Search by Keyword:
Start Date:
End Date:
Tip: Wrap text in quotation marks when searching for phrases (e.g. "motion to dismiss").

930 Results

Clear Search Parameters x
Location: Orange County x
Judge: Lee, Richard x
2023.11.30 Motion for Entry of Judgment 135
Location: Orange County
Judge: Lee, Richard
Hearing Date: 2023.11.30
Excerpt: ... include a finding that Keller and are jointly and severally liable in the amount of $9,239.68 (the amount of the arbitration award) plus costs in the amount of $1,296.75; and that 1- 800-Battery is also liable for an additional $38,641.50 plus prejudgment interest and attorneys fees in the amounts of $25,518.40 and respectively. As a preliminary matter, the court declines to consider the late opposition filed by because 1-8W is not entitled to t...
2023.11.30 Demurrer, Motion to Strike 319
Location: Orange County
Judge: Lee, Richard
Hearing Date: 2023.11.30
Excerpt: ...e sections 451(a), 452(c) and (h), and 453: 1. A copy of the California Department of Insurance ("CDI") license information for Defendant Bele Nguyen retrieved from the CDI's website, accessed on July 1, 2023. 2. The CDI issued to license OC54331 to Bele Thi Nguyen. 3. Bele Thi Nguyen maintains a current property license with the CDI. 4. Bele Thi Nguyen has an authorized agent of State Farm General Insurance Company for property and casualty as o...
2023.11.30 Demurrer 161
Location: Orange County
Judge: Lee, Richard
Hearing Date: 2023.11.30
Excerpt: ...pliance, the governmental entity can request the court to take judicial notice under Evidence Code section 452, subdivision (c) that the entity's records do not show compliance." (Gong v. City Page 20 of 42 of Rosemead (2014) 226 Cal.App.4th 353, 375.) Similarly, a court may take judicial notice that public records do not contain a claim, where a "[government] employee familiar with the records...searched the records and so declared." (Fowler v. ...
2023.11.16 Motion to Disqualify Counsel 692
Location: Orange County
Judge: Lee, Richard
Hearing Date: 2023.11.16
Excerpt: ...er persons connected with its proceedings in furtherance of Page 10 of 35 justice. Disqualification may be ordered as a prophylactic measure against a prospective ethical violation likely to have a substantial continuing effect on future proceedings." (Doe v. Yim (2020) 55 Cal.App.5th 573, 581 (citations omitted).) Plaintiff's motion is made on the grounds that CF's representation of Defendants in these related actions violates California Rules o...
2023.11.16 Motion to Deem RFAs Admitted, for Monetary Sanctions 627
Location: Orange County
Judge: Lee, Richard
Hearing Date: 2023.11.16
Excerpt: ...s for admission are directed fails to serve a timely response, the party waives any objection to the requests. The requesting party may also move for an order that the genuineness of documents and the truth of any matters s#cified in the Page 26 of 35 requests be deemed admitted. Civ. Proc. S 2033.280(a)-(b).) The court shall deem the matters admitted "unless it finds that the party to whom the requests for admission have been directed has served...
2023.11.16 Motion to Compel Arbitration 369
Location: Orange County
Judge: Lee, Richard
Hearing Date: 2023.11.16
Excerpt: ...ufacturer under the d'Ntrine of equitable estoppel. More recently, Div. 8 of the Second District in Ford Motor Warranty Cases v. Ford Motor Co. (2023) 89 Cal.App.5th 1324 (rev. granted 7/19/2023) and Div. 7 of the Second District Montemapr v. Ford Motor Co. (2023) 92 Cal.App.5th 958, 310 Cal.Rptr.3d 82 (June 25, 2023) disagreed with the reasoning in Felisilda and concluded that the manufacturer was not entitled to enforce the arbitration agreemen...
2023.11.16 Motion for Summary Judgment 581
Location: Orange County
Judge: Lee, Richard
Hearing Date: 2023.11.16
Excerpt: ...tion has no merit or that there is no defense to the action or proceeding." (Code Civ. Proc., S "The motion for summary judgment shall be granted if all the papers submitted show that there is no triable issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. In determining if the papers show that there is no triable issue as to any material fact, the court shall consider all of the evidence set forth...
