Search by Keyword:
Start Date:
End Date:
Tip: Wrap text in quotation marks when searching for phrases (e.g. "motion to dismiss").

433 Results

Clear Search Parameters x
Location: Alameda x
Judge: Lee, Jo-Lynne x
2021.02.09 Motion to Continue Trial 553
Location: Alameda
Judge: Lee, Jo-Lynne
Hearing Date: 2021.02.09
Excerpt: ...e prepared to discuss the length of the continuance in light of the 5/3/2021 trial date in this action and the specific jurisdictional discovery Plaintiff wishes to conduct. The Tuesday, 2/9/2021 at 3:00 p.m. hearing will be conducted via COURTCALL. RELEVANT EVIDENCE In its Moving papers, Navistar initially points out that Plaintiff's Complaint specifically alleges at pp. 2:2-6 and 2:27-3:1, that Plaintiff was exposed to asbestos in the 1950's an...
2021.02.09 Motion for Leave to File FAC 330
Location: Alameda
Judge: Lee, Jo-Lynne
Hearing Date: 2021.02.09
Excerpt: ...t may, in furtherance of justice, and on any terms as may be proper, allow a party to amend any pleading[.]" (CCP § 473(a)(1).) "[T]rial courts are to liberally permit such amendments, at any stage of the proceeding[.]" (Hirsa v. Superior Court (1981) 118 Cal. App. 3d 486, 488-89.) A court's discretion is usually exercised liberally to permit amendment of the pleadings, and it is a rare case in which denial of leave to amend can be justified. (S...
2021.02.02 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 377
Location: Alameda
Judge: Lee, Jo-Lynne
Hearing Date: 2021.02.02
Excerpt: ...� 437c(a)(1).) "A party may move for summary adjudication as to one or more causes of action within an action, one or more affirmative defenses, one or more claims for damages, or one or more issues of duty, if the party contends that the cause of action has no merit, that there is no affirmative defense to the cause of action, that there is no merit to an affirmative defense as to any cause of action, that there is no merit to a claim for damage...
2021.02.02 Motion for Summary Judgment 456
Location: Alameda
Judge: Lee, Jo-Lynne
Hearing Date: 2021.02.02
Excerpt: ...has no merit or that there is no defense to the action or proceeding." (CCP § 437c(a)(1).) "[T]he party moving for summary judgment bears the burden of persuasion that there is no triable issue of material fact and that he is entitled to judgment as a matter of law." (Aguilar v. Atl. Richfield Co. (2001) 25 Cal. 4th 826, 850.) "That is because of the general principle that a party who seeks a court's action in his favor bears the burden of persu...
2021.02.02 Motion for Summary Adjudication 456
Location: Alameda
Judge: Lee, Jo-Lynne
Hearing Date: 2021.02.02
Excerpt: ...adjudication as to one or more causes of action within an action, one or more affirmative defenses, one or more claims for damages, or one or more issues of duty, if the party contends that the cause of action has no merit, that there is no affirmative defense to the cause of action, that there is no merit to an affirmative defense as to any cause of action, that there is no merit to a claim for damages . . . , or that one or more defendants eith...
2021.01.29 Motion for Summary Adjudication 456
Location: Alameda
Judge: Lee, Jo-Lynne
Hearing Date: 2021.01.29
Excerpt: ...MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND SUMMARY ADJUDICATION "A party may move for summary judgment in an action or proceeding if it is contended that the action has no merit or that there is no defense to the action or proceeding." (CCP § 437c(a)(1).) "[T]he party moving for summary judgment bears the burden of persuasion that there is no triable issue of material fact and that he is entitled to judgment as a matter of law." (Aguilar v. Atl. Richfield...
2021.01.29 Motion for Summary Adjudication 377
Location: Alameda
Judge: Lee, Jo-Lynne
Hearing Date: 2021.01.29
Excerpt: ...(1).) "A party may move for summary adjudication as to one or more causes of action within an action, one or more affirmative defenses, one or more claims for damages, or one or more issues of duty, if the party contends that the cause of action has no merit, that there is no affirmative defense to the cause of action, that there is no merit to an affirmative defense as to any cause of action, that there is no merit to a claim for damages . . . ,...
2021.01.22 Motion to Quash Service of Summons 436
Location: Alameda
Judge: Lee, Jo-Lynne
Hearing Date: 2021.01.22
Excerpt: ...vice of process" for lack of specific jurisdiction, "the plaintiff has the initial burden of demonstrating facts justifying the exercise of jurisdiction." (Snowney v. Harrah's Entm't, Inc. (2005) 35 Cal. 4th 1054, 1062.) "If the plaintiff meets this initial burden, then the defendant has the burden of demonstrating 'that the exercise of jurisdiction would be unreasonable.'" (Id.) "When a nonresident defendant challenges personal jurisdiction the ...
2021.01.22 Motion for Summary Judgment 456
Location: Alameda
