Search by Keyword:
Start Date:
End Date:
Tip: Wrap text in quotation marks when searching for phrases (e.g. "motion to dismiss").

2604 Results

Location: Sonoma x
2023.08.09 Motion to Compel Further Responses, for Sanctions 861
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Broderick, Patrick M
Hearing Date: 2023.08.09
Excerpt: ...e 2020 GMC Sierra 2500 ("the Subject Vehicle"). Plaintiff's complaint alleges that defects and nonconformities to warranty manifested themselves within the applicable express warranty period, including but not limited to engine, electrical, brakes, suspension, steering, HVAC, exterior, and transmission. The complaint contains causes of action against GM for violation of the Song-Beverly Act for breach of an express warranty and for breach of impl...
2023.08.09 Demurrer, Motion to Strike 667
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2023.08.09
Excerpt: ...Welf. & Ins. Code ("WIC")) S 15600 et seq.; 3) wrongful death caused by medical malpractice. This matter is on calendar for two (2) motions. First, Defendant's demurrer to the Complaint pursuant to Cal. Code Civ. Proc. ("CCP") S 430.10(e) for failure to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action and CCP S 430.10(f) for uncertainty, Second, Defendant's moton to strike pursuant to CCP S 435 et seq. Of note, Plaintiff's Opposition to the...
2023.08.09 Motion to Compel Further Doc Production 950
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Honigsberg, Christopher
Hearing Date: 2023.08.09
Excerpt: ... N.Y., Inc. (2016) 246 Cal.App.4th 566, 590-591.) Specifically, the Code of Civil Procedure provides that "any party may obtain discovery regarding any matter, not privileged, that is relevant to the subject matter involved in the pending action or to the determination of any moton made in that action, if the matter either is itself admissible in evidence or appears reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence." (CCP S 20...
2023.08.09 Demurrer 547
Location: Sonoma
Judge: DeMeo, Bradford
Hearing Date: 2023.08.09
Excerpt: ...es that she was on October 24, 2022, lawfully walking in the parking lot of the Premises, through the landscaping section of the Premises, in order to enter the Yogurt Time business on the Premises, when she tripped and fell as a result of an overly high and dangerous curb. She complains that Defendants negligently owned, operated, and maintained the Premises, causing the dangerous condition. The complaint identifies two causes of action: 1) negl...
2023.08.09 Demurrer 787
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Honigsberg, Christopher
Hearing Date: 2023.08.09
Excerpt: ...are liberally construed. (Blank v. Kirwan (1985) 39 cal.3d 311, 318; see also, stevens v. superior court (1999) 75 cal.App.4th 594, 601.) In reviewing the suffciency of a complaint, courts accept as true all material facts properly pleaded, but not contentions, deductions, or conclusions of fact or law, or the construction of instruments pleaded, or facts impossible in law. (Rakestraw v. California Physicians' Service (2000) 81 Cal.App.4th 39, 43...
2023.08.09 Demurrer 989
Location: Sonoma
Judge: DeMeo, Bradford
Hearing Date: 2023.08.09
Excerpt: ...e"), Lloyd T. Phillips ("Lloyd"), Phillips Trust, and Phillips J & S Family Trust ("JS Trust") breached an agreement (the "Agreement") to manage the Property as a rental property. He alleges that his predecessor in interest as owner of the Property, the George and Rita Lillis Family Trust (the "Lillis Trust") entered into the Agreement with Defendant Katherine who, in return for payment, agreed to manage the Property and perform certain tasks suc...
2023.08.09 Demurrer 948
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Broderick, Patrick M
Hearing Date: 2023.08.09
Excerpt: ...hat it entered into an agreement with the County to be the exclusive provider of emergency ground ambulance services in a central zone of Sonoma County known as Exclusive Operating Area 1 ("EOA-I") ("the Agreement"). AMR alleges that despite this Agreement, as part of a settlement agreement with the Sonoma County Fire District ("SCFD"), the County secretly agreed to allow SCFD to operate in EOA-I on a backup, stand-by, and/or mutual aid basis. AM...