2023.11.16 Motion for Right to Attach Order and Writ of Attachment 839
Location: Orange County
Judge: Lee, Richard
Hearing Date: 2023.11.16
Excerpt: ... Company; Blue Shield of California; Cigna Healthcare of California, Inc.; Humana Health Plan of California, Inc.; and United Healthcare of California to secure $ü311.93, including estimated costs of and estimated allowable attorney fees of $12,Cü3. Plaintiff asserts that it executed an Offce Lease Agreement with Defendant on or about April 30, 2015 (the "Agreement"); that Plaintiff has fully performed all obligations required of it Page 16 of ...
2023.11.16 Motion for Preliminary Injunction 191
Location: Orange County
Judge: Lee, Richard
Hearing Date: 2023.11.16
Excerpt: ...orm, and all tangible property like computers, laptops, printers, scanners, and the like ("Nymox Property"). 2. Orders and compels Defendants to: a. turn over to Nymox any and all Nymox Information and Nymox Property in Defendants' possession, custody, or control; b. remove any and all Nymox Information and Nymox Property from CRNSV's website at www.crnsv.com, and any other publicly available forum; and c. refrain from filing any Nymox Informatio...
2023.11.16 Demurrer 880
Location: Orange County
Judge: Lee, Richard
Hearing Date: 2023.11.16
Excerpt: ...tion. (CIV-140) However, moving party herein is St. Judge Medical Group, not St. Judge Medical Center. As such, it is unclear if moving party has complied with CCP 5430.41. However, given there is no objection to the meet and confer, this appears to be an error, and the Court will proceed to the merits. This case involves Defendants' alleged negligence in the care and treatment of Plaintiff CATHERINE TAFOLLA while giving birth to decedent GIANNA ...
2023.11.09 Application for Right to Attach Order and Writ of Attachment 100
Location: Orange County
Judge: Lee, Richard
Hearing Date: 2023.11.09
Excerpt: ...parent LinkedIn filed is judicially noticeable. Moreover, a LinkedIn profile that Plaintiff pulled from the interest does not appear to a matter that is reasonably beyond dispute and therefore judicially noticeable. (Evid. Code, SS 451-453; Tenet Healthsystem Inc. v. Blue Cross of California (2015) 245 Cal.App.4th 821, 835.) Likewise, even the court took judicial notice of the dtNument, the truth of the statements contained in the document and th...
2023.11.09 Demurrer 671
Location: Orange County
Judge: Lee, Richard
Hearing Date: 2023.11.09
Excerpt: ... action and allegations of personnel management alone are insufficient to state a cause of action. Defendants cite to Janken v. GM Hughes Elec. (1996) 46 Cal.App.5th 55, 54-65 as legal authority. In Opposition, Plaintiff contends that the Court previously found a viable claim could be pleaded based on Plaintiff's protected status alleged; that the SAC pleads that Plaintiff went on medical leave on 4/23/2020, returned, and then Defendant LEANO's c...
2023.11.09 Demurrer to FAC 644
Location: Orange County
Judge: Lee, Richard
Hearing Date: 2023.11.09
Excerpt: ...ngBeverly Act, and there are no facts that would support a demand for punitive damages. Specificity Fraud generally must be pleaded in the complaint specifically. General and conclusory allegations are not sufficient. Page 8 of 39 (Nagy v. Nagy (1989) 210 Cal.App.3d 1262, 1268.) However, a lower level of specificity is required in cases involving nondisclosure. (Alfaro v. Community Housing Improvement System & Planning Assn., Inc. (2009) 171 Cal....
2023.11.09 Motion to Strike or Tax Costs 473
Location: Orange County
Judge: Lee, Richard
Hearing Date: 2023.11.09
Excerpt: ... for electronic filing or service" in the sum of $2,659.00 on the grounds that the amount is excessive and does not reflect the actual cost of filing fees or service on Defendant; and (3) Item Number 16, "Other" in the sum of $3,951.90 on the grounds that there is no itemization or explanation of the amount. Defendant also moves to reduce: (1) Item Number 5, "Service of process" from sum of $3,347.83 to $300 on the grounds that the amount is exce...
