Excerpt: ...l's Remittitur states that Plaintiff is entitled to recover costs on appeal. That is incorrect. The Remittitur states “The parties shall bear their own costs on appeal.” That is also in the Opinion's Disposition at p. 10 (“The parties shall bear their own costs on appeal”). Although Plaintiff does not expressly seek recovery of anything but attorney's fees, the motion includes (Exhibit 2) documentation regarding $485.26 in “disbursement...

Excerpt: ... plaintiffs and the defendant, the petition would have to be denied. (Iskanian v. CLS, 59 Cal.4th 348, 384‐390.) ...

Excerpt: ...case, and this motion, the Court tentatively finds that Moving Party Carol Pulliam is a vexatious litigant pursuant to CCP 391(b)(3) and sets the following Order to Show Cause: Carol Pulliam is Ordered to Appear and Show Cause as to why she should not be declared a vexatious litigant pursuant to CCP 391(b)(3) and why the Court should not require her to obtaining a prefiling order, per CCP 391.7(a), before she may be allowed to file any further li...

Excerpt: ...pear at the Jury Trial. Plaintiffs do not contest that, but argue that certain items are excessive and/or not allowed. Each challenged item is addressed in turn as follows: ITEMS 4 (i) through (q) – DEPOSITION COSTS: Plaintiffs argue that $1,171.69 in deposition costs sought under Items 4 (i) through (q) should be taxed because they were not reasonably necessary to the litigation, or because it is unclear what the costs were for. Opposing defen...

Excerpt: ...he moving parties. However, the Court finds that the Order for Judgment filed on December 18, 2013, and the Corrected Order for Judgment filed on January 9, 2014, should be clarified. The Court finds that pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 762.050 and as the real parties in interest, the moving parties and opposing party is properly before this court and the court has considered the moving papers, the opposition, and the reply. After exa...

Excerpt: ...onally serve Defendant. (CCP § 415.20.) Prevailing party to give notice. ...

Excerpt: ...rry declaration); 1,714 (Bello declaration at ¶ 4 (422 + 1,292); and 1,764 (Bello's declaration at ¶ ¶ 21 & 27). This inconsistency must be resolved. 2. The Bello declaration refers to a sample of the time records of the class members, but does not describe the size of the sample, i.e., the number or percentage of employees whose records were included in the sample. (¶ 22.) 3. The Bello declaration (at ¶ 25) justifies the claim requirement f...

Excerpt: ...mely made. /// Even if the motion was timely made, it is still improper. A motion for reconsideration must be based on new or different facts or circumstances of law. C.C.P. §1008(a). When a party seeks reconsideration he or she must show a “satisfactory explanation for failing to provide the evidence earlier, which can only be describes as a strict requirement of diligence.” Garcia v. Hejmadi (1997) 58 Cal.App.4th 674, 690. Facts know by th...

Excerpt: ... provides for payment to the named plaintiff of a “service award. The Court will require citation of authority for such an award in a PAGA case. The motion shall explain why such an award is fair under the circumstances of this case. The motion shall be supported by a declaration from the named plaintiff in which the declarant: a. Describes the services performed by the declarant to further the prosecution of the action; b. Estimates the time i...

Excerpt: ...tepped into Cross‐Defendant's shoes and alleged that Cross Complainants were the cause of the accident and the damage to Cross‐Defendant's vehicle. Since State Farm has substituted in for Cross‐Defendant as the party plaintiff, Cross‐Complainants may assert any affirmative defense they might have had against Cross‐Defendant Magana including the defense of comparative negligence and apportionment of fault. Cross Complainants are also see...

Excerpt: ...oses of expediency, the following abbreviations are used in this ruling: “Deft” or “Millard” refers to Defendant moving party and “Pltf” refers to Plaintiff. Deft MILLARD's motion rests entirely upon its contention that it had no actual or constructive knowledge of the alleged floor condition which caused pltf to fall. (NOTE: to the extent the motion includes arguments disputing the reason pltf fell, and whether there was actually any...

Excerpt: ...strues the privilege as between Forgy, as the client, and Defendant's attorney. The privilege belongs to Defendant as the client and applies to Forgy as a representative of the insurance carrier required to defend against Plaintiff's claim. The privilege is between Defendant and Forgy/Garrison rather than between Garrison and Defendant's counsel, Daniels, Fine, Israel, Schonbuch & Lebovits. Plaintiff next argues that Defendant waived attorney cli...

Excerpt: ... to quash must be filed at the same time as a motion to set aside default to avoid the argument that by making a motion to set aside default, the improper service has been waived. (Civ. Proc., § 418.10(d). Service was improper because under Code of Civil Procedure section 416.10(a)(b) service on a corporation must be on either the designated agent for service or a specified corporate officers, a general manager, or a person authorized by the cor...

