Excerpt: ...ment in the case in the amount of $10,471.00, as Defendant has defaulted on the agreement. There is no opposition t o the motion. The Motion is GRAN TED . CCP § 6 6 4 .6 (a ) p r o v id e s : “If p a r t ie s t o p e n d in g lit ig a t io n s t ip u la t e , in a w r it in g signed by the parties outside of the presence of the court or orally before the court, for settlement of the case, or part thereof, the court, upon motion, may enter judg...

Excerpt: ...warded only as to the $60.00 filing fee. Defendants shall provide complete, objection -free verified responses to Plaintiff, and pay $60.00 in sanctions within 30 days of service of the notice of e nt ry of orde r. Proce dural Hist ory Plaintiff propounded post -judgment written interrogatories and demands for production on Defendants and Defendants never responded, despite Plaintiff's efforts to meet and confer on the lack of response. Plaintiff...

Excerpt: ...terrogatory Number 87 is DENIED. The City's motion as to Special Interrogatory Numbers 88 and 89 are GRANTED. Sanctions are denied. The City's motion to compel further responses to its Request for Production of Documents, Set Two, Request Numbers 44 through 46, and 48 through 50 is DENIED. Sanctions are granted against the City in the amount of $1,000. 1. Sp e c ia l In t e r r o g a t o r ie s On May 9, 2023, Defendant served its Form Interrogat...

Excerpt: ...ess warranty under the Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act, Civ. Code § 1790 et seq. (the “Act”) (against Manufacturer); 2) breach of implied warranty under the Act (against Manufacturer); and 3) Negligent Repair(against Dealer). This matter is on calendar for the motion by Plaintiffs to compel further production directed at the document requests set forth in Plaintiffs' first demand for inspection served to Manufacturer (the “RPODs”). Th...

Excerpt: ...otion for summary judgment or summary adjudication, or both, that facts essential to justify opposition may exist but cannot, for reasons stated, be presented, the court shall deny the motion, order a continuance to permit affidavits to be obtained or discovery to be had, or make any other order as may be just. The applicatio n to continue the motion to obtain necessary discovery may also be made by ex parte motion at any time on or before the da...

Excerpt: ...Afterwards she filed her complaint in this matter seeking damages from Walmart for negligence and p r e m is e s lia b ilit y. ( Ib id .) Walmart has moved for summary judgment as to these causes of action and Plaintiff has opposed. AN ALYSIS Legal Standard Motion for Summary Judgment Summary judgment “shall be granted if all the papers submitted show that there is no triable issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled t...

Excerpt: ...of action. Th e m o t io n is GRAN TED . 1. Co m p la in t P la in t if f 's c o m p la in t a lle g e s it is t h e o w n e r o f r e a l p r o p e r t y lo c a t e d a t 2 3 2 5 0 Maffei Road in Sonoma (“the Property”). On February 1, 2021, Plaintiff entered into a Commercial Property Purchase Agreement with Edward Benedetti to purchase the Property alon g with turkey rendering equipment (“the Equipment”) from Benedetti Farms, Inc. Escr...

Excerpt: ...ilding, grading, and zoning code violations related to unpermitted greenhouses, solar arrays and cannabis cultivation on their property. (See Complaint, 1:19- 27.) In the Defendants' amended answer, they plead various affirmative defenses and they denied or admitted each allegation in the complaint or otherwise stated they did not have enough information to admit or deny it, so denied it. (See g enerally, Amended Answer.) Finding issue with the A...

Excerpt: ...o lid a t e t h is c a s e w it h Scot t sda le insura nce Compa ny v. Nort h Ba y Pressure Wa shing, Inc. , SCV-273302, also pending in Department 19 (the “Associated Action”) pursuant to Cal. Code Civ. Proc. (“CCP”) §1048, for all purposes. The M o t io n is GRAN TED . The Associated Action is filed by plaintiff Scottsdale Insurance Company (“Consolidation Plaintiff”) against Defendant. Thereafter, in the Associated Action, ST Hosp...

Excerpt: ... trustee's sale following a foreclosure. Whether or not they actually did is the underlying issue in this motion. CATAM O U N T brought the underlying unlawful detainer (“UD”) action, MCV -262009, after serving proper notice, on May 26, 2023. ISAACS answered on June 22, alleging affirmative defenses based on violations of Civil Code §§ 2923.55 and 2923.7, two statutes that are part of the Homeowner Bill of Rig h t s (“H BO R”). On Augus...

Excerpt: ...y s is : This Court previously sustained a demurrer to Plaintiff's Complaint on the basis that Plaintiff had failed to allege the existence of a contract between the parties. Thus, Plaintiff's breach of contract and derivative causes of action against Defendants failed. The Complaint had included several fragmentary quotations from correspondence between the parties which purportedly contained the offer, acceptance, and terms of the alleged contr...

Excerpt: ...ned by BOWIE. J O H N liv e s o n t h e p r o p e r t y ; BO W IE liv e s in Au st r a lia . (Individual defendants are referred to by their first names for clarity, as they have the same surname. No disrespect is intended.) Plaintiff filed the instant lawsuit on July 7, 2023. On September 27, Defendants' counsel sent a pleading captioned “Answer to Complaint of the County of Sonoma,” which purported to answer for both Defendants to counsel f...

Excerpt: ...tices; 4. Appointing Plaintiffs as Class Representatives for settlement purposes; 5. Appointing Plaintiffs' Counsel, Justin F. Marquez and Benjamin H. Haber of Wilshire Law Firm, PLC, as Class Counsel for settlement purposes; 6. Ap p o in t in g Sim p lu r is Cla s s Ac t io n Se t t le m e n t Ad m in is t r a t io n a s t h e Settlement Administrator; and 7. Scheduling a Final Approval Hearing. P r e lim in a r y a p p r o v a l is GRAN TED . T...

