Excerpt: ... any time determines that there has been a change of law that warrants it to reconsider a prior order it entered, it may do so on its own motion and enter a different order.” Plaintiff argues that Defendant's motion to compel arbitration was granted based upon the ruling in Felisilda v. FCA US LLC (2020) 53 Cal.App.5th 486 compelling arbitration based upon principles of equitable estoppel. Plaintiff argues that the Third District Court of Appea...

Excerpt: ...verages but that although Youngs performed, Defendants breached the contract by failing to pay the amount owed. Plaintiff filed this action to collect the debt, allegedly $6,381.54, plus costs, legal fees, and interest. Defendants failed to appear, so Plaintiff obtained their default on November 16, 2021, and obtained a default judgment against them on January 12, 2022 for $9,249.34. Post-Judgment Discovery Plaintiff served Defendants by mail wit...

Excerpt: ...lying Facts: Carmen Marinsik (hereafter, “Marinsik”) was the owner of 1928 Camino Del Prado, Santa Rosa, California. (Undisputed Material Fact “UMF”, 1.) This residence was destroyed in the October 2017 Tubbs Fire. (UMF, 2.) Marinsik intended to rebuild the residence on the Camino Del Prado property and hired Defendant Gregory Mitchell dba Mitchell and Company as her general contractor to handle all aspects of rebuilding the residence. (U...

Excerpt: ... pay Plaintiff the full amount owed after Plaintiff suffered a loss (the “Loss”) to the Property. Motion Defendant moves the court for a protective order shielding it from the burden and expense of responding to Plaintiff First Set of Requests for Admission (“RFAs”), First Set of Requests for Production (“RFPs”), and First Set of Special Interrogatories (collectively, the “Discovery”). Alternatively, it asks the court to extend th...

Excerpt: ... to take her son out of a car which Defendant was driving. Only one Plaintiff, Jeanine Grider (“Plaintiff” or “Jeanine”) is identified as a party, and she is self-represented, but the FAC appears to assert claims on behalf of minor son, William Grider (“William”). Defendant answered the FAC and later brought a special motion to strike the sixth cause of action pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16. The court granted that ...

Excerpt: ...tentative ruling and in compliance with Rule 3.1312. Analysis: CCP § 1048 states that “[w]hen actions involving a common question of law or fact are pending before the court, it may order a joint hearing or trial of any or all the matters in issue in the actions; it may order all the actions consolidated and it may make such orders concerning proceedings therein as may tend to avoid unnecessary costs or delay.” (CCP § 1048(a).) “The court...

Excerpt: ... TRVFD, “Defendants”), arising initially out alleged violations of the Court's orders in another case, SCV- 266225. This matter is on calendar for demurrers to all causes of action within the SAC by TRVFD, the County and Thompson pursuant to Cal. Code Civ. Proc. (“CCP”) § 430.10(e) for failure to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, that there is another action proceeding between the same parties, and for misjoinder of...

Excerpt: ... Nathaniel Engquist is OVERRULED. The motion to strike is MOOT. 1. Note regarding combined motions The County has filed three motions as one. The County should note that it is the practice in this court for demurrers and motions to strike to be filed as separate motions. 2. Complaint This action involves property owned by the Howard Jay Engquist 2010 Revocable Trust. On March 24, 2010, Howard recorded a deed granting real property located at 250 ...

Excerpt: ...mnity. The 1XC incorporates the allegations of the complaint which allege that defendants PG&E, Mountain, and Moreno Consulting Group, Inc. (“Moreno”) in 2020 owned, possessed, supervised, operated, maintained, leased, occupied, and/or otherwise controlled a worksite in Santa Rosa near 6101 Cleland Road in Santa Rosa. (Complaint ¶10.) On October 12, 2020, while Plaintiff was at the property, Defendants' alleged negligence caused a tree to fa...

Excerpt: ...ng to pay the amount owed. Plaintiff filed this action to collect the debt, allegedly $15,795.66, plus costs, legal fees, and interest. Defendants failed to appear, so Plaintiff obtained their default on May 25, 2023, and obtained a default judgment against them on June 23, 2023 for $20,425.41. Post-Judgment Discovery Plaintiff served Defendants by mail with post-judgment discovery on July 25, 2023; the discovery included one set of production de...

Excerpt: ....050, Defendant requests monetary sanctions in the amount of $2,700 and the amount of attorney fees and costs incurred to bring this motion. As Plaintiff has now provided a signed authorization to release the footage, the discovery issue is MOOT. Sanctions are granted in the amount of $1,435 for Cloverdale having to bring this motion. Plaintiff's complaint alleges that she was injured due to a dangerous condition of public property located near M...

Excerpt: ... issuing water well permits for groundwater extraction; and adopt and implement policies and procedures to ensure consideration of the impacts of water well permits on public trust resources and uses and also to prevent harm from the impacts of such permits. Petitoners set forth two identified causes of action, both seeking a writ of mandate: 1) Violation of CECA, and 2) Failure to Comply With Mandatory Duties Under the Public Trust Doctrine. In ...

Excerpt: ...: Standards on Demurrer A demurrer tests whether the complaint sufficiently states a valid cause of achon. (Hahn v. Merda (2007) 147 Cal.App.4th 740, 747.) Complaints are read asa whole, in context and are liberally construed. (Blank v. Kirwan (1985) 39 cal.3d 311, 318; see also, stevens v. superior court (1999) 75 cal.App.4th 594, 601.) In reviewing the suffciency of a complaint, courts accept as true all material facts properly pleaded, but not...

