Search by Keyword:
Start Date:
End Date:
Tip: Wrap text in quotation marks when searching for phrases (e.g. "motion to dismiss").

1360 Results

Location: Stanislaus x
2023.08.02 Demurrer, Motion to Strike 859
Location: Stanislaus
Judge: Mayne, John R
Hearing Date: 2023.08.02
Excerpt: ...tends that as the contract is not attached and the allegations are insuffciently precise, the complaint as a whole fails. Defendant further alleges that a lack of specificity as to which Defendant did which things is fatal. Defendant is correct. The Demurrer The First Cause of Action for Declaratory Relief This cause of action is based on the parties' respective rights under the insurance contract, and therefore the sufficiency of the allegations...
2023.08.01 Motion to Compel Further Discovery, for Monetary Sanctions 695
Location: Stanislaus
Judge: Freeland, John F
Hearing Date: 2023.08.01
Excerpt: ...t 23. The Court notes that the parties' efforts have resulted in Defendant's service of two sets of amended responses to date, the latest of which was provided while the instant motions were pending. Therefore, it appears to the Court that the potential exists for the parties to further narrow and/or resolve the issues presented herein with the pursuit of additional meet-and-confer efforts conducted in faith. The hearing is continued for this pur...
2023.08.01 Motion to Compel Arbitration 609
Location: Stanislaus
Judge: Speiller, Stacy P
Hearing Date: 2023.08.01
Excerpt: ...he status of the arbitration. Plaintiff Entered Into the Arbitration Agreement, and the Agreement Covers the Dispute A valid and enforceable agreement requiring the resolution of employment-related disputes through arbitration precludes the employee's right to pursue claims in the judicial context. Circuit City Stores, Inc. v. Adams (2001) 532 U.S. 105, 123. The only prerequisite for a court to order arbitration is a determination that the partie...
2023.08.01 Demurrer 747
Location: Stanislaus
Judge: Speiller, Stacy P
Hearing Date: 2023.08.01
Excerpt: ...shall state the specific ground upon which the objection is taken and, if the objection is taken by answer, the specific facts upon which the objection is based. An objection may be taken on more than one ground, and the grounds be inconsistent. Defendant has not stated specific facts in support of any of its affirmative defenses. The defendant makes factually unsupported allegations, such as the County has not established a right to take the Pro...
2023.07.28 Motion to Quash Subpoena, for Sanctions 006
Location: Stanislaus
Judge: Freeland, John F
Hearing Date: 2023.07.28
Excerpt: ... the parties and finds that Defendant has not provided sufficient evidence relative to the ownership of the phone account to justify his claim that disclosure will unduly violate the privacy rights of non-parties herein. Nevertheless, the Court acknowledges that Defendant himself likely has some level of privacy interest in the sought-after phone records, butthe motion herein has not sufficiently demonstrated that Defendant's privacy interests ou...
2023.07.27 Motion for Summary Judgment 498
Location: Stanislaus
Judge: Freeland, John F
Hearing Date: 2023.07.27
Excerpt: ...al.App.5* 933, 941; Sanchez v. Kern Emergency Medical Transportation Corp. (2017) 8 Cal.App.5* 146, 165.) In this regard, the Court notes that Dr. Chang relies, in part on a purported declaration from Dr. Roubach explaining his choice of an alternative lens during the initial cataract procedure on 2-11-20; however, the information described by Dr. Chang in this regard does not appear in the evidence submitted with the instant motion. In addition,...
2023.07.27 Demurrer, Motion to Strike 116
Location: Stanislaus
Judge: Speiller, Stacy P
Hearing Date: 2023.07.27
Excerpt: ...fails to survive the statute of frauds, because the FAC is based on an alleged oral contract to purchase real property, which under Civil Code secton 1524(a)(3) is required to be in writing. However, an exception to the statute of frauds is the doctrine of partial performance, pursuant to which an oral agreement for the transfer of an interest in real property is enforceable when the buyer has taken possession of the property, and either makes a ...
2023.07.26 Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Action 745
Location: Stanislaus
Judge: Mayne, John R
Hearing Date: 2023.07.26
Excerpt: ...Judicial Notice - DENIED. As to Plaintiff's requests for judicial notice, none need be taken for the Court to consider published state or federal cases. The California cases are legal authority, and the federal case may be persuasive. The Court finds Defendant's request for judicial notice of unpublished state court cases disingenuous at best. There is a case directly on point. (TBG Ins. Service Corp. v. Superior Court (2002) 96 Cal.App.4th 443, ...
2023.07.26 Application to Reconsider Order Granting Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement, for Sanctions 451
