Search by Keyword:
Start Date:
End Date:
Tip: Wrap text in quotation marks when searching for phrases (e.g. "motion to dismiss").

2604 Results

Location: Sonoma x
2023.07.19 Motion for Preliminary Approval of Settlement 625
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Honigsberg, Christopher
Hearing Date: 2023.07.19
Excerpt: ...ng the putative Class for settlement purposes; 5. Approving the Class Notice and plan for distribution of the Class Notice to Class Members; and 6. Scheduling a Final Approval Hearing. Preliminary approval is GRANTED. The Final Fairness Hearing is hereby set for November 15, 2023, at 3:00 p.m., in Department 18. BACKGROUND Redwood Oil Company, Inc. ("Defendant") employed Plaintiffs and approximately 1,231 Class Members. Plaintiffs claimed Defenda...
2023.07.19 Motion for Consolidation 226
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Honigsberg, Christopher
Hearing Date: 2023.07.19
Excerpt: ...ease agreement. Plaintiffs allege that Defendants Patrick King and David Samson planned to surreptitiously transfer the lease for the property originally executed on December 19, 2017 by Jammie King, Patrick King, and Ann Hathaway (as lessors) to Defendant Seed 2 Soul by talking Plaintiff into signing a sublease under false pretenses on November 5, 2018. Plaintiffs allege: A. The sublease was a ploy to remove Plaintiff King from the original leas...
2023.07.19 Motion for Approval of PAGA Settlement Agreement, for Attorney Fees 494
Location: Sonoma
Judge: DeMeo, Bradford
Hearing Date: 2023.07.19
Excerpt: ...fendant, among other things, failed to provide rest breaks, provide meal breaks, pay overtime, pay timely wages, or keep complete and accurate payroll records. Defendant moved to strike PAGA claims. The court on March 16, 2022 partly granted the moton and partly denied the moton. The court granted the motion as to PAGA claims regarding the allegation that Defendant failed to reimburse business expenses. The court otherwise denied the motion, spec...
2023.07.19 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 567
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Honigsberg, Christopher
Hearing Date: 2023.07.19
Excerpt: ...p.4th 995, 999; Sykora v. State Dept. of State Hospitals (2014) 25 Cal.App.4th 1530, 1534.) Defendant Jennifer Vertz' counsel shall submita written order that is consistent with this ruling and in compliance with Rule 3.1312. Analysis: As alleged in Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint, Plaintiff and Jennifer Vertz entered into a domestic relationship in 2012. In or around October 2013, Plaintiff and Jennifer Vertz jointly purchased a single- fami...
2023.07.12 Motion for Protective Order 984
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2023.07.12
Excerpt: ...ed as: "All persons in the United States who paid tuition to Sonoma Academy from the year(s) 2006 to the present." FAC 113. However, the Court recently sustained the demurrer as to all causes of action within the FAC with leave to amend. This matter is on calendar for Defendant's motion for protective order under CCP SS 2030.090, 2031.060, and 2033.080. The Motion is GRANTED until such time that the pleadings are settled. Governing Authorities "C...
2023.07.12 Demurrer 166
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Honigsberg, Christopher
Hearing Date: 2023.07.12
Excerpt: ...for ejectment, partition, quiet title, injunctive relief and unjust enrichment, for holding over without a lease, refusing to vacate from the premises, and withholding the real property located at 312 Broadmoor Street, Santa Rosa, California ("Subject Property), in which property White Tornado 312 LLC has a 99% undivided interest. (Complaint, 1-8.) Ramirez cross-complained against Cross-Defendants and other named individuals alleging causes of ac...
2023.07.12 Motion for Leave to File FAC 425
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Honigsberg, Christopher
Hearing Date: 2023.07.12
Excerpt: ...r "the City"), Plaintiff was required to bring a Government Tort Claim within six months of the accrual of her causes of action. (Gov. Code, S 911.2.) Plaintiff concedes that she did not do so, but states that her reasoning for failing to do so is that she is not a resident of California, thus was not aware of the requirement. However, ignorance of California law is not a basis for excusable neglect. Furthermore, The law neither expects nor requi...