Excerpt: ...pports recovery for a stale mechanics lien claim under a nuisance cause of action. The demurrer based upon standing and the economic loss rule is OVERRULED. The demurrer to the second cause of action for nuisance is SUSTAINED. On September 18, 2023, Plaintiff filed his complaint against Defendants alleging that they failed to use a professional level of skill when they performed certain land surveying services. Plaintiff alleges that in depositio...

Excerpt: ... costs be stricken. The motion is GRANTED as to expert fees and attorney fees. The motion is otherwise DENIED. 1. Lee is a prevailing party pursuant to CCP section 1032 A "Prevailing party" includes the party with a net monetary recovery, a defendant in whose favor a dismissal is entered, a defendant where neither plaintiff nor defendant obtains any relief, and a defendant as against those plaintiffs who do not recover any relief against that def...

Excerpt: ...earing or trial of any or all the matters in issue in the actions; it may order all the actions consolidated and it may make such orders concerning proceedings therein as may tend to awid unnecessary costs or delay." (CCP S 1048(a).) "The court, in furtherance of convenience or to avoid prejudice, or when separate trials will be conducive to expedition and economy, may order a separate trial of any cause of action, including a cause of action ass...

Excerpt: ...his matter is on calendar for Defendant's motion to strike pun-tive damages. The motion to strike is DENIED. Governing Law A. Motion to Strike Punitive Damages A motion to strike lies where a pleading contains "irrelevant, false, or improper matter[s]" or is "not drawn or filed in conformity with the laws of this state, a court rule, or an order of the court." CCP S 435(b). However, "falsity," must be demonstrated by reference to the pleading its...

Excerpt: ...ar for the moton by Corporate Defendant seeking to compel further responses to requests for production of documents set one ("RPODs"), Nos. 4, 24, 27, 36, 48, and 58, and request for sanctions in the amount of $5,510.00, from Plaintiff under Code of Civil Procedure ("CCP") S 2031.310. Governing Law Regarding the RPODs, a demand for production may request access to "documents, tangible things, land or other property, and electronically stored info...

Excerpt: ...rder on this motion. Defendants' counsel shall submit a written order consistent with this tentative ruling. Due to the lack of opposition, compliance with Rule 3.1312 is excused. Analysis: Requests for Production of Documents A party to whom a document demand is directed must respond to each item in the demand with an agreement to comply, a representation of inability to comply, or an objection. (CCP S 2031.210(a).) If only part of an item or ca...

Excerpt: ...Dave Leuschner and James Leuschner. As for the subpoena served on the LLP, this court directs the LLP to submit responsive documents to Department 16's chambers within 15 days of this order for in camera review. On November 15, 2023, Defendants issued deposition subpoenas for business records to Dave Leuschner; James Leuschner; and Plaintiffs' attorneys, the law firm Perry, Johnson, Anderson, Miller, & Moskowitz, LLP. (O'Rourke decl., 94, Exhibit...

Excerpt: ...y premiums, but Defendant failed to pay premiums owed. It seeks to collect the unpaid premiums. Plaintiff filed this action on June 26, 2023. It later filed a proof of service for the summons and complaint on September 6, 2023, purporting to show service on Defendant personally on August 2, 2023, at 3:39 p.m.at 689 Benicia Drive, santa Rosa, CA 95409. Defendant failed to appear, so Plaintiff obtained Defendant's default on September 26, 2023. Pla...

Excerpt: ...ez, "Defendants"), and Does 1-100. The Complaint alleges a variety of causes of action derived from work contracted to be performed by Defendants. Grape Land has filed a cross- complaint alleging further contract actions ("Cross-complaint"). This matter is on calendar for Plaintiffs' motion to strike particular claims from the Cross-complaint, or in the alternative, to require a bill of particulars under Code of Civil Procedure ("CCP"), S 454. Pl...

Excerpt: ...tions to compel answers to special interrogatories ("Sl") against Defendant under Code of Civil Procedure ("CCP") S 2030.300, and to compel compliance with Plaintiff's request for production of documents ("RPOD") under CCP S 2031.310. The motions are GRANTED. Governing Law A. Special interrogatories A party may propound up to 35 special interrogatories to another party. (CCP S 2030.030(a).) If the party propounds more than 35, it must attach to e...

Excerpt: ...a (the "Property"). Defendant has filed the instant motion for issuance of an order to show cause ("OSC") re: contempt against the receiver, Mark Adams ("Receiver"). The motion is DENIED. Judicial Notice As a preliminary matter, the Court takes permissive judicial notice of the docket within this case, including the orders therein, and the filings of the Receiver in this case. Judicial notice of official acts and court records is statutorily appr...

Excerpt: ...t has filed the instant motion for issuance of an order to show cause ("OSC") re: contempt against the receiver, Mark Adams ("Receiver"). The motion is DENIED. Judicial Notice As a preliminary matter, the Court takes permissive judicial notice of the docket within this case, including the orders therein, and the filings of the Receiver in this case. Judicial notice of official acts and court records is statutorily appropriate. See Cal. Evid. Code...