Excerpt: ...plaint alleged the vehicle was purchased "used." (Complaint, 98.) On April 14, 2022, the Court sustained Defendant's demurrer to the original complaint with leave to amend, explaining in the minute order: "In order for used vehicles to have ccwerage under the Song-Beverly Act, certain facts must be alleged to provde coverage. While Plaintiff attempts to provide these necessary allegations in his Opposition, the Court cannot consider extrinsic evi...

Excerpt: ...116, 126; Reed v. United Teachers Los Angeles (2012) 208 Cal.App.4th 322, 337.) The court has “broad discretion in making this determination.” (In re Microsoft I-V Cases (2006) 135 Cal.App.4th 706, 723.) Relevant factors the court may consider include “the strength of the plaintiffs' case, the risk, the expense, complexity and likely duration of further litigation, the risk of maintaining class action status through trial, the amount offere...

Excerpt: ...tions, deter future ones, and to maximize enforcement of state labor laws.” (Moniz v. Adecco USA, Inc. (2021) 72 Cal.App.5th 56, 77.) The court must also find that the plaintiff “has adequately represented the state's interests, and hence the public interest.” (Id. at p. 89.) Finally, the LWDA must be notified of the settlement and thereby be given an opportunity to object. The court has several concerns about the proposed settlement. Couns...

Excerpt: ...errule 3. Objections to the Points & Authorities: 1 – 9. overrule (objections are proper only as to evidence, not argument) 4. Supplemental Declaration of Julie Weiner: 1-28. overrule Motion: A. Procedural Issue: Plaintiffs have “lodged” certain documents in support of their Opposition. If a party intends to “lodge” exhibits, he needs to cite to a statute, rule of court, or local rule that provides for the “lodging” of exhibits. (Lo...

Excerpt: ...dure authorized under the Civil Discovery Act. If no one responds to the website's plea for information, this court is not empowered to compel a response from anyone. Defendants next argue that the website is inaccurate and misleading, in violation of the rules of professional conduct governing lawyers. Defendants have failed to make the requisite showing. The website accurately characterizes the allegations made in the lawsuit. The website does ...

Excerpt: ...concurrent jurisdiction is subject to waiver and should be raised by demurrer where the issue appears on the face of the complaint and by answer where factual issues must be resolved, followed by a motion to abate or for summary judgment. [Citations omitted.] In Shaw, the defendant did not raise the issue by demurrer or answer, but the Court declined to find waiver because the plaintiffs never argued for it. (Ibid.) Unlike Shaw, plaintiff has rai...

Excerpt: ...quirement appears satisfied. Requests at issue. The subject RFPs request the following original documents for purportedly non-destructive testing: (1) “AIR CRE Standard Industrial/Commercial Multi- Tenant Lease—Net dated November 6, 2020 between Ron Herndon Jr. as ‘Lessor' and Cannextract LLC as ‘Lessee', including page 17 with added handwritten paragraphs.” This lease relates to Units 2 and 3 which Plaintiffs allegedly leased from the ...

Excerpt: ...eed v. United Teachers Los Angeles (2012) 208 Cal.App.4th 322, 337.) The court has “broad discretion in making this determination.” (In re Microsoft I-V Cases (2006) 135 Cal.App.4th 706, 723.) Relevant factors the court may consider include “the strength of plaintiffs' case, the risk, expense, complexity and likely duration of further litigation, the risk of maintaining class action status through trial, the amount offered in settlement, th...

Excerpt: ...ell (“Defendant” or “Burrell”). The Complaint alleges two causes of action for (1) Private Nuisance, and (2) Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress. According to the Complaint, Plaintiff moved into his apartment at 9550 Fremont Avenue, Apt. J5, Montclair, CA 91763, on May 10, 2019. Defendant Kortnee Burrell occupied an adjoining apartment, Apt. J6. Beginning on May 11, 2019, Burrell made loud noises, including talking and laughing a...

Excerpt: ...ility based on a negligence and failure to warn theory. According to the complaint, the incident occurred as Salinas was walking away from the checkout stand with a bag in her hand. The Motion for Summary Judgment/Adjudication Now, through the pending motion, Walmart seeks summary judgment/adjudication, on the grounds that Salinas cannot meet her burden of establishing that the dangerous condition existed for a sufficient time to support a findin...

Excerpt: ...duty; (3) defendant's breach was a substantial factor in causing the damages; and (4) plaintiff was damaged. (Ladd v. County of San Mateo (1996) 12 Cal.4th 913, 917.) Under her first cause of action for negligence, Plaintiff alleges the District “knew or should have reasonably known” Allen “had or was capable of” sexually abusing Plaintiff or other victims. (Compl. ¶98.) Plaintiff further alleges the District breached its duties by faili...

Excerpt: ... Exhibits A-K and M-Q in their entirety. 2. Motion: A. Where the moving party in a motion for judgment on the pleadings is the defendant, the motion is limited to the grounds that the court has no jurisdiction over the subject of the cause of action alleged in the complaint or the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against the defendant. (Code Civ. Proc., § 438, subds. (c)(1)(B)(i)- (ii).) Like a demurrer, ...

Excerpt: ...hibit 1 (to both Defendants Bamboo & Catlin's Requests), the First Amended Complaint. The Court would GRANT. 2. As to Exhibits 2-4 (to Defendant Bamboo's Requests), state license information and Statements of Information filings relating to Bamboo, the Court would GRANT as to the existence of such documents only. The existence of a document recorded in the official records of a government body may be judicially noticeable, but its proper interpre...

