Search by Keyword:
Start Date:
End Date:
Tip: Wrap text in quotation marks when searching for phrases (e.g. "motion to dismiss").

2528 Results

Location: Sonoma x
2024.01.24 Motion to Compel Further Responses 776
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.01.24
Excerpt: ...ar for the moton by Corporate Defendant seeking to compel further responses to requests for production of documents set one ("RPODs"), Nos. 4, 24, 27, 36, 48, and 58, and request for sanctions in the amount of $5,510.00, from Plaintiff under Code of Civil Procedure ("CCP") S 2031.310. Governing Law Regarding the RPODs, a demand for production may request access to "documents, tangible things, land or other property, and electronically stored info...
2024.01.24 Motion to Compel Authorization for Release of Home Surveillance Footage 896
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Broderick, Patrick M
Hearing Date: 2024.01.24
Excerpt: ....050, Defendant requests monetary sanctions in the amount of $2,700 and the amount of attorney fees and costs incurred to bring this motion. As Plaintiff has now provided a signed authorization to release the footage, the discovery issue is MOOT. Sanctions are granted in the amount of $1,435 for Cloverdale having to bring this motion. Plaintiff's complaint alleges that she was injured due to a dangerous condition of public property located near M...
2024.01.24 Motion for Consolidation 883
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Honigsberg, Christopher
Hearing Date: 2024.01.24
Excerpt: ...earing or trial of any or all the matters in issue in the actions; it may order all the actions consolidated and it may make such orders concerning proceedings therein as may tend to awid unnecessary costs or delay." (CCP S 1048(a).) "The court, in furtherance of convenience or to avoid prejudice, or when separate trials will be conducive to expedition and economy, may order a separate trial of any cause of action, including a cause of action ass...
2024.01.24 Motion for Attorney Fees 818
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Broderick, Patrick M
Hearing Date: 2024.01.24
Excerpt: ... costs be stricken. The motion is GRANTED as to expert fees and attorney fees. The motion is otherwise DENIED. 1. Lee is a prevailing party pursuant to CCP section 1032 A "Prevailing party" includes the party with a net monetary recovery, a defendant in whose favor a dismissal is entered, a defendant where neither plaintiff nor defendant obtains any relief, and a defendant as against those plaintiffs who do not recover any relief against that def...
2024.01.24 Demurrer, Motion to Strike 601
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Broderick, Patrick M
Hearing Date: 2024.01.24
Excerpt: ...pports recovery for a stale mechanics lien claim under a nuisance cause of action. The demurrer based upon standing and the economic loss rule is OVERRULED. The demurrer to the second cause of action for nuisance is SUSTAINED. On September 18, 2023, Plaintiff filed his complaint against Defendants alleging that they failed to use a professional level of skill when they performed certain land surveying services. Plaintiff alleges that in depositio...
2024.01.24 Demurrer to TAC 765
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Honigsberg, Christopher
Hearing Date: 2024.01.24
Excerpt: ...: Standards on Demurrer A demurrer tests whether the complaint sufficiently states a valid cause of achon. (Hahn v. Merda (2007) 147 Cal.App.4th 740, 747.) Complaints are read asa whole, in context and are liberally construed. (Blank v. Kirwan (1985) 39 cal.3d 311, 318; see also, stevens v. superior court (1999) 75 cal.App.4th 594, 601.) In reviewing the suffciency of a complaint, courts accept as true all material facts properly pleaded, but not...
2024.01.24 Demurrer 415
Location: Sonoma
Judge: DeMeo, Bradford
Hearing Date: 2024.01.24
Excerpt: ... issuing water well permits for groundwater extraction; and adopt and implement policies and procedures to ensure consideration of the impacts of water well permits on public trust resources and uses and also to prevent harm from the impacts of such permits. Petitoners set forth two identified causes of action, both seeking a writ of mandate: 1) Violation of CECA, and 2) Failure to Comply With Mandatory Duties Under the Public Trust Doctrine. In ...
2024.01.19 Motion for Attorney Fees 107
Location: Sonoma
Judge: DeMeo, Bradford
Hearing Date: 2024.01.19
Excerpt: ...efendants have trespassed on Plaintiff's Property. Plaintiff subsequently obtained a temporary restraining order ("TRO") and then a preliminary injunction (the "Injunction") against Defendant Mona Verducci ("Mona") in February 2023. The Injunction orders Mona and her agents or others not to enter upon Plaintiff's Property as defined by the survey (the "Survey") attached as Exhibit A to the Injunction. Plaintiff then brought an application for ord...
2024.01.19 Motion for Entry of Final Judgment 483
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Broderick, Patrick M
