Search by Keyword:
Start Date:
End Date:
Tip: Wrap text in quotation marks when searching for phrases (e.g. "motion to dismiss").

806 Results

Clear Search Parameters x
Location: Orange County x
Judge: Servino, Deborah C x
2024.04.26 Motion to Compel Further Responses 297
Location: Orange County
Judge: Servino, Deborah C
Hearing Date: 2024.04.26
Excerpt: ...filed, the burden i s on the responding party to justify any objection or failure to fully answer the interrogatories. (Fairmont Ins. Co. v. Superior Court (2000) 22 Cal.4th 245, 255.) The interrogatories at issue seek the names and contact information for: (1) all roomma tes of Casanas at the facility during the period of August 6, 2021 through August 7, 2022 (no. 13); (2) the responsible party for all residents of the facility during the perio...
2024.04.26 Motion for Summary Judgment 380
Location: Orange County
Judge: Servino, Deborah C
Hearing Date: 2024.04.26
Excerpt: ...rectional Drilling. The motions for summary judgment are denied. Relevant Background Plaintiff Michael Konrad filed a Complaint alleging that the subject accident occurred on December 19, 2018. The Complaint alleges that Plaintiff was properly and lawfully riding his bicycle when he unknowingly encountered a damaged portion in the road and was violently thrown from his bicycle to the ground and sustained serious bodily injuries. (Compl., at ¶ 1...
2024.04.26 Motion for Leave to File Complaint 665
Location: Orange County
Judge: Servino, Deborah C
Hearing Date: 2024.04.26
Excerpt: ...n, Cal. Practice Guide: Civi l Procedure Before Trial (The Rutter Group 2021) ¶ 6:564.) Where the proposed cross -complaint arises out of the same transaction as plaintiff's claim, leave to file must be granted as long as defendant is acting in good faith. (Code Civ. Proc., § 426.50.) Here, Defendant's proposed cross- complaint asserts a single cause of action for breach of contract related to Plaintiffs' alleged failure to pay two years o...
2024.04.26 Demurrer 397
Location: Orange County
Judge: Servino, Deborah C
Hearing Date: 2024.04.26
Excerpt: ...intiff stated a cause of action for false promise. (Complaint, second cause of action, § FR -2(c); see Opp., at pp. 3:11 -15, 4:23 -25, 5:19 -21.) Plaintiff did not select section FR -4 of the Judicial Council form complaint, which alleges a promise without intent to perform. (S ee Complaint.) Regardless of which species of fraud is alleged, Plaintiff did not allege sufficient facts with the required specificity to state a cause of action for f...
2024.04.19 Motion to Compel Responses, to Deem RFAs Admitted 483
Location: Orange County
Judge: Servino, Deborah C
Hearing Date: 2024.04.19
Excerpt: ...arty may move for an order compelling responses to interrogatories at any time “[i]f a party to whom interrogatories are directed fails to serve a timely response.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 2030.290, subd. (b).) By failing to serve timely responses, Plaintiffs waived “any r ight to exercise the option to produce writings under Section 2030.230, as well as any objection to the interrogatories, including one based on privilege or on the protectio...
2024.04.19 Motion to Compel Production of Docs 056
Location: Orange County
Judge: Servino, Deborah C
Hearing Date: 2024.04.19
Excerpt: ... sustained. Evidentiary object ions nos. 4 through 6 are overruled. Evidence Submitted With Reply The court exercises its discretion to consider the evidence submitted with Plaintiffs' reply. Andry may address the evidence during the hearing. (Jay v. Mahaffey (2013) 218 Cal.App.4th 1522, 1537 -1538.) Merits Plaintiffs served Andry with a notice of taking a remote deposition and requests for production of documents at deposition. The notice li...
2024.04.12 Motion to Vacate Default Judgment 216
Location: Orange County
Judge: Servino, Deborah C
Hearing Date: 2024.04.12
Excerpt: ...must follow the cor rect rules of procedure. (See Rappleyea v. Campbell (1994) 8 Cal.4th 975, 984 -985; Nwosu v. Uba (2004) 122 Cal.App.4th 1229, 1246 -1247). A self -represented litigant is not entitled to any greater consideration than other litigants and attorneys. (See Petr osyan v. Prince Corp. (2013) 223 Cal.App.4th 587, 594 [self -represented litigants are entitled to same treatment as represented parties].) The fact that Defendant is a se...
