Search by Keyword:
Start Date:
End Date:
Tip: Wrap text in quotation marks when searching for phrases (e.g. "motion to dismiss").

1411 Results

Location: Placer x
2019.4.18 Motion to Amend Expert Witness Disclosure 202
Location: Placer
Judge: Wachob, Charles D
Hearing Date: 2019.4.18
Excerpt: ... Tentative Rulings Page 3 of 30 expert witness whom that party has subsequently retained. (Code of Civil Procedure section 2034.610.) The court looks to several factors when considering the motion, which include whether the moving party will be prejudiced by the amendment. (Code of Civil Procedure section 2034.620.) Initially, defendants have made a sufficient showing to support the need to amend their expert witness disclosure based upon the abr...
2019.4.18 Motion to Compel Responses, Production of Docs, to Deem Matters Admitted, for Sanctions 738
Location: Placer
Judge: Wachob, Charles D
Hearing Date: 2019.4.18
Excerpt: ...ils to submit a sufficient declaration showing Turner was properly served PLACER COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT THURSDAY, CIVIL LAW AND MOTION DEPARTMENT 42 THE HONORABLE CHARLES D. WACHOB TENTATIVE RULINGS FOR APRIL 18, 2019 AT 8:30 A.M. PLACER SUPERIOR COURT – DEPARTMENT 42 Thursday Civil Law and Motion – Tentative Rulings Page 4 of 30 written discovery for this litigation. Furthermore, Turner has presented sufficient evidence to contradict proper s...
2019.4.18 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 994
Location: Placer
Judge: Wachob, Charles D
Hearing Date: 2019.4.18
Excerpt: ...sor's website. Defendant Sero Amusement Company (Sero) objects to the entirety of these documents as either (1) having an improper showing the documents were actually recorded, (2) inadmissible hearsay, and (3) improper foundation. None of these objections are well taken. The recorded documents submitted to the court include certifications from the Placer County Clerk‐Recorder's Office, sufficiently establishing they were recorded. While Sero i...
2019.4.18 Demurrer 742
Location: Placer
Judge: Wachob, Charles D
Hearing Date: 2019.4.18
Excerpt: ...m. (In re Emery's Estate (1962) 199 Cal.App.2d 22.) The current guardian ad litem cannot simply withdraw from the action. He must bring a noticed motion and request a hearing seeking to withdraw along with discussing why a new guardian ad litem should not be appointed. (Ibid.) The court declines to consider any filings by plaintiff until such time as the issues surrounding the appointed guardian ad litem have been properly addressed. PLACER COUNT...
2019.4.18 Demurrer 304
Location: Placer
Judge: Wachob, Charles D
Hearing Date: 2019.4.18
Excerpt: ...chool (1996) 50 Cal.App.4th 726, 733.) All properly pleaded facts are assumed to be true as well as those that are judicially noticeable. (Blank v. Kirwan (1985) 39 Cal.3d 311, 318; Gomes v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. (2011) 192 Cal.App.4th 1149, 1153.) Plaintiff's complaint alleges six separate causes of action. The allegations within each claim are disjointed, partially illegible, and conclusory in nature, failing to sufficiently allege facts...
2019.4.16 Demurrer 123
Location: Placer
Judge: Jacques, Michael A
Hearing Date: 2019.4.16
Excerpt: .... The court assumes the truth of all facts properly pleaded, and accepts as true all facts that may be implied or reasonably inferred from facts expressly alleged, unless they are contradicted by judicially noticed facts. Evans v. City of Berkeley (2006) 38 Cal.4th 1, 6. However, the court does not assume the truth of contentions, deductions, or conclusions of facts or law. Id. The City's demurrer is sustained as to the first cause of action for ...
2019.4.16 Motion for Attorneys' Fees 887
Location: Placer
Judge: Jacques, Michael A
Hearing Date: 2019.4.16
Excerpt: ...zes the recovery of attorneys' fees to a buyer who prevails in an action under that section, “determined by the court to have been reasonably incurred by the buyer in connection with the commencement and prosecution of such action.” Plaintiff is the prevailing party in this action, and entitled to attorneys' fees pursuant to this statute. Plaintiff asserts that the attorneys' fees billed by his counsel in this action total $24,000. Plaintiff ...
2019.4.16 Demurrer 641
Location: Placer
Judge: Jacques, Michael A
Hearing Date: 2019.4.16
Excerpt: ...legal sufficiency of the pleadings, not the truth of the plaintiff's allegations or the accuracy of the described conduct. Bader v. Anderson (2009) 179 Cal.App.4th 775, 787. The allegations in the pleadings are deemed to be true no matter how improbable the allegations may seem. Del E. Webb Corp. v. Structural Materials Co. (1981) 123 Cal.App.3d 593, 604. The court assumes the truth of all facts properly pleaded, and accepts as true all facts tha...
2019.4.11 Motion for Disqualification 646
Location: Placer
Judge: Wachob, Charles D
