Excerpt: ...When an application for an order has been made to a judge, or to a court, and refused in whole or in part, or granted, or granted conditionally, or on terms, any party affected by the order may, within 10 days after service upon the party of written notce of entry of the order and based upon new or different facts, circumstances, or law make application to the same judge or court that made the order, to reconsider the matter and modify, amend, re...

Excerpt: ... of litigation." (Hernandez v. City of Stockton, (2023) 90 Cal. App. 5th 1222, 1231) The Court also finds that a government tort claim need not contain the detail and specificity required of a pleading, but need only fairly describe what the entity is alleged to have done; the claims statute should not be applied to snare the unwary where its purpose has been satisfied. (Stockett v. Association of California Water Agencies Joint Powers Ins. Autho...

Excerpt: ...pre-emptive blanket order based on claims of attorney client privilege and or work product privilege. (Cal Code of Civ. Proc.S 2054.420, Nativi v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. (2014) Cal.App.4th 261, review denied). Accordingly, Plaintiff may proceed with the noticed depositions of Ms. Tudor and Mr. Kouba. Defendant may make any objections it deems necessary during said deposition. The Court declines to prohibit discovery of the documents req...

Excerpt: ...te of judicial judgment. (See, e.g. Britz, Inc. v. Alfa-Laval Food & Dairy Co. (1995) 34 Cal.App.4th 1085, 1106– 1107.) Moreover, the Court Þnds that Pe
Ÿ
Ÿoners have demonstrated their en
Ÿtlement to recover costs in the amount of $17,140, represen
Ÿng the a
©orney's fees awarded by the arbitrator and the Þling fees incurred in connec
Ÿon with this ac
Ÿon. However, the Court lacks power to award arbitra
Ÿon costs that should have bee...

Excerpt: ...nds that the papers demonstrate insufficient meet-and-confer efforts prior to submission of the instant motion. For example, it appears that the defense has proposed a stipulated protective order which would arguably permit the production of several of the items in dispute. Therefore, the Court has concluded that the parties have not yet exhausted the potential for them to further narrow and/or resolve the issues presented herein with the pursuit...

Excerpt: ...6 Cal.App.4th 443, 447, fn2.) There are good reasons for this rule; the Court does not have access to every trial court ruling, and cherry-picking is unhelpful. Further, I have an ethical obligation to be an independent jurist. FACTUAL SUMMARY A separate case filed on November 14, 2019 by Brianna Dennis in Santa Clara Superior Court involved the same Defendant and similar issues. This case was filed on June 22, 2020. Ross answered on July 23, 202...

Excerpt: ... that the payment to the Class Representative and to the Class Members to be appropriate given all relevant factors of the settlement. The Court also finds the attorney's fees to be comparable to the award of fees generally issued by California Courts. The Court hereby grants final approval of the Class Acton Settlement herein. The class counsel, class representative and claims administrator are hereby approved and appointed as set forth in the m...

Excerpt: ...e to Mr. Broderick-villa's supplemental declaration on August 4, 2023. The Court has decided to consider Mr. Broderick-villa's supplemental declaration because Mr. Eighmey has had time to file a responsive pleading on the merits and because the Court wishes to rule on the merits. Ms. Vega claims that Strategic Legal Group's fees are being paid by adverse party Miguel Duran Jr., which constitutes a violation of California Rule of Professional Cond...

Excerpt: ...1, 2022, or January 1, 2023, and the action was filed on January 11, 2023. Defendant is mistaken as to the time when the action was filed. The Complaint, naming only Doe's, was filed on December 19, 2022, which was within the three-year statutory revival period as set forth in 340.1(q). Ten days later, on December 29, 2022, the Certificate of Merit required by Code Civ. Proc. section 340.1(g)(3) was filed, which was well within the 50 days allowe...

Excerpt: ...ication for an order has been made to a judge, or to a court, and granted ...any party affected by the order may, within 10 days after service upon the party of written notice of entry of the order and based upon new or different facts, circumstances, or law, make application to the same judge or court that made the order, to reconsider the matter and modify, amend, or revoke the prior order. The Motion does not comply with Code Civ. Proc. secton...

Excerpt: ...sition of liability. The traditional elements of duty, breach of duty, causation, and damages apply. (6 Witkin, Summary of Cal. Law (9th ed. 1988) Torts, S 838, p. 195, Marlene F. v. Affiliated Psychiatric Med. Clinic, Inc., (1989) 48 cal. 3d 583, 588). The Court finds that a cause of action for Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress does not exist in this Damages for severe emotional distress, rather, are recoverable in a negligence action w...

Excerpt: ...rt (Cole National Corp.) (2004) 122 Cal.App.4± 1060, 1078.) Plaintiffs' generic reference to the "State of California" does not provide sufficient information to put the relevant agency or department on notce of the claim(s) against it herein. Moreover, Plaintiffs' argument in opposition, i.e., that the subject property is designated as "open irrigated land" under the California Land Conservation Act, appears insufficient to support the purporte...