2024.04.12 Motion to Permit Financial Discovery 715
Location: Orange County
Judge: Servino, Deborah C
Hearing Date: 2024.04.12
Excerpt: ...upon a clea r and convincing showing that a defendant is guilty of oppression, fraud or malice. A court order is required to obtain discovery of a defendant's financial condition in actions seeking punitive damages. (Civ. Code, § 3295, subd. (c).) Before a court m ay enter an order permitting discovery of a defendant's financial condition, it must (1) weigh the evidence submitted in favor of and in opposition to motion for discovery and (2) ma...
2024.04.12 Demurrer 056
Location: Orange County
Judge: Servino, Deborah C
Hearing Date: 2024.04.12
Excerpt: ...ntity Plaintiffs argue that the court should not consider the demurrer and the motion to strike because they named K & A Kingdom Holdings, LLC, but K & A Kingdom Holding, Inc. filed the demurrer and motion to strike. However, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 4 73, Defendant submitted a proposed amendment to pleadings noting that the "Inc." shown on its pleadings was in error and asking that its pleadings be amended to reflect...
2024.04.05 Motion to Compel Deposition Answers 297
Location: Orange County
Judge: Servino, Deborah C
Hearing Date: 2024.04.05
Excerpt: ... or to produc e any document, electronically stored information, or tangible thing under the deponent's control that is specified in the deposition notice or a deposition subpoena, the party seeking discovery may move the court for an order compelling that answer or pro duction.” A deponent who has objected to a question and refused to answer bears the burden of justifying such refusal on the motion to compel. (Weil & Brown, Cal. Practice ...
2024.04.05 Demurrer 258
Location: Orange County
Judge: Servino, Deborah C
Hearing Date: 2024.04.05
Excerpt: ...ustained without leave to amend. Aiding and Abetting Fraud or Breach of Fiduciary Duties (Seventh Cause of Action) The seventh cause of action is against the Starboard Defendants for "aiding and abetting fraud and/or breach of fiduciary duties". (TAC, at pp. 54 -57.) TPG alleg es Starboard had actual knowledge of Defendant Honarkar's planned fraud and breach of fiduciary duties, and that Starboard “actively concealed” that it was �...
2024.03.29 Demurrer 779
Location: Orange County
Judge: Servino, Deborah C
Hearing Date: 2024.03.29
Excerpt: ...n is overruled. The demurrer is sustained as to the third cause of action is sustained without leave to amend. Dependent Adult Abuse/Neglect (First Cause of Action) The first cause of action is for dependent adult abuse/neglect. “The purpose of the [Elder Abuse Act] is essentially to protect a particularly vulnerable portion of the population from gross mistreatment in the form of abuse and custodial neglect.” (Delaney v. Baker (1999) 20 Cal...
2024.03.29 Motion to Compel Arbitration 574
Location: Orange County
Judge: Servino, Deborah C
Hearing Date: 2024.03.29
Excerpt: ...ed “Grievance of Disputes”) that states the following, in relevant part: [A]ll employee claims or disputes concerning violations of, or arising under Wage Order 16 (except as noted in the immediately preceding paragraph), the California Labor Code Sections identified in California Labor Code section 2699.5 as amended, all derivative claims under California Business and Professions Code section 17200, et seq., all associated penalties, and fe...
2024.03.29 Motion to Compel Further Responses 908
Location: Orange County
Judge: Servino, Deborah C
Hearing Date: 2024.03.29
Excerpt: ...ing party is required to set forth specific facts showing good cause justifying the discovery sought by the inspection demand, pursuant to Code of Civil Pro cedure section 2031.310, subdivision (b)(1). To establish “good cause,” the burden is on the moving party to show both: (1) relevance to the subject matter (e.g., how the information in the document would tend to prove or disprove some issue in the case); and (2) specific facts justifyi...