Hearing Date: 2019.4.11
Excerpt: ...d the opposition papers plaintiff filed to the ex parte application on March 22, 2019. Ruling on Defendant's Request to Present Oral Testimony On April 5, 2019, defendant filed a “Notice of Intention to Introduce Oral Testimony at hearing to Disqualify Counsel”. Defendant failed to submit an application seeking the introduction of oral testimony as required under California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1306. Further, the notice fails to sufficientl...
2019.4.2 Motion to Quash Deposition for Production of Records 607
Location: Placer
Judge: Jacques, Michael A
Hearing Date: 2019.4.2
Excerpt: ...esses of the individual and/or company associated with the telephone number, a record of all phone calls made or received by that number, a record of all text messages, including the messages themselves, sent by or received by that number, 2 and the billing and payment records regarding same, and any further records of telephone numbers associated with Kammrin Bernard from April 1, 2009 to October 31, 2017. (Declaration of Erin Scharg, ¶ 4, Exh....
2019.4.2 OSC Re Preliminary Injunction 619
Location: Placer
Judge: Jacques, Michael A
Hearing Date: 2019.4.2
Excerpt: ...hereas Charity has filed notice that he does not oppose issuance of the preliminary injunction. The court may grant a preliminary injunction when it appears from the complaint that the plaintiff is entitled to the demanded relief and the plaintiff would suffer irreparable injury if the enjoined action were allowed to proceed. Code Civ. Proc. § 526(a). When determining whether to issue a preliminary injunction, the court weighs the likelihood of ...
2019.4.2 Demurrer 131
Location: Placer
Judge: Jacques, Michael A
Hearing Date: 2019.4.2
Excerpt: ...rt assumes the truth of all facts properly pleaded, and accepts as true all facts that may be implied or reasonably inferred from facts expressly alleged, unless they are contradicted by judicially noticed facts. Evans v. City of Berkeley (2006) 38 Cal.4th 1, 6. However, the court does not assume the truth of contentions, deductions, or conclusions of facts or law. Id. Defendant argues that plaintiff's claims in this action are barred by the doct...
2019.4.2 Demurrer 141
Location: Placer
Judge: Jacques, Michael A
Hearing Date: 2019.4.2
Excerpt: ...e allegations in the pleadings are deemed to be true no matter how improbable the allegations may seem. Del E. Webb Corp. v. Structural Materials Co. (1981) 123 Cal.App.3d 593, 604. The court assumes the truth of all facts properly pleaded, and accepts as true all facts that may be implied or reasonably inferred from facts expressly alleged, unless they are contradicted by judicially noticed facts. Evans v. City of Berkeley (2006) 38 Cal.4th 1, 6...
2019.4.2 Motion for Good Faith Settlement Determination 407
Location: Placer
Judge: Jacques, Michael A
Hearing Date: 2019.4.2
Excerpt: ...il Procedure section 877.6. Motion for Summary Judgment Defendant City of Auburn's motion for summary judgment is dropped in light of the settlement agreement entered into between the City and plaintiff. Motion to Compel Further Deposition Testimony Defendant City of Auburn's motion to compel further deposition testimony is dropped in light of the settlement agreement entered into between the City and plaintiff. ...
2019.3.7 Motion to Vacate Judgment 674
Location: Placer
Judge: Jones, Michael W
Hearing Date: 2019.3.7
Excerpt: ...ent with or supported by the facts in the case. (Code of Civil Procedure section 663(1); see Glen Hill Farm, LLC v. California Horse Racing Bd. (2010) 189 Cal.App.4th 1296, 1302.) A motion to vacate does not allow for a reweighing of the facts. (Simac Design, Inc. v. Alciati (1979) 92 Cal.App.3d 146, 153.) Defendant has failed to make a sufficient showing the judgment is based upon an incorrect or erroneous legal basis. Plaintiff's sister state j...
2019.3.7 Motion to Compel Written Discovery, to Establish Admissions, Request for Sanctions 958
Location: Placer
Judge: Wachob, Charles D
Hearing Date: 2019.3.7
Excerpt: ...l interrogatories, set one; and (3) request for production of documents, set one, by March 29, 2019. The request is denied as to the request for admissions. Defendant has made a sufficient showing that responses have been provided to plaintiff. PLACER COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT THURSDAY, CIVIL LAW AND MOTION DEPARTMENT 42 THE HONORABLE CHARLES D. WACHOB TENTATIVE RULINGS FOR MARCH 7, 2019 AT 8:30 A.M. PLACER SUPERIOR COURT – DEPARTMENT 42 Thursday C...
2019.3.7 Motion to Compel Further Responses 890
Location: Placer
Judge: Wachob, Charles D
Hearing Date: 2019.3.7