Excerpt: ... relief; (3) partition; and (4) constructive trust. The underlying allegations are that Plaintiff and Defendant orally agreed that each would share a one-half interest in the Yucca Valley property at issue. Plaintiff alleges that Defendant agreed to take the loan out for the property as well as pay the down payment and closing costs. The title was, therefore, originally in his name. For her part, Plaintiff alleges that she agreed to pay Defendant...

Excerpt: ...emed a limited civil case. (Gov. Code, §53069.4.) In limited cases, discovery is permissible but limited on the total number of interrogatories, document demands, and admission requests that can be propounded. (Code Civ. Proc., §94.) As a limited civil case authorizes discovery, and the appeal is treated like a limited civil case, it cannot be said that Appellants are denied the right of limited discovery. Arguably vague, Interrogatory #21, the...

Excerpt: ...represented by Counsel (and to this date, he is still represented by Counsel, as Counsel has never filed a proof of service of the signed Order). On November 22, 2021, Plaintiff's Counsel (Eghbali Firm) obtained an Order Granting its Motion to be Relieved as Counsel (“Order”). That Order (¶5(a)) provides that the relief as counsel is effect “upon the filing of the proof of service of this signed order upon the client.” (See also Rules of...

Excerpt: ...te and reasonable.” (Kullar v. Foot Locker Retail, Inc. (2008) 168 Cal.App.4th 116, 126; Reed v. United Teachers Los Angeles (2012) 208 Cal.App.4th 322, 337.) The court has “broad discretion in making this determination.” (In re Microsoft I-V Cases (2006) 135 Cal.App.4th 706, 723.) Relevant factors the court may consider include “the strength of plaintiffs' case, the risk, expense, complexity and likely duration of further litigation, the...

Excerpt: ...nder Code of Civil Procedure section 2025.450, however, it should be under section 2025.480. By the facts, a deposition notice was served to which Defendant GM objected. Section 2025.450 addresses compelling depositions when no objection is served. An objection was served, and there are entire objections to producing documents and answering questions. Thus, section 2025.480 which applies to objections to deposition questions and documents is more...

Excerpt: ...Moriana (2022) 142 S.Ct. 1906. Before Viking River, PAGA claims were not subject to arbitration under any circumstances. (See e.g. Iskanian v. CLS Transp. Los Angeles LLC (2014) 59 Cal.4th 348.) In Viking River, however, the Court held, contrary to Iskanian, that under the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C., section 1 et seq. (FAA), a PAGA action is divisible into “individual” and “non-individual” components. In the Viking River lexicon, a...

Excerpt: ... Los Angeles (2012) 208 Cal.App.4th 322, 337.) The court has “broad discretion in making this determination.” (In re Microsoft I-V Cases (2006) 135 Cal.App.4th 706, 723.) Relevant factors the court may consider include “the strength of plaintiffs' case, the risk, expense, complexity and likely duration of further litigation, the risk of maintaining class action status through trial, the amount offered in settlement, the extent of discovery ...

Excerpt: ...nited Teachers Los Angeles (2012) 208 Cal.App.4th 322, 337.) The court has “broad discretion in making this determination.” (In re Microsoft I-V Cases (2006) 135 Cal.App.4th 706, 723.) Relevant factors the court may consider include “the strength of plaintiffs' case, the risk, expense, complexity and likely duration of further litigation, the risk of maintaining class action status through trial, the amount offered in settlement, the extent...

Excerpt: ...rest break violations; (5) reimbursement violations; (6) final pay violations; (7) wage statement violations; (8) unfair competition law violations; and (9) civil penalties pursuant to the Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA). The LWDA was given notice of Plaintiff's claims as of September 11, 2022. Plaintiff sought to represent all of the hourly, non-exempt current and former California who worked at Defendant's lumber and building supplies busi...

Excerpt: ...laws.” (Moniz v. Adecco USA, Inc. (2021) 72 Cal.App.5th 56, 77.) The court must find that the plaintiff “has adequately represented the state's interests, and hence the public interest.” (Id. at p. 89.) The LWDA must have been notified of the settlement and given an opportunity to object. The court finds that the settlement is fair, reasonable, and adequate under Moniz. The court further finds that all representative plaintiffs with the exc...

Excerpt: ..., Inc. (2008) 168 Cal.App.4th 116, 126; Reed v. United Teachers Los Angeles (2012) 208 Cal.App.4th 322, 337.) The court has “broad discretion in making this determination.” (In re Microsoft I-V Cases (2006) 135 Cal.App.4th 706, 723.) Relevant factors the court may consider include “the strength of plaintiffs' case, the risk, expense, complexity and likely duration of further litigation, the risk of maintaining class action status through tr...

Excerpt: ... settle. As such they have argued, in the alternative to denying the motion, the Court may continue the matter past the pending mediation and motion to stay. Page 4 Defendant roofing company's overspray blew silicone adhesive on to nearby properties and various nearby tractors, trucks, and automobiles. The proposed class are “all persons whose vehicles were damaged by silicone overspray on October 18, 2018, at 1901 Raymer Ave., Fullerton, CA 92...

