Excerpt: ...aring for 3/26/18. Opposition was to be filed on or before 3/13/18, and reply Page 2 of 3 on or before 3/19/18). The court's order also provided that all members were to be provided notice at least 20 days before the hearing either via e‐mail or first‐class mail, pursuant to Civil Code section 4040, based on each member's preferred method of communication. Although the court order provide 20 days' notice the code provides 15 days' notice whic...

Excerpt: ...nc., dba Paragon Schmid Building Products. Analysis: The arbitration provision in the contract between K. Hovnanian and BSG provides that the only disputes that must be arbitrated are disputes that arise “out of this Master Subcontract . . . , including disputes involving claims made by homebuyers, . . . which involve[] a matter with economic value in excess of the jurisdictional limit of a small claims court….” (See Exh. S to decl. of Josh...

Excerpt: ...sagree with one another. Their opinions are supported by Plaintiff's medical records. Hence, there are disputed material facts as to whether defendant Dr. Ha's actions fell below the applicable standard of care and whether that alleged failure to meet the applicable standard of care caused or contributed to Plaintiff's injuries. Plaintiff presented evidence (response to Form Interrogatory 2.6) that defendant Dr. Ha was an employee of defendant Ri...

Excerpt: ... declaration was actually filed with the motion. The only evidence in support of the motion is the declaration of Field filed with the reply. The Court will not consider that evidence, because the opposing parties have not had a chance to respond to or rebut it. Because this denial is not on the merits of the motion, it is without prejudice to the filing of a second motion that is supported by evidence. Alternatively, if the Field declaration was...

Excerpt: ... through illusory modification proposals in order to charge exorbitant processing and late fees. (FAC, ¶73.) This allegation arguably constitutes an unfair business practice. Although many of the other allegations are unclear or improper, Plaintiff has stated a cause of action based on this allegation. Although, Nationstar argues that Plaintiff does not have standing to bring a UCL cause of action because he was granted a loan modification and n...

Excerpt: ..., memorandum of points and authorities, and exhibits filed on 1‐5‐18;  The defendant's opposition to the motion, and attached exhibits and transcripts, filed 1‐29‐18;  The declaration on behalf of defendant regarding the timeliness of that opposition, filed 1‐30‐18;  The plaintiff's reply, filed 2‐5‐18;  The declaration on behalf of plaintiff, filed 2‐9‐18;  The declaration of Sherise Histen filed 3‐12‐18. �...

Excerpt: ...ary approval on May 21, 2018, at 8:30 A.M. in this department. If a second motion is filed at least three court days before that date, the Court is likely to vacate that status conference. Page 3 of 7 Analysis: New Evidence With Reply New evidence is generally not permitted with reply papers. (Jay v. Mahaffey (2013) 218 Cal.App.4th 1522, 1537‐1538.) Plaintiff submits his declaration and deposition transcripts, as well as the supplemental declar...

Excerpt: ...tired faculty member. There are no material facts are in dispute and the parties agree the petition raises a question of law. There is no administrative record. Request for Judicial Notice: The Request for Judicial Notice is granted pursuant to Evidence Code 452(b) and (c). “It is settled principle that administrative agencies have only such powers as have been conferred upon them, expressly or by implication, by constitution or statute.” (Fe...

Excerpt: ...reponderance of the evidence that a defendant is liable for financial abuse of an elder, in addition to compensatory damages and all other remedies otherwise provided by law, the court shall award to plaintiff reasonable attorney's fees and costs. (Emphasis added.) This is a unilateral fee‐shifting provision under which fees may be awarded to a prevailing plaintiff but not a prevailing defendant in order to encourage the effective enforcement o...

Excerpt: ...ned on a Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. (The Court did note correspondence between Plaintiff and defendant Priamos concerning attorney's fees and that defendant Priamos filed the Motion to Dismiss after the correspondence.) A party who qualifies for a fee award should recover for all hours reasonably spent, including those spent on fee related matters unless special circumstances would render an award unjust. (Serrano v. Unruh (1982) 32 Ca...

Excerpt: ... had moved out of his house after his mortgage lender threatened to foreclose, moved back into his house in September 2014 and expended funds to repair damages to his house that were made while the house was vacant based upon Ocwen's representation in April 2014 that Ocwen would consider his application for a loan modification. (TAC ¶¶ 56‐59.) The demurrer is based upon the grounds that the 2nd cause of action fails to state facts sufficient ...

Excerpt: ...Maher then took Wolcott's default on 09/28/2017. Default Judgment was entered on 1/15/2017. The motion is based upon the grounds that the default and default judgment were entered as result of Wolcott's excusable neglect. For the following reasons, the motion is denied: Wolcott has not shown that the default and default judgment were entered as result of his excusable neglect. Wolcott states that he did not file an answer because he thought that ...

Excerpt: ...ndant Priamos' and defendant Thorson's requests to apportion the remaining costs are DENIED. Item 1e, 1f and 1h‐ Fees Related to Pro Hac Vice Applications: Plaintiff failed to demonstrate, discuss, or explain why the skill and expertise of an out of state attorney were reasonably necessary to the litigation. Item 16a,16c and 16g‐ Mileage to Appear for Hearings and Courtcall: Plaintiff claimed $177 in fees as mileage for its attorney to appear...