2023.08.09 Motion for Determination of Good Faith Settlement 849
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2023.08.09
Excerpt: ...ments violate Civil Code section 896(a) standards for water issues, including unintended passage of water beyond, around, or through designated moisture barriers at doors, windows, patio and deck doors, roofs, roofing systems, decks, decking, stucco, exterior walls, and more. The FAC adds that there are signs of water intrusion behind the building paper and the building sheathing is compromised with rot above a window. Plaintiffs named several de...
2023.08.09 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 612
Location: Sonoma
Judge: DeMeo, Bradford
Hearing Date: 2023.08.09
Excerpt: ... common counts. On May 11, 2022, Defendant filed an answer. On June 17, 2022, Plaintiff served Requests for Admissions, Set One ("RFAs"), on Defendant. Plaintiff subsequently moved the court to order the Requests for Admissions, Set One, be deemed admitted against Defendant. The court granted the motion in full after the hearing of December 14, 2022. Motion Plaintiff moves the court for judgment on the pleadings in it favor on its complaint again...
2023.08.09 Motion for Stay or Dismissal 624
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2023.08.09
Excerpt: ...ction for alleged violations of California Labor Code S 2698. This matter is on calendar for Defendants' motion for dismissal or a stay due to the existence of a class action in federal court based on the same alleged labor code violations. The motion is DENIED. Governing Authorities Stays and Concurrent Federal Jurisdiction California courts maintain the inherent power to stay proceedings in the interests of justice and to promote judicial effic...
2023.08.09 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 818
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Broderick, Patrick M
Hearing Date: 2023.08.09
Excerpt: ...nd several liability between the bite alleged to have been inflicted by a husky and the nip from Lee's dog. The motion is DENIED. Lee's objection to Murillo's motion being untimely is overruled. Lee has not demonstrated prejudice. Lee's objections, numbers 1-16 are overruled. Plaintiff Vanessa Garretson ("Garretson") filed her complaint on July 15, 2021, against DOE defendants. The complaint alleges causes of action for general negligence and str...
2023.08.09 Motion to Compel Answers to Post Judgment Discovery, for Monetary Sanctions 916
Location: Sonoma
Judge: DeMeo, Bradford
Hearing Date: 2023.08.09
Excerpt: ...ed the contract by failing to pay the amount owed. Plaintiff filed this action to collect the debt, allegedly $3,514.10, plus costs, legal fees, and interest. Defendants failed to appear so Plaintiff took their default on January 10, 2023 and obtained a default judgment against them on March 6, 2023 for $4,412.26. Post-Jud nt Discove Plaintiff served Defendants by mail with post-judgment discovery on March 27, 2023; the discovery included one set...
2023.08.09 Motion to Compel Arbitration 243
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2023.08.09
Excerpt: ... he suffered during the course of that employment. This matter is on calendar for the petition (styled as a "motion") by the Medical Group to compel arbitration pursuant to Cal. Code Civ. Proc. ("CCP") S 1281.2. Providence has filed a joinder tothe petition. Defendants' petition to compel arbitration and stay proceedings is GRANTED. Facts and Procedure This matter arises out of an employment relationship between the Plaintiff and Annadel. Plainti...
2023.08.02 Motion to Compel Deposition of PMK 005
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Broderick, Patrick M
Hearing Date: 2023.08.02
Excerpt: ...ce of Deposition of Defendant GM's PMK and requests for production of documents with the deposition to take place on January 17, 2023. (Sogoyan decl., 914, Exhibit 3.) On January 10, 2023, GM provided its response. (ld., 915.) The response consisted of general introductory objections as well as objections to each category of matters for examination. (ld., Exhibit 3.) In response to some examination requests, GM stated that without waiving its obj...
2023.08.02 Demurrer, Motion to Strike 522
Location: Sonoma
Judge: DeMeo, Bradford
Hearing Date: 2023.08.02
Excerpt: ...of entry of this order within 5 days of entry of this order. CRC 3.1320(g). Facts and History Plaintiffs Mark Stokes ("Stokes"), Larissa May Torkelson Smith ("Torkelson"), and John Fradelizio ("Fradelizio") (collectively, Stokes, Torkelson, and Fradelizio are the "Individual Plaintiffs"), and their current employer, Plaintiff ABD Insurance and Financial Services, Inc. ("ABD"), seek declaratory relief regarding their ability to compete with Defend...
