Search by Keyword:
Start Date:
End Date:
Tip: Wrap text in quotation marks when searching for phrases (e.g. "motion to dismiss").

2570 Results

Location: Sonoma x
2024.04.24 Petition to Compel Arbitration 690
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.04.24
Excerpt: ...ar for the petition by Uber to compel arbitration pursuant to Cal. Code Civ. Proc. (“CCP”) § 1281.2. Uber's petition to compel arbitration and stay proceedings is GRAN TED . I. Fact s and Proce dure Plaintiff allegedly was injured through the negligence of Individual Defendant, and that he was acting as the agent of Uber, on October 25, 2021. On December 16, 2021, Uber updated its terms of service. See Declaration of Chenshan Yu in Support, ...
2024.04.24 Motion for Leave to File Complaint-in-Intervention 512
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.04.24
Excerpt: ...intervention (the “M o t io n ”). Th e M o t io n is GRAN TED . I. Governing Law Labor Code Division 4, governing “Workers' Compensation and Insurance,” Part 1, Chapter 5, “Subrogation of Employer,” governs the subrogation and intervention rights of employees, employers, and employers' insured on claims involving payment of workers' co mpensation or other similar benefits. Lab. Code section 3 8 5 2 g ive s e m p lo ye e s a n d e m p ...
2024.04.24 OSC Re Preliminary Injunction 822
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.04.24
Excerpt: ...ndar for Plaintiff's Order to Show Cause re: Preliminary Injunction arising out of a Temporary Restraining Order request filed on April 8, 2024. The motion is continued to May 15, 2024. I. Underlying facts Plaintiff filed the application for Temporary Restraining Order and request to set the Order to Show Cause re: Preliminary Injunction on April 8, 2024. The Court's orde r grant ing t he Te mporary Re straining Orde r and se tt ing of t he Pre l...
2024.04.24 Demurrer to SAC 124
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Honigsberg, Christopher
Hearing Date: 2024.04.24
Excerpt: ...the Eighth Cause of Action for Reformation. Defendant's request for judicial n o t ic e is GRAN TED a s t o Exh ib it s 1-2 , a n d 5 -9 and DENIED as to Exhibits 3 -4 , a s they are disputable evidence. The cases cited in su pport of t he re que st for judicial n o t ic e o f Exh ib it s 3-4 do not require the Court take judicial notice of these documents and they are not persuasive. Defendant's counsel shall submit a written order consistent wi...
2024.04.24 Demurrers, Motion to Strike 853
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Broderick, Patrick M
Hearing Date: 2024.04.24
Excerpt: ... they own property located at 121 Olive Street in Petaluma (“121 Olive”) which they purchased on September 18, 2003 from Creed W. Wood and Andree L. Wood (“Trustees”), Trustees under the Creed W. Wood and Andree L . Wood 1991 Trust. A condition of the purchase was that Plaintiffs were granted an access easement over the Trustees' property. Plaintiffs allege that over three months prior to closing escrow for the sale of 121 Olive, Trustees...
2024.04.24 Motion for Entry of Judgment 238
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Broderick, Patrick M
Hearing Date: 2024.04.24
Excerpt: ...n 6 6 4 .6 (a ) p r o v id e s : “If p a r t ie s t o p e n d in g lit ig a t io n s t ip u la t e , in a writing signed by the parties outside of the presence of the court or orally before the court, for settlement of the case, or part thereof, the court, upon motion, may enter judgment pursuant to the terms of the settlement. If requested by the parties, the court may retain jurisdiction over the parties to enforce the settlement until perfor...
2024.04.24 Demurrer to FAC 845
Location: Sonoma
Judge: DeMeo, Bradford
Hearing Date: 2024.04.24
Excerpt: ...ages” requested for the Ninth Cause of Action in the Prayer for Relief on page 14 of the F AC. P RO CED URAL H ISTO RY Plaintiff commenced this suit to recover repair and replacement costs from named defendants regarding fire sprinkler sensors that Plaintiff installed but did not own. Plaintiff purchased the sprinkler sensors from defendant Pace Supply C o r p . (“P a c e ”) t o in stall them into the residential homes. The specific model w...
2024.04.24 Motion to Compel Answers 462
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.04.24
Excerpt: ...nts under Code of Civil Procedure (“CCP”) §§ 708.020 & 2030.290, and to compel production of documents (“RPODs”) from Defendants under CCP §§ 708 .030 & 2031.300. The unopposed Motion is GRAN TED . Defendants shall serve verified code- compliant responses free of objections within thirty (30) days of notice of entry of the order on this Motion. Defendants shall pay $60 in sanctions to Plaintiff within thirty (30) days of notice of ent...
2024.04.24 Motion to Compel Further Responses 397
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Honigsberg, Christopher
Hearing Date: 2024.04.24
