Search by Keyword:
Start Date:
End Date:
Tip: Wrap text in quotation marks when searching for phrases (e.g. "motion to dismiss").

2570 Results

Location: Sonoma x
2024.04.24 Petition to Compel Arbitration 690
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.04.24
Excerpt: ...ar for the petition by Uber to compel arbitration pursuant to Cal. Code Civ. Proc. (“CCP”) § 1281.2. Uber's petition to compel arbitration and stay proceedings is GRAN TED . I. Fact s and Proce dure Plaintiff allegedly was injured through the negligence of Individual Defendant, and that he was acting as the agent of Uber, on October 25, 2021. On December 16, 2021, Uber updated its terms of service. See Declaration of Chenshan Yu in Support, ...
2024.04.24 Motion for Entry of Judgment 238
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Broderick, Patrick M
Hearing Date: 2024.04.24
Excerpt: ...n 6 6 4 .6 (a ) p r o v id e s : “If p a r t ie s t o p e n d in g lit ig a t io n s t ip u la t e , in a writing signed by the parties outside of the presence of the court or orally before the court, for settlement of the case, or part thereof, the court, upon motion, may enter judgment pursuant to the terms of the settlement. If requested by the parties, the court may retain jurisdiction over the parties to enforce the settlement until perfor...
2024.04.24 OSC Re Preliminary Injunction 822
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.04.24
Excerpt: ...ndar for Plaintiff's Order to Show Cause re: Preliminary Injunction arising out of a Temporary Restraining Order request filed on April 8, 2024. The motion is continued to May 15, 2024. I. Underlying facts Plaintiff filed the application for Temporary Restraining Order and request to set the Order to Show Cause re: Preliminary Injunction on April 8, 2024. The Court's orde r grant ing t he Te mporary Re straining Orde r and se tt ing of t he Pre l...
2024.04.24 Demurrer to FAC 845
Location: Sonoma
Judge: DeMeo, Bradford
Hearing Date: 2024.04.24
Excerpt: ...ages” requested for the Ninth Cause of Action in the Prayer for Relief on page 14 of the F AC. P RO CED URAL H ISTO RY Plaintiff commenced this suit to recover repair and replacement costs from named defendants regarding fire sprinkler sensors that Plaintiff installed but did not own. Plaintiff purchased the sprinkler sensors from defendant Pace Supply C o r p . (“P a c e ”) t o in stall them into the residential homes. The specific model w...
2024.04.24 Demurrer to SAC 124
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Honigsberg, Christopher
Hearing Date: 2024.04.24
Excerpt: ...the Eighth Cause of Action for Reformation. Defendant's request for judicial n o t ic e is GRAN TED a s t o Exh ib it s 1-2 , a n d 5 -9 and DENIED as to Exhibits 3 -4 , a s they are disputable evidence. The cases cited in su pport of t he re que st for judicial n o t ic e o f Exh ib it s 3-4 do not require the Court take judicial notice of these documents and they are not persuasive. Defendant's counsel shall submit a written order consistent wi...
2024.04.24 Demurrers, Motion to Strike 853
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Broderick, Patrick M
Hearing Date: 2024.04.24
Excerpt: ... they own property located at 121 Olive Street in Petaluma (“121 Olive”) which they purchased on September 18, 2003 from Creed W. Wood and Andree L. Wood (“Trustees”), Trustees under the Creed W. Wood and Andree L . Wood 1991 Trust. A condition of the purchase was that Plaintiffs were granted an access easement over the Trustees' property. Plaintiffs allege that over three months prior to closing escrow for the sale of 121 Olive, Trustees...
2024.04.24 Motion for Leave to File Complaint-in-Intervention 512
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.04.24
Excerpt: ...intervention (the “M o t io n ”). Th e M o t io n is GRAN TED . I. Governing Law Labor Code Division 4, governing “Workers' Compensation and Insurance,” Part 1, Chapter 5, “Subrogation of Employer,” governs the subrogation and intervention rights of employees, employers, and employers' insured on claims involving payment of workers' co mpensation or other similar benefits. Lab. Code section 3 8 5 2 g ive s e m p lo ye e s a n d e m p ...
