Excerpt: ...is four years. Defendant's failure to make distributions and to provide the profit and loss statement followed by his denial of the contract (i.e. repudiation) in the 7/14/15 letter constituted a total breach of the agreement. “Under the discovery rule, the statute of limitations begins to run when the plaintiff suspects or should suspect that her injury was caused by wrongdoing, that someone has done something wrong to her. A plaintiff need no...

Excerpt: ...he same grounds instead of moving to strike the new and improper allegations/argument, the County has essentially invited the court to reconsider the prior ruling. To the extent that the court is now required to engage in such reconsideration, without adherence to the jurisdictional requirements set forth in CCP §1008, the court will exercise its inherent authority to do so pursuant to Le Francois v Goel (2005) 35 Cal 4th 1094. On reconsideratio...

Excerpt: ...d cause of action for wrongful foreclosure which is barred by Res Judicata. (see further discussion below) LAW AND MOTION TENTATIVE RULINGS DATE: JANUARY 4, 2021 TIME: 8:30 A.M. 2 The demurrer to the First cause of action for breach of contract is sustained without leave to amend for Plaintiff's failure to allege a contract and her performance. (First Commercial Mortgage Co. v. Reece (2001) 89 Cal.App.4th 731, 745; Goodman v. Kennedy (1976) 18 Ca...

Excerpt: ... and attorneys have a duty of loyalty to their clients. Thus, while an attorney must represent his or her clients zealously within the bounds of the law a broker only needs to use reasonable care to represent his or her client. (Kotlar v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co. (2000) 83 Cal.App.4th 1116, 1123.) Plaintiff has failed to plead that Defendant failed to obtain insurance at the best possible price; ( Westrec Marina Mgmt v Jardine Ins. Brokers (2000) 8...

Excerpt: ...rbitrate between the parties (The trial court is to decide two “gateway issues” of arbitrability: (1) whether there is an agreement to arbitrate between the parties, and (2) whether the agreement covered the dispute at issue. (Omar v. Ralphs Grocery Co. (2004) 118 Cal.App.4th 955, 960.), the Court finds that Defendants have met their burden of proving the existence of a valid arbitration agreement by a preponderance of the evidence. The Decla...

Excerpt: ... no right to discovery in this Superior Court action and the Request was premature as the Court had not ruled on the Responding Party's Petition to Compel Arbitration. MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSES TO SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES FROM RAMOS The motion to compel further responses to Special Interrogatories Set One is granted. Mr. Ramos is ordered to serve verified responses to Connellys' Special Interrogatories Set One within 30 days of service of...

Excerpt: ...not disputed that Plaintiff delivered all of the originals of the documents at issue (Exhibits 3‐13 to the Amended Complaint) to Mr. Paetkau in August 2017; nor have they provided applicable authority for their assertion that Plaintiff is not entitled to use copies of these documents in this litigation, or that the documents should be sealed. In support of their claim that Plaintiff's “self‐help evidence gathering” is inappropriate, and t...

Excerpt: ...ling on the contract within the meaning of Section 1717 of the Civil Code.” (Notice of motion p.2:2) However, the motion to compel arbitration in case No. 18CV00897 was denied without prejudice; the Court's order says,“ A request for an order compelling arbitration has also been brought by the identical party in the earlier filed action [Case No. 18CV00848] and that action is more complex because of issues related to additional parties who ma...

Excerpt: ...nded complaint alleges facts that are sufficiently similar to those alleged in the original complaint, the critical inquiry is whether the defendant had adequate notice of the claim based on the original pleading. The policy behind statutes of limitations is to put defendants on notice of the need to defend against a claim in time to prepare a fair defense on the merits. This policy is satisfied when recovery under an amended complaint is sought ...

Excerpt: ...avor of Ralph Partners on July 9, 2018 (RFJN Ex. 11). Plaintiffs' claim against Ralph Partners, as well as against Defendant Geiser who is alleged to be the alter‐ego of Ralph Partners, is therefore barred by judicial estoppel/res judicata. In addition, the FAC fails to allege any facts to support the claim of fraud, and therefore fails to state a cause of action against Defendants, and is uncertain. Defendants' RFJN is granted in its entirety ...

Excerpt: ...egularities in the sale notice or procedure, the borrower must offer to pay the full amount of the debt for which the property was security. The borrower must pay, or offer to pay, the secured debt, or at least all of the delinquencies and costs due for redemption, before commencing the action. “The rationale behind the rule is that if [the borrower] could not have redeemed the property had the sale procedures been proper, any irregularities in...

Excerpt: ...s to Defendant Larsh's co‐defendants, NFMG, Susan White and Anthony Tirri, and has expressly alleged that NFMG and Susan White, dba Susan White Chiropractic, Inc., were her joint employers; and that her employment contract, “which she understood to be between and her employer‐NFMG” was signed by Susan White, President of NFMG, “on behalf of NFMG”. However, Plaintiff has not alleged any facts giving rise to an employment relationship w...