2024.03.22 Petition to Compel Compliance with Investigational Subpoena 630
Location: Orange County
Judge: Servino, Deborah C
Hearing Date: 2024.03.22
Excerpt: ...al). The complaint stated that Chiavetta was on medical leave of absence in Septemb er 2022, when she accompanied her pregnant cousin to Hoag to provide care of the patient as labor began. The Charge Nurse told Chiavetta that she was on a leave of absence and was unable to provide care and treatment to her cousin as a nurse, but could be the patient's doula. Chiavetta adjusted the patient's pitocin and ignored the bedside labor and delive...
2024.03.22 Motion to Set Aside Default, Judgment 349
Location: Orange County
Judge: Servino, Deborah C
Hearing Date: 2024.03.22
Excerpt: ... is denied. It is unnecessary to ask the court to take judicial notice of materials previously filed in this case. A party may “simply call the court's attention to such papers.” (Weil & Brown, Cal. Practice Guide: Civil Procedure Before Trial (The Rutter Group 2023) ¶ 9:53.1a.) Merits Defendant moves to set aside the default and default judgment, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 473, subdivisions (b) and (d), Code of Civil Proce...
2024.03.22 Motion to Continue Trial 258
Location: Orange County
Judge: Servino, Deborah C
Hearing Date: 2024.03.22
Excerpt: ...t if it granted TPG's motion to amend and/or motion to bring defendant into case (scheduled to be heard on February 22, 2024), the court may reconsider another trial continuance. (9/18/2023 Minute Order.) At that time, however, the court did not vacate the February 29, 2024 hearing on the motion to continue trial. And, TPG did not wit hdraw its motion to continue the trial date, even though it appeared to be somewhat outdated. On December 8, ...
2024.03.22 Motion for Summary Judgment 422
Location: Orange County
Judge: Servino, Deborah C
Hearing Date: 2024.03.22
Excerpt: ...2004) 122 Cal.App.4th 1229, 12461247.) A self -represented litigant is not en titled to any greater consideration than other litigants and attorneys. (Petrosyan v. Prince Corp. (2013) 223 Cal.App.4th 587, 594 [self -represented litigants are entitled to same treatment as represented parties]; see Cal. Rules of Court, Rule 1.6(15) [de fines “parties” as including both self -represented persons and persons represented by an attorney of record ...
2024.03.22 Demurrer 578
Location: Orange County
Judge: Servino, Deborah C
Hearing Date: 2024.03.22
Excerpt: ...ckich, Cruz & McCort (2001) 91 Cal.App.4th 875, 882.) To the extent Plaintiff is requesting that the court take judicial notice of the fact that these cases exist, the request is denied as irrelevant to the issue presented in the demurrer. (Ragland v. U.S. Bank National Assn. (2012) 209 Cal.App.4th 182, 194 [noting that the court may take judicial notice of a recorded deed, but declining to do so where deed was not relevant].) Special Demurrer Sp...
2024.03.15 Motion to Transfer Action 902
Location: Orange County
Judge: Servino, Deborah C
Hearing Date: 2024.03.15
Excerpt: ...r any applicable statute. (Crestwood Behavioral Health, Inc. v. Superior Court (2021) 60 Cal.App.5th 1069, 1075.) “Venue is determined based on the complaint on file at the time the motion to change venue is made.” (Brown v. Superior Court (1984) 37 Cal.3d 477, 482; Malloy v. Superior Court (2022) 83 Cal.App.5th 543, 553.) Code of Civil Procedure section 395, subdivision (a) sets forth the general venue rule. It states in relevant part: “E...
2024.03.15 Motion to Quash 109
Location: Orange County
Judge: Servino, Deborah C
Hearing Date: 2024.03.15
Excerpt: ...notice of continuance of Plaintiff's deposition; (6) notice of taking Plaintiff's deposition off calendar ; (7) proposed order granting motion to compel further responses to demands for inspection of documents; (8) proposed order granting motion to compel further responses to form interrogatories; (9) proposed order granting motion to compel further responses to special interrogatories; (10) statement of special interrogatories; (11) statement of...