2024.04.24 Motion to Compel Answers 462
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.04.24
Excerpt: ...nts under Code of Civil Procedure (“CCP”) §§ 708.020 & 2030.290, and to compel production of documents (“RPODs”) from Defendants under CCP §§ 708 .030 & 2031.300. The unopposed Motion is GRAN TED . Defendants shall serve verified code- compliant responses free of objections within thirty (30) days of notice of entry of the order on this Motion. Defendants shall pay $60 in sanctions to Plaintiff within thirty (30) days of notice of ent...
2024.04.24 Motion to Compel Answers 942
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.04.24
Excerpt: ... t e r r o g a t o r ie s (“SIs ”) a g a in s t Defendants under Code of Civil Procedure (“CCP”) §§ 708.020 & 2030.290, and to compel production of documents (“RPODs”) from Defendants under CCP §§ 708.030 & 2031.300. The unopposed Motion is GRAN TED . D e f e n d a n t s s h a ll serve verified code-compliant responses free of objections within thirty (30) days of notice of entry of the order on this Motion. Defendants shall pay $...
2024.04.24 Motion to Compel Further Responses 397
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Honigsberg, Christopher
Hearing Date: 2024.04.24
Excerpt: ...and unjustified. Defendant is ordered to notify all necessary individuals prior to the release of the requested educational records that pertain to them. Prior to disclosure, Defendant is also ordered to redact any private and confidential information, including personal id e n t if ic a t io n in f o r m a t io n , p r iva t e m e d ic a l in f o r m a t io n , a n d private financial information that are not relevant to this action. Defendant s...
2024.04.24 Motion to Compel Further Responses 624
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Broderick, Patrick M
Hearing Date: 2024.04.24
Excerpt: ...Lazaro Ortiz (“Plaintiffs”). Defendants request monetary sanctions in the amount of $5,185. The motion is DENIED as to special interrogatories numbers 2, 3, 5, 6, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 21, 24, and 26; and is GRANTED as to 1, 4, 7, 10, 15, 16, 19, 20, 22, and 23. Sanctions are denied. This is a wage and hour action. Plaintiffs allege they worked for Defendant as truck drivers delivering construction materials. Plaintiffs allege that De...
2024.04.24 Motion to Intervene in Action 876
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Broderick, Patrick M
Hearing Date: 2024.04.24
Excerpt: ... court against Defendant Catholic Charities of the Diocese of Santa Rosa (“Defendant”), titled Kimberlee Keller v. Catholic Charities of the Diocese of Santa Rosa , Sonoma County Case No. 23CV00371. Intervenor argues that Defendant has opted to mediate only with the plaintiff in this case, plaintiff Lourdes Rangal (“Plaintiff Rangal”). Intervenor argues that she must be permitted to intervene as any settlement reach ed between Plaintiff R...
2024.04.24 Motion to Set Aside Default Judgment 090
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Honigsberg, Christopher
Hearing Date: 2024.04.24
Excerpt: ...promissory note . Plaint iff's proce ss se rve r e ffe ctuate d se rvice of the summons and complaint by substituted service at 3660 Roblar Road in Petaluma, at which address Defendant concedes he currently resides, and which was listed under his name in the caption for this motion. Defendant claims he does not receive mail at this address and that he has never been personally served. Defendant has not apprised the Court of any different address ...
2024.04.17 Motion for Certification of Class and Final Approval of Class Action Settlement, for Attorney Fees 587
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.04.17
Excerpt: ...ll as the motion for attorney's fees and class representative enhancements. The Court issued a tentative ruling on the motion on April 4, 2024, and ordered the parties to appear for oral argument the next day. At the hearing, the Court allowed arguments by Plaintiff's counsel which focused on the Court's modification to the attorn ey's fees allocation in the settlement. Plaintiff argued the original attorney's fee request was justified but re...
