Search by Keyword:
Start Date:
End Date:
Tip: Wrap text in quotation marks when searching for phrases (e.g. "motion to dismiss").

1408 Results

Location: Placer x
219.8.30 Petition for Writ of Mandate 098
Location: Placer
Judge: Jones, Michael W
Hearing Date: 219.8.30
Excerpt: ...City of Auburn's answer to the petition filed December 13, 2018, is deemed the answer to the petition as verified June 15, 2019. The court sustains petitioner's objections to Exhibit A of the request for judicial notice, and the declaration of Jon R. Di Cristina. Respondent City of Auburn's request for judicial notice is denied as to Exhibit A, and granted as to Exhibit B. Petitioner Z Brothers Investment, LLC petitions for a writ of administrati...
2024.04.23 Motion for Attorney Fees 945
Location: Placer
Judge: Hirashima, Trisha
Hearing Date: 2024.04.23
Excerpt: ...ns arising u nder the chapter. (Civ. Code § 1794, subd. (a).) If the buyer successfully prevails in their action, he or she may recover “attorney's fees based on actual time expended, determined by the court to have been reasonably incurred by the buyer in connection with the commencement and prosecution of such action.” (Id. at subd. (d).) The parties entered into a settlement agreement that stipulated plaintiff was the prevailing party and...
2024.04.23 Demurrer, Motion to Strike 463
Location: Placer
Judge: Hirashima, Trisha
Hearing Date: 2024.04.23
Excerpt: ...nt rule precludes defendant's liability; and the complaint is uncertain. A demurrer tests the legal sufficiency of the pleading, not the truth of the plaintiff's allegations or accuracy of the described conduct. (Bader v. Anderson (2009) 179 Cal.App.4th 775, 787.) T he allegations in the pleading are deemed to be true no matter how improbable the allegations may seem. (Del E. Webb Corp. v. Structural Materials Co. (1981) 123 Cal.App.3d 593, 604.)...
2024.04.23 Demurrer 839
Location: Placer
Judge: Hirashima, Trisha
Hearing Date: 2024.04.23
Excerpt: ... the truth of the allegations or the accuracy of the described conduct. (Bader v. Anderson (6th Dist. 2009) 179 Cal.App.4th 775, 787.) The allegations in the pleadings are deemed true no matter how improbable they may seem. (Del E. Webb Corp. v. Structural Materials Co. (2d Dist. 1981) 123 Cal.App.3d 593, 604.) However, the court does not assume the truth of contentions, deductions, or conclusions of facts or law. (Evans v. City of Berkeley (2006...
2024.04.23 Motions to Seal, for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 323
Location: Placer
Judge: Hirashima, Trisha
Hearing Date: 2024.04.23
Excerpt: ...ical Clinic (“N CFMC”), specifically: - - - - Mr. Miller's memorandum of points and authorities in opposition to defendant NCFMC's motion for summary adjudication; Mr. Miller's compendium of evidence in support of plaintiff's opposition to NCFMC's motion for summary adjud ication; Mr. Miller's separate statement in opposition to NCFMC's motion for summary adjudication; and Mr. Miller's declaration in opposition to NCFMC's motion for summary ...
2024.04.18 Petition for Writ of Mandate 201
Location: Placer
Judge: Dehr, Christine S
Hearing Date: 2024.04.18
Excerpt: ...ue to petiti oner's misdemeanor violation of Penal Code section 311.3. Individuals may file writs of mandate to compel public agencies to perform acts required by law. (People v. Picklesimer (2010) 48 Cal.4th 330, 339.) In order to obtain relief, “a petitioner must demonstrate (1) no ‘plain, speedy, and adequate' alternative remedy exists (Code Civ. Proc., § 1086); (2) ‘a clear, present, . . . ministerial duty on the part of the responden...
2024.04.18 Motion for Attorney Fees 450
Location: Placer
Judge: Dehr, Christine S
Hearing Date: 2024.04.18
Excerpt: ...he court must make an order awarding attorney's fees and costs to the propounding party unless: “(1) an objection to the request was sustained or a response to it was waived under Section 2033.290; (2) The admission sought was of no substantial importance; (3) The party failing to make the admission had reasonable ground to believe that that party would prevail on the matter; [or] (4) There was other good reason for the failure to admit.” (Id...
2024.04.16 Motion to Strike or Dismiss Complaint or Abate Action 107
Location: Placer
Judge: Hirashima, Trisha
Hearing Date: 2024.04.16
Excerpt: ...ect matter jurisdiction over a certain issue assumes it to the exclusion of all others and has the power to enjoin proceedings that are filed subsequent in time. (Franklin & Franklin v. 7 -Eleven Owners for Fair Franchising (2000) 85 Cal.App.4th 1168, 1175.) The rule of exclusive concurrent jurisdiction seeks to avoid two cases pertaining to the same subject matter pending in different courts at the same time, needlessly taking up court resource...
2024.04.16 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 365
Location: Placer
Judge: Hirashima, Trisha