Location: Stanislaus
Judge: Speiller, Stacy P
Hearing Date: 2023.07.26
Excerpt: ... by the order may, within 10 days after service upon the party of written notice of entry of the order and based upon new or different facts, circumstances, or law, make application to the same judge or court that made the order, to reconsider the matter and modify, amend, or revoke the prior order. The Motion does not comply with Code Civ. Proc. secton 1008(a), because plaintiff has not shown any new or different facts, circumstances or law. Pla...
2023.07.25 Motion to Seal Docs 626
Location: Stanislaus
Judge: Sandhu, Sonny
Hearing Date: 2023.07.25
Excerpt: ...lity is required by law, court records are presumed to be open to the public (CRC 2.550(c)). Therefore, pleadings, evidence (including that obtained in discovery), and other papers may not be filed under seal merely by stipulation of the parties. A prior court order must be obtained. [CRC 2.551(a); see H.B. Fuller co. u Doe (2007) 151 cal.App.4th 879, 888]. Plaintiffs recently filed redacted versions of the relevant pleadings and evidence with th...
2023.07.25 Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement 848
Location: Stanislaus
Judge: Freeland, John F
Hearing Date: 2023.07.25
Excerpt: ...ly, the motion lacks a discussion of the reasonableness of the proposed settlement as compared to the maximum and practical exposure of Defendant on the claims asserted herein. Likewise, with regard to the PAGA claim, the information provided is insufficient for the Court to determine whether the proposed settlement provides for relief that is genuine, meaningful, and consistent with the State's goal of benefitting the public through enforcement ...
2023.07.25 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 331
Location: Stanislaus
Judge: Speiller, Stacy P
Hearing Date: 2023.07.25
Excerpt: ...ferred the three parcels to his daughters, and petitioner has not shown that Arnaldo did not have the authority to do so. As a result of Arnaldo recording the Affidavit of Surviving Spouse, the daughters' parcels were arguably Mr. Avila's separate property as a matter of law pursuant to Probate Code section 13540 (the property shall be free of the rights of the state of the deceased spouse or of the devisees or creditors of the deceased spouse to...
2023.07.21 Motion for Reconsideration 138
Location: Stanislaus
Judge: Speiller, Stacy P
Hearing Date: 2023.07.21
Excerpt: ...that interest accrues at the rate of 10% per year through December 31, 2022, and thereafter interest accrues at the rate of 5% per year. Thus, the judgment only accrued interest at the rate of 5% per year between January 1, 2023, and March 22, 2023. Therefore, the total interest is $7,831.46, not $7,861.41, and the total renewed judgment is $15,819.58, not $15,834.53. Plaintiff asks that the Court use a 10% interest rate through the date of the r...
2023.07.20 Motion for Summary Judgment 604
Location: Stanislaus
Judge: Speiller, Stacy P
Hearing Date: 2023.07.20
Excerpt: ...f Tree Guys, would cut and/or trim some palm trees on certain real property in lieu of a cash payment so Tree Guys could store some tree cutting equipment at a yard owned by defendant Eagle Valley Investment. Declaration of Larry Buehner, paragraphs 2 and 3. Thus, it cannot be determined as a matter of law that Tree Guys did not owe a duty to plaintiff Brandon Garcia. Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. Superior Court (1985) 168 Cal. App. 3d 1155, dæs not m...
2023.07.19 Motion to Compel Responses, for Monetary Sanctions 568
Location: Stanislaus
Judge: Sandhu, Sonny
Hearing Date: 2023.07.19
Excerpt: ...s for Payment Relief De IV LLC Motion to Compel Responses and Production of Documents; Request for Monetary Sanctions- GRANTED, in part, DENIED, in part, d) Defendant's, Fay Servicing LLC and Partners for Payment Relief De IV LLC Motion to Have Requests for Admission Deemed Admitted and Matters Deemed Genuine as Against Plaintiff; Request for Monetary Sanctions —GRANTED, in part, DENIED, in part, unop1H)sed. a) The Court finds that Plaintiff ha...
2023.07.19 Motion for Final Approval of Class Action Settlement 160
Location: Stanislaus
Judge: Speiller, Stacy P
Hearing Date: 2023.07.19
Excerpt: ...inistrator reports that all the distributions under the Settlement are complete and, if needed, an Amended Judgment is submitted to address distribution of any unclaimed funds in compliance with Code Civ. Proc. section 384. The settlement terms are as follows: (1) The settlement class is composed of all persons who are or were employed in California by defendant as non-exempt employees at any tme from March 5, 2017 through September 30, 2022 (app...
2023.07.18 Petition to Compel Binding Arbitration 115
Location: Stanislaus
Judge: Sandhu, Sonny
Hearing Date: 2023.07.18