2023.08.02 Demurrer, Motion to Strike 688
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Honigsberg, Christopher
Hearing Date: 2023.08.02
Excerpt: ...ed Agreement") between Plaintiff Uponor, Inc. and Defendants Frederick and Linda Hecht to resolve certain claims in an underlying action. In the underlying action, Defendants brought claims against Plaintiff, a general contractor, and a plumbing subcontractor for property damage allegedly caused by Plaintiff's improperly manufactured tubing, which was subsequently improperly installed by the subcontractor. Defendants asserted various causes of ac...
2023.08.02 Motion for Leave to File FAC 605
Location: Sonoma
Judge: DeMeo, Bradford
Hearing Date: 2023.08.02
Excerpt: ...sts of two assessor's parcels, one without street frontage (the "Rear Parcel") and one along West Spain Street (the "Front Parcel"), and the Mattson Property borders real property at 10 West Spain Street, Sonoma, which belongs to Defendant State of California (the "State"). Plaintiff alleges that the Property at issue is a "sliverof land" running the entire property boundary between the Front Parcel and the State Property, about 157 feet long and...
2023.08.02 Motion for Summary Adjudication 018
Location: Sonoma
Judge: DeMeo, Bradford
Hearing Date: 2023.08.02
Excerpt: ...s failed to pay as agreed. It also contends that Defendants knowingly made false promises or representations in order to induce it to enter into the Agreement and provide the services even though they never had any intention of paying Plaintiff. Defendants, plus the alleged wife of Steve, Mary Bates ("Marv") (collectively, "Cross Complainants"), filed a cross-complaint against Plaintiff as well as Plaintiff's alleged principal, Michael Stutes ("S...
2023.08.02 Motion for Summary Judgment 449
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2023.08.02
Excerpt: ...ierrez ("Gutierrez"), (all together, "Cross-Defendants"), Ashley Eib ("Eib"), Marie Young ("Young", dismissed), Margherita Gudenzi ("Gudenzi", dismissed), Michael Sean McGuire ("McGuire", now dismissed), and Does 1-50 alleging fifteen causes of action. This matter is on calendar for the moton by the Cross-Defendants for summary judgment or in the alternative adjudication pursuant to Cal. Code Civ. Proc. ("CCP") S 437(c). The Motion is GRANTED in ...
2023.08.02 Motion for Summary Judgment 503
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Broderick, Patrick M
Hearing Date: 2023.08.02
Excerpt: ...nd slipped and fell due to water on the floor. Defendant's employees or agents responded, told Plaintiff to stay put, and called 911. Plaintiff alleges he incurred wage loss, hospital and medical expenses, general damage, and loss of earning capacity as a result of the fall. In their motion, Defendant states that Plaintiff was supplied as a room attendant by the staffing agency; Porter Pros, to work at the Fairmont. Defendant argues that the Fair...
2023.08.02 Motion for Reconsideration 797
Location: Sonoma
Judge: DeMeo, Bradford
Hearing Date: 2023.08.02
Excerpt: ...motion was entered on April 18, 2022. Defendants Rachel Averbuck ("Averbuck") and Jennifer Jill Hale ("Hale") on February 24, 2022, filed a motion to compel Plaintiff to attend an independent medical examination ("IME"). Defendant Jenna Lynn Riley ("Riley") joined in the motion. Plaintiff, now self represented, on May 13, 2022, filed a "Request for Case to be Put on Hold While Seeking New attorney," in which she informed the court that she was se...
2023.08.02 Motion to Compel Deposition of PMK 849
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2023.08.02
Excerpt: ...breach of express warranty through failure to repair timely under the Act (Civ. Code S 1793.2(b); 3) breach of implied warranty under the Act. This matter is on calendar for the motion to compel deposition of person most knowledgeable, and production of documents thereon under Code of Civil Procedure ("CCP") 2025.450. The unopposed Motion is GRANTED. Defendants are ordered to produce their person(s) most knowledgeable as to the subject matters in...