Hearing Date: 2024.04.16
Excerpt: ...age, the notice of motion and motion, exhibits, declarations, attachments, table of contents, table of authorities, or proof of service. Additionally, the court notes defendants' objections to additional evidence submitted by plaintiff does not conform to the requir ements in California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1354 because it does not cite to any legal authority for the objections. Further, defendants' response to plaintiff's additional material f...
2024.04.16 Motion for Attorney Fees 408
Location: Placer
Judge: Hirashima, Trisha
Hearing Date: 2024.04.16
Excerpt: ...ed an opposition indicating he had only been served by electronic service. The proof of service respondent filed February 16, 2024 shows service by both U.S. mail and by electronic mail. Accordingly, while electronic service on a self -represented litigant who has not consent ed to electronic service is insufficient, Code Civ. Proc., § 1010.6, it appears the motion was properly served by mail. Nonetheless, the court exercises its discretion and...
2024.04.16 Demurrer to FAC 979
Location: Placer
Judge: Hirashima, Trisha
Hearing Date: 2024.04.16
Excerpt: ...th of statem ents contained in deposition transcripts is not subject to judicial notice, and the court declines to consider the deposition transcripts submitted by the parties for the purpose of ruling on the demurrer. Ruling on Demurrer Defendants Kaiser Foundation Hospitals and The Permanente Medical Group, Inc.'s (collectively, “defendants”) demurrer to plaintiff's first amended complaint (“FAC”) is sustained with leave to amend in it...
2024.04.11 Motion for Terminating Sanctions 844
Location: Placer
Judge: Dehr, Christine S
Hearing Date: 2024.04.11
Excerpt: ...ising o ut of, plaintiff's divorce or relationship with his family, ex -wife, current partner, and children. (Code Civ. Proc. § 2023.030, subd. (d)(1).) Defendants request the court to issue a terminating sanction against plaintiff for his misuse of the discover y process. Courts may impose sanctions pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure, section 2023.030 against a party who misuses the discovery process. (Code Civ. Proc. § 2023.030) Examples of ...
2024.04.09 Demurrer to FAC 455
Location: Placer
Judge: Hirashima, Trisha
Hearing Date: 2024.04.09
Excerpt: .... (Code Civ. Proc. , § 430.10, subds. (b), (e), (f).) “Uncertain” is defined as “ambiguous and unintelligible.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 430.10, subd. (f).) A demurrer tests the legal sufficiency of the pleadings, not the truth of the allegations or the accuracy of the described conduct. (Bader v. Anderson (2009) 179 Cal.App.4th 775, 787.) The allegations in the pleadings are deemed true no matter how improbable they may seem. (Del E. Webb ...
2024.04.09 Motion to Seal, for Summary Judgment, to Stay or Continue Trial 323
Location: Placer
Judge: Hirashima, Trisha
Hearing Date: 2024.04.09
Excerpt: ...iding interest wi ll be prejudiced if certain records are not sealed. The court further finds that the proposed sealing of information is narrowly tailored, and that no less restrictive means to achieve the identified overriding interest exists. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 2 .550(d).) The motion is granted in part and the court orders sealed the following documents only: - - - - Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Mr. Miller's Mot...
2024.04.09 Demurrer to FAC 733
Location: Placer
Judge: Hirashima, Trisha
Hearing Date: 2024.04.09
Excerpt: ...ons or accuracy o f the described conduct. (Bader v. Anderson (2009) 179 Cal.App.4th 775, 787.) The allegations in the pleading are deemed to be true no matter how improbable the allegations may seem. (Del E. Webb Corp. v. Structural Materials Co. (1981) 123 Cal.App.3d 5 93, 604.) However, “[i]f the allegations in the complaint conflict with the exhibits, we rely on and accept as true the contents of the exhibits.” (SC Manufactured Homes, In...
2024.04.02 Motion to Quash 523
Location: Placer
Judge: Hirashima, Trisha
Hearing Date: 2024.04.02
Excerpt: ...f the household . . . at least 18 years of age.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 415.20, subd. (b).) However, plaintiff contends defendants had already generally appeared in the action before they filed the instant motion to quash. “A general appearance by a party is equivalent to p ersonal service of summons on such party” and 8 thereby forfeits any objection to defective service. (Code Civ. Proc., § 410.50, subd. (a); Fireman's Fund Ins. Co. v. Sp...
2024.04.02 Motion for Leave to File SAC 323
Location: Placer
Judge: Hirashima, Trisha
Hearing Date: 2024.04.02
