Search by Keyword:
Start Date:
End Date:
Tip: Wrap text in quotation marks when searching for phrases (e.g. "motion to dismiss").

1411 Results

Location: Placer x
2019.6.14 Motion to Vacate Dismissal, Enforce Settlement Agreement 021
Location: Placer
Judge: Holley, Glenn M
Hearing Date: 2019.6.14
Excerpt: ...rdingly, the dismissal may be vacated to permit entry of judgment pursuant to the terms of the settlement. The motion to vacate dismissal is granted. The motion to enter judgment in the amount of $9,416.30 is denied. In ruling on plaintiff's prior motion to enter judgment, the court noted errors in plaintiff's calculations. Plaintiff's current motion does not acknowledge the court's prior ruling, or correct the errors. Plaintiff is not entitled t...
2019.6.14 Motion to Compel Further Discovery Responses, for Leave to Amend Complaint 831
Location: Placer
Judge: Holley, Glenn M
Hearing Date: 2019.6.14
Excerpt: ...y Responses Defendant's motion to compel further discovery responses was continued by stipulation of the parties to July 5, 2019, at 8:30 a.m. in Department 31. Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint Defendant Granite Financial Solutions, Inc. dba Granite Data Solutions' request for judicial notice is denied. Plaintiff's motion for leave to amend complaint is denied. Plaintiff moves for leave to file an amended complaint in this action to add three ...
2019.6.14 Motion for Summary Judgment 840
Location: Placer
Judge: Jones, Michael W
Hearing Date: 2019.6.14
Excerpt: ...an unlawful detainer action may be brought at any time after the answer is filed upon five days notice. Code Civ. Proc. §1170.7. The party seeking summary judgment bears the burden of showing there is no triable issue of material fact and that the party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co. (2001) 25 Cal.4th 826, 850. The moving party has the burden of showing, by affidavit, facts establishing every elemen...
2019.6.14 Demurrer 243
Location: Placer
Judge: Jones, Michael W
Hearing Date: 2019.6.14
Excerpt: ... Code Civ. Proc. § 430.10(e). A demurrer tests the legal sufficiency of the pleadings, not the truth of the plaintiff's allegations or the accuracy of the described conduct. Bader v. Anderson (2009) 179 Cal.App.4th 775, 787. The court assumes the truth of all facts properly pleaded, and accepts as true all facts that may be implied or reasonably inferred from facts expressly alleged, unless they are contradicted by judicially noticed facts. Evan...
2019.6.14 Motion to Set Aside Default 359
Location: Placer
Judge: Holley, Glenn M
Hearing Date: 2019.6.14
Excerpt: ...onditional settlement of the action with plaintiff on or about December 3, 2019. Defendant made three payments of $1,762.60 each before requesting in writing that he be permitted to skip the payment due in March 2019 because of a change in jobs. Plaintiff apparently did not respond to this request. Thereafter, on April 3, 2019, defendant informed plaintiff that he would have funds available for his next payment on April 12, 2019. Plaintiff also d...
2019.6.13 Motion for Summary Adjudication 404
Location: Placer
Judge: Wachob, Charles D
Hearing Date: 2019.6.13
Excerpt: ...– Tentative Rulings Page 9 of 12 Ruling on Motion The unopposed motion is granted. The trial court shall grant a motion for summary adjudication where a party establishes there is no merit to one or more causes of action. (Code of Civil Procedure section 437c(f)(1).) In reviewing a motion for summary adjudication, the trial court must view the supporting evidence, and inferences reasonably drawn from such evidence, in the light most favorable t...
2019.6.13 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 392
Location: Placer
Judge: Wachob, Charles D
Hearing Date: 2019.6.13
Excerpt: ...he third cause of action for negligent failure to warn, train, or educate and fifth cause of action for sexual harassment. The motion has the same function as a demurrer but is brought where the time for a demurrer has expired. (Code of Civil Procedure section 438(g); Southern California Edison Co. v. City of Victorville (2013) 217 Cal.App.4th 218, 227.) A defendant challenging a complaint must show either (1) the court has no jurisdiction over t...
2019.6.13 Motion for Attorneys' Fees 447
Location: Placer
Judge: Wachob, Charles D
Hearing Date: 2019.6.13
Excerpt: ... number of hours reasonably expended multiplied by the reasonable hourly rate. (PLCM Group v. Drexler (2000) 22 Cal.4th 1084, 1095; Serrano v. Priest (Serrano III) (1977) 20 Cal.3d 25, 48‐49.) The lodestar figure may then be adjusted, based upon factors specific to the case, to fix the fees at a fair market value. (Ibid.) Steyer Lowenthal Fees The court has carefully reviewed submitted declarations and billing statements in conjunction with the...
2019.6.13 Demurrer 190
Location: Placer
Judge: Wachob, Charles D
Hearing Date: 2019.6.13