Excerpt: ...he trial court's broad discretion.” (Wershba v. Apple Computer, Inc. (2001) 91 Cal.App.4th 224, 234‐235, citing Dunk v. Ford Motor Co. (1996) 48 Cal.App.4th 1794.) In determining whether a class settlement is fair, adequate and reasonable, the trial court should consider relevant factors, such as “the strength of plaintiffs' case, the risk, expense, complexity and likely duration of further litigation, the risk of maintaining class action s...

Excerpt: ...avor of Ralph Partners on July 9, 2018 (RFJN Ex. 11). Plaintiffs' claim against Ralph Partners, as well as against Defendant Geiser who is alleged to be the alter‐ego of Ralph Partners, is therefore barred by judicial estoppel/res judicata. In addition, the FAC fails to allege any facts to support the claim of fraud, and therefore fails to state a cause of action against Defendants, and is uncertain. Defendants' RFJN is granted in its entirety ...

Excerpt: ...tion or a defense thereto. (CA CCP § 437c (p)(1)) LAW AND MOTION TENTATIVE RULINGS DATE: NOVEMBER 24, 2020 TIME: 8:30 A.M. 2 As set forth below, Defendant's objections to evidence are overruled. Moreover, because Defendant has failed to provide any references to any supporting evidence for each of the material facts he contends are disputed, he has failed to create a triable issue of material fact. (CA CCP § 437c (b)(3) & (c)) Judgment shall be...

Excerpt: ...pel arbitration due to a risk of inconsistent rulings. Plaintiffs have failed to demonstrate that the Agreement is subject to revocation Plaintiffs contend that the Agreement is subject to revocation due to lack of mutual consent, lack of consideration, its illusory nature, and fraud. The parties mutually agreed to arbitrate any disputes covered by the Agreement. Therefore, pursuant to Civ. Code §1605, there was good consideration for the Agreem...

Excerpt: ...ty of the petitioner to make available to the trial court an adequate record of the administrative proceeding; otherwise the presumption of regularity will prevail, since the burden falls on the petitioner attacking the administrative decision to demonstrate to the trial court where the administrative proceedings were unfair, were in excess of jurisdiction, or showed “‘prejudicial abuse of discretion. (Foster v. Civil Service Com (1983) 142 C...

Excerpt: ...standard. The court finds that the Commission did exceed its authority by granting the County's request and reconsidering the September 27, 2018 decision on an issue other than those specified in County Personnel Regulations §130 (E)(7)(a). Factual background Petitioner appealed a disciplinary action taken by the Santa Cruz Sheriff's Office, demoting him from the position of Lieutenant to Sargent, to the Civil Service Commission. On September 27...

Excerpt: ...ty of the petitioner to make available to the trial court an adequate record of the administrative proceeding; otherwise the presumption of regularity will prevail, since the burden falls on the petitioner attacking the administrative decision to demonstrate to the trial court where the administrative proceedings were unfair, were in excess of jurisdiction, or showed “‘prejudicial abuse of discretion. (Foster v. Civil Service Com (1983) 142 C...

Excerpt: ...standard. The court finds that the Commission did exceed its authority by granting the County's request and reconsidering the September 27, 2018 decision on an issue other than those specified in County Personnel Regulations §130 (E)(7)(a). Factual background Petitioner appealed a disciplinary action taken by the Santa Cruz Sheriff's Office, demoting him from the position of Lieutenant to Sargent, to the Civil Service Commission. On September 27...

Excerpt: ... obtain this information through formal discovery. In a case decided under the predecessor statute (Burkle v. Burkle, (2006) 141 Cal. App. 4th 1029, 1030) the court held that the trial court erred in denying a motion to compel the production of an LLC's financial records brought by the owner of a 1% interest. Both this case and common sense indicate that Plaintiff can obtain the information that she is statutorily entitled to through formal disco...

Excerpt: ...CCP §1281.4 provides that “If the issue which is the controversy subject to arbitration is severable, the stay may be with respect to that issue only”. This section vests the trial court with the discretion to sever issues to prevent prejudice to a litigant in multiple issue or multiple party actions by a stay of proceedings. Cook v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County (1966), 240 Cal. App. 2d 880. Similarly, Federal courts have interpreted...

Excerpt: ...it card and does not appear to have anything to do with the breach of the 11/19/17 Lease of the wine tanks described in the Complaint. (Complaint First cause of action‐Breach of Contract attachment, paragraph BC‐1) Although CA Civil Code § 1642 provides that several contracts relating to the same matters, between the same parties, and made as parts of substantially one transaction, are to be taken together, there is not clear and unequivocal...

Excerpt: ...e of limitations applying to bodily injury claims in the state in which the accident occurred in order to have the dispute settled by a court having jurisdiction”, this language does not require the suit to be litigated in California, nor is it Defendants' consent to litigate in California. Rather, California's statute of limitation is to apply “in order to have the dispute settled by a court having jurisdiction”. (Ex. A to Dec. K. Thompson...

Excerpt: ...ested voicemails either never existed, or to the extent they existed they were deleted “consistent with the ordinary course and regular practice of deleting voicemails following their receipt and review”, provides an explanation for the inability to comply, regardless of the fact that it provides two alternative reasons. However, Defendants' statement that the requested voicemails, to the extent they existed, were deleted “consistent with t...