2023.11.09 Motion to Compel Further Deposition of PMK, for Monetary Sanctions 492
Location: Orange County
Judge: Lee, Richard
Hearing Date: 2023.11.09
Excerpt: ...notice, a party to the action or an offcer, director, managing agent, or employee of a party, or a person designated by an organization that is a party under Section 2025.230, without having served a valid objection under Section 2025.410, fails to appear for examination, or to proceed with ft, or to produce for inspection any document, electronically stored information, or tangible thing described in the deposition notice, the party giving the n...
2023.11.02 Motions to Strike 001
Location: Orange County
Judge: Lee, Richard
Hearing Date: 2023.11.02
Excerpt: ...thstanding that the First Cause of Acton is brought only against Lockett & Horwitz. Defendants move for an order striking the follow-ng portions of Plaintiff's Complaint: 1. The entre Complaint; 2. The entire First Cause of Action; 3. The entire Second Cause of Acton; 4. Paragraphs 11; 12; 18; 21-24; 35, lines 7-8; 39, lines 15-16; 40, lines 20-23; 42, lines 4-11; 58; 59, lines 14-15; 50; 64-70; Prayer, Paragraphs 4 and 4. Defendants argue that t...
2023.11.02 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 644
Location: Orange County
Judge: Lee, Richard
Hearing Date: 2023.11.02
Excerpt: ...rth, Fifth, Sixth, Seventh, and Eighth Causes of Action of Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint based on the following issues: • Issue 1. Plaintiff Has Not Produced, And Cannot In The Future Produce, Evidence Of Exposure To Indoor Mold Or Asbestos That Exceeds Outdoor Mold Or Asbestos Sufficient To Support Any Cause Of Acton • Issue 2. Plaintiff Has Not Produced, And Cannot In The Future Produce, Evidence Of Exposure To Levels Of Mold Or Asbe...
2023.10.26 Motion to Strike 398
Location: Orange County
Judge: Lee, Richard
Hearing Date: 2023.10.26
Excerpt: ...e words "willfully and intentionally"); Paragraph 44, line 27 (the word "willful"); Paragraph 50, line 9 (the word "abhorrent"); Paragraph 62, line 25 (the word "willfully"); Paragraph 98, line 20 (the word "intentional"); Paragraph 109, lines 4 (the words "reckless and willful"); Paragraph 127, lines 16-17 (the phrase, "Because they did not act at all to maintain the Tree, it cannot be said that Anaheim Hills orthe Anaheim Hills Board acted in f...
2023.10.26 Motion to Compel Responses 480
Location: Orange County
Judge: Lee, Richard
Hearing Date: 2023.10.26
Excerpt: ...sponses to interrogatories waives any objection to the requested discovery. (Code Civ. Proc., S 2030.290, subd. The party propounding the interrogatories may move for an order compelling responses to the discovery. (Code Civ. Proc., S 2030.290, subd. (bj.) "Unlike a motion to compel further responses, a motion to compel responses is not subject to a 45—day time limit, and the propounding party does not have to demonstrate either good cause or t...
2023.10.26 Motion to Compel Arbitration 507
Location: Orange County
Judge: Lee, Richard
Hearing Date: 2023.10.26
Excerpt: ...ed, Inc. ("KI"), based on theories of agency and estoppel. Agency Page 49 of 51 With regard to the agency theory, the Outlier Defendants argue that Plaintiff has clearly alleged agency in paragraph 11 of the FAC and that no other facts are specifically alleged against them. They argue that because the only facts Plaintiff has alleged to include the Outlier Defendants are the allegations of agency, those allegations cannot be ignored— they eithe...
2023.10.26 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 546
Location: Orange County
Judge: Lee, Richard
Hearing Date: 2023.10.26
Excerpt: ... Indemnity; (4) Breach of Contract; (5) Declaratory Relief Re: Duty to Indemnify; (6) Declaratory Relief Re: Duty to Defend; and (7) Declaratory Relief Re: Failure to Maintain Insurance as follows, pursuant to the Notice of Motion: 1. CRH's First Cause of Action for Equitable Indemnity and Second Cause of Acton for Contribution fail because there is no evidence that Winnelson had independent fault for the subject incident. 2. CRH's Third Cause of...