Excerpt: ...and unjustified. Defendant is ordered to notify all necessary individuals prior to the release of the requested educational records that pertain to them. Prior to disclosure, Defendant is also ordered to redact any private and confidential information, including personal id e n t if ic a t io n in f o r m a t io n , p r iva t e m e d ic a l in f o r m a t io n , a n d private financial information that are not relevant to this action. Defendant s...
2024.04.24 Motion to Compel Further Responses 624
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Broderick, Patrick M
Hearing Date: 2024.04.24
Excerpt: ...Lazaro Ortiz (“Plaintiffs”). Defendants request monetary sanctions in the amount of $5,185. The motion is DENIED as to special interrogatories numbers 2, 3, 5, 6, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 21, 24, and 26; and is GRANTED as to 1, 4, 7, 10, 15, 16, 19, 20, 22, and 23. Sanctions are denied. This is a wage and hour action. Plaintiffs allege they worked for Defendant as truck drivers delivering construction materials. Plaintiffs allege that De...
2024.04.24 Motion to Intervene in Action 876
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Broderick, Patrick M
Hearing Date: 2024.04.24
Excerpt: ... court against Defendant Catholic Charities of the Diocese of Santa Rosa (“Defendant”), titled Kimberlee Keller v. Catholic Charities of the Diocese of Santa Rosa , Sonoma County Case No. 23CV00371. Intervenor argues that Defendant has opted to mediate only with the plaintiff in this case, plaintiff Lourdes Rangal (“Plaintiff Rangal”). Intervenor argues that she must be permitted to intervene as any settlement reach ed between Plaintiff R...
2024.04.24 Motion to Set Aside Default Judgment 090
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Honigsberg, Christopher
Hearing Date: 2024.04.24
Excerpt: ...promissory note . Plaint iff's proce ss se rve r e ffe ctuate d se rvice of the summons and complaint by substituted service at 3660 Roblar Road in Petaluma, at which address Defendant concedes he currently resides, and which was listed under his name in the caption for this motion. Defendant claims he does not receive mail at this address and that he has never been personally served. Defendant has not apprised the Court of any different address ...
2024.04.24 Motion to Compel Answers 942
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.04.24
Excerpt: ... t e r r o g a t o r ie s (“SIs ”) a g a in s t Defendants under Code of Civil Procedure (“CCP”) §§ 708.020 & 2030.290, and to compel production of documents (“RPODs”) from Defendants under CCP §§ 708.030 & 2031.300. The unopposed Motion is GRAN TED . D e f e n d a n t s s h a ll serve verified code-compliant responses free of objections within thirty (30) days of notice of entry of the order on this Motion. Defendants shall pay $...
2024.04.17 Motion for Certification of Class and Final Approval of Class Action Settlement, for Attorney Fees 587
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.04.17
Excerpt: ...ll as the motion for attorney's fees and class representative enhancements. The Court issued a tentative ruling on the motion on April 4, 2024, and ordered the parties to appear for oral argument the next day. At the hearing, the Court allowed arguments by Plaintiff's counsel which focused on the Court's modification to the attorn ey's fees allocation in the settlement. Plaintiff argued the original attorney's fee request was justified but re...
2024.04.17 Anti-SLAPP Motion to Strike 977
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Honigsberg, Christopher
Hearing Date: 2024.04.17
Excerpt: ...pliance with Rule 3.1312. I. Background This complaint arises out of an ongoing dispute between the parties who are a HOA President (Plaintiff) and a resident of the Association (Defendant). Defendant is alleged to have sent sent several letters and emails to Plaintiff personally (that are large ly not the subject of this motion) and letters, emails, and flyers to board members and residents with his concerns regarding Plaintiff's fitness to serv...
2024.04.17 Application for Determination of Good Faith Settlement 212
Location: Sonoma
Judge: DeMeo, Bradford
Hearing Date: 2024.04.17
Excerpt: ...) for settlement. Plaintiffs had sued Defendants for motor vehicle property damage and personal injury. ANALYSIS Legal Standard C.C.P. section 877.6 allows a plaintiff to settle with one or more joint tortfeasors without releasing others as long as the settlement is in “good faith.” A good-faith settlement discharges the settling defendant from liability to other parties for equit able contribution or comparative indemnity. ( City of Grand Te...
2024.04.17 Demurrer, Motion to Strike 163
Location: Sonoma
Judge: DeMeo, Bradford
Hearing Date: 2024.04.17
