continued to employ Debbie. After being transferred, R.G. left the employmen t, only to seek reemployment two years later. R.G. was informed he could be rehired on the condition that he did not tell anyone about the abuse. (Compl. at ¶¶ 10 - 13.) Based on Del Taco's failure to terminate or discipline Debbie, transferri...
2024.03.01 Motion to Set Aside Post-Judgment Attorney Fees, Default Judgment 592
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Driscoll, David E 22
Hearing Date: 2024.03.01
Excerpt: ...ugust 23, 1994, and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive: (1) Violation of Civil Code section 789.3; (2) Wrongful Eviction; (3) Breach of the Warranty of Habitability; (4) Breach of Covenant of Quiet Enjoyment ; (5) Unjust Enrichment; (6) Breach of Contract; and, (7) Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress. Plaintiff alleged that she was wrongfully evicted from real property (“the property”) owned by the Donald and Barbara Atkinson Revocable Tr...
2024.03.01 Motion to Stay
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ochoa, Gilbert G S24
Hearing Date: 2024.03.01
Excerpt: ... o f Electronic Protected Health Page | 2 Information and (b) 45 C.F.R. section 165.524 (right to access), and breach of the notification rule. He asks the stay be pending the investigation and any subsequent criminal proceedings. Now, civil litigations may be appropriately stayed when a party (generally the defendant) is subject to a criminal prosecution that may result in the party invoking his 5th Amendment privilege. (Pacers, Inc. v. Superio...
2024.02.27 Motion to Deem RFAs Admitted 576
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ortiz, Joseph T S17
Hearing Date: 2024.02.27
Excerpt: ...e the General Manager of the project. PETI delegated many of its duties to Defendant Facility Services Management Company (FSMC). On September 29, 2021, FSMC entered a contract for Plaintiff's benefit for the purchase of a pre -engineered steel 3 building from Defenda nt 98 Leaf dba “Flex Plus”. While Plaintiff made various deposits in satisfaction of its obligations and served Flex Plus with a demand for assurances to obtain the status of m...
2024.02.27 Motion to Compel Further Responses, for Leave to File FAC 789
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Driscoll, David E 22
Hearing Date: 2024.02.27
Excerpt: ...enn -Star”), alleging causes of action for: (1) Breach of Contract, (2) Breach of the Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing (Failure or Delay in Payment), (3) Bad Faith and Breach of the Implied Covenant of Goo d Faith and Fair Dealing (Failure to Properly Investigate Claim), and (4) Unfair Business Practices. According to the Complaint, between November 1, 2019 and November 1, 2020, Defendant provided insurance coverage for real prop...
2024.02.27 Motion for Final Approval of Class Action Settlement 282
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ortiz, Joseph T S17
Hearing Date: 2024.02.27
Excerpt: ...Private Attor neys General Act (PAGA). Per the terms of the currently proposed settlement, Plaintiff would represent a class of current and former nonexempt workers in Defendant's California operations from April 21, 2018 through September 17, 2023. (Settlement, ¶¶6 [“C lass”] & 10 [“Class Period”].) The PAGA period would be a year from the LWDA filing. After commencing the litigation, the parties engaged in discovery, with Defendant p...
2024.02.26 Motion to Compel Further Responses 495
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Keh, Winston 33
Hearing Date: 2024.02.26
Excerpt: ...rogatories—was apparently rejected due to a filing irregularity. On January 30, 2024, the Court heard and granted the other six discovery motions. The Court ordered Defendants to resubmit their motion to compel Mauricio's further responses to s pecial interrogatories, which Defendants did that same day. Mauricio filed an opposition (one court day late). Defendants filed a timely opposition. A. Analysis At issue are Mauricio's responses to Sp...
2024.02.26 Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement 480