Excerpt: ..., adequate and reasonable.” (Kullar v. Foot Locker Retail, Inc. (2008) 168 Cal.App.4th 116, 126; Reed v. United Teachers Los Angeles (2012) 208 Cal.App.4th 322, 337.) The court has “broad discretion in making this determination.” (In re Microsoft I-V Cases (2006) 135 Cal.App.4th 706, 723.) Relevant factors the court may consider include “the strength of plaintiffs' case, the risk, expense, complexity and likely duration of further litigat...

Excerpt: ...to compel arbitration pursuant to Viking River Cruises, Inc. v. Moriana (2022) 142 S.Ct. 1906. Before Viking River, PAGA claims were not subject to arbitration under any circumstances. (See e.g. Iskanian v. CLS Transp. Los Angeles LLC (2014) 59 Cal.4th 348.) In Viking River, however, the Court held, contrary to Iskanian, that under the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C., section 1 et seq. (FAA), a PAGA action is divisible into “individual” and...

Excerpt: ...ums, (3) unpaid rest period premiums, (4) minimum wages, (5) untimely final wages, (6) untimely wages, (7) wage statements violations, (8) payroll records violations, (9) reimbursements, and (10) violations of the unfair competition law. Plaintiff seeks to represent Defendant's California hourly and non-exempt employees who worked during the statutory period. On September 14, 2021, Plaintiff separately filed a single cause of action Private Attor...

Excerpt: ...i-SLAPP motion against an amended complaint if it could not have been brought earlier, but to prohibit belated motions that could have been brought earlier (subject to the trial court's discretion to permit a late motion). This interpretation maximizes the possibility the anti-SLAPP statute will fulfill its purpose while reducing the potential for abuse.” (Newport Harbor Ventures, LLC v. Morris Cerullo World Evangelism (2018) 4 Cal. 5th 637, 65...

Excerpt: ...eved employees.” On the one hand, the basic coverage provision in the agreement is broad, covering all claims the employee may have against the company unless otherwise excluded. (See Arbitration Agreement, p. 1, ¶ 1 (“Claims Covered by the Agreement.”) On the other hand, the agreement also provides: These claims are not covered under the Agreement: …(iv) representative actions for civil penalties filed under the California Private Attor...

Excerpt: ...to compel arbitration pursuant to Viking River Cruises, Inc. v. Moriana (2022) 142 S.Ct. 1906. Before Viking River, PAGA claims were not subject to arbitration under any circumstances. (See e.g. Iskanian v. CLS Transp. Los Angeles LLC (2014) 59 Cal.4th 348.) In Viking River, however, the Court held, contrary to Iskanian, that under the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C., section 1 et seq. (FAA), a PAGA action is divisible into “individual” and...

Excerpt: ... and implied warranty under the Song-Beverly Act. In essence, Plaintiffs allege they purchased the 2020-year subject vehicle from Defendant, that express and implied warranties existed, and that there were various defects and non-conformities that arose during the warranty period. Plaintiffs sent the vehicle in for repairs but Defendant was unable to successfully repair it after a reasonable number of attempts. Plaintiffs also alleges that, after...

Excerpt: ... current resume of 7 employees. In their initial responses, Walmart's initial responses consisted of boilerplate objections: relevancy, privacy, Page | 2 vague and ambiguous, and unduly burdensome. Subsequently, Walmart served identical supplemental responses to Request Nos. 57-65, each of which states: There are no documents responsive to this request in Defendant's possession, custody, or control. Plaintiff argues that relevancy is not a valid ...

Excerpt: ...to arbitrate the controversy exists. . . .' ([Code Civ. Proc.,] § 1281.2) The statute does not require the petitioner to introduce the agreement into evidence.” (Condee v. Longwood Management Corp. (2001) 88 Cal.App.4th 215, 218.) “A plain reading of the statute indicates that as a preliminary matter the court is only required to make a finding of the agreement's existence, not an evidentiary determination of its validity.” (Condee v. Long...

Excerpt: ..., adequate and reasonable.” (Kullar v. Foot Locker Retail, Inc. (2008) 168 Cal.App.4th 116, 126; Reed v. United Teachers Los Angeles (2012) 208 Cal.App.4th 322, 337.) The court has “broad discretion in making this determination.” (In re Microsoft I-V Cases (2006) 135 Cal.App.4th 706, 723.) Relevant factors the court may consider include “the strength of plaintiffs' case, the risk, expense, complexity and likely duration of further litigat...

Excerpt: ... alleged facts are insufficient to support punitive damages. Defendants argue that California does not recognize a cause of action for gross recklessness. The Court agrees. “‘Ordinary negligence'—an unintentional tort—consists of a failure to exercise the degree of care in a given situation that a reasonable person under similar circumstances would employ to protect others from harm. [Citation.] [¶] ‘Gross negligence' long has been def...

Excerpt: ...ment is fair, adequate and reasonable.” (Kullar v. Foot Locker Retail, Inc. (2008) 168 Cal.App.4th 116, 126; Reed v. United Teachers Los Angeles (2012) 208 Cal.App.4th 322, 337.) The court has “broad discretion in making this determination.” (In re Microsoft I-V Cases (2006) 135 Cal.App.4th 706, 723.) Relevant factors the court may consider include “the strength of plaintiffs' case, the risk, expense, complexity and likely duration of fur...