2024.04.17 Anti-SLAPP Motion to Strike 977
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Honigsberg, Christopher
Hearing Date: 2024.04.17
Excerpt: ...pliance with Rule 3.1312. I. Background This complaint arises out of an ongoing dispute between the parties who are a HOA President (Plaintiff) and a resident of the Association (Defendant). Defendant is alleged to have sent sent several letters and emails to Plaintiff personally (that are large ly not the subject of this motion) and letters, emails, and flyers to board members and residents with his concerns regarding Plaintiff's fitness to serv...
2024.04.17 Application for Determination of Good Faith Settlement 212
Location: Sonoma
Judge: DeMeo, Bradford
Hearing Date: 2024.04.17
Excerpt: ...) for settlement. Plaintiffs had sued Defendants for motor vehicle property damage and personal injury. ANALYSIS Legal Standard C.C.P. section 877.6 allows a plaintiff to settle with one or more joint tortfeasors without releasing others as long as the settlement is in “good faith.” A good-faith settlement discharges the settling defendant from liability to other parties for equit able contribution or comparative indemnity. ( City of Grand Te...
2024.04.17 Demurrer, Motion to Strike 163
Location: Sonoma
Judge: DeMeo, Bradford
Hearing Date: 2024.04.17
Excerpt: ...Plaintiff's complaint alleges that in or around January 2016, Defendant hired Plaintiff to work as a full -time, non- exempt ceiling and acoustical foreman. Plaintiff alleges that he was wrongfully terminated on or about August 12, 2022. Plaintiff alleges that, previously, on April 1, 2022, he injured his right arm while performing job duties. The injury impaired major life activities and constituted a disability. The injury required surgery whic...
2024.04.17 Motion to Set Aside Default, Judgment 581
Location: Sonoma
Judge: DeMeo, Bradford
Hearing Date: 2024.04.17
Excerpt: ...ff filed suit on May 6, 2022, and s erved the summons and complaint upon Defendant through substituted service on May 13, 2023. Defendant did not file a response, so Plaintiff filed a Request for Entry of Default, which the Court entered on July 12, 2023. On July 18, 2023, Defendant's representative from Phoenix Law contacted Plaintiff's counsel wanting to settle the matter on behalf of Defendant. As proof of representation, Phoenix Law emailed a...
2024.04.17 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 161
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.04.17
Excerpt: ...nting judgment on the pleadings on the ground that the Complaint fails to state sufficient facts to constitute causes of action in this matter. The motion is DENIED. I. Governing Law A. Judgment on the Pleadings A motion for judgment on the pleadings may only be made on the grounds specified in the statute. CCP section 438(c)(1). If the moving party is a defendant, the motion may be made on the grounds that the complaint does not state facts suff...
2024.04.17 Motion for Leave to Amend FAC 679
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.04.17
Excerpt: .... (“CCP”) § 473 for leave to amend the FAC. The motion is DENIED. I. Legal Standards The California Code of Civil Procedure provides that a court “may in the furtherance of justice, and on any terms as may be proper” allow a party to amend any pleading to correct a mistake. CCP § 473(a)(1). Likewise, the court may “in its discretion, after notice to the adverse party, allow, upon any terms as may be just, an amendment to any pleading ...
2024.04.17 Motion for Summary Adjudication 585
Location: Sonoma
Judge: DeMeo, Bradford
Hearing Date: 2024.04.17
Excerpt: ...rling commenced this action to obtain money owed by Arrowtown for roofing work done and for materials provided by Sterling in connection to a construction project on a residential remodeling in Sonoma for Heather Jordan and Joseph Beare (the “Owners”). Arrowtown, as the general contractor, sought a contract with Sterling for roofing work. Arrowtown disputes any additional amounts claimed by Sterling. Sterling submitted a bid proposal for $82,...
2024.04.17 Motion to Quash Subpoena for Deposition 054
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Honigsberg, Christopher
Hearing Date: 2024.04.17
Excerpt: ...h 1997, Plaintiff agreed to assist Defendant in purchasing a house on 21st Avenue in San Francisco (“San Francisco Property”) where Defendant would live with the parties' parents. Plaintiff alleges that he and Defendant agreed as follows: Plaintiff would pay a $70,000 down payment and co -sign the loan application, and pay $5,000 per month to Defendant to cover the mortgage, tax, and maintenance expenses on the house. Plaintiff and Defendant ...