2024.03.08 Motion to Quash Records Subpoena 056
Location: Orange County
Judge: Servino, Deborah C
Hearing Date: 2024.03.08
Excerpt: ...onditions as the court shall declare including protective orders. In addition, the cour t may make any other order as may be appropriate to protect the moving party from unreasonable or oppressive demands including unreasonable violations of the moving party's right of privacy. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1987.1.) Where the documents sought are c onsumer records, a notice to consumer must be served before the subpoena is served. (Code Civ. Proc., § 198...
2024.03.08 Motion to Compel Deposition of PMQ 742
Location: Orange County
Judge: Servino, Deborah C
Hearing Date: 2024.03.08
Excerpt: ...onically stored information, or tangible thing described in the deposition notice” if, “after service of a deposition notice, a party to the action or an officer, director, managing agent, or employee of a party, or a person designated by an organization that is a party under Section 2025.230, without having served a valid objection under Section 2025.410, fails to appear for examination, or to proceed with it, or to produce for inspection an...
2024.03.08 Motion for Leave to File FAA 315
Location: Orange County
Judge: Servino, Deborah C
Hearing Date: 2024.03.08
Excerpt: ...the time for answer or demurrer. (Code Civ. Proc., § 473, s ubd. (a) (1).) The court may likewise, in its discretion, after notice to the adverse party, allow, upon any terms as may be just, an amendment to any pleading or proceeding in other particulars; and may upon like terms allow an answer to be made after the time limited by this code. (Code of Civ. Proc., § 473, subd. (a) (1).) Additionally, any judge, at any time before or after commenc...
2024.03.08 Demurrer 238
Location: Orange County
Judge: Servino, Deborah C
Hearing Date: 2024.03.08
Excerpt: ...o identify Doe Perpetrator renders the FAC uncertain. Special demurrers based on uncert ainty are rarely sustained – only where the complaint is so bad that defendant cannot reasonably respond —i.e., he or she cannot reasonably determine what issues must be admitted or denied, or what counts or claims are directed against him or her. (See Khou ry v. Maly's of Calif., Inc. (1993) 14 Cal.App.4th 612, 616.) However, a demurrer for uncertaint...
2024.03.01 Motion for Summary Judgment 046
Location: Orange County
Judge: Servino, Deborah C
Hearing Date: 2024.03.01
Excerpt: ...he court did not consider this document. Summary Judgment Standard “[F]rom commencement to conclusion, the party moving for summary judgment bears the burden of persuasion that there is no triable issue of material fact and that he is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” (Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co. (2001) 25 Cal.4 th 826, 850.) A “party moving for summary judgment bears an initial burden of production to make a prima facie show...
2024.03.01 Motion for Sanctions 836
Location: Orange County
Judge: Servino, Deborah C
Hearing Date: 2024.03.01
Excerpt: ...les of Court, rule 3.1345(a)(7).) Failing to respond to an authorized method of discovery is a misuse of the discovery process. (Code Civ. Proc., § 2023.010, subd. (d).) So, too, is disobeying a court order to provide discovery. (Code Civ. Proc., § 2023.010, subd. (g); Van Sickle v. Gilbert (2011) 196 Cal.App.4th 1495, 1516.) If a party fails to obey an order compelling answers to discovery, the court may impose whatever sanctions are just, inc...
2024.03.01 Motion to Strike or Tax Costs 166
Location: Orange County
Judge: Servino, Deborah C
Hearing Date: 2024.03.01
Excerpt: ...in civil actions.'” (Brown v. Desert Christian Center (2011) 193 Cal.App.4th 733, 737 –738.) Specifically, in a ctions to enforce the governing documents of a common interest development such as covenants, conditions and restrictions ("CC&Rs"), Civil Code section 5975, subdivision (c) provides that “the prevailing party shall be awarded reasonable attorney's fees and costs.” Code of Civil Procedure section 1032, subdivision (b), ...
2024.03.01 Motion to Compel Deposition 056
Location: Orange County
Judge: Servino, Deborah C
Hearing Date: 2024.03.01
Excerpt: ...ove for an order compelling the deponent's attendance and testimony at deposition. The motion must be accompanied by a declaration under Code of Civil Procedure section 2016.040 stating that the moving party contacted the deponent to inquire about the nonappearance. (Code Civ. Proc., § 2025.450, subd. (b)(2).) Code of Civil Procedure section 2025.410, subdivision (b) provides in part that any deposition taken after the service of a written objec...