Excerpt: ...ust demonstrate that “the settlement is fair, adequate and reasonable.” (Kullar v. Foot Locker Retail, Inc. (2008) 168 Cal.App.4th 116, 126; Reed v. United Teachers Los Angeles (2012) 208 Cal.App.4th 322, 337.) The court has “broad discretion in making this determination.” (In re Microsoft I-V Cases (2006) 135 Cal.App.4th 706, 723.) Relevant factors the court may consider include “the strength of plaintiffs' case, the risk, expense, com...

Excerpt: ... Class Action Settlements Settlement of a class action requires court approval. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.769.) The moving party must demonstrate that “the settlement is fair, adequate and reasonable.” (Kullar v. Foot Locker Retail, Inc. (2008) 168 Cal.App.4th 116, 126; Reed v. United Teachers Los Angeles (2012) 208 Cal.App.4th 322, 337.) The court has “broad discretion in making this determination.” (In re Microsoft I-V Cases (2006) 1...

Excerpt: ...p.4th 322, 337.) The court has “broad discretion in making this determination.” (In re Microsoft I-V Cases (2006) 135 Cal.App.4th 706, 723.) Relevant factors the court may consider include “the strength of plaintiffs' case, the risk, expense, complexity and likely duration of further litigation, the risk of maintaining class action status through trial, the amount offered in settlement, the extent of discovery completed and the stage of the...

Excerpt: ...tice of Errata regarding their motion. As threshold matter, both the motion and errata are unsigned and should have been rejected by the court. The notice of motion and the accompanying motion, filed on September 6, include a designation “/s” on the signature line, which in other contexts is sometimes used to indicate an electronic signature, but this court does not yet utilize electronic filing. Therefore, these documents are both unsigned. ...

Excerpt: ...ntenot v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (2011) 198 Cal.App.4th 256, 264, disapproved on other grounds in Yvanova v. New Century Mortg. Corp. (2016) 62 Cal.4th 919, 939, FN.13.) As to the Motion for Summary Judgment: The Court would DENY the motion. Case Summary This matter is an Unlawful Detainer. The Complaint alleges that Plaintiff purchased the real property that was previously owned by Defendants. Defendants failed to vacate the property after the s...

Excerpt: ...ce to Yudo Inc., and it has been paying death benefits due to the death of Yudo's employee, Manuel Ortega, who died in an auto accident in New Mexico on July 18, 2019. Plaintiff further alleges Lancer and Palma were the legal and proximate cause of the accident and Ortega's death. Plaintiff's complaint includes two causes of action: (1) general negligence; and (2) motor vehicle negligence. On April 19, 2022, the Court (Judge Robinson) signed and ...

Excerpt: ...ves the right to exclude any such evidence upon proper objection during the trial depending upon what occurs at trial. The denial or grant of these motions is without prejudice. Where any motion is granted, the Court orders the parties and their attorneys to advise all witnesses: 1. Not to mention, refer or attempt to convey to the jury any evidence excluded or limited; and 2. Not to make any reference to the fact that any Order was made on a mot...

Excerpt: ...ers Los Angeles (2012) 208 Cal.App.4th 322, 337.) The court has “broad discretion in making this determination.” (In re Microsoft I-V Cases (2006) 135 Cal.App.4th 706, 723.) Relevant factors the court may consider include “the strength of plaintiffs' case, the risk, expense, complexity and likely duration of further litigation, the risk of maintaining class action status through trial, the amount offered in settlement, the extent of discove...

Excerpt: ...(2012) 208 Cal.App.4th 322, 337.) The court has “broad discretion in making this determination.” (In re Microsoft I-V Cases (2006) 135 Cal.App.4th 706, 723.) Relevant factors the court may consider include “the strength of plaintiffs' case, the risk, expense, complexity and likely duration of further litigation, the risk of maintaining class action status through trial, the amount offered in settlement, the extent of discovery completed and...

Excerpt: ...ished in the Senate Daily Journal, dated July 29, 2004. These Requests are unopposed, and the Court GRANTS them. As to the Motion for Approval: The Court's tentative is to GRANT. Standards Settlements under PAGA at Labor Code sections 2698, et seq., do not require preliminary approval. The court must find, however, that the PAGA settlement is “fair, reasonable, and adequate in view of PAGA's purposes to remediate present labor law violations, d...

Excerpt: ... law violations, deter future ones, and to maximize enforcement of state labor laws.” (Moniz v. Adecco USA, Inc. (2021) 72 Cal.App.5th 56, 77.) The court must find that the plaintiff 5 “has adequately represented the state's interests, and hence the public interest.” (Id. at p. 89.) The LWDA must be notified of the settlement and be given an opportunity to object. The court may looks to parallel class action guidelines to determine what is ...

Excerpt: ...ndant” or “Honda”) filed a demurrer which the Court sustained on June 7, 2022 with leave to amend. Plaintiff did not file an opposition to the demurrer. Plaintiff filed a first amended complaint (“FAC”) on June 27, 2022 asserting the same single cause of action. On September 26, 2022, Honda filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings. The Court sustained the motion for judgment on the pleadings with leave to amend. On November 18, 2023...

Excerpt: ... USA, Inc. (2021) 72 Cal.App.5th 56, 77.) The court must find that the plaintiff “has adequately represented the state's interests, and hence the public interest.” (Id. at p. 89.) The LWDA must have been notified of the settlement and given an opportunity to object. Counsel seeks $45,333.00 as an attorney fee. While counsel stated the number of hours worked on the case, which allows the court to calculate the hourly rate, no lodestar analysis...