2024.04.17 Petition to Compel Arbitration and Stay 780
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.04.17
Excerpt: ...necessary precautions to prevent her from falling, as a result of which she fell and suffered injuries. Plaintiff's complaint, filed on November 29, 2023, alleges causes of action for (1) negligence and (2) violations of the Elder and Dependent Adult Civil Protection Act (Welf & Instit. Code §15600 et. seq.) Plaintiff, a 93-year elder who was a resident at Defendants' Muirwoods Memory Care assisted -living facility in Santa Rosa, California (the...
2024.04.10 Motion for Leave to File TACC, or for Reconsideration 872
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Broderick, Patrick M
Hearing Date: 2024.04.10
Excerpt: ...an amended cross -c o m p la in t is GRAN TED . This motion is based upon Cross -Co m p la in a n t s ' r e c e ip t o f d is c o ve r y responses that indicate that Plaintiff Dorian Guerrero was not an employee of Craft Contract ing dba Craft Ge ne ral Const ruct ion (“Craft ”). It is Cross - Complainants' position that Craft cannot therefore avail itself of the protections of Labor Code section 3864, which formed the basis of this court's r...
2024.04.10 Demurrer 469
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Broderick, Patrick M
Hearing Date: 2024.04.10
Excerpt: ...ffs”). The demurre r is SUSTAINED without leave to amend. Plaintiffs' FAC alleges that on August 20, 2020, defendant Vanessa Ann Bardella (“Vanessa”) left her home and crossed the street to where Decedent was residing in her recreational vehicle. Vanessa shot Decedent in the face which caused severe i njuries resulting in her death. Plaintiffs allege that Barbara, Vanessa's mother, and Vanessa's brother, Matthew Bardella, knew that Vanessa ...
2024.04.10 Demurrer to SAC 312
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Honigsberg, Christopher
Hearing Date: 2024.04.10
Excerpt: ... its discretion to consider the late - filed opposition since Defendant was still able to file a substantive reply. Analysis: I. St andard on De murre r A demurrer tests whether the complaint sufficiently states a valid cause of action. (Hahn v. Merda (2007) 147 Cal.App.4th 740, 747.) Complaints are read as a whole, in context and are liberally construed. ( Blank v. Kirwan (1985) 39 Cal.3d 311, 318; see also, St evens v. Superior Court (1999) 75 ...
2024.04.10 Demurrer to TAC, Motion to Strike 997
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Honigsberg, Christopher
Hearing Date: 2024.04.10
Excerpt: ... ura l Ma t eria ls Co. (1981) 123 Cal.App.3d 593, 604 -605. Defendant's counsel shall submit a written order consistent with this tentative ruling and in compliance with Rule 3.1312. Analysis: I. St andards on De murre r A demurrer tests whether the complaint sufficiently states a valid cause of action. (Hahn v. Merda (2007) 147 Cal.App.4th 740, 747.) Complaints are read as a whole, in context and are liberally construed. ( Blank v. Kirwan (1985...
2024.04.10 Motion for Leave to File Complaint 578
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.04.10
Excerpt: ....50(c) provides: “The court, after notice to the adverse party, shall grant, upon such terms as may be just to the parties, leave to amend the pleading, or t o file the cross -complaint, to assert such cause if the party who failed to plead the caus e acted in good faith. This subdivision shall be liberally construed to avoid forfe it ure of cause s of act ion.” If t he propose d cross -c o m p la in t is p e r m is s iv e , leave of court ma...
2024.04.10 Motion to Stay 389
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Broderick, Patrick M
Hearing Date: 2024.04.10
Excerpt: ...c o n sidered for, coordination.” Section 404.5 contemplates a stay of proceedings when the coordination of two actions is being considered. No such action is being considered for c o o r d in a t io n w it h t h is c a s e . Th e r e f o r e , s e c t io n 4 0 4 .5 is in a p p lic a b le . Re g a r d le s s , as pre vio usly d etermined by this court, and as acknowledged in defendant's moving papers, Dorothy Langley transferred the subject rea...