Excerpt: ...ns on the ground of lack of jurisdiction of the court over him or her. When a defendant challenges the court's personal jurisdiction on the ground of improper service of process the burden is on the plaintiff to prove the existence of jurisdiction by proving the facts requisite to an effective service.” (Summers v. McClanahan (2006) 140 Cal. App. 4th 403, 413.) In this case, the Summons and Complaint were served on August 1, 2017. The Page ...

Excerpt: ...rogatories 2 ‐ 15, 18 ‐ 20, 22 ‐ 25, 27 ‐ 28, and 31 ‐ 42. Sanctions in the amount of $100.00 are imposed against Plaintiff and shall be payable to Defendant within 30 days. Plaintiff's objections to the Special Interrogatories are largely without merit. With respect to each Special Interrogatory to which Plaintiff actually provided an answer in whole or part, the answer was preceded by the phrase, “to the extent it can be answered,�...

Excerpt: ... that the Opposition is untimely. The Court also notes that Defendant failed to comply with the meet and confer requirements under CCP § 435.5 prior to filing the motion. The hearing on the motion to strike was continued to 8:30 a.m. on April 20, 2018 in Department 7. Defendant is ordered to meet and confer with Plaintiff by phone or in person for the purpose of determining whether an agreement can be reached that would resolve the objections ra...

Excerpt: ...ontract. Civil Code §1559 specifically allows a third party beneficiary to enforce the contract. 2COA (Elder Financial Abuse): The complaint only contains conclusory allegations. This COA requires factual allegations to support the assertions. Rice v. Clark (2002) 120 Cal.Rptr.2d 522, 527, as cited by the Plaintiff does not address pleading issues. 3COA (Fiduciary Duty): Plaintiffs fail to cite to any authority to support this assertion. 4COA (C...

Excerpt: ...g fee. C.C.P. §425.16 provides a summary procedure by which a defendant can dispose of a lawsuit brought primarily to chill the valid exercise of the constitutional rights of free speech and right to petition, at the pleading stage to avoid the cost and delay of lengthy litigation. Soukup v. Law Offices of Herbert Hafif (2006) 39 Cal.4th 260, 278. Anti‐SLAPP motions to strike have two prongs. First, the moving party must show that the anti‐S...

Excerpt: ... this litigation is something that would never have been in FCA's control – an aftermarket alteration. Finally, DCH and Wells Fargo correctly assert that a good faith settlement does not preclude their statutory indemnity cause of action under Civil Code §1792. ...

Excerpt: ...limit waives the right to compel a further response to the interrogatories. (CCP §§ 2030.300(c); see Vidal Sassoon, Inc. v. Sup.Ct. (Halpern) (1983) 147 Cal.App.3d 681, 685.) The 45‐day time limit is mandatory and “jurisdictional” (court has no authority to grant a late motion). (Sexton v. Sup.Ct. (Mullikin Med. Ctr.) (1997) 58 Cal.App.4th 1403, 1410.) The 45‐day deadline runs from the date the verified response is served, not from the ...

Excerpt: ...iled this motion timely. This argument fails. The mandatory relief provisions of section 473(b) are in pertinent part as follows: “[T]he court shall, whenever an application for relief is made no more than six months after entry of judgment, is in proper form, and is accompanied by an attorney's sworn affidavit attesting to his or her mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or neglect, vacate any (1) resulting default entered by the clerk against his ...

Excerpt: ...itle to Plaintiff's real and personal property through an alleged fraudulent investment scam. Demurring Defendant, 5AIF Sycamore 1, LLC (“5AIF”) loaned money that was used to purchase one of subject pieces of real Page 3 of 4 property, the Shadow Mountain property, and is named on and demurs to the 10th cause of action for false promise, 14th cause of action for declaratory relief, 15th cause of action to quiet title and 16th cause of action ...

Excerpt: ... leave to amend. Plaintiffs plead ultimate facts to support their fourth and fifth cause of action for negligence and products liability. See CCP § 425.10; Doe v. City of Los Angeles (2007) 42 Cal.4th 53, 550; C.A. v. William S. Hart Union High School Dist. (2012) 53 Cal.4th 861, 872. However, the sixth cause of action for breach of warranties fails because there is no allegation that Corona sold the allegedly defective Tire to Decedent or Plain...

Excerpt: ...g, LLC agreed “to provide Premier Passover with temporary Event and Banquet staff…” for a 7‐day Passover celebration at the Westin Mission Hills Resort in Rancho Mirage in April, 2014. (SAC, Exh. A; SAC ¶ 24.) Spherion alleges that Spherion is a partnership, that Defendants Barry and Simon Werner are the owners of D KMR Tours, D Baruch Erblich is the owner of Defendant Afikoman Tours, that all are partners in Premier Passover a partnersh...

Excerpt: ...n were denied as compared to the harm the defendant would be likely to suffer if the preliminary injunction were issued.” [Smith v. Adventist Health System/West (2010) 182 Cal.App.4th 729, 749.) This test functions on a sliding scale, such that a greater showing on one factor will mean less is required on the other. (Butt v. State of Calif. (1992) 4 Cal.4th 668, 678.) The evidence supports that there is a likelihood of Plaintiff prevailing on t...