2023.10.26 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 652
Location: Orange County
Judge: Lee, Richard
Hearing Date: 2023.10.26
Excerpt: ...d every allegation set forth in the First Amended Complaint pursuant to Code of Civil Prmædure, section 431.30, subdivision (d)." (See ROA 53, Answer.) Defendant's Answer also alleges one defense: "[t]he Complaint fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against the Defendant." (Ibid.) The operative First Amended Complaint contains one cause of action: violations of the California Constitution Article l, SS 7 and 19. The F...
2023.10.19 Motion to Compel Arbitration 347
Location: Orange County
Judge: Lee, Richard
Hearing Date: 2023.10.19
Excerpt: ...on February 1, 2021, Cross-complainants signed a "Voluntary Mutual Agreement to Arbitrate Claims" whereby Cross-complainants agreed to arbitrate employment related claims, and that Cross-complainants' claims for age discrimination, failure to effect reasonable accommodation, breach of partly oral and Page 4 of 23 partly implied contract, and associational discrimination alleged in their Cross-complaint fall within the scope of the Arbitration Agr...
2023.10.19 Motion for Summary Adjudication 828
Location: Orange County
Judge: Lee, Richard
Hearing Date: 2023.10.19
Excerpt: ...yer at the time of her termination or the alleged retaliation against her and thus, not liable as to the first, second, third, and fifth causes of action; and (3) AVIM is not liable to Plaintiff because AVIM was no longer a party to the contract at the time of the alleged breach and thus the fourth cause of action fails. The motion and moving papers were filed on 7/27/2023. (AVIM/CFPH-Cl's MSA; ROA 67, 58, 69, 70). Defendant Compassion-First Pet ...
2023.10.19 Motion to Stay Action, for Judgment on the Pleadings 692
Location: Orange County
Judge: Lee, Richard
Hearing Date: 2023.10.19
Excerpt: ...tion." Defendants contend that abatement is a matter of right when final judgment in the first acton would bar the second action under the doctrine of res judicata or have a preclusive effect on a material issue. Leaving aside that the statute expressly specifies that the argument is to be made by demurrer or answer (thereby severely limiting the material that the court can consider), Defendants do not meet the requirements for a mandatory plea i...
2023.10.19 Motion to Stay Action, for Judgment on the Pleadings 699
Location: Orange County
Judge: Lee, Richard
Hearing Date: 2023.10.19
Excerpt: ...e same cause of action." Defendants contend that abatement is a matter of right when final judgment in the first action would bar the second action under the doctrine of res judicata or have a preclusive effect on a material issue. Leaving aside that the statute expressly specifies that the argument is to be made by demurrer or answer (thereby severely limiting the material that the court can consider), Defendants do not meet the requirements for...
2023.10.12 Petitioner to Appoint Receiver 936
Location: Orange County
Judge: Lee, Richard
Hearing Date: 2023.10.12
Excerpt: ... Code section 17980.7(c). "If any building is maintained in a manner that violates any provisions of this part, the building standards published in the State Building Standards Cuie relating to the provisions of this part, any other rule or regulation adopted pursuant to the provisions of this part, or any provision in a local ordinance that is similar to a provision in this part, and the violations are so extensive and of such a nature that the ...
2023.10.12 Demurrer to SAC 123
Location: Orange County
Judge: Lee, Richard
Hearing Date: 2023.10.12
Excerpt: ...v. UHS of Rancho Springs, Inc. (2014) 230 Cal.App.4th 336, 343—344 for the proposition that: " 'Generally, after an amended pleading has filed, courts will disregard the original pleading. [Citation.] [91 However, an exception to this rule is found where an amended complaint attempts to avoid defects set forth in a prior complaint by ignoring them. The court may examine the prior complaint to ascertain whether the amended complaint is merely a ...