2023.08.02 Motion to Compel Full Satisfaction of Judgment, for Attorney Fees 959
Location: Sonoma
Judge: DeMeo, Bradford
Hearing Date: 2023.08.02
Excerpt: ... 2023, Plaintiff filed a full acknowledgment of satisfaction of judgment, but this does not render the motion moot because Defendant seeks, and is entitled to, attorney's fees and costs. Facts and History Asserting common counts, Plaintiff filed this action to collect money which it alleged Defendant owed. Defendant failed to appear to defend the action so on October 8, 2020, Plaintiff obtained an entry of default against Defendant, followed by a...
2023.08.02 Motion to Compel Further Responses 934
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Broderick, Patrick M
Hearing Date: 2023.08.02
Excerpt: ...NTED. Sanctions are granted in the amount of $2,160.00. On or about March 2, 2023, Plaintiff served Defendant with a second set of Demand for Identification, Production and Inspection of Documents. (Jyoo decl., Exhibits 1, 2.) Thereafter, Defendant's counsel requested, and Plaintiff's counsel granted, extensions to respond. (ld., Exhibits 2, 3.) On April 24, 2023, Plaintiff's counsel emailed Defendant's counsel regarding the responses received. (...
2023.08.02 Motion to Deem RFAs Admitted 586
Location: Sonoma
Judge: DeMeo, Bradford
Hearing Date: 2023.08.02
Excerpt: ...llegedly owes it on a credit account which it purchased from the prior creditor. It alleges that Defendant applied for, and obtained, the credit account with the original creditor, WebBank, Defendant agreed to the terms and incurred a debt on the account, but Defendant failed to pay the debt as agreed. Plaintiff asserts that it served Defendant on or about August 9, 2022, with Request for Admissions, Set No. 1 ("RFAs"), the deadline for Defendant...
2023.08.02 Motion to Disqualify Counsel 948
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Broderick, Patrick M
Hearing Date: 2023.08.02
Excerpt: ...Emergency Medical Services under Health and Safety Code secton 1797, et seq., the competitive proposal process under Health and Safety Code section 1797.224, and Sonoma County's potential ant-trust liability and immunity. Defendant argues that this lawsuit also involves exclusive operating areas for Emergency Medical Services and the competitive proposal process under Health and Safety Code section 1797.224. Therefore, Defendant argues that this ...
2023.08.02 Motion to Exonerate Bond 652
Location: Sonoma
Judge: DeMeo, Bradford
Hearing Date: 2023.08.02
Excerpt: ...a ("the Property"), and Defendants are improperly attempting to foreclose on a deed of trust ("DOT") recorded against the Property solely based on the fraudulent activites of Defendant Joseph B. Reiter ("Reiter"). They claim that after Adams invested his own property in Piner, including cash, Reiter, a business associate of Adams, advised Adams that the latter should, based on legal advice, form and transfer his assets to Defendant Lonestar Inves...
2023.08.02 OSC Re Preliminary Injunction 283
Location: Sonoma
Judge: DeMeo, Bradford
Hearing Date: 2023.08.02
Excerpt: ..., complains that Defendants have improperly attempted to foreclose on a deed of trust ("DOT") recorded against the Property to secure a mortgage loan (the "Loan"). She asserts the following causes of acton: 1) Defendants violated Civil Code ("CC") section 2923.5 by failing to notify her about possible foreclosure and waiting 30 days after notice before recorded the notice of default ("NOD"); 2) Defendants violated CC secton 2924(a)(1) because the...
2023.08.02 Petition to Compel Arbitration 661
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2023.08.02
Excerpt: ...r the petition (styled as a "motion") by the Defendants to compel arbitration pursuant to Cal. Code Civ. Proc. ("CCP") S 1281.2. Defendants' petition to compel arbitration and stay proceedings is CONTINUED to August 18, 2023. The Basis for the Motion Defendant moves to compel arbitration based on arbitration agreements allegedly signed by each of the Plaintiffs on January 18, 2022. See Declaration of Deisy Hernandez, Exhibit A (the "Arbitration A...