2023.07.12 Motion for Leave to File FAC 425
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Honigsberg, Christopher
Hearing Date: 2023.07.12
Excerpt: ...r "the City"), Plaintiff was required to bring a Government Tort Claim within six months of the accrual of her causes of action. (Gov. Code, S 911.2.) Plaintiff concedes that she did not do so, but states that her reasoning for failing to do so is that she is not a resident of California, thus was not aware of the requirement. However, ignorance of California law is not a basis for excusable neglect. Furthermore, The law neither expects nor requi...
2023.07.12 Demurrer 312
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Honigsberg, Christopher
Hearing Date: 2023.07.12
Excerpt: ...'s previous analysis. While such statement of non-oppositon alone would be sufficient basis on which to sustain the demurrer, the Court has still analyzed the sufficiency of the facts newly alleged in the Second Amended Complaint and finds that they do not adequately plead this matter outside of the Worker's Compensation Exclusivity Rule. The Court notes that Plaintiff did not file any opposition to the first orthe second demurrer. Defendant's co...
2023.07.12 Motion for Summary Adjudication 557
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Broderick, Patrick M
Hearing Date: 2023.07.12
Excerpt: ...23, the Dutts filed a cross-complaint against Montmorency alleging causes of action for quiet title, breach of contract/specific performance, declaratory relief, and breach of contract/specific performance (water rights). The cross-complaint alleges that the Dutts are owners of property located at 1400 Alexander Valley Road in Healdsburg ("Dutt Property" or "1400 AVR") and Montmorency is the owner of property located at 1410 Alexander Valley Road...
2023.07.12 Motion to Compel Arbitration 328
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2023.07.12
Excerpt: ...de S 1793.2(d)) (against Manufacturer); 2) breach of express warranty through failure to repair timely under the Act (Civ. Code S 1793.2(b)) (against Manufacturer); 3) breach of express warranty through failure to maintain sufficient service literature and replacement parts under the Act (Civ. Code S (against Manufacturer); 4) breach of implied warranty under the Act (against Manufacturer); 5) fraudulent inducement — concealment (against Manufa...
2023.07.12 Motion to Strike 231
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Honigsberg, Christopher
Hearing Date: 2023.07.12
Excerpt: ...Court 3.1312. Procedural History This action arises from a landlord-tenant relationship established through a written residential lease entered into by Plaintiffs and Defendants. (Motion to Strike ["MTS"I, 4:3-10.) Plaintiffs brought a complaint alleging two causes of action against Defendants for breach of contract and breach of the covenants of good faith and fair dealing, and later filed the FAC adding a third cause of action for intentional i...
2023.07.12 Motion to Strike 644
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2023.07.12
Excerpt: ...ode Civ. Proc. ("CCP") S 435. The motion is GRANTED without leave to amend. Motions to Strike A motion to strike lies where a pleading contains "irrelevant, false, or improper matter[s]" or is "not drawn or filed in conformity with the laws of this state, a court rule, or an order of the court." CCP S 4361b). However, "falsity," must be demonstrated by reference to the pleading itself of judicially noticeable matters, not extraneous facts. See CC...
2023.07.12 Motions to Compel Discovery 948
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2023.07.12
Excerpt: ...n of Documents Nos. 1-3, 9, 14-16, 31-33, 37-96, 107 and 108, and (3) Motion to Compel Defendant General Motors LLC, Further Responses to Special Interrogatory Nos. 14, 40-45, and 55. Defendant opposed all three motions by contending Plaintiff failed to meet and confer in good faith, that all its responses are proper, and Plaintiff improperly seeks trade secret material. Plaintiff does not seek sanctions in any motion. The Court also received a r...