2023.10.05 Motion to Compel Responses, for Sanctions, to Deem RFAs Admitted 942
Location: Orange County
Judge: Lee, Richard
Hearing Date: 2023.10.05
Excerpt: ...m Requests for Admission, Set One propounded on Defendant/Cross-Defendant John Andraos Admi©ed, plus $860 in sancŸons, and (4) MoŸon to Deem Requests for Admission, Set One propounded on Defendant/Cross-Defendant Golden Foods Admi©ed, LLC plus $860 in sancŸons. Neither Defendant/Cross-Defendant John Andraos nor Defendant/Cross-Defendant Golden Foods, LLC opposed the MoŸons. MoŸons to Compel Responses to Form Interrogatories Pursuant...
2023.10.05 Motion to Compel Further Responses, for Sanctions 692
Location: Orange County
Judge: Lee, Richard
Hearing Date: 2023.10.05
Excerpt: ...ron Allen to Request for Admission, Set Two, Nos. 28-35 plus $19,875 in sanctions, ROA 56; (4) Motion to Compel Further Responses by Plaintiff Byron Allen to Form Interrogatories, Set Two, No. 17.1 plus $19,875 in sanctions, ROA 65. The court notes that the replies request $9,875 in sanctions. The parties agree that the meet and confer efforts were sufficient and that the Motions were timely filed based on the parties Page 11 of 13 agreements dur...
2023.10.05 Demurrer 310
Location: Orange County
Judge: Lee, Richard
Hearing Date: 2023.10.05
Excerpt: ...cessarily timed barred and not that it may be time-barred. In Marshall v. Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher (1995) 37 Cal.App.4th 1397, 1403, the court explained that: "A demurrer based on a statute of limitations will not lie where the action may be, but is not necessarily, barred. (Citation omitted) In order for the bar of the statute of limitations to be raised by demurrer, the defect must clearly and affirmatively appear on the face of the complaint; i...
2023.09.28 Motion to Compel Arbitration 638
Location: Orange County
Judge: Lee, Richard
Hearing Date: 2023.09.28
Excerpt: ...a written agreement to arbitrate a controversy and that a party to the agreement refuses to arbitrate that controversy, the court shall order the petitioner and the respondent to arbitrate the controversy if it determines that an agreement to arbitrate the controversy exists." (Code Civ. Proc., S 1281.2.) Pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1281.6: "If the arbitration agreement provides a method of appointing an arbitrator, that method sh...
2023.09.28 Motion to Compel Arbitration 322
Location: Orange County
Judge: Lee, Richard
Hearing Date: 2023.09.28
Excerpt: ...arbitration agreement or predispute joint-action waiver shall be valid or enforceable with respect to a case which is filed under Federal, Tribal, or State law and relates to the sexual assault dispute or the sexual harassment dispute. (b) Determination of applicability—An issue as to whether this chapter applies with respect to a dispute shall be determined under Federal law. The applicability of this chapter to an agreement to arbitrate and t...
2023.09.28 Motion for Terminating Sanctions 492
Location: Orange County
Judge: Lee, Richard
Hearing Date: 2023.09.28
Excerpt: ...ed at a default prove-up hearing; or, in the alternative (b) a fourth order compelling Hyundai to comply with the Court's March 18, 2021, April 22, 2022, and April 6, 2023 Orders and for prospective sanctions of $1000 per day for each day that Hyundai does not comply. Plaintiff brings this Motion is made pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure Sections 128(a)(4) and 2023.030(d)(1) & (4). Code Civ. Proc. provides, "Every court shall have th...
2023.09.14 Demurrer 446
Location: Orange County
Judge: Lee, Richard
Hearing Date: 2023.09.14
Excerpt: ... been quoted verbatim. A demurrer for uncertainty is not intended to reach the failure to incorporate sufficient facts in the pleading, but is directed at the uncertainty existing in the allegations actually made. (People v. Lim (1941) 18 Cal.2d 872, 883.) "A demurrer for uncertainty is strictly construed, even where a complaint is in some respects uncertain, because ambiguities can be clarified under mtxlern discovery procedures." (Khouryv. Maly...
2023.09.14 Motion for Attorney Fees 374
Location: Orange County
Judge: Lee, Richard
Hearing Date: 2023.09.14
Excerpt: ... $27,810.47. The Motion is GRANTED as to the stipulated costs in the amount of $27,810.47. Otherwise, the Motion is DENIED. A. The Motion is Timely The motion for fees "must be served and filed within the time for filing a notice of appeal under rules 8.104 and 8.108 in an unlimited civil case or under rules 8.822 and 8.823 in a limited civil case." (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1702, subd. (b).) Pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 8.104(a...