2023.07.26 Demurrer 693
Location: Sonoma
Judge: DeMeo, Bradford
Hearing Date: 2023.07.26
Excerpt: ...were ultimately found to owe substantial unpaid taxes and penalties. Plaintiffs allege that they are winemakers operating a business as DNA Vineyards (the "Business"), they hired Defendant, a certified public accountant ("CPA"), to provide the services and prepare and file their tax returns starting with their 2014 return, Defendant initially prepared an amendment to their 2013 return before preparing and filing their returns for the 2014 through...
2023.07.26 Motion for Attorney Fees 778
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2023.07.26
Excerpt: ...acated because the parties reached a settlement which awarded Plaintiff attorneys' fees and costs, but left the matter to further stipulation or order of the Court. This matter is on calendar for Plaintiff's motion for attorneys' fees and costs pursuant to the parties' settlement agreement and Cal. Civ. code S 1794. The Motion is GRANTED, in the amount of $81,328.58. The Basis for Fees Cal. Civ. Code S1794(d) provides: "Ifthe buyer prevails in an...
2023.07.26 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 115
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2023.07.26
Excerpt: ...at she has one or more valid defenses to Plaintiff's causes of action, the motion will be granted, WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND. Plaintiff's unopposed request for judicial notice is GRANTED. The legal effect of the court's order deeming matters admitted is judicially noticed. A plaintiff is entitled to judgment on the pleadings if "the complaint states facts sufficient to consttute a cause or causes of action against the defendant and the answer does n...
2023.07.26 Motion for Leave to File SAC 254
Location: Sonoma
Judge: DeMeo, Bradford
Hearing Date: 2023.07.26
Excerpt: ..., according to the explanation in the motion, Plaintiffs have removed any claim for, or reference to, punitive damages. Plaintiffs attach a copy of the proposed SAC. There is no opposition. Service Plaintiffs filed proof of service for this motion showing only electronic service on an attorney, Caitlyn M. Harris ("Harris") but Defendant has not appeared in this action in any way and Harris is not her attorney of record. Service is therefore defec...
2023.07.26 Motion for Leave to File SAC 905
Location: Sonoma
Judge: DeMeo, Bradford
Hearing Date: 2023.07.26
Excerpt: ...n behalf of DFLP. In brief, Plaintiff complains that Defendant Lynn Duggan ("Lynn"), general partner of DFLP, breached obligations to DFLP under a loan which DFLP made to Lynn ("the GP Loan"), improperly halted distributions to the other partners, and impermissibly entered into an agreement to sell a general partner interest. The action has seen significant litigation since it was filed, including a motion by DFLP, joined by Lynn and the other pa...
2023.07.26 Motion for Sanctions 688
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2023.07.26
Excerpt: ...he presently operative cross-complaint (the "Cross- Complaint") against defendants William B. Kelly ("William") as trustee of the Thomas P. Kelly, Jr. 1999 Dated May 8, 1999 (the "Trust"), and John A. Kelly ("John", together with William, "Cross-Defendants") arising out of Cross-Defendant's alleged mishandling in managing the affairs of the Trust. This matter is on calendar for Thomas's motion for sanctions against John's counsel, Mark Clausen ("...
2023.07.26 Motion for Summary Judgment 755
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Honigsberg, Christopher
Hearing Date: 2023.07.26
Excerpt: ...principal amount lent plus applicable interest and finance charges for charges he made to the credit card for goods, services, or cash advances. (ld. at "14-5.) Adams' current balance on the credit card is $13,373.78, for which no payments have been made since November 29, 2022, but regarding which there have been no payment disputes claimed. (ld. at 5-13.) We Is Fargo brought this action against Adams alleging causes of achon for: (1) breach of ...