Excerpt: ...Plaintiff's complaint alleges that in or around January 2016, Defendant hired Plaintiff to work as a full -time, non- exempt ceiling and acoustical foreman. Plaintiff alleges that he was wrongfully terminated on or about August 12, 2022. Plaintiff alleges that, previously, on April 1, 2022, he injured his right arm while performing job duties. The injury impaired major life activities and constituted a disability. The injury required surgery whic...
2024.04.17 Motion for Summary Adjudication 585
Location: Sonoma
Judge: DeMeo, Bradford
Hearing Date: 2024.04.17
Excerpt: ...rling commenced this action to obtain money owed by Arrowtown for roofing work done and for materials provided by Sterling in connection to a construction project on a residential remodeling in Sonoma for Heather Jordan and Joseph Beare (the “Owners”). Arrowtown, as the general contractor, sought a contract with Sterling for roofing work. Arrowtown disputes any additional amounts claimed by Sterling. Sterling submitted a bid proposal for $82,...
2024.04.17 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 161
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.04.17
Excerpt: ...nting judgment on the pleadings on the ground that the Complaint fails to state sufficient facts to constitute causes of action in this matter. The motion is DENIED. I. Governing Law A. Judgment on the Pleadings A motion for judgment on the pleadings may only be made on the grounds specified in the statute. CCP section 438(c)(1). If the moving party is a defendant, the motion may be made on the grounds that the complaint does not state facts suff...
2024.04.17 Motion for Leave to Amend FAC 679
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.04.17
Excerpt: .... (“CCP”) § 473 for leave to amend the FAC. The motion is DENIED. I. Legal Standards The California Code of Civil Procedure provides that a court “may in the furtherance of justice, and on any terms as may be proper” allow a party to amend any pleading to correct a mistake. CCP § 473(a)(1). Likewise, the court may “in its discretion, after notice to the adverse party, allow, upon any terms as may be just, an amendment to any pleading ...
2024.04.17 Motion to Quash Subpoena for Deposition 054
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Honigsberg, Christopher
Hearing Date: 2024.04.17
Excerpt: ...h 1997, Plaintiff agreed to assist Defendant in purchasing a house on 21st Avenue in San Francisco (“San Francisco Property”) where Defendant would live with the parties' parents. Plaintiff alleges that he and Defendant agreed as follows: Plaintiff would pay a $70,000 down payment and co -sign the loan application, and pay $5,000 per month to Defendant to cover the mortgage, tax, and maintenance expenses on the house. Plaintiff and Defendant ...
2024.04.17 Motion to Set Aside Default, Judgment 581
Location: Sonoma
Judge: DeMeo, Bradford
Hearing Date: 2024.04.17
Excerpt: ...ff filed suit on May 6, 2022, and s erved the summons and complaint upon Defendant through substituted service on May 13, 2023. Defendant did not file a response, so Plaintiff filed a Request for Entry of Default, which the Court entered on July 12, 2023. On July 18, 2023, Defendant's representative from Phoenix Law contacted Plaintiff's counsel wanting to settle the matter on behalf of Defendant. As proof of representation, Phoenix Law emailed a...
2024.04.17 Petition to Compel Arbitration and Stay 780
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.04.17
Excerpt: ...necessary precautions to prevent her from falling, as a result of which she fell and suffered injuries. Plaintiff's complaint, filed on November 29, 2023, alleges causes of action for (1) negligence and (2) violations of the Elder and Dependent Adult Civil Protection Act (Welf & Instit. Code §15600 et. seq.) Plaintiff, a 93-year elder who was a resident at Defendants' Muirwoods Memory Care assisted -living facility in Santa Rosa, California (the...
2024.04.10 Motions to Enforce Settlement 181
Location: Sonoma
Judge: DeMeo, Bradford
Hearing Date: 2024.04.10
Excerpt: ...efendant Bethany Zoe (“Zoe”) stipulated to a settlement agreement in open court. The parties exchanged multiple versions to memorialize this settlement agreement in writing, but Defendants did not agree to the terms because they did not include the requirement for escrow, a title report, and a transfer disclosure statement re garding re al prope rt y at issue . Anabi's posit ion is t hat t he se t e rms we re a part of the general category po...
2024.04.10 Motion to Strike Unverified Answer 308
Location: Sonoma
Judge: DeMeo, Bradford
Hearing Date: 2024.04.10
Excerpt: ...for ju d ic ia l n o t ic e a r e GRAN TED . Defendants shall file and serve their proposed amended answer within 10 days of service of the notice of entry of this order. P RO CED URAL H ISTO RY Plaintiffs brought this action to seek damages from Defendants for breach of contract and property damage arising out of a commercial lease. Defendants filed an unverified answer with a general denial to the verified complaint to avoid an entry of default...

2570 Results

Per page

Pages