Excerpt: ...ition is wrong or to arrive at a solution without involving the court. Defendant's motion seeks to compel further responses to a single RPD, RPD no. 27. The RPD requests the following: All DOCUMENTS, including, medical and psychological reports and records, prepared by House Psychiatric Clinic, Inc., which reflect, memorialize, refer to, or otherwise RELATE TO any treatment, opinion, or diagnosis of YOUR purported injuries alleged in the COMPLAIN...
2019.3.7 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 936
Location: Placer
Judge: Wachob, Charles D
Hearing Date: 2019.3.7
Excerpt: ...pplemental declaration of Jolita Mikuleniene is not properly executed under Code of Civil Procedure section 2015.5 as the declaration is not executed under the penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California. Defendant's motion for summary judgment or, in the alternative, summary adjudication is continued to March 28, 2019 at 8:30 a.m. in Department 42. Defendant may submit an amended declaration, properly executed under Code of Civi...
2019.3.7 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 292
Location: Placer
Judge: Wachob, Charles D
Hearing Date: 2019.3.7
Excerpt: ...the papers submitted show that there is no triable issue as to any material fact and the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” (Code of Civil Procedure §437c(c).) The trial court engages in a specific analysis when reviewing a motion for summary judgment. First, it must define the scope of the motion by looking to the operative pleading. The pleadings serve as the “outer measure of materiality” for a motion for summar...
2019.3.5 Motion to Set Aside Default, Judgment 965
Location: Placer
Judge: Jacques, Michael A
Hearing Date: 2019.3.5
Excerpt: ...alleges that James Allen, on behalf of himself and as agent for Marie Allen, executed the operative contract which was subsequently breached by the defendants. Plaintiff alleges damages of $14,908. James Allen was subsequently dismissed from the lawsuit. A proof of service of summons filed December 8, 2014, states that Marie Allen was personally served with the first amended complaint and summons on November 25, 2014, at 3:25 p.m. Allen denies th...
2019.3.5 Motion to Modify Preliminary Injunction Order 825
Location: Placer
Judge: Jacques, Michael A
Hearing Date: 2019.3.5
Excerpt: ...ices, Inc. and Dennis F. Graham are hereby enjoined from directly or indirectly (1) competing with plaintiff in the business of providing heating, ventilation and air conditioning services to national retail commercial customers; (2) soliciting plaintiff's national retail commercial heating, ventilation and air conditioning service customers whose business and contracts were transferred to plaintiff pursuant to the Asset Purchase Agreement; and (...
2019.3.5 Motion to Compel Further Responses 053
Location: Placer
Judge: Jacques, Michael A
Hearing Date: 2019.3.5
Excerpt: ...s' (“SCP's”) responses to the requests at issue do not comply with the Code of Civil Procedure, as SCP does not clearly state whether it is complying with the request, or whether it is unable to comply. For example, in response to Request No. 1, SCP sets forth several objections, then states that “to the extent that relevant non‐privileged documents otherwise subject to production and responsive to this request actually exist within the R...
2019.3.5 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 483
Location: Placer
Judge: Jacques, Michael A
Hearing Date: 2019.3.5
Excerpt: ...nstitute a cause of action against the defendant. Code Civ. Proc. § 438(c). The grounds for the motion must appear on the face of the challenged pleading, or be based on facts which may be judicially noticed. Code Civ. Proc. § 438(d). Nationstar's motion is granted without leave to amend as to plaintiffs' first cause of action for violation of Civil Code section 2923.5. The sole remedy for noncompliance with this statute is postponement of a fo...
2019.3.5 Motion for Approval of PAGA Settlement 271
Location: Placer
Judge: Jacques, Michael A
Hearing Date: 2019.3.5
Excerpt: ..., failure to provide meal and rest breaks, failure to provide accurate wage statements, and violations under the Private Attorneys General Act (“PAGA”). PAGA “authorizes an employee to bring an action for civil penalties on behalf of the state against his or her employer for Labor Code violations committed against the employee and fellow employees, with most of the proceeds of that litigation going to the state. Iskanian v. CLS Trans. L.A.,...
2019.3.5 Demurrer 141
Location: Placer
Judge: Jacques, Michael A
Hearing Date: 2019.3.5
Excerpt: ...ded complaint as Exhibit A. Exhibit A is a document titled “verified complaint” (not first amended complaint). It appears that plaintiffs then attempted to file another version of the complaint, this one titled “verified first amended complaint”, which was rejected for filing. The court presumes that defendants' demurrer relates to the “verified complaint” attached as Exhibit A to the notice of errata, which though not labeled as such...

1411 Results

Per page

Pages