2023.07.26 Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement 969
Location: Sonoma
Judge: DeMeo, Bradford
Hearing Date: 2023.07.26
Excerpt: ...ed to as NEWREZ which holds a lien on the Property, and directing that the Property be sold. Defendant Eugene and Victoria Williams ("Williams") (collectively, "Cross-complainants"), filed a cross-complaint against Plaintiff, complaining that they all purchased the Property together by agreement, with each one holding a 1/3 interest with a share of the loan liability, Eugene is Plaintiff's father, and Williams is Plaintiff's sister. They allege t...
2023.07.26 Motion to Expunge Lis Pendens, for Attorney Fees 155
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2023.07.26
Excerpt: ...ction 22 is sustained to the degree it represents Defendants' belief of Plaintiff's position. The balance are OVERRULED. Governing Law A lis pendens notice is an instrument recorded against real property that gives notice of a pending lawsuit affecting title to the property. It clouds title and prevents the transfer of the property until the litigation is resolved. Malcom v. Sup.Ct. (Green) (1981) 29 Cal.3d 518, 523. It is a remedy which must be ...
2023.07.26 Motion to Transfer Case to Appropriate Court 892
Location: Sonoma
Judge: DeMeo, Bradford
Hearing Date: 2023.07.26
Excerpt: ...ecklessly caused an automobile accident on State Route 29 in Napa, California, near Imola Avenue which resulted in Decedent's death. He adds that Jevarian was intoxicated or under the influence of alcohol at the time, having consumed alcohol before the accident despite knowing that she would be driving. He complains also that the accident resulted wholly or partly from a dangerous condition in the signage and configuration of that intersection an...
2023.07.26 Petition for Writ of Administrative Mandamus 653
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Honigsberg, Christopher
Hearing Date: 2023.07.26
Excerpt: ...which job she became a member of the California Public Employees' Retrement System ("CalPERS"). (Petition, Exhibit A, pg. 2, 1.) At the time, Decedent's registered domestic partner was a real party in interest, Donna Starr ("Starr"). (ld. at Exhibit A, pg. 2, '1 2.) Decedent listed Starr as a beneficiary when she retired in 2015 and started receiving a monthly retirement benefit of $4,884.63. (ibid.) Decedent separated from Starr in 2017 and marr...
2023.07.19 Motions to Compel Deposition, for Sanctions 882
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Broderick, Patrick M
Hearing Date: 2023.07.19
Excerpt: ... for their depositions, which shall take place in the next 60 days. Sanctions are granted in the total amount of 95M) On April 18, 2023, Plaintiff served notices to take the depositions of Defendants Jamie and Sami Halteh on May 23, 2023. (Kayne decl., 94.) On May 1, 2023, attorney Christopher Daley of the firm Phillips Spallas & Angstadt LLP, counsel for Jamie Halteh and Sami Halteh, confirmed in a telephone call with Plaintiff's counsel's colle...
2023.07.19 Motion to Reclassify Case to Limited Civil Jurisdiction 876
Location: Sonoma
Judge: DeMeo, Bradford
Hearing Date: 2023.07.19
Excerpt: ...nlimited to limited jurisdiction, on motion by a defendant filed by the time that defendant must file its initial responsive pleading. C.C.P. 5403.040(b) permits later-filed motions to reclassify, but only if "The moving party shows good cause for not seeking reclassification sooner". Page 2 of 2 WALMART's motion made no showing of gtnd cause for the six to seven month delay in filing here. Even if WALMART's motion had been timely filed and timel...
2023.07.19 Motion to Enter Judgment for Full Settlement Amount 384
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2023.07.19
Excerpt: ...he motion is DENIED without prejudice. CCP S 664.6(a) provides: "If parties to #nding litigation stipulate, in a writing signed by the parties outside of the presence of the court or orally before the court, for settlement of the case, or part thereof, the court, upon motion, may enter judgment pursuant to the terms of the settlement. If requested by the parties, the court may retain jurisdiction over the parties to enforce the settlement until #...