2023.07.05 Petition for Instructions to Partition Referee 355
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Honigsberg, Christopher
Hearing Date: 2023.07.05
Excerpt: ... the Court must approve contracts with third parties before the partition referee enters them, pursuant to CCP S 873.110. This is inaccurate. The statute says that the Court may authorize or approve contracts of the referee with third parties. It is not required. Rather, the "referee may perform any acts necessary to exercise the authority conferred by this title or by order of the court." (CCP S 873.060.) The Court sees no compelling reason to r...
2023.07.05 Motion to Compel Deposition 795
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Broderick, Patrick M
Hearing Date: 2023.07.05
Excerpt: ...ng the hearing on this motion, the motion will be GRANTED. The service of a deposition notice under Section 2025.240 is effective to require any deponent who is a party to the action or an officer, director, managing agent, or employee of a party to attend and to testify, as well as to produce any document, electronically stored information, or tangible thing for inspection and copying. (Code Civ. Proc., S 2025.280(a).) The party noticing the dep...
2023.07.05 Motion to Compel Arbitration 523
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Honigsberg, Christopher
Hearing Date: 2023.07.05
Excerpt: ...ation agreement. (Goldman v. Sunbridge Healthcare, LLC (2013) 220 Cal.App.4th 1160, 1169.) "There are circumstances in which nonsignatories to an agreement containing an arbitration clause can be compelled to arbitrate under that agreement." (Suh v. Superior Ct. (2010) 181 Cal.App.4th 1504, 1513.) "As one authority has stated, there are six theories by which a nonsignatory may be bound to arbitrate: '(a) incorporation by reference; (b) assumption...
2023.07.05 Motion for Stay 870
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2023.07.05
Excerpt: ...mplaint contains causes of action for alleged violations of California Labor Code S 2698. This matter is on calendar for Defendant's motion for stay due to the existence of a class action in federal court based on the same alleged labor code violations. The motion is DENIED. Governing Authorities Stays and Concurrent Federal Jurisdiction California courts maintain the inherent power to stay proceedings in the interests of justice and to promote j...
2023.07.05 Motion for Relief from Arbitration Costs 908
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Broderick, Patrick M
Hearing Date: 2023.07.05
Excerpt: ...at Delaware Law applies to this case and that Section 5712 does not prevent a party from renewing a request for reallocation of arbitration expenses. Thereafter, citing California authority, Plaintiff argues that the court has the inherent authority to modify the order to arbitrate as it sees fit. In its order to compel arbitration, this court noted that the parties' LPA states at secton 19.9 that it is governed by the Delaware Revised uniform Li...
2023.07.05 Demurrer 177
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2023.07.05
Excerpt: ... to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. No opposition was filed. The Demurrer is SUSTAINED with leave to amend. Legal Standards A demurrer can be used only to challenge defects that appear on the face of the pleading under attack or from matters outside the pleading that are judicially noticeable. CCP S 430.30(a). "On a demurrer a court's function is limited to testing the legal sufficiency of the complaint. [Citation.] 'A dem...
2023.06.28 Demurrer 154
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Honigsberg, Christopher
Hearing Date: 2023.06.28
Excerpt: ...sts whether the complaint sufficiently states a valid cause of acton. (Hahn v. Merda (2007) 147 Cal.App.4th 740, 747.) Complaints are read as a whole, in context and are liberally construed. (Blank v. Kirwan (1985) 39 cal.3d 311, 318; see also, Stevens v. superior court (1999) 75 cal.App.4th 594, 601.) In reviewing the suffciency of a complaint, courts accept as true all material facts properly pleaded, but not contentions, deductions, or conclus...
2023.06.28 Demurrer 819
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Honigsberg, Christopher
Hearing Date: 2023.06.28
Excerpt: ...are liberally construed. (Blank v. Kirwan (1985) 39 cal.3d 311, 318; see also, Stevens v. superior court (1999) 75 cal.App.4th 594, 601.) In reviewing the suffciency of a complaint, courts accept as true all material facts properly pleaded, but not contentions, deductions, or conclusions of fact or law, or the construction of instruments pleaded, or facts impossible in law. (Rakestrawv. California Physicians' Service (2000) 81 Cal.App.4th 39, 43;...