Excerpt: ...may permit a party to amend a pleading in the furtherance of justice and on such terms as may be just. (Code Civ. Proc., §§ 473, subd. (a)(1), 576.) Leave to amend is generally exercised liberally provided there is no showing of prejudice to the opposing party. (Howard v. County of San Diego (2010) 184 Cal.App.4th 1422, 1428; Douglas v. Superior Court (1989) 215 Cal.App.3d 155, 158.) Despite the policy of liberally allowing amendments, whether ...
2024.03.26 Motion to Strike Complaint 657
Location: Placer
Judge: Hirashima, Trisha
Hearing Date: 2024.03.26
Excerpt: ... prayer for punitive damages on the grounds the complaint, as plead, does not provide a basis for punitive damages. (Code Civ. Proc. §§ 435, 436.) Punitive damages are available “where it is proven by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant has been guilty of oppression, fraud, or malice.” (Civ. Code § 3294, subd. (a).) Malice is “conduct which is intended by the defendant to cause injury to the plaintiff or despicable conduct w...
2024.03.26 Motion to Compel Arbitration 645
Location: Placer
Judge: Hirashima, Trisha
Hearing Date: 2024.03.26
Excerpt: ... causes of action in the complaint. However, defendant is not a signatory to the retail installment sales contract (“RISC”). A non- signatory generally may not enforce an arbitration agreement. (Felisilda v. FCA US LLC (2020) 53 Cal.App.5th 486, 495.) There is, how ever, an exception to this general principle under the doctrine of equitable estoppel: “[A] nonsignatory defendant may invoke an arbitration clause to compel a signatory plaintif...
2024.03.26 Demurrer, Motion to Strike 725
Location: Placer
Judge: Hirashima, Trisha
Hearing Date: 2024.03.26
Excerpt: ...o amend afte r a defendant files a demurrer. (Code Civ. Proc., § 472.) A review of the court's file reveals plaintiff had submitted for filing a first amended complaint on March 8, 2024 which the clerk rejected, noting “Leave of court is required.” While the court file reveals defendant Ferro Automotive Group, Inc. dba Fairfield Chevrolet had already answered, one defendant answering does not affect plaintiff's statutory right to amend...
2024.03.26 Demurrer to SAC 353
Location: Placer
Judge: Hirashima, Trisha
Hearing Date: 2024.03.26
Excerpt: ...e cause of action doe s not state sufficient facts to state a negligence cause of action. A demurrer tests the legal sufficiency of the pleading, not the truth of the plaintiff's allegations or accuracy of the described conduct. (Bader v. Anderson (2009) 179 Cal.App.4th 775, 787.) The allegations in the pleading are deemed to be true no matter how improbable the allegations may seem. (Del E. Webb Corp. v. Structural Materials Co. (1981) 123 Cal.A...
2024.03.19 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 773
Location: Placer
Judge: Hirashima, Trisha
Hearing Date: 2024.03.19
Excerpt: ...o the causes of action for negligence and premises liability in plaintiff Michael Bickers's first amended complaint. A motion for summary judgment may be granted if “all the 1 papers submitted show that there is no triable issue as to any material fact and the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” (Code Civ. Proc. § 437c, subd. (c).) This is compared to summary adjudication that requires a showing that there is no meri...
2024.03.12 Motion to Compel Production of Docs 745
Location: Placer
Judge: Hirashima, Trisha
Hearing Date: 2024.03.12
Excerpt: ...eeks over ly broad records that are not calculated to lead to admissible evidence. The court agrees, as the subpoena seeks records not sufficiently limited to the 2021 vehicle collision, injuries therefrom, and treatment thereafter forming the basis of the current a ction. The subpoena is also not sufficiently limited in time, seeking records that predate the incident by approximately 7 years. The court may make an order modifying a subpoena or d...
2024.03.12 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 501
Location: Placer
Judge: Hirashima, Trisha
Hearing Date: 2024.03.12
Excerpt: ... on the Motion A party is entitled to bring a motion for summary judgment where there are no triable issues of fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. (Code Civ. Proc., § 437c, subd. (c).) The defendant bears the initial burden of establis hing that one or more elements of the cause of action cannot be established or that there is a complete defense to the cause of action. (Id. subd. (p)(2).) Only when this initial ...
2024.03.12 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 045
Location: Placer
Judge: Hirashima, Trisha
Hearing Date: 2024.03.12
Excerpt: ... sho w that there is no triable issue as to any 13 material fact and the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” (Code Civ. Proc. § 437c, subd. (c).) This is compared to summary adjudication that requires a showing that there is no merit to one or more of the causes of action. (Id. at § 437c, subd. (f)(1).) A motion for summary adjudication proceeds “in all procedural respects as a motion for summary judgment.” (Id. at...

1408 Results

Per page

Pages