Judge: Lee, Jo-Lynne
Hearing Date: 2021.01.22
Excerpt: ...n has no merit or that there is no defense to the action or proceeding." (CCP § 437c(a)(1).) "[T]he party moving for summary judgment bears the burden of persuasion that there is no triable issue of material fact and that he is entitled to judgment as a matter of law." (Aguilar v. Atl. Richfield Co. (2001) 25 Cal. 4th 826, 850.) "That is because of the general principle that a party who seeks a court's action in his favor bears the burden of per...
2021.01.19 Motion for Retroactive Application or for Summary Judgment 895
Location: Alameda
Judge: Lee, Jo-Lynne
Hearing Date: 2021.01.19
Excerpt: ...nd (b), which provide: "(a) (1) The court may, in furtherance of justice, and on any terms as may be proper, allow a party to amend any pleading or proceeding by adding or striking out the name of any party, or by correcting a mistake in the name of a party, or a mistake in any other respect; and may, upon like terms, enlarge the time for answer or demurrer. The court may likewise, in its discretion, after notice to the adverse party, allow, upon...
2021.01.19 Motion for Protective Order 303
Location: Alameda
Judge: Lee, Jo-Lynne
Hearing Date: 2021.01.19
Excerpt: ...a protective order." (CCP § 2025.420(a).) "The court, for good cause shown, may make any order that justice requires to protect any party, deponent, or other natural person or organization from unwarranted annoyance, embarrassment, or oppression, or undue burden and expense." (CCP § 2025.420(b).) "This protective order may include, but is not limited to, one or more of the following directions: . . . [t]hat the deposition be taken only on certa...
2021.01.19 Motion for Summary Adjudication 467
Location: Alameda
Judge: Lee, Jo-Lynne
Hearing Date: 2021.01.19
Excerpt: ...ause of action has no merit, that there is no affirmative defense to the cause of action, that there is no merit to an affirmative defense as to any cause of action, that there is no merit to a claim for damages . . . , or that one or more defendants either owed or did not owe a duty to the plaintiff or plaintiffs." (CCP § 437c(f)(1).) "A motion for summary adjudication shall be granted only if it completely disposes of a cause of action, an aff...
2021.01.19 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 377
Location: Alameda
Judge: Lee, Jo-Lynne
Hearing Date: 2021.01.19
Excerpt: ...issue of material fact and that he is entitled to judgment as a matter of law." (Aguilar v. Atl. Richfield Co. (2001) 25 Cal. 4th 826, 850.) "That is because of the general principle that a party who seeks a court's action in his favor bears the burden of persuasion thereon." (Id.) Further, "the party moving for summary judgment bears an initial burden of production to make a prima facie showing of the nonexistence of any triable issue of materia...
2021.01.15 Motion to Quash Service of Summons and Complaint 377
Location: Alameda
Judge: Lee, Jo-Lynne
Hearing Date: 2021.01.15
Excerpt: ... by a preponderance of evidence." (Strasner v. Touchstone Wireless Repair & Logistics, LP (2016) 5 Cal.App.5th 215, 221-222.) A defendant's "minimum contacts" with California can establish the Court's personal jurisdiction over the defendant in two ways: generally (i.e., as to all claims and causes of action) or specifically (i.e., as to causes of action related to the contacts themselves). (See Bristol-Meyers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of Cali...
2021.01.15 Motion for Protective Order 303
Location: Alameda
Judge: Lee, Jo-Lynne
Hearing Date: 2021.01.15
Excerpt: ...a protective order." (CCP § 2025.420(a).) "The court, for good cause shown, may make any order that justice requires to protect any party, deponent, or other natural person or organization from unwarranted annoyance, embarrassment, or oppression, or undue burden and expense." (CCP § 2025.420(b).) "This protective order may include, but is not limited to, one or more of the following directions: . . . [t]hat the deposition be taken only on certa...
2021.01.08 Motion for Trial Setting Preference 606
Location: Alameda
Judge: Lee, Jo-Lynne
Hearing Date: 2021.01.08
Excerpt: ...dditional Orders of Court set forth below. STANDARD OF LAW "A party to a civil action who is over 70 years of age may petition the court for a preference, which the court shall grant if the court makes both of the following findings: (1) [t]he party has a substantial interest in the action as a whole[;] [and] (2) [t]he health of the party is such that a preference is necessary to prevent prejudicing the party's interest in the litigation." (CCP �...
2021.01.08 Motion for Trial Setting Preference 522
Location: Alameda
Judge: Lee, Jo-Lynne
Hearing Date: 2021.01.08