2023.06.28 Demurrer 989
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Honigsberg, Christopher
Hearing Date: 2023.06.28
Excerpt: ...lleges that his predecessor in interest as owner of the Property, the George and Rita Lillis Family Trust (the "Lillis Trust") entered into the Agreement with Defendant Katherine who, in return for payment, agreed to manage the Property and perform certain tasks such as conducting inspections, performing maintenance, making reasonably necessary alterations and repairs. "Defendant" continued to be obligated and regularly paid under the Agreement u...
2023.06.28 Motion to Compel Arbitration 613
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2023.06.28
Excerpt: ...verly Consumer Warranty Act, Civ. Code S 1790 et seq. (the "Act") (against Manufacturer); 2) breach of implied warranty under the Act (against Manufacturer); and 3) Negligent Repair (against Repair Facility). Plaintiff purchased a 2020 Nissan Sentra (the "Vehicle") from Dealer. During the sales process Plaintiff and Dealer executed a "Retail Installment Sale Contract— Simple Finance Charge (With Arbitration Provision)" ("RISC"). See Declaration...
2023.06.28 Motion to Compel Arbitration 992
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Honigsberg, Christopher
Hearing Date: 2023.06.28
Excerpt: ...ed grocery stores and bakeries. Plaintiff, a native Spanish speaker, worked for Defendant from approximately August 2019 to May 2022, first as a cashier and then as a manager. Plaintiff alleges eight causes of action against all Defendants in this case: Whistleblower Retaliation; Gender Discrimination; Gender Harassment; Retaliation; Failure to Take Steps Necessary to Prevent Gender Discrimination, Harassment, or Retaliation; Negligent Hiring, Su...
2023.06.28 Motion to Compel Discovery Responses 604
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Honigsberg, Christopher
Hearing Date: 2023.06.28
Excerpt: ...issions is GRANTED. Plaintiff's request for sanctions is GRANTED but reduced to the amount of $1,500 total for costs and fees incurred in bringing both motions. The Court finds that $1,500 is reasonable compensation for the motions and reasonable deterrence for future discovery violations. Procedural History This action involves a breach of warranty claim pursuant to the Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act involving Plaintiffs vehicle. (Motion to ...
2023.06.28 Motion to Compel Further Responses 911
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Honigsberg, Christopher
Hearing Date: 2023.06.28
Excerpt: ...23. On November 23, 2022, Quantum Mechanical served its Document Requests, Set Two to Plaintiff. Plaintiff requested an extension of time to respond, to which Quantum Mechanical agreed, and Plaintiff provided responses on January 4, 2023. Plaintiff's responses to the items at issue in this motion stated that Plaintiff would produce responsive documents which were not privileged or protected. On January 11, 2023, after the cut-off for discovery pr...
2023.06.28 Motion to Compel Responses, to Seal, for Sanctions 477
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2023.06.28
Excerpt: ...nt under Code of Civil Procedure ("CCP") S 2031.310. The Mohon is DENIED in part. Plaintiff's request for sanctions is GRANTED in part. The matter is also on calendar for two motons to seal portions of certain filings and exhibits. Plaintiff has filed a motion to seal certain portions of their reply to the already adjudicated summary judgment motion, and their opposition to Defendant's motion for leave to amend. The motions are DENIED. Law Govern...
2023.06.28 Motion to Deem RFAs Admitted 131
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2023.06.28
Excerpt: ...") admitted under CCP S 2033.280. Plaintiff only requests that answers be compelled to interrogatories if the RFAs are not deemed admitted. The unopposed Motion is GRANTED. Plaintiff's motion to deem admissions admitted is GRANTED. Defendants shall attend a properly noticed deposition from Plaintiff within thirty (30) days' notice of this order. Defendants shall pay $2,391.00 to Plaintiff within 10 days' notice of this order. Governing Law Regard...