Hearing Date: 2024.01.19
Excerpt: ...etaluma ("the Property"). Prior to the parties taking title to the Property, it had been held in the Peter Dana Smith Revocable Living Trust. Peter D. Smith passed away on or about March 17, 2020. On April 11, 2023, this Court issued an Interlocutory Judgment for Partition of Real Property and Appointment of Referee. The order appointed Ethan A. Glaubiger as the partition referee with the discretion to hire real estate agent Kristi Taylor to sell...
2024.01.19 Motion for Leave to File SAC 124
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Honigsberg, Christopher
Hearing Date: 2024.01.19
Excerpt: ...cial policy favors resolution of all disputed matters between the parties in the same lawsuit, and courts are bound to apply a policy of great liberality in permitting amendments to the complaint "at any stage of the proceedings, up to and including trial," absent prejudice to the adverse party. (Atkinson v. Elk Corp. (2003) 109 Cal.App.4th 739, 761.) "Generally, leave to amend must be liberally granted (Nestle v. City of Santa Monica (1972) 6 Ca...
2024.01.19 Motion for Reconsideration 380
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Broderick, Patrick M
Hearing Date: 2024.01.19
Excerpt: ...ay do so on its own moton and enter a different order." Plaintiff argues that Defendant's moton to compel arbitration was granted based upon the ruling in Felisilda v. FCA US LLC (2020) 53 Cal.App.5th 486 compelling arbitration based upon principles of equitable estoppel. Plaintiff argues that the Third District Court of Appeal has recently determined that Felisilda does not apply to the issue of whether a manufacturer can compel arbitration via ...
2024.01.19 Motion for Summary Adjudication 494
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Honigsberg, Christopher
Hearing Date: 2024.01.19
Excerpt: ... is addressed below. Defendants' counsel shall submit a written order consistent with this tentative ruling and in compliance with Rule 3.1312. Request for Judicial Notice: Defendants' request for judicial notice of Exhibit A and Exhibit 8 is GRANTED. As for the remainder of the request, the Court will take judicial notice of each version of Plaintiffs' complaint and the date on which it was filed. However, the Court will not judicially notice th...
2024.01.19 Motion to Compel Further Responses 065
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.01.19
Excerpt: ...cuments ("RPODs"), Set One, Nos. 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 15, 18, 20, 22, 32, 34, 36, and 39, against Defendant under Code of Civil Procedure ("CCP") S 2031.310. The motion is GRANTED. Governing Law Regarding the RPODs, a demand for production may request access to "documents, tangible things, land or other property, and electronically stored information in the possession, custody, or control" of another party. A party to whom a document demand is...
2024.01.19 Motion to Compel Arbitration 759
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.01.19
Excerpt: ...or Code violations, and civil penalties thereon(the "Complaint"). This matter is on calendar for the petition (styled as a "motion") by the Defendant to compel arbitration pursuant to Federal Arbitration Act ("FAA"), 9 USC SS 1-15. Defendant's petition to compel arbitration and stay proceedings is DENIED. Facts and Procedure This matter arises out of an employment relationship between the parties. Defendant avers that Plaintiff, as part of his on...
2024.01.19 Motion to Compel Production of Docs, for Sanctions 104
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Honigsberg, Christopher
Hearing Date: 2024.01.19
Excerpt: ...tions in the amount of $1,000. Plaintiff's counsel shall submit a written order consistent with this tentative ruling and in compliance with Rule 3.1312. Analysis: "California law prov-des parties with expansive discovery rights." (Lopez v. Watchtower Bible & Tract Society of N.Y., Inc. (2016) 246 Cal.App.4th 566, 590-591.) Specifically, the Code of Civil Procedure provides that "any party may obtain discovery regarding any matter, not privileged...
2024.01.19 Motion to Continue Trial 905
Location: Sonoma
Judge: DeMeo, Bradford
Hearing Date: 2024.01.19
Excerpt: ...ng attempting to sell a portion of his general partner interest (the "GP Interest") to Kelly. As a result of developments during this litigation, including Defendat' efforts to sell an important Partnership asset, real property comprising the Summerfield Shopping Center (the "Property"), he ultimately filed a second amended complaint ("SAC") which includes, amongst others, claims for wrongdoing based on Defendants' efforts to sell the Property. M...
2024.01.19 Motion to Seal or Redact Previously Filed Motion 677
Location: Sonoma
Judge: DeMeo, Bradford
Hearing Date: 2024.01.19