Excerpt: ...l.App.4th 116, 126; Reed v. United Teachers Los Angeles (2012) 208 Cal.App.4th 322, 337.) The court has “broad discretion in making this determination.” (In re Microsoft I-V Cases (2006) 135 Cal.App.4th 706, 723.) Relevant factors the court may consider include “the strength of the plaintiffs' case, the risk, the expense, complexity and likely duration of further litigation, the risk of maintaining class action status through trial, the amo...

Excerpt: ...rson is sought. Therefore, no privacy interest is invaded. DENY further responses to Special Interrogatories #30-33. There is no demonstration that every Pipeline Carrier driver of Latino or Hispanic descent is a witness to Plaintiff's allegations to justify the disclosure of their identities. Regardless of the number of drivers involved in this request, without additional information demonstrating that these individuals are witnesses, releasing ...

Excerpt: ... Inc. (2008) 168 Cal.App.4th 116, 126; Reed v. United Teachers Los Angeles (2012) 208 Cal.App.4th 322, 337.) The court has “broad discretion in making this determination.” (In re Microsoft I-V Cases (2006) 135 Cal.App.4th 706, 723.) Relevant factors the court may consider include “the strength of plaintiffs' case, the risk, expense, complexity and likely duration of further litigation, the risk of maintaining class action status through tri...

Excerpt: ...endant Flowers, who made an abrupt and unsafe left turn, causing a crash that injured Plaintiff. Plaintiff further alleges that Defendant Flowers was operating his shuttle during the course and scope of his employment and that the shuttle was leased, entrusted or owned by the various other Defendants (collectively, Defendants). Plaintiff filed suit on December 3, 2021, alleging (1) motor vehicle negligence; (2) common carrier negligence; and (3) ...

Excerpt: ...d. The discrepancy covers approximately three months. Defendant's motion is overly broad, seeking to strike portions of the amended complaint that go far beyond the narrow issue and would result in portions of the pleading being stricken which Defendant does not challenge. Defendant clarifies, however, that if the court were to agree with Defendant's view of the issue, the court could grant the motion and allow Plaintiff to amend the complaint to...

Excerpt: ...-hour class action asserted by a mechanic against his former employer. On March 3, 2022, Plaintiff filed this matter seeking to represent all of Defendant's current and former hourly, non-exempt California employees during the statutory period. His suit alleges (1) wage violations; (2) wage statement violations; (3) waiting time penalties; and (4) violation of the unfair competition law. Relevantly, Olid v. Westrux International, Inc., et al, Cas...

Excerpt: ...s and ages not connected with any specific person is sought. Therefore, no privacy interest is invaded. DENY further responses to Special Interrogatories #27-30 (misnumbered in Defendant's response as 30-33). There is no demonstration that every Pipeline Carrier driver of Latino or Hispanic descent is a witness to Plaintiff's allegations to justify the disclosure of their identities. DENY further responses to Special Interrogatories #31 to 40 (mi...

Excerpt: ...rson is sought. Therefore, no privacy interest is invaded. DENY further responses to Special Interrogatories #30-33. There is no demonstration that every Pipeline Carrier driver of Latino or Hispanic descent is a witness to Plaintiff's allegations to justify the disclosure of their identities. DENY further responses to Special Interrogatories #34 to 43. Responses to interrogatories #34 and 39 indicated that the missing records have now been locat...

Excerpt: ...ers. Petitioner claims damages arising from the alleged use of excessive force by police sometime between April 27 and 30, 2020. Respondents oppose the petition. Analysis The motion is supported by the declaration of attorney Steven Parnell Weaver (Weaver), and opposed by the declaration of Fontana Police Lieutenant Matt Kraut (Kraut). While these declarations do reveal some minimal discrepancies in the timeline of events, none are significant en...

Excerpt: ... Cal.App.4th 116, 126; Reed v. United Teachers Los Angeles (2012) 208 Cal.App.4th 322, 337.) The court has “broad discretion in making this determination.” (In re Microsoft I-V Cases (2006) 135 Cal.App.4th 706, 723.) Relevant factors the court may consider include “the strength of the plaintiffs' case, the risk, the expense, complexity and likely duration of further litigation, the risk of maintaining class action status through trial, the ...

Excerpt: ...iscretion in making this determination.” (In re Microsoft I-V Cases (2006) 135 Cal.App.4th 706, 723.) Relevant factors the court may consider include “the strength of plaintiffs' case, the risk, expense, complexity and likely duration of further litigation, the risk of maintaining class action status through trial, the amount offered in settlement, the extent of discovery completed and the stage of the proceedings, the experience and views of...

Excerpt: ...ent in the underlying eminent domain proceeding related to the Archibald Avenue Improvement Project, which was intended to improve traffic and interchange operations by making improvements to Archibald Avenue between East Oak Hill Drive and Monticello Place near State Route 60. In entering the judgment, the Court determined that defendants Kuzina Development, LLC (Kuzina) was entitled to $206,475.50 for the San Bernardino County Transportation Au...

Excerpt: ...2012) 208 Cal.App.4th 322, 337.) The court has “broad discretion in making this determination.” (In re Microsoft I-V Cases (2006) 135 Cal.App.4th 706, 723.) Relevant factors the court may consider include “the strength of plaintiffs' case, the risk, expense, complexity and likely duration of further litigation, the risk of maintaining class action status through trial, the amount offered in settlement, the extent of discovery completed and ...

