Excerpt: ... the beneficiary of another 1/3 of 40% through the Trust (although William Jackson is seeking to exercise the option he was given to purchase the Trust's interest). Because this inspection is outside of the Discovery Act, if a member has an issue with the inspection, then the appropriate procedural mechanism is for the member to file a civil pleading seeking a writ of mandate against the company—NOT try to shoehorn the issue through a trust pro...

Excerpt: ...Request for Production of Documents, Set Two and Request for Sanctions —GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. d) Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Further Responses of Defendant Secret River, Inc. to special Interrogatories, set one and Request for sanctions -GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. e) Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Further Responses of Defendant Smart Management & Co., Inc. to Special Interrogatories, set one and Request for sanctions - GRA...

Excerpt: ...esentation that responses would be served no later than 12-15-23; Counsel shall appear to confirm whether this was accomplished. In addition, the Court is inclined to award sanctions against Defendant Craven Farming Company and its counsel in favor of Plaintiff in connection with the instant motion, which appears to have been necessary in order to elicit the required responses. Therefore, sanctions are awarded in the amount of $460, to be paid to...

Excerpt: ...82; Cal. Rules of rule 3.769.) Good cause appearing to the satisfaction of the Court, the Court is inclined to find that the proposed settlement and the associated fees and costs are approved as set forth in the motion and supporting papers, as follows: Fees and costs of Settlement Administrator: $9,500 Payment to Class Representatives: $17,500 PAGA allocation to LWDA (75%): $15,000 Class Counsel's attorney's fees: $325,000 Class Counsel's costs:...

Excerpt: ...es to have a contractual duty to defend Mid-Cal Constructors Inc., from and against all claims by Super Store Industries arising out of or in connec
Ÿon with A+ Innova
Ÿve Drywall Inc.'s work on the property located at 2600 Spengler Way, Turlock California, except “to the extent the claims arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the ac
Ÿve negligence or willful misconduct of that general contractor, construc
Ÿon manager, or other subcontract...

Excerpt: ...rged his burden of demonstrating that he is entitled to the requested discovery. (Code of Civ. Proc., "2017.010, 2030.290(b); (Appleton v. Superior Ct., (1988) 206 Cal. App. 3d 632; Steven M. Garber & Associates v. Eskandarjan (2007) 150 Cal.App.4th 813). Furthermore, the Court finds, in view of the upcoming motions for summary judgment filed by other Defendants herein against Plaintiff on calendar for February 2024, Plaintiff will be prejudiced ...

Excerpt: ...sed by P from American Chevrolet (GM UMF 1) and as to the lack of a new Limited Vehicle Warranty issued by Defendant accompanying said sale. (GM UMF4, UMF6 and UMF 7). (Rodriguez v. FCA US, LLC, (2022).77 cal. App. 5th 209). Accordingly, Defendant's application for summary judgment is hereby granted. Plaintiff's request for a continuance is denied on grounds that Plaintiff already possess the evidence it alleges supports its claim that a new vehi...

Excerpt: ...card by Plaintiff. (UMF 1.) Plaintiff sent Defendant a credit card with a copy of the customer agreement. (UMF 2.) under the terms set forth in the customer agreement, Defendant manifested his assent to the contract when he used the card. (UMF 3.) Pursuant to the terms of the customer agreement, Plaintiff extended credit to Defendant whereby Defendant could charge for goods or services or obtain cash advances. (UMF 4.) In exchange, Defendant was ...

Excerpt: ...inal fairness hearing and subject to final approval by this Court. Defendant's objection to Exhibit 5 attached to the 11/16/23 Mallison Declaration is OVERRULED, and the request to strike is DENIED. This is Plaintiff Kristeena Tinnin's own mediation brief, and Defendant failed to highlight any of its own confidential information in the document. Defendant therefore has no standing to object to the public filing of the brief. Defendant asserts tha...

Excerpt: ...scovery Act under which Plaintiff seeks relief in this instance. Moreover, while the Court presumes that Plaintiff may be attempting to obtain an order suppressing the June 2023 deposition pursuant to Code Civ. Proc. S 2025.520(g), Plaintiff has failed to demonstrate the meet-and-confer efforts required by that section. Moreover, the Court questions whether Plaintiff brought the instant motion seasonably, as it appears she delayed in this regard ...

Excerpt: ...bitrate that controversy, the court shall order the petitioner and the respondent to arbitrate the controversy if it determines that an agreement to arbitrate the controversy exists, unless it determines that: (a) The right to compel arbitration has been waived by the petitioner; or (b) Grounds exist for rescission of the agreement." Petitioner Central Valley — Sierra Associates ("CVSA") is correct in contending that there is an overarching lev...

Excerpt: ...law. (Serrano v. Priest (1971) 5 Cal.3d 584, 591.) The Court also considers matters that can be judicially noticed. (Ibid.) The Court sustains the demurrer on the following grounds: (1) Plaintiff has not demonstrated that she complied with the Government Claims Act; (2) the pleading is barred by the statute of limitations; and (3) Defendant Lucas is protected by quasi-judicial immunity with regard to the allegations in the First Amended Complaint...