2024.04.10 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 139
Location: Sonoma
Judge: DeMeo, Bradford
Hearing Date: 2024.04.10
Excerpt: ...a n a g e r if s h e r e lo c a t e d f r o m H a w a ii t o Ca lif o r n ia . P la in t if f w a s liv in g in Hawaii after retiring after working for Defendants for many years, and taking care o f h e r ill husband who requires kidney dialysis. Plaintiff claims she agreed to relocate based on the oral promise that she would be appointed as Store Manager and Defendants would cover her relocation costs. After she had relocated, Defendants offered...
2024.04.10 Motion to Compel Deposition, Responses, for Monetary Sanctions 719
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.04.10
Excerpt: ...��), special interrogatories (“SIs”), and requests for produc tion of documents (“RPODs”), and for monetary sanctions. Th e M o t io n is GRAN TED . I. Relevant Law A. Motions to Compel Responses Regarding the FIs, a party responding to an interrogatory must provide a response that is “as complete and straightforward as the information reasonably available to the responding party permits” and “[i]f an interrogatory cannot be answere...
2024.04.10 Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement 714
Location: Sonoma
Judge: DeMeo, Bradford
Hearing Date: 2024.04.10
Excerpt: ... located at 4723 Muirfield Court, Santa Rosa, (the “Property”). Defendants were uncertain whether Plaintiff got a permit to install this first. The parties entered into the Settlement Agreement on November 1, 2023. Paragraph 9 of the Settlement Agreement required Plaintiff to provide support that he obtained a permit for the installation of the propane tank. (Declaration of Pavone, Ex hibit A.) Plaintiff had to send this support to Defendant ...
2024.04.10 Motion to Quash Service of Summons 326
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.04.10
Excerpt: ...� 4 1 8 .1 0 (a)(1 ) o n t he gro und s t hat t he Co urt lacked personal jurisdiction over Defendant because the summons and complaint we re ne ve r prope rly se rve d . I . Governing La w The Co de o f Civil Pro ce d ure st at e s t hat “[a] de fe ndant , o n o r b e fo re t he last day o f his o r he r t ime t o p le ad o r wit hin any furt he r t ime t hat t he co urt may fo r go o d cause allo w , may se rve and file a no t ice o f mo t io...
2024.04.10 Motion to Strike Unverified Answer 308
Location: Sonoma
Judge: DeMeo, Bradford
Hearing Date: 2024.04.10
Excerpt: ...for ju d ic ia l n o t ic e a r e GRAN TED . Defendants shall file and serve their proposed amended answer within 10 days of service of the notice of entry of this order. P RO CED URAL H ISTO RY Plaintiffs brought this action to seek damages from Defendants for breach of contract and property damage arising out of a commercial lease. Defendants filed an unverified answer with a general denial to the verified complaint to avoid an entry of default...
2024.04.10 Motions to Enforce Settlement 181
Location: Sonoma
Judge: DeMeo, Bradford
Hearing Date: 2024.04.10
Excerpt: ...efendant Bethany Zoe (“Zoe”) stipulated to a settlement agreement in open court. The parties exchanged multiple versions to memorialize this settlement agreement in writing, but Defendants did not agree to the terms because they did not include the requirement for escrow, a title report, and a transfer disclosure statement re garding re al prope rt y at issue . Anabi's posit ion is t hat t he se t e rms we re a part of the general category po...
2024.04.05 Demurrer 916
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.04.05
Excerpt: ...s sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The Demurrer is SUSTAIN ED w it h leave to amend. I. Legal Standards A demurrer can be used only to challenge defects that appear on the face of the pleading under attack or from matters outside the pleading that are judicially noticeable. CCP § 430.30(a). In the event a demurrer is sustained, leave to amend should be granted where the complaint's defect can be cured by amendment. Th e Swahn Group, I...