2023.09.14 Motion for Summary Adjudication 691
Location: Orange County
Judge: Lee, Richard
Hearing Date: 2023.09.14
Excerpt: ...ker List which constitutes trade secrets. Sprout is not represented by counsel, and the motion is unopposed. "A motion for summary adjudication may be made by itself or as an alternative to a motion for summary judgment and shall proceed in all procedural respects as a motion for summary judgment." (Code Civ. Proc. S 437c(f)(2).) A party may move for summary adjudication as to one or more causes of action within an action, one or more affrmatve d...
2023.09.14 Motion to Compel Responses, for Monetary Sanctions 212
Location: Orange County
Judge: Lee, Richard
Hearing Date: 2023.09.14
Excerpt: ...and her counsel of record in the sum of $1,078. Defendant Tran also moves for an order deeming the truth of all matters specified in Request for Admissions, Set Two, Nos. 29 through 42, and awarding monetary sanctions against Plaintiff and her counsel of record in the sum of $1,078. Defendant Tran contends that the foregoing discovery was served on Plaintiff and that Plaintiff did not serve responses, necessitating these motions to compel and sup...
2023.09.14 Motion to Set Aside Dismissal 777
Location: Orange County
Judge: Lee, Richard
Hearing Date: 2023.09.14
Excerpt: ... within a reasonable time, in no case exceeding six months, after the judgment, dismissal, order, or proceeding was taken." (CINIe Civ. Proc., S 473(b).) Because this Motion was filed more than six months after the dismissal, secton 473(b) does not apply. Aside from the authority set forth in section 473(b), every court has the power to "amend and control its process and orders so as to make them conform to law and justice." (Code Civ. Proc., S 1...
2023.09.07 Motion to Compel Responses, for Monetary Sanctions 661
Location: Orange County
Judge: Lee, Richard
Hearing Date: 2023.09.07
Excerpt: ...atories General (Set One), all within 10 calendar days of the hearing of the motion, as well as for an order awarding monetary sanctions Page 19 of 40 in the amount of $ 2,963.15 against Horizon and its counsel of record, Fred Hayes and Rogers, MacLeith & Stolp, LLP, jointly and severally, for each of the two motions, as well as monetary sanctions in the same amount against Besnos and his counsel of record for one of the motions. Plaintiff Beznos...
2023.09.07 Motion to Compel Arbitration 457
Location: Orange County
Judge: Lee, Richard
Hearing Date: 2023.09.07
Excerpt: ...turer under the doctrine of equitable estop#l. More recently, Div. 8 of the Second District in Ford Motor Warranty Cases v. Ford Motor Co. (2023) 89 Cal.App.5th 1324 (rev. granted 7/19/2023) and Div. 7 of the Second District Montemayor v. Ford Motor Co. (2023) 92 Cal.App.5th 958, 310 Cal.Rptr.3d 82 (June 26, 2023) disagreed with the reasoning in Felisilda and concluded that the manufacturer was not entitled to enforce the arbitration agreement. W...
2023.09.07 Motion for Summary Adjudication 492
Location: Orange County
Judge: Lee, Richard
Hearing Date: 2023.09.07
Excerpt: ...ntends that there is no merit to the Second Cause of Acton for Violation of Civil Code section 1793.2(b) because the undisputed facts show no single visit lasted longer than 30 days as required under Civil Code secton 1793.2(b); that Plaintiff has failed to provide any evidence, and no evidence exists, that any visit lasted longer than 30 days or that any repair to the subject vehicle was not initiated promptly; and that Plaintiff has failed to p...
2023.09.07 Motion for Protective Order 723
Location: Orange County
Judge: Lee, Richard
Hearing Date: 2023.09.07
Excerpt: ...ff contends that he is an elderly 81-year-old senior, and is in fear of his body and life from Defendants and their potential physical, violent threats and retaliation against him and his property for this lawsuit, the FBI investigation, and the criminal indictment filing in the United States District Court. Plaintiff also contends that requiring Plaintiff to submit to separate depositions in the civil and criminal actions would subject Plaintiff...
