Excerpt: ...sagrees. I nterrogatory No. 13.1 asks whether Defendant has conducted surveillance. Defendant responded “no.” Interrogatory No. 13.2 asks if a written report has been prepared on the surveillance. Defendant responded, “not applicable.” These responses are full respon ses. Accordingly, the court DENIES the motion as moot insofar as it seeks further responses. The motion is GRANTED as to sanctions. Sanctions of $1,260 are issued against Def...

Excerpt: ...d in the Decl aration. Plaintiff presents no reason to believe that the applicable standard of care changed in this short time period. Plaintiff's objections to Exhibits 3- 5 are OVERRULED. “A party may move for summary judgment in an action or proceeding if it is conten ded that the action has no merit or that there is no defense to the action or proceeding.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 437c(a)(1).) In a medical malpractice action, when a defendant...

Excerpt: ...allegations relat ed to punitive damages and attorney fees. The demurrer is OVERRULED. First, the court finds that the allegations alleged in the First Amended Complaint are sufficient to plead a cause of action for elder abuse and neglect pursuant to Elder Adult and Depend ent Adult Civil Protection Act - Welfare and Institution Code §§ 15600, et seq. Plaintiff has alleged that Defendant was aware of Ms. Sperling' to provide the requisite ser...

Excerpt: ...s of fraud based on false promises and/or misrepresentations and concealment, respectively. “‘The elements of fraud that will give rise to a tort action for deceit are: '(a) misrepresentation (false representation, concealment, or nondisclosure); (b) knowledge of falsi ty (or ‘scienter'); (c) intent to defraud, i.e., to induce reliance; (d) justifiable reliance; and (e) resulting damage.' ” (Engalla v. Permanente Medical Group, Inc. ...

Excerpt: ...h the moving papers. [CRC 3.1320(c).] While the Court's ruling is not based on these defects, the Court reminds Defendants to comply with the CCP and CRC, moving forward. Notably, the fact that plaintiffs are in pro per does not afford them special treatment. (Nwosu v. Uba (2004) 122 Cal.App.4th 1229, 1246- 1247.) Pro pers must also abide by the same procedural rules – e.g., the Code of Civil Procedure and the California Rules of Court. (See Ga...

Excerpt: ...GRANTED as follows. Code of Civil Procedure section 664.6 provides, in pertinent part: If parties to pending litigation stipulate, in a writing signed by the parties outside of the presence of the court or orally before the court, for settlement of the case, or part thereof, the court, upon motion, may enter judgment pursuant to the terms of the settlement. If requested by the parties, the court may retain jurisdiction over the parties to enforce...

Excerpt: ... The Court further granted 252 5 Main summary adjudication of Issue 9, which sought judgment on the second cause of action for disgorgement in 2525 Main's crosscomplaint as to Pacific LLC. (ROA 207.) The first cause of action of 2525 Main's cross -complaint was dismissed on 07/14/23. (RO A 300.) Thus, the only remaining claim is 2525 Main's second cause of action against Pacific INC. On 09/28/23, the Court signed an order releasing Pacific LL...

Excerpt: ...er now but admonishes Defendant that the future failure to comply with all applicable rules and statutes may result in a motion being denied or taken off calendar, and sanctions, where appropriate. First Cause of Action for Inducing Breach of Contract and Second Cause of Actio n for Intentional Interference with Contractual Relations Defendant argues that the first cause of action fails to plead sufficient facts showing that Plaintiff had an ong...

Excerpt: ...ecificity as to the element s of active concealment and existence of a defect. Defendants also argue that Plaintiff has not alleged when or where the alleged omitted information should or could have been revealed by Ford. Defendants further argue that the allegations fail to demonstr ate any duty to disclose because there was no transactional relationship between Plaintiff and Ford and that the claim is barred by the economic loss rule. The Cour...

Excerpt: ...otice of this ru ling. If a timely motion to compel has been filed, the responding party has the burden to justify any objection or failure fully to answer the discovery requests. (Coy v. Sup.Ct. (Wolcher) (1962) 58 Cal.2d 210, 220 -221 [re: interrogatories]; Kirkland v. Su perior Court (2002) 95 Cal.App.4th 92, 98 [burden shifts to objector after good cause shown for RFPs]; Costco Wholesale Corp. v. Superior Court (2009) 47 Cal.4th 725, 733 [pa...

Excerpt: ...ential to justify oppositio n may exist but cannot, for reasons stated, be presented, the court shall deny the motion, order a continuance to permit affidavits to be obtained or discovery to be had, or make any other order as may be just.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 437c(h).) “When lack of diligence results in a party's having insufficient information to know if facts essential to justify opposition may exist, and the party is therefore unable to p...

Excerpt: ...ion to strike is filed but before the demurrer or motion to strike is heard if the amended pleading is filed and served no later than the date for filing an opposition to the demurrer or motion to strike.”].) On April 10, 2024, Defendant The Summit At Turtle Ridge Communi ty Association WITHDREW its Demurrer and Motion to Strike. Defendant MLG Assessment Recovery LLC's Demurrer remains on calendar but it is MOOT since Plaintiff timely filed...

Excerpt: ... not opposed t his Motion and has failed to meet that burden. Further, it is clear that the questions do not implicate any private communications between Defendant and her attorneys and the attorney -client privilege does not apply. As for privacy, there must be a legally protected privacy interest, an objectively reasonable expectation of privacy in the given circumstances, and a threatened intrusion that is serious. (Williams, 3 Cal.5th at p. 5...