Excerpt: ...Zoe moved for summary judgment on claims brought against her in the cross -c o m p la in t . ( Id . a t 2 :2 -12.) This Court issued an order after hearing on the motion granting Zoe's motion for summary adjudication (the “Order”) because Cross -Complainants lacked essential elements to all of the causes of action as to Zoe. (See generally, Orde r Aft e r He a ring on Cross-Defendant Bethany Zoe's Motion for Summary Adjudication of the Cross ...

Excerpt: ...allege that, after telling Plaintiffs that they intended only to remove a single tree that was leaning over Swallows Road, a private way, Defendants trespassed on Plaintiffs' property, excavated a cut in P la in t if f s ' h ills id e , e lim in a t e d a d r a in a g e d it c h , in s t a lle d a b u r ie d c u lv e r t d u m p in g w a t e r into a seasonal creek above Plaintiffs' home, cut down Plaintiffs' trees and vegetation, and dumped rock...

Excerpt: ...d motor vehicle negligence after she was injured in a motor vehicle collision between her vehicle/ trailer and another vehicle. (Motion, 1:26 -28, 2:1- 3.) Sonoma propounded set one of form int errogatories and requests for production on Jones, but she has failed to ever respond despite Sonoma's meet and confer efforts regarding the discovery requests. ( Id . at 3:7-28, 4:1- 11.) Jones' counsel was relieved as counsel because there was a breakdow...

Excerpt: ...'s Medi -Ca l P r o v id e r Ag r e e m e n t (M P A), in c lu d in g amounts owed in accordance with applicable federal and California statutes and regulations, and rules and policies of DHCS governing the California Public Hospital Redesign and Incentives in Medi -Ca l (P RIM E) P r o g r a m . Th e m o t io n is GRAN TED . In this action, DHCS challenges Defendants' receipt of federal PRIME Program funds for Demonstration Mid -Year 14 (January...

Excerpt: ...ted Material Fact “UMF,” 1.) On January 1, 2023, Defendant defaulted on the terms and conditions of the Contract by failing to make all of the required installment payments when due. Following the default of the Defendant in making the required payments, Plaintiff declared the entire unpaid principal balance immediately due and payable, pursuant to its option to do so as set for th in the Contract. (UMF, 2.) As a result of the default describ...

Excerpt: ... p p o s it io n Plaintiff's opposition to this motion was filed three court days late. Nonetheless, the Court exercises its discretion to consider the late -filed opposition because the hearing on this motion was advanced by the Court and because Defendant would not be pre judiced by the Court considering the opposition since Defendant was a b le t o f ile a t im e ly r e p ly . An a ly s is : I. Plaintiff's Response to Defendant's Special Inter...

Excerpt: .... P la in t if f s h a ll f ile the First Amended Complaint attached to counsel's declaration within five days of entry of the order on this motion. P la in t if f s h a ll s u b m it a w r it t e n o r d e r t o t h e Court consistent with this ruling in compliance with Rule of Court 3.1312. I. Background In March 1997, Plaintiff agreed to assist Defendant in purchasing a house on 21st Avenue in San Francisco (the “21st Avenue Property”) whe...

Excerpt: ...s action arose from a contract for purchase and sale of real property between the Wights and the Richardsons. (Cross -Co m p la in t , ¶ 1 0 .) The Wights claim the Richardsons misrepresented the details of the metes and bounds of the property sold. ( Ib id .) The Richardsons claim that they advised the Wights of errors in the legal description after the sale and applied to the Sonoma County Permit & Resource Management Department to correct the...

Excerpt: ...ny (“Amerihome”), BW Re a l Es t a t e (“BW ”), W e s t e r n Allia n c e Bank (“Western”, together with Amerihome and BW, “Additional Cross-Defendants”) and Roes 1 -10. Thereafter, Plaintiff dismissed the FAC. There are two matters on calendar covered in this ruling. First, is Plaintiff's special motion to strike (“Anti -SLAPP motion”) brought pursuant to Cal. Code Civ. Proc. (“CCP”) § 425.16 to strike the First, Second,...

Excerpt: ...l to be entered correcting these two errors. The court in all other respects DENIES the motio n . Fact s and Hist ory Plaintiffs obtained a verdict against Defendant Martin Reilley (“Martin”) for various claims of fraud and negligent misrepresentation after a trial which ended in March 2005. Judgment was entered in favor of Plaintiffs against Martin. Th e surviving co urt records show a judgment in Plaintiffs' favor of $621,336.26. Se e Judgm...

Excerpt: ...Plaintiff Jim Shelton (“Plaintiff”) on October 14, 2021, alleging unlawful detainer of property located at 935 C McConnell Avenue in Santa Rosa. On March 22, 2022, Long filed a demurrer to the complaint. The hearing on the demurrer was continued from April 5, 2022, to April 12, 2022, to a llo w P la in t if f 's t h e n -counsel to obtain a copy of the demurrer. However, on April 7 , 2 0 2 2 , P la in t if f f ile d a f ir s t a m e n d e d c...

Excerpt: ...een subjected to. Plaintiff objected to these requests based upon CCP section 2017.220. CCP section 2017.220(a) provides: “In any civil action alleging conduct that constitutes sexual harassment, sexual assault, or sexual battery, any party seeking discovery concerning the plaintiff's sexual conduct with individuals other than the alleged perpetrator shall establish specific facts showing that there is good cause for t hat dis covery, and t...