2023.09.07 Demurrer 123
Location: Orange County
Judge: Lee, Richard
Hearing Date: 2023.09.07
Excerpt: ...n v. UHS of Rancho Springs, Inc. (2014) 230 Cal.App.4th 336, 343— 344 for the proposition that: " 'Generally, after an amended pleading has been filed, courts will disregard the original pleading. [Citation.] [Y] However, an exception to this rule is found where an amended complaint attempts to avoid defects set forth in a prior complaint by ignoring them. The court may examine the prior complaint to ascertain whether the amended complaint is m...
2023.08.31 Motion to Stay and Consolidate Unlimited Civil Case 871
Location: Orange County
Judge: Lee, Richard
Hearing Date: 2023.08.31
Excerpt: ...y the unlawful detainer action pending the outcome of this Unlimited Action. (ROA 86, 89.) After oral argument, the Court permitted the parties to file simultaneous briefs regarding authority and justification for an undertaking and the amount of an undertaking. Said briefs were due no later than 08/24/2023, with no reply to be filed. (Ibid.) In his supplemental brief, Campbell contends that there is no statute that authorizes an undertaking or b...
2023.08.31 Motion to Compel Responses, for Monetary Sanctions 661
Location: Orange County
Judge: Lee, Richard
Hearing Date: 2023.08.31
Excerpt: ... and severally pay monetary sanctions in the amount of $2,963.15. Plaintiff also moves for an order deeming admitted Plaintiff's Requests for Admission, Set One to Horizon and an order that Horizon and its counsel of record Fred Hayes and Rogers, MacLeith & Stolp, LLP jointly and severally pay monetary sanctions in the amount of $2,963.15. Lastly, Plaintiff moves for an order deeming admitted Plaintiff's Requests for Admission, Set One to Defenda...
2023.08.31 Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Action 387
Location: Orange County
Judge: Lee, Richard
Hearing Date: 2023.08.31
Excerpt: ...e FAA provides that a “written provision in any . . . contract evidencing a transaction involving commerce to settle by arbitration a controversy thereafter arising out of such contract or transaction, the refusal to perform the whole or any part thereof . . . shall be valid, irrevocable and enforceable, save upon such grounds as exist at law or in equity for the revocation of any contract.” (9 U.S.C. § 2.) “The ‘principal purpose' of th...
2023.08.31 Motion to Compel Arbitration 719
Location: Orange County
Judge: Lee, Richard
Hearing Date: 2023.08.31
Excerpt: ...er under the doctrine of equitable estoppel. More recently, Div. 8 of the Second District in Ford Motor Warranty Cases v. Ford Motor Co. (2023) 89 Cal.App.5th 1324 (rev. granted 7/19/2023) and Div. 7 of the Second District in Montemayor v. Ford Motor Co. (2023) 92 Cal.App.5th 958, 310 Cal.Rptr. 3d 82 (June 26, 2023) disagreed with the reasoning in Felisilda and concluded that the manufacturer was not entitled to enforce the arbitration agreement....
2023.08.31 Motion to Compel Arbitration 540
Location: Orange County
Judge: Lee, Richard
Hearing Date: 2023.08.31
Excerpt: ...very v. Integrated Healthcare Holdings, Inc. (2013) 218 Cal.App.4th 50, 59-60.) “If a party to a civil action asks the court to compel arbitration of [a] pending claim, the court must determine in a summary proceeding whether an ‘agreement to arbitrate the controversy exists.' [Citations] ‘Because the existence of the agreement is a statutory prerequisite to granting the petition, the petitioner bears the burden of proving its existence by ...
2023.08.31 Demurrer to FAC 371
Location: Orange County
Judge: Lee, Richard
Hearing Date: 2023.08.31
Excerpt: ...alleges that he was Defendants' employee and therefore was not required to hold a valid contractor's license to recover under the contract. Plaintiff claims that he is an employee pursuant to Labor Code section 2750.5, which “provides in relevant part that a person performing an activity requiring a contractors' license “shall hold a valid contractors' license as a condition of having independent contractor status.” (Fillmore v. Irvine (198...

930 Results

Per page

Pages