Excerpt: ...daughter Vanessa French ("Decedent"), negligently caused Decedent's death. They allege that Decedent sought medical care from Defendants for a combination of physical and emotional complaints which included skin conditions, back pack, severe depression, and suicidal ideations, but that Defendants negligently failed to provide proper treatment, resulting in Decedent handing herself. Plaintiff Wendy French ("Wendy" or "Mother Plaintiff"), individua...
2024.01.19 OSC Re Contempt 470
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.01.19
Excerpt: ...mplaint, Plaintiff alleges that 275 and Walden are the lessors of the Property. 275 and Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement on February 8, 2020. Plaintiff filed the Complaint based on Defendants' alleged violations of the lease agreement, particularly as it pertained to issues of the parking lot and other common areas on the Property. Plaintiff thereafter moved the Court for a preliminary injunction, which was heard on July 26, 2023. The Cou...
2024.01.19 OSC Re Contempt 714
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.01.19
Excerpt: ...t has filed the instant motion for issuance of an order to show cause ("OSC") re: contempt against the receiver, Mark Adams ("Receiver"). The motion is DENIED. Judicial Notice As a preliminary matter, the Court takes permissive judicial notice of the docket within this case, including the orders therein, and the filings of the Receiver in this case. Judicial notice of official acts and court records is statutorily appropriate. See Cal. Evid. Code...
2024.01.10 Motion to Quash Service of Summons 907
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Broderick, Patrick M
Hearing Date: 2024.01.10
Excerpt: ...l LLC") and the Oregon Corp. The cross-complaint alleges that Cal LLC and Shimadzu entered into agreements wherein Shimadzu agreed to sell Cal LLC certain scientific equipment. Shimadzu alleges that Cal LLC has failed to pay all invoices. In addition, Shimadzu alleges that Cal LLC transferred personal property to the Oregon Corp. without receiving the reasonable value of the assets. Shimadzu alleges that the Oregon Corp. now carries on the former...
2024.01.10 Motion to Quash Service of Summons 314
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.01.10
Excerpt: ...cedure ("CCP") S 418.10(a)(1) on the grounds that the Court lacked personal jurisdiction over Laird because the summons and complaint were never properly served. Governing Law The Code of Civil Procedure states that "[a] defendant, on or before the last day of his or her time to plead or within any further time that the court may for good cause allow, may serve and file a notice of motion [tlo quash service of summons on the ground of lack of jur...
2024.01.10 Motion to Enter Judgment 384
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.01.10
Excerpt: ...ount. The motion is DENIED. CCP S 664.6(a) provides: "If parties to pending litigation stipulate, in a writing signed by the parties outside of the presence of the court or orally before the court, for settlement of the case, or part thereof, the court, upon motion, may enter judgment pursuant to the terms of the settlement. If requested by the parties, the court may retain jurisdiction over the parties to enforce the settlement until performance...
2024.01.10 Motion to Dismiss Complaint 208
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Broderick, Patrick M
Hearing Date: 2024.01.10
Excerpt: ...e, "Cabinet Vision." Plaintiffs allege that the software was defective, crashed constantly, and did not cut the cabinet pieces at the specifications stated by the software. Forum non conveniens is an equitable doctrine, codified in Code of Civil Procedure section 410.30, under which a trial court has discretion to stay or dismiss a transitory cause of acton that it believes may be more appropriately and justly tried elsewhere. (Anima/ Film, LLC v...
2024.01.10 Motion to Compel Responses, for Sanctions 874
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Broderick, Patrick M
Hearing Date: 2024.01.10
Excerpt: ...n the second motion. The motions are DENIED. 1. Request for Admissions, Set One Defendants' counsel states that on August 15, 2022, Plaintiff was served by and through his attorney of record with Defendants' Request for Admissions, Set One. (Peebles decl., 93.) However, Plaintiff has been self-represented throughout this entire action. In addition, while the proof of service of Defendants' Requests for Admissions has an attached "Service List" wh...
2024.01.10 Motion to Compel Deposition 124
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Honigsberg, Christopher
Hearing Date: 2024.01.10
Excerpt: ...ndant's objections to the Declaration of Jaimee Modica are OVERRULED. Plaintiffs' counsel shall submit a written order consistent with this tentatve ruling and in compliance with Rule 3.1312. Defendant Gudgel Roofing, Inc.'s opposition requests that the Court consider his Motion for Protective Order as his opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel. Defendant's motion for protective order is not scheduled to be heard until April. Defendant did no...

2528 Results

Per page

Pages