2023.06.28 Motion to Vacate and Set Aside Renewal of Judgment 956
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Barry, William
Hearing Date: 2023.06.28
Excerpt: ...ch 10, 2023. See CCP Section 683.170(b)(60 days). Defendant adds five days for mailing pursuant to CCP section 1013(a). Sixty-five (65) days after March 10, 2023, is Sunday, May 14, 2023. This moton was filed on May 12, 2023—63 days after the notice of renewal of judgment was mailed. Without citing authority, Plaintiff argues that this motion had to be filed within 30 days. The applicable statute states otherwise. 2. Timeliness arguments on the...
2023.06.23 Demurrer 113
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2023.06.23
Excerpt: ...urrer to all causes of action within the Complaint pursuant to Cal. Code Civ. Proc. ("CCP") S 430.10(e) for failure to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The Demurrer is SUSTAINED without leave to amend. Legal Standards A demurrer can be used only to challenge defects that appear on the face of the pleading under attack or from matters outside the pleading that are judicially noticeable. CCP S 430.30(a). "On a demurrer a cour...
2023.06.23 Demurrer 154
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Boyd, Robert S
Hearing Date: 2023.06.23
Excerpt: ... action. (Hahn v. Merda (2007) 147 Cal.App.4th 740, 747.) Complaints are read as a whole, in context and are liberally construed. (Blank v. Kirwan (1985) 39 Cal.3d 311, 318; see also, Stevens v. Superior Court (1999) 75 Cal.App.4th 594, 601.) In reviewing the sufficiency of a complaint, courts accept as true all material facts properly pleaded, but not contentions, deductions, or conclusions of fact or law, or the construction of instruments plea...
2023.06.23 Demurrer 984
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2023.06.23
Excerpt: ...ard as a class, defined as: "All persons in the United States who paid tuition to Sonoma Academy from the year(s) 2006 to the present." FAC 113. This matter is on calendar for Defendant's demurrer to all causes of action within the Complaint pursuant to Cal. Code Civ. Proc. ("CCP") S 430.10(e) for failure to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. Defendant's demurrer to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint is SUSTAINED with leave ...
2023.06.23 Motion for Dismissal, for Sanctions 202
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2023.06.23
Excerpt: ...ll be brought to trial within five years after the action is commenced against the defendant." CCP S 583.310. "An action shall be dismissed by the court on its own motion or on motion of the defendant, after notice to the parties, if the action is not brought to trial within the time prescribed in this article." CCP S 583.360 (a). "The requirements of this article are mandatory and are not subject to extension, excuse, or exception except as expr...
2023.06.23 Motion for Sanctions 518
Location: Sonoma
Judge: DeMeo, Bradford
Hearing Date: 2023.06.23
Excerpt: ...August 1, 2022, they entered into a Retail Installment Sales Contract — Simple Finance Charge with Arbitration Clause (the "Contract") and Redwood assigned the Contract to Defendant Community First Credit Union ("CFCU"). However, the Truck allegedly began suffering from electrical malfunctions within one day of purchase so on August 2, 2022, August 8, 2022, and August 22, 2022, they tendered the Truck to Redwood for repair. Redwood, however, ha...
2023.06.23 Motion for Summary Judgment 072
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Boyd, Robert S
Hearing Date: 2023.06.23
Excerpt: ... the real property commonly known as 2814 Audubon Court, Santa Rosa, CA 95403. (undisputed Material Fact "LIME" 1.) Green Rock II, LLC assigned the beneficial interest under the DOT to Defendant, IRP Fund II Trust 2A ("IRP Fund") in September 2018, via an Assignment of Deed of Trust, which was recorded on May 28, 2019. (UMF, 2.) IRP Fund substituted Entra Default Services, LLC ("EDS") as the foreclosure trustee under the DOT, Via a Substitution o...