2024.04.05 Demurrer to FAC 522
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Broderick, Patrick M
Hearing Date: 2024.04.05
Excerpt: ...second amended complaint. West of Temperance is a winery. John King (“King”) and Brian Ojalvo (“Ojalvo”) are managers and/ or members of Plaintiff. King mainly manages the finances and Ojalvo mainly operates the winemaking process. Plaintiffs allege that they purchased wine corks from Defendant which contained “cork taint,” a fungus which can be present in natural cork that ruins the wine. The FAC alleges causes of action for breach o...
2024.04.05 Motion for Certification of Class and Final Approval of Class Action Settlement, for Attorney Fees 587
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.04.05
Excerpt: ...�E+>GXji N--b + JÄf] S' + NSÄéMj f x JäT JäT S' J NJii lßÄXMiA ä Aixrwotj ß ß JÄäz f ä f XP6äT ß J zXiäTöGöTJä JzX* N•eiTÄz JÄf] Jii%txr GZJBfgä Oi IlJi±Oi 2JMi SgTXJäT#SiÄXi JäT , iqZGiAäi SGTXY*' Jfgäi JigSäT j' gß iXöJäTäXf éX*TiPtäTä fä *CéJCß TSiÄz JäT JÄf] A NJii Nf'Nfqä JäT XNJÄi 13MXMixr TJä Jzx CS Jä A XSJä &XÉJiJfgä TAB JO äNGiJi0&i Jäj a A cze xnÅäXi JäT Jö 7' JÄf]j J' TArV...
2024.04.05 Motion for Entry of Default 873
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Broderick, Patrick M
Hearing Date: 2024.04.05
Excerpt: ...least March 24, 2010. As of the date of the motion, $54,733.82 has been incurred in costs, fees, and penalties. Th e m o t io n is D EN IED . The court hereby sets this matter for a default pro ve -up hearing for Tuesday, April 16, 2024, at 4:00 p.m., in Department 16. Counsel, the parties, and the witnesses are required to appear in person. On August 4, 2023, County filed a Complaint to Abate Public Nuisance; to Enforce Septic and Zoning Code Vi...
2024.04.05 Motion to Compel Further Production of Docs, for Sanctions 739
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.04.05
Excerpt: ...ake the deposition of an entity by examining an officer or agent designated by the entity to testify on its behalf. In such a case, the notice of deposition must “describe with reasonable particularity the matters on which e xa m in a t io n is r e q u e sted” and the entity must “designate and produce at the deposition those of its officers, directors, managing agents, employees, or agents who are most qualified to testify on its behalf as...
2024.04.05 Motion to Compel Responses 225
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.04.05
Excerpt: ...ode of Civil Procedure (“CCP”) §§ 708.020 & 2030.290, and to compel production of documents (“RPODs”) from Defendants under CCP §§ 708.030 & 2031.300. The unopposed Motion is GRAN TED . Defendants shall serve verified code -c o m p lia n t responses free of objections within thirty (30) days of notice of entry of the order on this Motion. Defendants shall pay $60 in sanctions to Plaintiff within thirty (30) days of notice of entry of ...
2024.04.05 Motion to Dismiss for Forum Non Conveniens 703
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.04.05
Excerpt: ...f action for alleged violations of the Song -Be ve rly Consume r Warranty Act, Civ. Code § 1790 et se q. (the “Act”). This matter is on calendar for Moving Defendants' motion on the basis of forum non conveniens. The motion is G RAN TED . I. Governing Authorities A. Forum Non -Conveniens Eve n if a court has subje ct matt e r and pe rsonal jurisdict ion, it may st ay or dismiss an action on the grounds that the court is an inconvenient forum...
2024.03.27 Petition to Compel Arbitration 794
Location: Sonoma
Judge: DeMeo, Bradford
Hearing Date: 2024.03.27
Excerpt: ... a r b it r a t io n . P RO CED URAL H ISTO RY Plaintiff Robert Kourik brought this action against Kaiser and other defendants for medical malpractice after he ended up having severe functional issues, nerve damage, and chronic following a shoulder surgery. Plaintiff was enrolled as a “Senior Advantage ” member of Kaiser for Medicare healthcare benefits. The agreement for Senior Advantage membership included an arbitration provision. The prov...