2024.03.01 Motion to Strike 652
Location: Orange County
Judge: Servino, Deborah C
Hearing Date: 2024.03.01
Excerpt: ...aud, or malice. “Malice” means conduct that is intended to cause injury or despicable conduct that is carried on with a willful and conscious disregard of the right and safety of others. (Civ. Code, § 3294, subd. (c)(1).) At the pleading stage, the complaint must allege facts supporting circumstances of oppression, fraud, or malice. (See Grieves v. Superior Court (1984) 157 Cal.App.3d 159, 166.) Punitive damages cannot be pled in conclusory ...
2024.02.23 Special Motion to Strike 288
Location: Orange County
Judge: Servino, Deborah C
Hearing Date: 2024.02.23
Excerpt: ...icial notice is granted. Defendants' request for judicial not ice that was included as part of the declaration of Christopher Hoo is denied. (Hoo Decl., at ¶ 17.) Requests for judicial notice should be filed as a separate document. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1113(l).) Also, this request does not comply with Calif ornia Rules of Court, rule 3.1306. Procedural Issues Plaintiff's opposition suffers from a number of procedural defects. First, Pla...
2024.02.23 Motion to Quash Deposition Subpoena 976
Location: Orange County
Judge: Servino, Deborah C
Hearing Date: 2024.02.23
Excerpt: ...-1538; see ROA 221.) Plaintiff's evidentiary objection to Dr. Lewandowski's declara tion is overruled. Dr. Lewandowski's evidentiary objections nos. 1 and 2 are overruled; nos. 3 and 4 are sustained. Any party to the action or the witness may bring a motion to quash a subpoena and may request the court to quash it entirely, modify it, o r direct compliance with it upon those terms and conditions as the court shall declare including protective ord...
2024.02.23 Motion to Consolidate Cases 109
Location: Orange County
Judge: Servino, Deborah C
Hearing Date: 2024.02.23
Excerpt: ...e in the actions; it may order all the actions consolidated and it may make such orders co ncerning proceedings therein as may tend to avoid unnecessary costs or delay." (Sosnick v. Sosnick (1999) 71 Cal.App.4th 1335, 1339; Stubblefield Construction Co. v. City of San Bernardino (1995) 32 Cal.App.4th 687, 701.) Where the actions at issue presen t essentially the same or overlapping issues, they should be consolidated and disposed of as a sin...
2024.02.23 Motion to Compel Arbitration 256
Location: Orange County
Judge: Servino, Deborah C
Hearing Date: 2024.02.23
Excerpt: ...rt shall order the petitioner and the respondent to arbitrate the controversy if it determines that an agreement to arbitrate the controversy exists, unless it determines that: (a) The right to compel arbitration has been waived by the petitioner; or (b) Grounds exist for rescission of the agreement. (c) A party to the arbitration agreement is also a party to a pending court action or special proceeding with a third party, arising out of the same...
2024.02.23 Demurrer to FAC 697
Location: Orange County
Judge: Servino, Deborah C
Hearing Date: 2024.02.23
Excerpt: ... to challenge defects that appear within the “four corners” of the pleading – which includes the pleading, any exhibits attached, and matters of which the court is permitted to take judicial notice. (Blank v. Kirwan (1985) 39 Cal.3d 311, 318; Donabedian v. Mercury Ins. Co. (2004) 116 Cal.App.4th 968, 994.) Limited to the “four corners” as such, a pleading is adequate if it contains a reasonably precise statement of the ultimate facts, i...
2024.02.16 Demurrer 598
Location: Orange County
Judge: Servino, Deborah C
Hearing Date: 2024.02.16
Excerpt: ...llegations set forth in the complaint. (Lambert v. Carneghi (2008) 158 Cal.App.4th 1 120, 1126.) The challenge is limited to the “four corners” of the pleading (which includes exhibits attached and incorporated therein) or from matters outside the pleading which are judicially noticeable under Evidence Code sections 451 or 452. Although C alifornia courts take a liberal view of inartfully drawn complaints, it remains essential that a complain...