Excerpt: ...126; Reed v. United Teachers Los Angeles (2012) 208 Cal.App.4th 322, 337.) The court has “broad discretion in making this determination.” (In re Microsoft I-V Cases (2006) 135 Cal.App.4th 706, 723.) Relevant factors the court may consider include “the strength of plaintiffs' case, the risk, expense, complexity and likely duration of further litigation, the risk of maintaining class action status through trial, the amount offered in settleme...

Excerpt: ...bitration Act (FAA) governs because Vista's business, and presumably the work performed by Muldrew, involve interstate commerce. The agreement, however, specifically provides otherwise. It states: “The arbitration shall conducted in the city and state of my employment and shall be governed and conducted in accordance with the laws of that state including all matters related to discovery, form of decision, procedures and remedy and relief availa...

Excerpt: ...ctions 2 6. Motion to Compel Resp. to Special Interrogatories, Set Two & for Sanctions 2/9/23, 8:30 a.m., Dept. S17 Preliminary: The underlying discovery was all served via email, but the submitted declarations do not indicate why such service is appropriate. (See Rules of Court, rule 2.251(b).) However, the Court notes the parties prior filings have utilized also uniformly used email service, and thus the Court will inquire regarding the appropr...

Excerpt: ...ockton v. Superior Court (2007) 42 Cal.4th 730, 734.) The purposes of the claim presentation is to provide public entities with sufficient information to enable them to investigate the merits of claims while the evidence is still fresh and the witnesses are available; to prevent public funds from being consumed in “needless” litigation by affording public entities an opportunity to settle claims before incurring litigation expenses; to provid...

Excerpt: ... (2012) 208 Cal.App.4th 322, 337.) The court has “broad discretion in making this determination.” (In re Microsoft I-V Cases (2006) 135 Cal.App.4th 706, 723.) Relevant factors the court may consider include “the strength of plaintiffs' case, the risk, expense, complexity and likely duration of further litigation, the risk of maintaining class action status through trial, the amount offered in settlement, the extent of discovery completed an...

Excerpt: ...SA, Inc. (2021) 72 Cal.App.5th 56, 77.) The court must find that the plaintiff “has adequately represented the state's interests, and hence the public interest.” (Id. at p. 89.) The LWDA must have been notified of the settlement and given an opportunity to object. The court is unable to make these findings because counsel has not provided the number of aggrieved employees who will participate in the settlement (actual or even estimated). The ...

Excerpt: ...rse parties at “all known addresses”; and (2) all owners of record shown in the “latest county assessment roll.” (Code Civ. Proc., §§ 405.22, 405.23). Here there is no dispute that the lis pendens was served after its recordation. Substantial compliance in Biddle involved the manner of mail service and waiver of defects, and thus, distinguishable from the case at hand. Biddle v. Superior Court (1985) 170 Cal.App.3d 135. CCP § 405 is cl...

Excerpt: ... failed to demonstrate any unreasonable delay, obstruction, or lack of substantial justification in producing the deponent. The delay resulted from deponent being on medical leave. In fact, the deposition was taken by Zoom while the deponent was still on medical leave, bedridden. The moving party has failed to establish substantial justification for filing the unmeritorious motion. Sanctions are therefore awarded to the City, assessed against cou...

Excerpt: ...012) 208 Cal.App.4th 322, 337.) The court has “broad discretion in making this determination.” (In re Microsoft I-V Cases (2006) 135 Cal.App.4th 706, 723.) Relevant factors the court may consider include “the strength of plaintiffs' case, the risk, expense, complexity and likely duration of further litigation, the risk of maintaining class action status through trial, the amount offered in settlement, the extent of discovery completed and t...

Excerpt: ...the Mansukhani Action. The Court would GRANT and take judicial notice of the existence of the referenced court documents. Although a court may take judicial notice of the existence of judicial opinions, court documents, and verdicts, it may not take judicial notice of the truth of the hearsay statements within or of the factual findings made in those other actions. (Johnson & Johnson v. Superior Court (2011) 192 Cal.App.4th 757, 768.) As to Cross...

Excerpt: ...ir of the Judicial Council of the removal, but indicated that the coordinated proceedings would remain open due to the possibility of remand. On April 13, 2022, counsel informed the court that the matters were remaining in federal court. This court therefore scheduled an order to show cause why the coordinated proceeding should not be closed on June 24, 2022. On June 24, counsel advised the court that the matters were settling and that a motion f...

Excerpt: ...abuse ‘after considering the totality of the circumstances: [the] conduct of the party to determine if the actions were willful; the detriment to the propounding party; and the number of formal and informal attempts to obtain the discovery.' [Citation.]” (Ibid.) “It is well established ‘the purpose of discovery sanctions “is not ‘to provide a weapon for punishment, forfeiture and the avoidance of a trial on the merits,'” ... but to ...

Excerpt: ...Interrogatories (SRG), Request for Production of Documents (RFPs), and Request for Admissions (RFAs), which Hussain opposed. On October 5, 2022, the Court heard Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Hussain's Initial Responses to Form Interrogatories (FRG), Special Interrogatories (SRG), Request for Production of Documents (RFPs), and Request for Admissions (RFAs) and made the following findings and rulings: Page | 5 (1) The Court granted Plaintiff's Moti...