2024.03.27 Motion to Set Aside and Vacate Dismissal, for Entry of Judgment Pursuant to Stipulation 397
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Broderick, Patrick M
Hearing Date: 2024.03.27
Excerpt: ...'s fees for this motion. As e xp la in e d b e lo w , because Plaintiff is entitled to attorney's fees for this motion pursuant to the Stipulation, and because Plaintiff clearly requested them in the moving papers, the court wi ll award such fees to Plaintiff absent an objection or explanation persuading the court why it should not do so. However, because Plaintiff has failed to provide any evidence whatsoever for the much larger amount claimed, ...
2024.03.27 Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement 842
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Honigsberg, Christopher
Hearing Date: 2024.03.27
Excerpt: ...ves. Defendant argues this even though the request for dismissal specifically states, “The Court shall retain jurisdiction over the Parties, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 664.6, to enforce the Settlement Agreement until performance in full of the terms therein. Any and all terms of the Settlement Agreement may be e nforce d pursuant to a motion brought under Code of Civil Procedure section 664.6, and the Court may retain jurisdict...
2024.03.27 Motion to Dismiss on Grounds of Forum Non Conveniens 638
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.03.27
Excerpt: ...A”) and violations of the Song -Beverly Consumer Warranty Act, Civ. Code § 1790 et seq. (the “Act”). This matter is on cale ndar for Defendants' motion on the basis of forum non conveniens. The motion is DENIED. I. Go ve r n in g Au t h o r it ie s A. Forum Non -Conveniens Eve n if a court has subje ct matt e r and pe rsonal jurisdict ion, it may st ay or dismiss an action on the grounds that the court is an inconvenient forum. CCP § 418....
2024.03.27 Motion to Compel Further Responses 479
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.03.27
Excerpt: ...�SIs”) and requests for admission (“RFAs”) pursuant to CCP §2033.290(d) (relating to requests for admission) and CCP § 2030.300(d) (relating to interrogatories) and for monetary sanctions. The motion is GRANTED. I. Legal Authority Regarding the FIs and SIs, a party responding to an interrogatory must provide a response that is “as complete and straightforward as the information reasonably available to the responding party permits” and...
2024.03.27 Motion for Summary Judgment 818
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Broderick, Patrick M
Hearing Date: 2024.03.27
Excerpt: ...nst DOE defendants. The complaint alleges causes of action for general negligence and strict liability pursuant to Civil Code section 3342(a). The complaint alleges that on September 11, 2019, Garretson was employed at PetSmart, Inc. as a pet groomer. Garretson alleges that she was bitten by a dog owned by DOE defendants. On August 24, 2021, Garretson substituted Murillo as DOE 1. Murillo owns a Husky named Ta h o e . 1. Assumption of the Risk Se...
2024.03.27 Motion for Summary Judgment 469
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Honigsberg, Christopher
Hearing Date: 2024.03.27
Excerpt: ...g forth plainly and concisely a ll m a t e r ia l f a c t s that the moving party contends are undisputed.” (Emphasis added.) “The failure to comply with this requirement of a separate statement may in the court's discretion constitute a sufficient ground for denying the motion.” ( Ib id .) Defendants' separate statement makes no mention of the Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA) between Brendon Barraclough and the Iron Workers Union ...
2024.03.27 Motion for Preliminary Injunction 302
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Broderick, Patrick M
Hearing Date: 2024.03.27
Excerpt: ...quently repossessed by defendant. The complaint alleges that defendant w r o n g f u lly r e p o s sessed the vehicle and failed to comply with vehicle repossession la w s . The complaint further alleges that defendant has unlawfully refused to release the vehicle back to plaintiff. The complaint requests a preliminary injunction ordering defendant to: (1) not engage in any further attempts to repossess the vehicle; (2) release the vehicle to pla...

2570 Results

Per page

Pages