Excerpt: ...e of the continued hearing was provided by the Court Clerk to Plaintiff, but not as to Kreizenbeck & Seim Partnership as it had not entered an appearance. A proof of service (“POS”) was filed January 9, 2018, reflecting personal service on January 4, 2018. The POS does not indicate that notice of the continued hearing was served. On January 18, 2018, Plaintiff filed a proof of service reflecting it had mailed a copy of the minute order contin...

Excerpt: ....52. Unlike the costs memorandum, a motion to tax costs based on factual matters must be supported by declarations. (County of Kern v. Ginn (1983) 146 Cal.App.3d 1107, 1113‐1114.) For instance, where “reasonableness” is challenged, conclusory allegations t Page 3 of 9 Shalikar) because they were not parties to the litigation nor involved in the promissory notes at issue. However, Plaintiffs assert these deponents were trial witnesses who te...

Excerpt: ...d.” Penal Code § 11165.12(b). Child abuse and neglect is defined to include “physical injury or death inflicted by other than accidental means upon a child by another person,” which includes “the willful harming or injuring of a child or the endangering of the person or health of a child.” Penal Code § 11165.6. The willful harming of a child “means a situation in which any person willfully causes or permits any child to suffer, or i...

Excerpt: ...tiff/Cross‐Defendant moves the Court to strike claims for punitive damages in the second cause of action for conversion and prayer for relief. Cross‐Defendant asserts that as the case arises out of a landlord‐tenant contract that punitive damages are not available. Cross‐Defendant further asserts that the allegations are not specifically pled and are inadequate to support punitive damages under Civil Code section 3294. Cross‐Complainant...

Excerpt: ...l Procedure section 1019.5, forthwith. On 8/7/17, this Court ordered Plaintiff to provide verified responses to form interrogatories, special interrogatories, and demand for production of documents within 30 days plus pay sanctions in the amount of $460 within thirty days. As a result of Plaintiff's failure to comply with that order, Defendant filed a Motion to Dismiss on 10/16/17, which this Court denied, but imposed monetary sanctions. The Cour...

Excerpt: ...s. Exchange (1991) 231 Cal.App.3d 481, 487.) Despite initial noncompliance with the court order, Plaintiff has since produced verified responses and paid monetary sanctions. ...

Excerpt: ...Motion for summary adjudication of the 8, 9, 10 and 11th causes of action denied. Defendants move the court for summary judgment, or in the alternative for summary adjudication, as to Plaintiff Patricia Olmedo. Procedural Issues: The court notes that Plaintiff's separate statement in opposition did not comply with CRC, rule 3.1350(f)(2). In response to UMFs Nos. 4, 46, 48, 49 and 51, Plaintiff disputed the facts, but failed to cite any evidence i...

Excerpt: .... No other fees and costs are awarded. The bond is exonerated. The Receiver is to prepare a proposed order and give notice pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1019.5, forthwith. This matter was previously heard on 11/9/17, at which time the court asked Page 2 of 8 2) Receiver advised the court in seeking authorization for the sale to Ms. Cota that it is his general practice, where after review he cannot find a lender willing to fund the n...

Excerpt: ... considered and made adjustments based on the following: (1) There was no showing that Inland Empire Counsel could not have been used. Accordingly, the use of comparable attorney's fees for San Francisco, Los Angeles, San Diego and Orange County are not persuasive. Center for Biological Diversity v. County of San Bernardino (2010) 188 Cal.App.4th 603, 615‐619 (2) Based on the court's experience a reasonable rate in this practice area would be a...

Excerpt: ...gnment before the foreclosure sale are insufficient to demonstrate that the assignment was void (as opposed to voidable) and are insufficient to support the first cause of action for wrongful foreclosure. The same is true with respect to the assignment from BANA to Nationstar. With regard to the second cause of action for violation of HBOR, Plaintiff fails to allege facts to demonstrate that the alleged violations of Civ. Code §§ 2923.55 and 29...

Excerpt: ...ecifically, Plaintiff has failed to allege facts which show that she is entitled to the protections afforded by HBOR in that Plaintiff alleges that she submitted two completed loan modification applications, one in August 2015 and then, for some unexplained reason, another in February 2016, but that Wells Fargo recorded a Notice of Default in November 2015 and Notice of Sale in February 2016. Because Plaintiff has not alleged specific dates for h...

Excerpt: ... section 1019.5, forthwith. The gravamen of the First Amended Cross‐Complaint (“FACC”) is as follows: The parties entered into a commercial lease for property equipped for vehicle sales, repair, and service. The lease also contained a purchase agreement for cross‐defendant's purchase of the Suzuki dealership equipment, furniture, and parts inventory in the amount of $100,000. The lease contained a bill of sale, which is allegedly attached...