2023.07.19 Motion to Disburse Monies from Surplus Funds on Deposition 055
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2023.07.19
Excerpt: ...ter the judgment was entered in 2016 per her interest in the property. The Petition is GRANTED in part, and DENIED in part without prejudice. Relevant Law Under CC section 2924j(a), absent an interpleader action, within 30 days of execution of a trustee's deed resulting from a sale with proceeds remaining after payment of the creditor, etc., the trustee must send notice to all persons with recorded interests in the property. Subdivision (b) requi...
2023.07.19 Motion to Declare Vexatious Litigant 714
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2023.07.19
Excerpt: ...ant motion to declare Defendant a vexatious litigant under Cal. Code of Civil Procedure ("CCP"), S 391. The moton is GRANTED. Governing Law The vexatious litigant statutes were created to curb misuse of the court system by those acting in pro per who repeatedly relitigate the same issues. Hupp v. Solera Oak Valley Greens Ass'n. (2017) 12 Cal.App.5th 1300, 1311. "These persistent and obsessive litigants' abuse of the legal system 'not only wastes ...
2023.07.19 Motion to Compel Responses, for Sanctions 668
Location: Sonoma
Judge: DeMeo, Bradford
Hearing Date: 2023.07.19
Excerpt: ...D FOR SANCTIONS LAW AND MOTION TENTATIVE RULINGS DATE: JULY 19, 2023 TIME: 8:30 A.M. Page 2 of 3 PLAINTIFF KHOREV'S MOTION TO COMPEL RESPONSES FROM DEFENDANT WELLS TO FORM INTERROGATORIES AND FOR SANCTIONS Khorev's motions against these four defendants are denied. Based on the hundreds of requests and the hundreds of pages of moving and oppositions papers (over 440 pages in Separate Statements alone, not counting the opposing Separate Statements ...
2023.07.19 Motion to Compel Discovery Responses 485
Location: Sonoma
Judge: DeMeo, Bradford
Hearing Date: 2023.07.19
Excerpt: ... entitled to seek is instead an order deeming the RFAs admitted. Sanctions of awarded to Plaintiffs as explained herein. Facts and History Alleging that they own a mobilehome (the "Mobilehome") which they obtained on the death of their parents, the previous owners, Plaintiffs complain that Defendants, who own and operate the mobilehome park (the "Park") in which the Mobilehome is located, have wrongfully and illegally taken possession and control...
2023.07.19 Motion to Compel Answers, to Deem RFAs Admitted 223
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2023.07.19
Excerpt: ...ant under Code of Civil Procedure ("CCP") S 2030.290, (2) Plaintiff's motion to compel of documents ("RPODs") from Defendant under CCP S and (3) Plaintiff's Motion to deem requests for admissions ("RFAs") admitted under CCP S 2033.280. The Motions are GRANTED. Defendant shall serve verified responses to FIS and RPODs, free of objections, within twenty (20) days of notice of entry of the order on this Motion. Plaintiff's motion to deem admissions ...
2023.07.19 Motion for Terminating Sanctions 884
Location: Sonoma
Judge: DeMeo, Bradford
Hearing Date: 2023.07.19
Excerpt: ...at Defendant holds a deed of trust ("DOT") on the Property securing a loan to Plaintiff ("the Loan"), Plaintiff complains that Defendant has improperly set up an escrow account to impound property taxes due, imposed improper late fees and other charges, and failed to provide a single point of contact to handle Plaintiff's request for a foreclosure alternative. She seeks monetary damages, restitution, and injunctive relief. Defendant served Plaint...
2023.07.19 Motion for Summary Judgment 457
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Honigsberg, Christopher
Hearing Date: 2023.07.19
Excerpt: ...is SUSTAINED. (See People v. Ferguson (1982) 129 Cal.App.3d 1014, 1024; People v. McVey (2018) 24 Cal.App.5th 405, 415.) Plaintiff's objection number 2 to County's supplemental memorandum is SUSTAINED the supplemental memorandum violates the 75-day rule of ccp S As to the moton for summary judgment of Plaintiff's claims, Plaintiff's counsel shall submit a written order consistent with this tentative ruling and in compliance with Rule 3.1312. As t...

2604 Results

Per page

Pages