2024.02.16 Applications for Writ of Possession 185
Location: Orange County
Judge: Servino, Deborah C
Hearing Date: 2024.02.16
Excerpt: ...ng: (1) A showing of the basis of the plaintiff's claim and that the plaintiff is entitled to possession of the property claimed. If the basis of the plaintiff's claim is a written instrument, a copy of the instrument shall be attached. (2) A showing that the property is wrongfully detained by the defendant, of the manner in which the defendant came into possession of the property, and, according to the best knowledge, information, and belief of ...
2024.02.09 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 509
Location: Orange County
Judge: Servino, Deborah C
Hearing Date: 2024.02.09
Excerpt: ...th Plan, Inc. was dismissed without prejudice on November 9, 2022. The parties agreed that Plaintiff reserved the right to amend to rename any of the Defendants in the event discovery proceedings in the action revealed a basis for liability against them. (ROA 21.) Plaintiff attempted to bring 360 Health Plan, Inc. back into this action w ith a Doe amendment. This attempt appears to have been improper given that Plaintiff had initially named 360 H...
2024.02.09 Motion for Severance or Bifurcation 555
Location: Orange County
Judge: Servino, Deborah C
Hearing Date: 2024.02.09
Excerpt: ...ded complaint. Judicial notice of other court records and files is limited to matters that are ind isputably true. This generally means that judicial notice is limited to the orders and judgments in the other court file, as distinguished from the contents of documents filed therein. (Fremont Indem. Co. v. Fremont Gen. Corp. (2007) 148 Cal.App.4th 97, 113; Arce v. Kaiser Found. Health Plan, Inc. (2010) 181 Cal.App.4th 471, 482- 484.) Code of Ci...
2024.02.09 Motion to Dismiss 666
Location: Orange County
Judge: Servino, Deborah C
Hearing Date: 2024.02.09
Excerpt: ...ires Plaintiff to litigate this claim in New York. Specifically, section 12 of the “ Grant of Restricted Units of Elm Bidco, L.P.” (the “Vesting Agreement”), (FAC at ¶ 21, Exh. 2) provides: This Vesting Agreement and the rights and obligations of the parties hereto shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the Cay man Islands, the parties hereto hereby submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the Federal and state...
2024.02.09 Motion to Quash Deposition and Document Subpoena 876
Location: Orange County
Judge: Servino, Deborah C
Hearing Date: 2024.02.09
Excerpt: ...nce, the documents are not properly identified. (See Cal. Rules of Court, rule 2.551(d)(2) [m aterial to be lodged under seal must be clearly identified as "CONDITIONALLY UNDER SEAL"].) The parties' stipulated protective order requires that the parties follow California Rules of Court, rules 2.550 and 2.551. (See Protective Order, at ¶ 18 [ROA 124].) The Clerk's Office properly did not conditionally seal those records. (See ROA...
2024.02.09 Motion to Quash Service of Summons 771
Location: Orange County
Judge: Servino, Deborah C
Hearing Date: 2024.02.09
Excerpt: ...se. A party may “simply call the court's attention to such papers.” ( Weil & Brown, Cal. Practice Guide: Civil Procedure Before Trial (The Rutter Group 2023) ¶ 9:53.1a.) Huston moves to quash the service of summons for lack of personal jurisdiction. Cross - Complainants Michael Akpeke, MD, PL dba Delta Internal Medicine Cent er and Michael Akpeke did not oppose the motion. A party opposing a motion to quash service of process for lack of per...
2024.02.02 Motion to Compel Further Responses 043
Location: Orange County
Judge: Servino, Deborah C
Hearing Date: 2024.02.02
Excerpt: ... interrogatories, instead, stating in response to most of them, that “Plainti¯ was not employed by Del Signore, nor is Del Signore synonymous with Truclear.” Each answer in the response must be “as complete and straightforward as the information reasonably available to the responding party permits. If an interrogatory cannot be answered completely, it shall be answered to the extent possible.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 2030.220, subds. (a) &...