Excerpt: ...App.4th 775, 787.) The allegations in the pleadings are deemed to be true no matter how improbable the allegations may seem. (Del E. Webb Corp. v. Structural Materials Co. (1981) 123 Cal.App.3d 593, 604.) A review of the first cause of action shows there are insufficient factual allegations to support the claim for equitable indemnity/apportionment against the cross‐defendant. The demurrer is sustained without leave to amend since cross‐compl...
2019.6.11 Motion to Compel Further Responses 913
Location: Placer
Judge: Holley, Glenn M
Hearing Date: 2019.6.11
Excerpt: ...proper. See Deyo v. Kilbourne (1978) 84 Cal.3d 771, 783. Plaintiff's responses to form interrogatory Nos. 8.6, 8.7 and 17.1 are non‐responsive. Plaintiff fails to state the dates he did not work and for which he lost income, or the manner in which he calculated the total income he alleges he lost. Further, plaintiff's responses to each request for admission were not unqualified admissions, as he denied request Nos. 2‐11. In response to specia...
2019.6.11 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 667
Location: Placer
Judge: Holley, Glenn M
Hearing Date: 2019.6.11
Excerpt: .... Cloud v. Northrop Grumman Corp. (1998) 67 Cal.App.4th 995, 999. Defendants' motion is granted with leave to amend. The complaint alleges an enforcement action under the Private Attorneys General Act of 2004, California Labor Code sections 2698 et seq. (“PAGA”) to recover civil penalties for applicable violations occurring “at any time between one year prior to the filing of this complaint until judgment”. (Complaint at 1:4‐12.) Plaint...
2019.6.11 Motion to Consolidate, to Compel Responses, to Deem Admitted 015
Location: Placer
Judge: Holley, Glenn M
Hearing Date: 2019.6.11
Excerpt: ...rial conference, and July 8, 2019, trial date set in Case No. S‐CV‐39027 are vacated. The October 18, 2019, mandatory settlement conference, October 25, 2019, civil trial conference, and November 4, 2019, trial date set in Case No. S‐CV‐40015 shall remain as set for the consolidated actions. Motion to Compel Plaintiffs' Responses to Discovery Defendants' motion to compel plaintiffs' responses to form interrogatories, special interrogatori...
2019.6.11 Petition to Compel Arbitration 771
Location: Placer
Judge: Holley, Glenn M
Hearing Date: 2019.6.11
Excerpt: ...rring to arbitration proceedings.” Rowe v. Exline (2007) 153 Cal.App.4th 1276, 1282; Laswell v. AG Seal Beach, LLC, supra, at 1405. Under both federal and state law, a threshold question for any petition to compel arbitration is whether there exists an agreement to arbitrate. Cruise v. Kroger Co. (2015) 233 Cal.App.4th 390, 396. Defendants in this case do not dispute the existence of an arbitration agreement, but argue that plaintiffs have waiv...
2019.5.30 Petition to Compel Arbitration 026
Location: Placer
Judge: Wachob, Charles D
Hearing Date: 2019.5.30
Excerpt: ...itration agreement is also a party to a pending court action or special proceeding with a third party arising out of the same transaction. (Code of Civil Procedure section 1281.2.) The arbitration statutes evidence a strong public policy in favor of arbitration that is frequently approved and enforced by the courts. (Madden v. Kaiser Foundation Hospitals (1976) 17 Cal.3d 699, 706; Laswell v. AG Seal Beach, LLC, et al. (2010) 189 Cal.App.4th 1399,...
2019.5.30 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 540
Location: Placer
Judge: Wachob, Charles D
Hearing Date: 2019.5.30
Excerpt: ...ended complaint. The claims asserted by plaintiffs include (1) medical malpractice; (2) abuse of dependent adult; (3) medical battery; and (4) loss of consortium. The trial court shall grant a motion for summary judgment if “all the papers submitted show that there is no triable issue as to any material fact and the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” (Code of Civil Procedure section 437c(c).) A party to the action may...
2019.5.23 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 890
Location: Placer
Judge: Wachob, Charles D
Hearing Date: 2019.5.23
Excerpt: ...ful termination in violation of public policy [Tameny claim]; section cause of action for disability discrimination in violation of public policy; and third cause of action for negligent failure to prevent discrimination and retaliation [FEHA]. The burden differs between the first and second causes of action as opposed to the third cause of action, which shall be discussed in further detail below. First and Second Causes of Action – Wrongful Te...
2019.5.23 Motion for Summary Adjudication 504
Location: Placer
Judge: Wachob, Charles D
Hearing Date: 2019.5.23
Excerpt: ...n is to penetrate through the pleading and expedite litigation by avoiding a needless trial on a claim. (Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co. (2001) 25 Cal.4th 826, 843, 849, 855.) The trial court conducts a specific analysis when considering any request for summary adjudication. First, the scope of the PLACER COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT THURSDAY, CIVIL LAW AND MOTION DEPARTMENT 42 THE HONORABLE CHARLES D. WACHOB TENTATIVE RULINGS FOR MAY 23, 2019 AT 8:30...