2023.06.23 Motion to Compel Answers to Post Judgment Discovery, for Sanctions 199
Location: Sonoma
Judge: DeMeo, Bradford
Hearing Date: 2023.06.23
Excerpt: ... beverages which it had purchased. Defendants never appeared so the original Plaintiff then obtained a default against them on May 5, 2017, followed by a judgment against them on May 15, 2017. The Plaintiff later brought a motion to compel responses to post-judgment discovery, which the court granted in February 2018. The court issued an order for examination ("OEX") for September 17, 2018, but the judgment debtors failed to appear for the OEX an...
2023.06.23 Motion to Compel Answers to Post Judgment Discovery, for Sanctions 628
Location: Sonoma
Judge: DeMeo, Bradford
Hearing Date: 2023.06.23
Excerpt: ... Defendants breached the contract by failing to pay the amount owed. Plaintiff filed this achon to collect the debt, allegedly $3,209.31, plus costs, legal fees, and interest. Defendants failed to appear, so Plaintiff took their default on March 30, 2021 and obtained a default judgment against them on April 2, 2021 for $4,649.36. Plaintiff brought a motion to amend the judgment to correct the names of judgment debtors and the court eventually gra...
2023.06.23 Motion to Deem RFAs Admitted, for Monetary Sanctions 180
Location: Sonoma
Judge: DeMeo, Bradford
Hearing Date: 2023.06.23
Excerpt: ...he court "shall" deem the requests admitted "unless it finds that the party to whom the requests for admission have been directed has served, before the hearing on the motion, a proposed response to the requests for admission that is in substantial compliance with Section 2033.220"). Sanctons of $590 awarded to Defendant against Plaintiff, as explained herein. Motion to Compel Discovery Responses from Plaintiff Karishma Crooke and Request for Mon...
2023.06.23 Motion to Quash Deposition 228
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Boyd, Robert S
Hearing Date: 2023.06.23
Excerpt: ...ing under this article shall be a professional photocopier registered under Chapter 20 (commencing with Section 22450) of Division 8 of the Business and Professions Code, or a person exempted from the registration requirements of that chapter under Section 22451 of the Business and Professions Code. This deposition officer shall not be financially interested in the action, or a relative or employee of any attorney of the parties... (Italics added...
2023.06.23 Motion to Set Aside Entry of Default 239
Location: Sonoma
Judge: DeMeo, Bradford
Hearing Date: 2023.06.23
Excerpt: ...022, Plaintiff filed proof of service ("POS") for the summons and complaint on January 19, 2023. The POS shows that she served Defendant at its business location, 3621 Copperhill Lane, Santa Rosa, by personally serving them on one Kyle Abe ("Abe") at Defendant's address on July 25, 2022. On January 25, 2023, Plaintiff obtained the default of Defendant. Motion Defendant, appearing as Cream's Dismantling, Inc., erroneously sued as "Cream's Dismantl...
2023.06.23 Motions to Compel Further Responses 500
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2023.06.23
Excerpt: ...er responses to form interrogatories ("Fls"), special interrogatories ("Sls"), and requests for production of documents ("RPODs"), from Plaintiff under code of Civil Procedure ("CCP") SS 2030.300 and 2031.310. Prior to the filing of this motion, Plaintiff had provded a first round of supplemental discovery responses to Defendants. Defendants found these supplementary responses wanting and requested an extension on the time to file their motion to...
2023.06.23 Petition for Release of Expired Mechanic's Lien 236
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Broderick, Patrick M
Hearing Date: 2023.06.23
Excerpt: ...0 San Simeon Drive in Rohnert Park ("the Property"). Petitioners state that on or around February 14, 2022, Statewide recorded a Claim of Mechanic's Lien against the Property. The Petition states that Statewide was required to commence legal action to enforce the lien by or before May 16, 2022; and, as they have not filed any enforcement action, the lien is null and void. Petitioners request an order fully and finally releasing and removing the l...