2024.02.02 Motion for Trial Preference 581
Location: Orange County
Judge: Servino, Deborah C
Hearing Date: 2024.02.02
Excerpt: ...ation.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 36, subd. (a), emphasis added; Weil & Brown, Cal. Practice Guide: Civil Procedure Before Trial (The Rutter Group 2023) ¶ 12:246:1 [“Trial priority is not mandatory and absolute merely because one of the parties is age 70. The court has discretion to determine the extent of that party's interest and Þnd as a matter of fact the risk posed of that party's death or incapacity if trial is delayed.”].) Plainti¯s s...
2024.02.02 Motion for Sanctions 056
Location: Orange County
Judge: Servino, Deborah C
Hearing Date: 2024.02.02
Excerpt: ... sustained. Defendant's remaining objections are overruled. New Evidence Submitted With Reply Plainti¯s submitted new evidence in support of their reply. “The general rule of motion practice . . . is that new evidence is not permitted with reply papers. . .‘[T]he inclusion of additional evidentiary matter with the reply should only be allowed in the exceptional case . . .' and if permitted, the other party should be given the opportunity to...
2024.02.02 Demurrer, Motion to Strike 974
Location: Orange County
Judge: Servino, Deborah C
Hearing Date: 2024.02.02
Excerpt: ...Group 2023) ¶ 7:162.1.) The court exercises its discretion to consider the merits of the demurrer and motion to strike. Plainti¯s opposition exceeded the 15-page limit, without seeking leave to Þle a longer memorandum. The opposition also did not include a table of contents or table of authorities. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1113(d) & (f).) The court considered the opposition, given that Defendant improperly combined the demurrer and motio...
2024.02.02 Demurrer 998
Location: Orange County
Judge: Servino, Deborah C
Hearing Date: 2024.02.02
Excerpt: ...' request for judicial notice of Exhibits A through E (ROA 65), is granted. (Evid. Code, § 452, subd. (c); see Ragland v. U.S. Bank National Assn. (2012) 209 Cal.App.4th 182, 194.) In taking judicial notice, the court does not take judicial notice of the truth of the matters stated therein. (Herrera v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. (2011) 196 Cal.App.4th 1366, 1375.) Violations of California Foreclosure Statutes (Civ. Code §§ 2924 et seq., ...
2024.02.02 Demurrer 555
Location: Orange County
Judge: Servino, Deborah C
Hearing Date: 2024.02.02
Excerpt: ... in some respects uncertain, because ambiguities can be clariÞed under modern discovery procedures.” (Khoury v. Maly's of California, Inc. (1993) 14 Cal.App.4th 612, 616.) Errors and confusion created by “the inept pleader” are to be forgiven if the pleading contains su¯icient facts entitling plainti¯ to relief. (Saunders v. Cariss (1990) 224 Cal.App.3d 905, 908.) A demurrer for uncertainty should be overruled if the facts are presumpt...
2024.01.26 Motion to Strike, OSC Re Preliminary Injunction 065
Location: Orange County
Judge: Servino, Deborah C
Hearing Date: 2024.01.26
Excerpt: ...to do so. (Perlman v. Municipal Court (1979) 99 Cal.App.3d 568, 574.) Code of Civil Procedure secton 761.020 provides that in any action to quiet title to real property "[t]he complaint shall be verified." Here, Plaintiffs Complaint is unverified. Accordingly, the motion to strike is granted with 15 days leave to amend. OSC RE: PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION The court grants Defendant's request to issue a preliminary injunction restraining Plaintiff and ...
2024.01.26 Motion to Quash Service of Summons 771
Location: Orange County
Judge: Servino, Deborah C
Hearing Date: 2024.01.26
Excerpt: ...mplainants Michael Akpeke, MO, PL, dba Delta Internal Medicine Center and Michael Akpeke's Crosscomplaint for forum non-conveniens. A defendant, on or before the last day of his or her time to plead or within any further time that the court may for good cause allow, may serve and file a notice of motion to quash service of summons on the ground of lack of jurisdiction of the court over him or her. (Code Civ. Proc„ S 418.10, subd. (a)(l).) A par...

806 Results

Per page

Pages