Excerpt: ...ery and all objections have been waived. (Code Civ. Proc. S 2030.290(a).) Therefore, Petitioner is entitled to an order compelling Mr. Joefield to prov-de answers, without objection, to the subject discovery within 30 days. (Code Civ. Proc. S 2030.290(b).) (b) The Court finds that Real Party in Interest has entirely failed to respond to the subject discovery and all objections have been waived (Code Civ. Proc. S 2031.300(a).) Therefore, Petitione...

Excerpt: ...aintiff Eileen Duarte filed a complaint for "reformation of deeds, cancellation of deeds and declaratory relief." Eileen alleges in the complaint that she is the sole trustee of the Duarte 1993 Trust, created by Joe and Mary Duarte. Eileen is one of Joe and Mary's three children — the other two are her sisters Defendants Irene (Duarte) Nelson and Kathleen (Duarte) Elliott. During Joe and Mary's lifetime, they transferred three parcels of proper...

Excerpt: ... Special Interrogatories, Set One and Request for Sanctions —GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART; d) Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Further Responses of Defendant Secret River, Inc. to Request for Production of Documents, Set Two and Request for Sanctions —GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART; e) Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Further Responses of Defendant Smart Management & Co., Inc. to Special Interrogatories, Set One and Request for Sanctions �...

Excerpt: ...aises issues with regard to the state of the administrative record. The Court currently believes an "unofficial" transcript is likely to be sufficient but expects to give Respondent tme to review it for accuracy. The Court further anticipates permitting tme for a sur-reply rather than automatically striking the reply. Therefore, the Court is unlikely to be able to consider the merits of the writ petition and expects to contnue the hearing to a fu...

Excerpt: ...sexual abuse by the Perpetrators on Plaintiff which was reported to Defendant between January 1, 1997- 2001. The Court finds that Defendant has not pled sufficient facts to establish that Defendant was a mandatory reporter under Penal Code 511164-11174.3, Child Abuse and Negligent Reporting Act (CANRA), when Plaintiff allegedly made his second report of sexual abuse by William and David Shook to Defendant. Accordingly, Defendant's Demurrer to Pla...

Excerpt: ...on. (White Lighting Co. u Wolfson, (1968) 68 Cal. 2d 335, 344). The Court finds that Plaintiff's claim herein has probable validity. (Code of Civil Procedure section 481.190; Loeb and Loeb v. Beverly Glen Music, Inc. (1985) 166 cal.App.3d 1110). The Court additionally finds that an attachment may not be issued herein on grounds that Plaintiff's claim herein is not readily ascertainable, based on Plaintiff's failure to provide evidence of the hour...

Excerpt: ...aises issues with regard to the state of the administrative record. The Court currently believes an "unofficial" transcript is likely to be sufficient but expects to give Respondent tme to review it for accuracy. The Court further anticipates permitting tme for a sur-reply rather than automatically striking the reply. Therefore, the Court is unlikely to be able to consider the merits of the writ petition and expects to contnue the hearing to a fu...

Excerpt: ...on. (White Lighting Co. u Wolfson, (1968) 68 Cal. 2d 335, 344). The Court finds that Plaintiff's claim herein has probable validity. (Code of Civil Procedure section 481.190; Loeb and Loeb v. Beverly Glen Music, Inc. (1985) 166 cal.App.3d 1110). The Court additionally finds that an attachment may not be issued herein on grounds that Plaintiff's claim herein is not readily ascertainable, based on Plaintiff's failure to provide evidence of the hour...

Excerpt: ...ch appears to include issues the Court has already resolved. Terry says the Court has no discretion to do anything other than grant her motion. She is wrong. First, she says that under Marriage of Woolsey (2013) 220 Cal.App.4th 881 at 898, the permissive "may" in S 664.6 becomes a "shall," if the Court finds the settlement enforceable. The Court was unable to find this language and is unconvinced. But more to the point, the Court has already foun...

Excerpt: .... Atlantic Richfield Co. (2001) 25 cal. 4th 826, 850). Accordingly, Defendant's motion for summary adjudication as to the lack of Defendant's liability to Plaintiff as a matter of law because Kevin Ray Zanders was not acting within the scope of his employment he engaged in tortious conduct towards Plaintiff, is hereby granted. (Aores v. AutoZone W„ Inc., (2008) 161 cal. App. 4th 373, Mary M. u City ofLos Angeles (1991) 54 cal.3d 202). The Court...

Excerpt: ...ave not yet received the Bills of Sale. Without the Bills of Sale, performance cannot occur, and the cause of action for breach of contract has not yet accrued. Defendants therefore have defeated their own sham pleading argument because their admissions demonstrate that the correct cause of action here is anticipatory breach, not actual breach. The cause of action is not barred by the statute of limitations. The statute of limitations on a cause ...

Excerpt: ... to contain contract specifics inclusive of the date renders the complaint fatally vague. Second, the failure to allege a contractor's license causes the complaint to fail as currently pled. (See Phoenix Mechanical Pipeline, Inc. v. Space Exploration Technologies (2017) 12 Cal.App.5th 842.) The Court is skeptical that expert testimony is necessary. Plaintiff's contenton that the contractor's license is necessary is not supported by the Space X ca...

Excerpt: ...dly injured in the accident and the timeframe for the medical records to 15 years before the date of the accident. The request for a protective order is DENIED, as the specifics of a protective order were not addressed in the motion. If counsel wish to agree on a protective order, the Court is likely to enter one. The Court views the limitation at 15 years and the body parts involved as sufficient given the facts of the case. The initial request ...