Excerpt: ...t if the court makes both of the following findings: (1) [t]he party has a substantial interest in the action as a whole[;] [and] (2) [t]he health of the party is such that a preference is necessary to prevent prejudicing the party's interest in the litigation." (CCP § 36(a).) Notably, "[t]he standard under subdivision (a), ..., includes no requirement of a doctor's declaration." (Fox v. Superior Court (2018) 21 Cal. App. 5th 529, 534.) "To the ...
2021.01.08 Motion for Trial Preference 653
Location: Alameda
Judge: Lee, Jo-Lynne
Hearing Date: 2021.01.08
Excerpt: ...e is necessary to prevent prejudicing the party's interest in the litigation." (CCP § 36(a).) "In its discretion, the court may also grant a motion for preference that is accompanied by clear and convincing medical documentation that concludes that one of the parties suffers from an illness or condition raising substantial medical doubt of survival of that party beyond six months, and that satisfies the court that the interests of justice will b...
2021.01.08 Motion for Trial Preference 553
Location: Alameda
Judge: Lee, Jo-Lynne
Hearing Date: 2021.01.08
Excerpt: ...alth of the party is such that a preference is necessary to prevent prejudicing the party's interest in the litigation." (CCP § 36(a).) "In its discretion, the court may also grant a motion for preference that is accompanied by clear and convincing medical documentation that concludes that one of the parties suffers from an illness or condition raising substantial medical doubt of survival of that party beyond six months, and that satisfies the ...
2021.01.08 Motion for Reconsideration 699
Location: Alameda
Judge: Lee, Jo-Lynne
Hearing Date: 2021.01.08
Excerpt: ....m. in Dept. 18 subject to the additional Orders of Court set forth below. STANDARD OF LAW "A party to a civil action who is over 70 years of age may petition the court for a preference, which the court shall grant if the court makes both of the following findings: (1) [t]he party has a substantial interest in the action as a whole[;] [and] (2) [t]he health of the party is such that a preference is necessary to prevent prejudicing the party's int...
2020.12.17 Motion for Preference 079
Location: Alameda
Judge: Lee, Jo-Lynne
Hearing Date: 2020.12.17
Excerpt: ...ld on the first day of trial. STANDARD OF LAW "A party to a civil action who is over 70 years of age may petition the court for a preference, which the court shall grant if the court makes both of the following findings: (1) [t]he party has a substantial interest in the action as a whole[, and] (2) [t]he health of the party is such that a preference is necessary to prevent prejudicing the party's interest in the litigation." (CCP § 36(a).) "In i...
2020.12.15 Motion for Preference 664
Location: Alameda
Judge: Lee, Jo-Lynne
Hearing Date: 2020.12.15
Excerpt: ...[t]he party has a substantial interest in the action as a whole[, and] (2) [t]he health of the party is such that a preference is necessary to prevent prejudicing the party's interest in the litigation." (CCP § 36(a).) "The standard under subdivision (a), unlike under subdivision (d), which is more specific and more rigorous, includes no requirement of a doctor's declaration." (Fox v. Superior Court (2018) 21 Cal. App. 5th 529, 534.) "An affidav...
2020.12.11 Motion to Quash Service of Summons and Complaint 330
Location: Alameda
Judge: Lee, Jo-Lynne
Hearing Date: 2020.12.11
Excerpt: ...n Thursday, December 10, 2020, contesting party must email [email protected] and provide notice to all counsel via File&ServeXpress of the intent to contest the tentative order. If a hearing is requested, the hearing will be conducted via COURTCALL. If not timely contested, and the tentative ruling will become the final order of the Court. RELEVANT EVIDENCE TCNA presents evidence in its moving papers that it is a not-for-profit trade ...
2020.12.11 Motion to Compel Further Responses 950
Location: Alameda
Judge: Lee, Jo-Lynne
Hearing Date: 2020.12.11
Excerpt: ...ete, verified, code-compliant, further responses to the Standard Interrogatories Nos. 33-34, 36, 40-41 and 50-53 pursuant to this Order. MOTION TO COMPEL Plaintiff seeks to compel further responses to her Interrogatory Nos. 33-34, 36, 40- 41 and 50-53. Plaintiff contends that Colgate has improperly imposed objections and evasive answers as to these interrogatories. In this action, Plaintiff alleges that she was exposed to asbestos in the Cashmere...
2020.12.11 Motion for Trial Setting Preference 298
Location: Alameda
Judge: Lee, Jo-Lynne
Hearing Date: 2020.12.11
Excerpt: ...ts.ca.gov and provide notice to all counsel via File&ServeXpress of the intent to contest the tentative order. If contested, the hearing will be conducted via COURTCALL. If not timely contested, and the tentative ruling will become the final order of the Court. STANDARD OF LAW CCP § 36 provides in relevant part: "(d) In its discretion, the court may also grant a motion for preference that is accompanied by clear and convincing medical documentat...

433 Results

Per page

Pages