2023.06.21 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 554
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Broderick, Patrick M
Hearing Date: 2023.06.21
Excerpt: ...tion for summary adjudication of Plaintiff's cause of action for negligence based upon theories of vicarious liability, negligent hiring and retention, and negligent training is GRANTED. The motion as to the issues of negligent and negligence based upon duties imposed by the parties' special relationship are DENIED. Plaintiff John Dæ ("Plaintiff) alleges in his complaint that Defendant operated a facility for the care of sexually and physically ...
2023.06.14 Motion to Quash Service of Summons 470
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Broderick, Patrick M
Hearing Date: 2023.06.14
Excerpt: ...n", together with 275, "Defendants"), and Does 2-20 with one cause of achon for declaratory relief (the "Complaint"). Walden moves to quash service of summons under Code of Civil Procedure ("CCP") S 418.10(a)(1) on the grounds that the Court cannot proceed without Walden, and the Court lacks personal jurisdiction over 275 due to its status as a terminated business entity. Walden has been added as Doe 1 after this motion was filed. Governing Law T...
2023.06.14 Motion to Deem RFAs Admitted 586
Location: Sonoma
Judge: DeMeo, Bradford
Hearing Date: 2023.06.14
Excerpt: ...from the prior creditor. It alleges that Defendant applied for, and obtained, the credit account with the original creditor, WebBank, Defendant agreed to the terms and incurred a debt on the account, but Defendant failed to pay the debt as agreed. Plaintiff asserts that it served Defendant on or about August 9, 2022 with Request for Admissions, Set No. 1 ("RFAs"), the deadline for Defendant to respond was September 13, 2022, and Defendant has ser...
2023.06.14 Motion to Compel Further Responses, for Monetary Sanctions 018
Location: Sonoma
Judge: DeMeo, Bradford
Hearing Date: 2023.06.14
Excerpt: ...s ("Steve") (collectively, "Defendants") by which Defendants agreed to make certain payments to Plaintiff in return for Plaintiff's consulting services, complains that Defendants failed to pay as agreed. It also contends that Defendants knowingly made false promises or representations in order to induce it to enter into the Agreement and provide the services even though they never had any intention of paying Plaintiff. Defendants, plus the allege...
2023.06.14 Motion for Summary Judgment 416
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Chouteau, Rene Auguste
Hearing Date: 2023.06.14
Excerpt: ....1312. Underlying Facts: The underlying matter arises out of a contract between Plaintiff, Michael Papenhausen (hereafter "Papenhausen"), and Defendants, Michael Funez and Linda Pardini (hereafter "Owners") for Papenhausen, as the general contractor, to reconstruct Owners' residence following the Tubbs Fire. In preparation for this project, Papenhausen entered into a subcontract with Cross-Defendant, Henris Supply, Inc. dba Henris Roofing Co. (he...
2023.06.14 Motion for Stay Pending Arbitration 002
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Chouteau, Rene Auguste
Hearing Date: 2023.06.14
Excerpt: ...ement of the settlement agreement is resolved, either of the parties may seek to have this matter reinstated and to have the current pending motions placed back on calendar. Analysis: Uponor has moved for a stay of the current proceedings pending the outcome of the related case in SCV- 272688, wherein Uponor has filed a complaint for enforcement of the settlement agreement purportedly reached between Uponor and the Plaintiffs. The purported settl...
2023.06.14 Motion for Relief from Mistake Related to Filing 300
Location: Sonoma
Judge: DeMeo, Bradford
Hearing Date: 2023.06.14
Excerpt: ...lainant"). Cross-complainant has in turn filed a cross- complaint ("Cross-complaint") against both Plaintiff and Angela DeCarli (together with Plaintiff, "Cross- Defendants"). This matter is on calendar for Cross-complaint's moton which seeks relief from mistake related to the filing of the first amended cross-complaint ("FACC") pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure ("CCP") S 473(b). The motion is DENIED. Procedural History On February 2...

2604 Results

Per page

Pages