Excerpt: ...irs, representatives, executors, administrators, successors and assigns" of parties to said agreement, Almond Vista Healthcare Center may enforce said arbitration agreement against Plaintiff. The Court also finds that the arbitration agreement entered into by the parties is not unconscionable as Plaintiff was not required to sign said arbitration agreement as a condition of being admitted to Defendant's facility. Furthermore, the Court finds that...
2023.07.18 Motion for Summary Judgment 932
Location: Stanislaus
Judge: Mayne, John R
Hearing Date: 2023.07.18
Excerpt: ...certifying the merger. The merger is the sole issue that Defendants contest, and therefore the Court is required to give Defendants an opportunity to respond. However, the Court currently views the request as valid. Defendants do not dispute that the loan, lease and guaranty agreements were entered into or that Defendant have not fulfilled their obligations under the agreements. Defendants only dispute Plaintiff's contention that CIT Bank, N.A. w...
2023.07.18 Demurrer to FAC, Motion to Strike 623
Location: Stanislaus
Judge: Freeland, John F
Hearing Date: 2023.07.18
Excerpt: ...d Cause of Acton herein rests on the suffciency of the pleading with regard to the District's alleged violation of the Ralph Civil Rights Act (Civ. Code S 57.1) and the Tom Bane Civil Rights Act (Civ. Code S 52.1). With regard to Defendant's argument that the extended limitations period and revival provisions of Cade Civ. PrcL S 340.1 and the claim exemption provisions of Gov. Code S 905(m) do not apply to the Third Cause of Action herein, the Co...
2023.07.14 Demurrer 132
Location: Stanislaus
Judge: Mayne, John R
Hearing Date: 2023.07.14
Excerpt: ... had an existing SBA and construction loan agreement with ATI relative to its construction project at the hotel property but that the Bank served a notce of default against ATI based on a "negligent mischaracterization" of ATI's renovation project involving demolition of the hotel lobby as destruction of collateral which represented security for the loan. In addition, the Bank withheld further constructon funding it had promised to provide under ...
2023.07.13 Motion to Remove Lien 065
Location: Stanislaus
Judge: Sandhu, Sonny
Hearing Date: 2023.07.13
Excerpt: ...ien on Wells, as required by Civil Code sections 8416(c)&(d). Thus, pursuant to Civil Code 8415(e), the lien is unenforceable as a matter of law. Also, pursuant to Civil Code section 8118, when notice is given by mail, the claimant's declaration of proof of service shall be accompanied by certain documentation, and the recorded proof of service fails to include this required documentation. Lisa Declaration, paragraphs 42 —46, and Weber Declarat...
2023.07.11 Motion to Fix Valuation Date, to Set Appraisal Procedures 626
Location: Stanislaus
Judge: Sandhu, Sonny
Hearing Date: 2023.07.11
Excerpt: ...s some "certainty" in Section provision of a hard and fast date for valuation of a company when the majority shareholders invoke the buyout process. However, the statute explicitly allows for an alternate (or deferred) date where the moving party can show "good cause." While it is true Plaintiffs "knew what they were doing" when they filed their lawsuit for involuntary dissolution in 2020 — i.e. knew that if the corporation agreed to dissolutio...
2023.07.11 Motion to Bifurcate Trial 717
Location: Stanislaus
Judge: Mayne, John R
Hearing Date: 2023.07.11
Excerpt: ...laint, or of any separate issue or of any number of causes of action or issues, preserving the right of trial by jury required by the Constitution or a statute of this state or of the United States. Keystone contracted with RGM to manage the property. Keystone's breach of contract cause of action in the cross-complaint against RGM concerns the amount of insurance obtained. The Property Management Contract contains an express defense and indemnity...
2023.06.30 Motion for Final Approval of Class Action Settlement 633
Location: Stanislaus
Judge: Mayne, John R
Hearing Date: 2023.06.30
Excerpt: .... 5382; Cal. Rules of Ct., rule 3.769.) Good cause appearingto the satisfaction of the Court, the Court is inclined to find that the proposed settlement and the associated fees and costs are approved as set forth in the motions and supporting papers, as follows: The gross settlement amount is $170,000. Of that, $56, 666.67 is apportioned for attorney fees, $16,368.58 in costs, $7,500 for named Plaintiff, $8,972 in administrative fees, and $7,500 ...
2023.06.30 Demurrer 332
Location: Stanislaus
Judge: Sandhu, Sonny
Hearing Date: 2023.06.30
Excerpt: ...ds should be stated with clearness and precision so that nothing is left to surmise. (Bernstein v. Piller(1950) 98 Cal.App.2d 441). The Court finds that Plaintiffs have not stated with clarity and precision essential facts on which their claims rely. More specifically, the Court finds that Plaintiffs' complaint is replete with long, disjointed, rambling, confusing, ambiguous allegations which make it difficult to comprehend said complaint or resp...

1360 Results

Per page

Pages