Excerpt: ...claims asserted by plaintiff. The issue is whether Precise Distributions, a non-party, can enforce it under theories of third- party beneficiary, equitable estoppel, or agency. Third Party Beneficiary Plaintiff fails to demonstrate that the doctrine of third party beneficiary applies. A third party's rights under a contract are predicated upon the contracting party's intent to benefit that person. (Civ. Code, §1559; Hess v. Ford Motor Co. (2002)...

Excerpt: ...rifications, the parties agreed to the deadline. These motions are brought more than a year after either date (the deadline agreed to by the parties or the deadline ordered by the court). These motions are therefore denied. Set 2 of Requests for Production The requests embrace tax returns, balance sheets, profit and loss statements, and other documents demonstrating defendant's financial condition during the liability period. Defendant objects on...

Excerpt: ...aint, and awarding Nulook $7,304.66 plus prejudgment interest of 10% per annum dating back to August 4, 2016. On November 21, 2022, Nulook filed its memorandum of costs seeking $7,002.42, along with a supporting declaration from counsel containing receipts. On December 8, 2022, M N M filed the instant motion to tax costs. Nulook opposes. No reply is on file to date. DISCUSSION Statement of the Law Except as otherwise expressly provided by statute...

Excerpt: ...ler also does not argue that the amendment would be time barred or address whether the new claims should relate back to the initial filing. (Opposition at 2:6-7 [defendant will not analyze the proposed pleading as that would be improper in connection with the motion for leave].) Page | 2 What Miller does argue is that the motion is not timely as Whitten was aware of the Suicas' purported percipient status in November 2020 and he fails to explain ...

Excerpt: ...n the judgment. (Highland Springs Conference & Training Center v. City of Banning (2016) 244 Cal.App.4th 267, 280 [“Highland Springs”].) The addition of an alter ego is an equitable procedure based on the theory that the court can insert the correct name of the real defendant. (Ibid.) Page | 2 The request to amend should be by a notice motion. (Highland Springs, supra, 244 Cal.App.4th at p. 280.) The Court need not hold an evidentiary hearing...

Excerpt: ...tract action against Defendant City of Redlands (“Defendant” or “Redlands”). Plaintiff's complaint included five causes of action: (1) breach of contract; (2) breach of implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing; (3) reformation; (4) declaratory relief; and (5) promissory estoppel. On August 5, 2022, the Court denied the notice of related cases filed by Coyote and found this action was not related to LLTVA2200544. On October 12, 2022...

Excerpt: ...eme Court's holdings in Adolph v. Uber Technologies. Case Summary On January 18, 2022, Plaintiff Donna Thomas filed this putative wage‐and‐hour class action against Defendant Ocelot Engineering, Inc. The operative First Amended Complaint (FAC) added a cause of action for civil penalties under the PAGA. The FAC alleges causes of action for (1) failure to pay minimum wages; (2) failure to pay overtime compensation; (3) failure to provide meal p...

Excerpt: ...; Reed v. United Teachers Los Angeles (2012) 208 Cal.App.4th 322, 337.) The court has “broad discretion in making this determination.” (In re Microsoft I‐V Cases (2006) 135 Cal.App.4th 706, 723.) Relevant factors the court may consider include “the strength of the plaintiffs' case, the risk, the expense, complexity and likely duration of further litigation, the risk of maintaining class action status through trial, the amount offered in s...

Excerpt: ...enticated with no indication of author, custodian, date, purpose, reliability or veracity].) As to Plaintiff's Motion for Prejudgment Possession The Court would GRANT SBCTA's Motion for Prejudgment Possession. Case Summary This is an eminent domain action for the acquisition of a permanent street easement and temporary construction easement over a portion of 931 W. Holt Boulevard in Ontario, California. On March 29, 2022 SBCTA filed its suit agai...

Excerpt: ...3) breach of loyalty; (4) intentional interference with prospective economic advantage; (5) unfair competition; and (6) unjust enrichment. Plaintiff essentially alleges that, unbeknownst to it, Defendant Urbina incorporated JNS Supplies, Inc. (Defendant JNS) and forwarded information and trade secrets to it in order to steal Plaintiff's business. On March 24, 2021, Defendant Urbina cross‐complained against Plaintiff and others alleging (1) fail...

Excerpt: ...endant Sedillo filed a supplemental declaration in support of the motion, testifying the only insurance policy he would have in place was the one with National General, policy number 2007805533, with a policy limit of $50,000 per person involved in an accident, with $100,000 per accident. (Sedillo Supp. Decl. at ¶2.) Defendant Chiaramonte was not employed by Sedillo on October 7, 2020, the date of the accident. (¶3.) Sedillo was not in the vehi...

Excerpt: ...ital Med. Center v. Belshe (1997) 56 Cal.App.4th 819, 831 [trial court rulings have no precedential value].) On the Motion to Compel Arbitration: 1. Defendant's Motion to Compel Arbitration of Plaintiff's non‐PAGA claims is GRANTED. 2. The Court would DELEGATE the decision whether arbitration may proceed on a class basis to the arbitrator. 3. Plaintiff's PAGA claim is STAYED pending completion of arbitration 3 Case Summary Plaintiff filed this ...