Excerpt: ...and conditions set forth therein and the Gross Settlement Amount and the allocation of payments. The proposed settlement terms are as follows: (1) Gross Settlement Amount of $480,000.00; (2) Attorney's Fees of $160,000.00 (1/3 of the Gross Settlement Amount) and costs of up to $10,000.00; (3) Settlement administration costs of approximately $10,500.00; (4) $10,000.00 allocated for PAGA Penalties under the Private Attorney General Acton of 2004 ("...

Excerpt: ...mpetent expert testimony that they acted at all times within the applicable standard of care. Ko Declaration, paragraphs 5 — 11; and Monjazeb Declaration, paragraphs 6 — 11. This expert testimony is sufficient to shift the burden under Code Civ. Proc. section 437c(p)(2) to plaintiffs to provide evidence of breach of the standard of care. Causation must be proven within a reasonable medical probability based on competent expert testimony. Broo...

Excerpt: ...oot as to him. The Court anticipates that the motion as to Aurora is not being pursued given the opportunity afforded to speak to her on August 9. Under Code Civ. Proc. S 2024.020, any party shall be entitled as a matter of right to complete discovery proceedings on or before the day, and to have motions concerning discovery heard on or before the 15th day, before the date initially set for trial, and except as provided in S 2024.050, a continuan...

Excerpt: ...s not prejudiced by said service. In the interests of equity, the Court holds such service valid. The Court finds that AB 218 (Code of Civil Procedure S 340.1) expressly exempts Plaintiff from complying with the claims presentation requirement of Government Code S 905. The Court further finds that AB 218 does not constitute an unconstitutional gift or appropriation of public funds, to the benefit of particular individuals based on an exception to...

Excerpt: ...s Inc. to Provide Responses to Special Interrogatories, and for an Award of Monetary Sanctions Against Defendant and Attorney; d) Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Defendant Brunk Industries Inc. to Provide Responses for Production of Documents, and for an Award of Monetary Sanctions Against Defendant and Attorney (a) GRANTED, unopposed. The Court finds that Defendant has entirely failed to respond to Plaintiff's Request for Form Interrogatories, (Gen...

Excerpt: ... with Cal. Rules of Ct., rule 3.769(c). The class counsel, class representatives, and claims administrator are hereby preliminarily approved and appointed as set forth in the motion. However, the Court is not convinced that the proposed payment structure for enhancement payments to the representative plaintiffs is justified; specifically, the Court does not believe that the moving papers and supporting evidence support the proposed award of $18,5...

Excerpt: ... newly discovered facts or circumstances or a change of law supporting the issues reasserted in the summary judgment motion. Defendant claims that since the first motion for summary judgment was filed, new facts have emerged which show that Mr. Amin did not exercise control over phases of the construction of the building, and the Court of Appeal has established a new standard for constructive notice of dangerous defects. However, the "newly disco...

Excerpt: ...ntiff regarding the sums claimed in respect of Agreement Nos. 4368/4193 and the total sum due on said agreements, the Court is inclined to GRANT the application on the basis that Plaintiff has established the requirements for issuance of a writ of possession and a turn over order against Defendant, subject to the filing of an undertaking. (Code Civ. Proc. 5512.060.) With regard to the issue of valuation as it pertains to the amount of the underta...

Excerpt: ...d not dispute the amount in either its opposition or its response to the separate statement. (See UMF's 44-45) As such, the Court is mandated to grant the motion. The Court orders Plaintiff to prepare an amended order consistent with this ruling. The Court also adopts its prior tentative ruling, as follows: Defendants do not dispute that the loan, lease and guaranty agreements were entered into or that the defendants have not fulfilled their obli...

Excerpt: ...340.1 (a)(2) in respect of Plaintiff's alleged claims of sexual abuse by Defendants Calvin and William Shook that occurred after Plaintiff's alleged first report of sexual abuse to Defendant made around 1995 or thereabouts. Accordingly, Defendant's Demurrer to Plaintiff's Third and Fourth Causes of Action are hereby overruled. The Court further finds that Defendant has not pled sufficient facts to establish that Defendant was a mandatory reporter...

Excerpt: ...rties to the marriage, and the Family Code does not address real property disputes involving third parties, as does this dispute. Therefore, a declaratory relief cause of achon involving not only the parties to the marriage but also a third party is properly before this Court. The Fourth Cause of Action for Breach of Fiduciary Duty This cause of action is asserted against Adam Vanderpool, but not Diane Neufeld. Family Code section 1101(a) provide...

Excerpt: ...rs, including, but not limited to, appointment notices, diagnoses, doctor's notes, bills, and correspondence, for pur physical, mental damage or emotional distress, since January 1, 2012. RFP No. 43 — For the health care practitioners identified in Interrogatory No. 5, a fully executed HIPAA Authorization for Release of Medical, Psychiatric, and/or Psychological Records, by you for all medical and associated billing records for visits and treat...

Excerpt: ...in their favor. Specifically, the express language of the Property Management Agreement dictates that the contractual terms were effective at the time of Plaintiff's injury. (See, e.g., UMF 8.) In interpreting an express indemnity agreement, the courts look first to the words of the contract to determine the intended scope of the indemnity agreement. (Centex Golden const. co. v. Dale Tile co. (2000) 78 cal.App.4th 992, 996-997, citation omitted.)...