2019.5.23 Motion for Reconsideration 126
Location: Placer
Judge: Wachob, Charles D
Hearing Date: 2019.5.23
Excerpt: ...ot offering it earlier. (Mink v. Superior Court (1992) 2 Cal.App.4th 1338, 1342.) Plaintiff's PLACER COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT THURSDAY, CIVIL LAW AND MOTION DEPARTMENT 42 THE HONORABLE CHARLES D. WACHOB TENTATIVE RULINGS FOR MAY 23, 2019 AT 8:30 A.M. PLACER SUPERIOR COURT – DEPARTMENT 42 Thursday Civil Law and Motion – Tentative Rulings Page 2 of 9 supporting declaration fails to provide a sufficient explanation as to why the new evidence was no...
2019.5.23 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 660
Location: Placer
Judge: Wachob, Charles D
Hearing Date: 2019.5.23
Excerpt: ...otion The motion is granted with leave to amend. A motion for judgment on the pleadings has the same function as a demurrer but is brought when the time for a demurrer has expired. (Code of Civil Procedure section 438(g); Southern California Edison Co. v. City of Victorville (2013) 217 Cal.App.4th 218, 227.) A plaintiff bringing such a motion must establish the complaint states facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action and the answer does ...
2019.5.9 Motion for Summary Adjudication 682
Location: Placer
Judge: Wachob, Charles D
Hearing Date: 2019.5.9
Excerpt: ...ks summary adjudication of plaintiff's request for exemplary/punitive damages under Civil Code section 3340. A motion for summary adjudication may be brought against a claim for damages, specified in Civil Code section 3294, where there is no merit to the punitive damages claim. The moving party bears the initial burden of establishing that one or elements of the damages claim cannot be established. (Id. at 437c(p)(2).) Only when this initial bur...
2019.5.7 Motion for Attorneys' Fees 299
Location: Placer
Judge: Jacques, Michael A
Hearing Date: 2019.5.7
Excerpt: ...mes Thompson's purchase of a 2013 Dodge Dart. The complaint in this action was filed March 28, 2017. The parties settled the case on September 24, 2018, just prior to commencement of trial. Defendants agreed to pay plaintiff $117,000 in settlement of the action. Civil Code section 1794(d) authorizes the recovery of attorneys' fees to a buyer who prevails in an action under that section, “determined by the court to have been reasonably incurred ...
2019.5.7 Joinder to Motion to Set Aside Foreclosure 015
Location: Placer
Judge: Jacques, Michael A
Hearing Date: 2019.5.7
Excerpt: ...plaintiffs' joinder, the same result would obtain. The motion filed in SCV‐39027 appears to seek judgment with respect to an equitable remedy pleaded in that action. No authority is provided for the ability of the court to issue the requested order in the current procedural context. Diamond v. Superior Court (2013) 217 Cal.App.4th 1172, cited in support of the motion, is not on point as that case involved the denial of a summary judgment motion...
2019.5.2 Motion for Preliminary Injunction, Appointment of Receiver 662
Location: Placer
Judge: Wachob, Charles D
Hearing Date: 2019.5.2
Excerpt: ... in their entirety. Ruling on Motion The motion is granted. An action by a secured lender for specific performance of an assignment of rents provision in a deed of trust, mortgage, or separate assignment document. The appointment may be continued after entry of a judgment for specific performance if appropriate to protect, operate, or maintain real property encumbered by a deed of trust or mortgage or to collect rents therefrom while a pending no...
2019.5.2 Demurrer 986
Location: Placer
Judge: Wachob, Charles D
Hearing Date: 2019.5.2
Excerpt: ... for general whistleblower violations under Labor Code section 1102.5. A demurrer is reviewed based upon well‐ established principles. A defendant may demur to a complaint where the pleading does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. (Code of Civil Procedure section 430.10(e).) The demurrer functions as a test regarding the legal sufficiency of the pleading; it does not address the truth of the allegations or accuracy of t...
2019.5.2 Demurrer 976
Location: Placer
Judge: Wachob, Charles D
Hearing Date: 2019.5.2
Excerpt: ...egations or accuracy of the described conduct. (Bader v. Anderson (2009) 179 Cal.App.4th 775, 787.) For the purposes of a demurrer, the allegations in the pleading are deemed to be true no matter how improbable they may seem. (Del E. Webb Corp. v. Structural Materials Co. (1981) 123 Cal.App.3d 593, 604.) The court reviews the FAC keeping these principles in mind. A review of the FAC, when the pleading is read as a whole, shows plaintiff has plead...

1411 Results

Per page

Pages