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ortiz, Joseph T S17
Hearing Date: 2024.02.26
Excerpt: ...App.4th 116, 1 26; Reed v. United Teachers Los Angeles (2012) 208 Cal.App.4th 322, 337.) The court has “broad discretion in making this 3 determination.” (In re Microsoft I -V Cases (2006) 135 Cal.App.4th 706, 723.) Relevant factors the court may consider include “the s trength of the plaintiffs' case, the risk, the expense, complexity and likely duration of further litigation, the risk of maintaining class action status through trial, the ...
2024.02.23 Motion to Compel Further Responses 697
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Raphael, Tony R17
Hearing Date: 2024.02.23
Excerpt: ...T he Pleadings and Allegations The underlying litigation arises from a dispute over the ownership of an automotive business. The action was commenced on May 26, 2022, by Plaintiffs Arsen H. Vartanian (“Arsen”) and AV Automotive, Inc. (“AVA”) against Defendan t Vahak Vartanian dba Vartanian on Wheels and VOW Automotive ( “Vahak”). Following consecutive demurrers, the operative second amended complaint (“SAC”) was filed on Septembe...
2024.02.23 Motion for Sanctions 277
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ortiz, Joseph T S17
Hearing Date: 2024.02.23
Excerpt: ...Summary T his is a real estate dispute. Plaintiff owns property within a shopping center. Defendants also have interests in that center. The shopping center is subject to a declaration of restrictions and reciprocal easements that are binding on all parties. Plainti ff alleges that Defendants interfered with Plaintiff's property rights. For example, Plaintiff alleges that Defendants imposed time limits on certain parking spots, locked access to t...
2024.02.23 Demurrer, Motion to Stay 178
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ortiz, Joseph T S17
Hearing Date: 2024.02.23
Excerpt: ...ative action for civil penalties pursuant to the Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA). Plaintiff alleges she worked for Defendants as a non- exempt Parts Sales Manager from 2019 to 2022. (Compl., ¶10.) On August 3, 2023, Plaintiff filed her PAGA action alleging violatio ns relating to (1) overtime; (2) meal periods; (3) rest breaks; (4) final pay; (6) wage statement requirements; (7) reimbursements; (8) vacation pay; and (9) the provision of a...
2024.02.23 Demurrer to SAC 176
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ortiz, Joseph T S17
Hearing Date: 2024.02.23
Excerpt: ...ement for thre e (3) storage units, owned and operated by 3855 IH 35 North, LLC (sued as “Phelan Self -Storage”). (SAC, ¶32.) The storage units were necessary to store “personal property,” including various family heirlooms. The units were being paid by automatic withdraw al from an account jointly owned by Plaintiffs' grandmother; their mother; and their aunt, Defendant Sheli Young. On or about January 16, 2021, Plaintiffs' mother passe...
2024.02.20 Motion for Leave to File Complaint 500
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ochoa, Gilbert G S24
Hearing Date: 2024.02.20
Excerpt: ...tion of Emotional Distress. Kassing provides a noticed motion, declaration of counsel, Declaration of Cesar Olvares (“Olvares”) (Exhibit A), points and authorities, and a copy of the proposed cross -complaint. These causes of action must be raised by cross -com plaint as failure to plead them will bar defendants from asserting it in any later lawsuit (The Rutter Group, Cal. Prac. Guide Civ. Pro. Before Trial Ch. 6 -D, § 6:511 [citing CCP §4...
2024.02.20 Demurrer 539
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ochoa, Gilbert G S24
Hearing Date: 2024.02.20
Excerpt: ...gence o n conclusions versus the ultimate fact. To plead negligence, the plaintiff must allege (1) legal duty, (2) breach of the legal duty, (3) causation, and (4) damages. (Brown v. USA Taekwondo (2021) 11 Cal.5th 204, 213.) An NIED claim is a general neglig ence claim. (Burgess v. Superior Court (Gupta) (1992) 2 Cal.4th 1064, 1072; Delfino v. Agilent Technologies, Inc. (2006) 145 Cal.App.4th 790, 796, fn. 4.) It is analyzed under either a byst...

1617 Results

Per page

Pages