Excerpt: ...d proposed amended complaint be deemed filed and served as of the date this motion is granted. The proposed First Amended Complaint seeks to add a claim for punitive damages based upon the fact that Defendant disclosed in discovery that he was looking down at his cell phone when he rear‐ end Plaintiff's vehicle. The additional allegations added in the proposed First Amended Complaint are located in the following paragraphs: (1) Paragraphs 9‐1...

Excerpt: ...rbitration agreement may compel or be compelled to arbitration in six circumstances: (1) thirdparty beneficiary, (2) incorporation by reference, (3) agent, (4) equitable estoppel, (5) alter ego/pierce the corporate veil, and (6) assumption. (Young Seck Suh v. Superior Court (Cha Hollywood Medical Center, L.P.) (2010) 181 Cal.App.4th 1504, 1513; Boucher v. Alliance Title Company, Inc. (2005) 127 Cal.App.4th 262, 268.) Equitable estoppel associated...

Excerpt: ...en (Riden), who was a locker room attendant and assistant coach, placed at least one hidden camera in the girls' bathroom. Plaintiff brought her action originally on December 14, 2021, hoping to represent herself and other female students who attended the subject school any time between January 1, 2015 and 7 August 24, 2021. The Court sustained the District's demurrer with leave to amend on November 21, 2022, and Plaintiff her First Amended Compl...

Excerpt: ...irected at the sufficiency of the allegations on the face of the complaint just like a demurrer. Cloud v. Northrop Grumman Corp. (1998) 67 Cal.App.4th 995, 999 [rules governing demurrers generally apply to motions for judgment on the pleadings]; Code of Civ. Proc. §430.10, subd. (e); Gruenberg v. Aetna Ins. Co. (1973) 9 Cal.3d 566, 572 [demurrer proper only when the facts alleged on the face of the complaint fail to state any valid claim].) Here...

Excerpt: ...10, subd. (f), uncertainty. The moving party complied with the meet and confer requirements before the motion was filed. A demurrer challenges the sufficiency of a pleading by raising questions of law. (Blank v. Kirwan (1985) 39 Cal.3d 311, 318; ABF Capital Corp. v. Berglass (2005) 130 Cal.App.4th 825, 833.) As such, the only issue involved in a demurrer hearing is whether the complaint, as it stands, unconnected with extraneous matters, states a...

Excerpt: ..., Rule 3.1113(l).) The Court further finds them irrelevant and unnecessary. As to the Motion to Stay: DENY. No authority is provided for a unilateral stay of the case pending compliance with Discovery Orders. As to the Motion to Compel & Sanctions: The Court GRANTS 2 the motion to compel supplemental responses as follows: 2 The parties may hire a discovery referee if discovery is to remain contentious. To the extent that is cost prohibitive, the ...

Excerpt: ...sition Attendance of GM's Person Most Qualified and Custodian of Records (PMG Motion). GM opposes both motions and Plaintiff has replied. The Motions currently are on the Court's January 26, 2023 law and motion calendar. At the outset, the Court is disappointed with counsel's lack of cooperation and effort in resolving their differences before seeking Court's intervention. Counsel for both sides are put on notice that the Court will issue monetar...

Excerpt: ...ation of the Song‐Beverly Act [against FCA]; and (5) negligent repair [against the Dealership]. FCA and the Dealership answered. The also each filed motions to compel arbitration. However, along with his opposition to FCA's motion, Plaintiff filed a request for dismissal of the Dealership. FCA replied to Plaintiff's opposition to its motion to compel arbitration. As the result of Plaintiff's dismissal of the Dealership, FCA is the only remainin...

Excerpt: ...e following causes of action: (1) negligence; (2) wrongful death; and (3) premises liability. Plaintiffs allege on February 17, 2018, one of the Plaintiffs presented a 2002 Toyota Sequoia for service at Fairmont Tire & Rubber, Inc., and Fairmont represented that the vehicle had been fully and properly serviced and that the vehicle was safe to drive. (¶7.) On August 23, 2018, one of the Plaintiffs was operating the vehicle on the 15 Freeway near ...

Excerpt: ...s case, the Plaintiffs are Adam Ali (an infant at the time of alleged facts), Yadira Trujilla (mother, for herself and as guardian), and Mohammad Ali (father). In essence, the Plaintiffs allege that on March 31, 2022, the parents entered a childcare agreement with Defendant KA of Rancho Cucamonga (sued as “Kiddie Academy”) to care for their infant and his sister. Defendants Moore were agents of Kiddie, and Defendant Ferra was the director and...

Excerpt: ...ent to arbitrate exists, and such summary procedure satisfies both state and federal law. (Rosenthal v. Great Western Fin. Securities Corp. (1996) 14 Cal.4th394, 413.) Under Code of Civil Procedure section 1281.2, a party to an arbitration agreement may move to compel arbitration if another party to the agreement refuses to arbitrate, and the court shall order the parties to arbitrate if it determines an agreement to arbitrate exists, unless it d...

Excerpt: ...g Defendants were personally served as Doe Defendants on October 16, 2022. (Exh. 1 to Skaf Decl.) The Demurrer would have been due 30 days thereafter, i.e., on November 15, 2022. (Code Civ. Proc., §430.30.) But Defendants obtained a 30‐day extension to file a response. (Campo Decl. at ¶¶4‐ 5, Exh. B.) That would extend the deadline to December 15, 2022. The Demurrer was filed the day before. And the fact Plaintiff misunderstood the 30‐da...