Search by Keyword:
Start Date:
End Date:
Tip: Wrap text in quotation marks when searching for phrases (e.g. "motion to dismiss").

657 Results

Clear Search Parameters x
Location: Sacramento x
Judge: Sueyoshi, Richard K x
2022.11.02 Motion for Protective Order 091
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Sueyoshi, Richard K
Hearing Date: 2022.11.02
Excerpt: ...d to third parties. These include a demand for exchange of expert witness information, supplemental request for production, supplemental interrogatories, form interrogatories (set two), special interrogatories (set three), request for production (set three), request for admissions (set one), and numerous subpoenas for production of business records to third parties. According to Plaintiff, a protective order is warranted because Defendant's disco...
2022.11.01 Motion to Compel Responses 875
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Sueyoshi, Richard K
Hearing Date: 2022.11.01
Excerpt: ...el is granted. On May 27, 2022, Defendants served supplemental discovery requests to Plaintiff. (Kono Decl., ¶ 3, Exh. A.) On June 28, 2022, Plaintiff served unverified responses. (Kono Decl., ¶ 4, Exh. B.) Plaintiff failed to serve verified responses by the deadline of June 29, 2022. (Id. at ¶ 3.) On June 28, 2022, Defendants emailed Plaintiff's counsel to request verifications and to obtain clarification regarding the unverified responses. (...
2022.11.01 Demurrer, Motion to Strike 695
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Sueyoshi, Richard K
Hearing Date: 2022.11.01
Excerpt: ...e 27, 2000, and as amended January 10, 2013 (the “Trust”). (FAC, ¶ 1.) Horgan is the Primary Beneficiary. (FAC, ¶ 7.) Defendants are attorneys who prepared the Trust. (FAC, ¶¶ 2 and 5.) Plaintiffs allege Defendants negligently drafted the Trust in a manner that delayed Horgan's ability to appoint a successor trustee, which resulted in the filing of otherwise unnecessary litigation and Trust disputes. (FAC, ¶¶ 5‐9.) Plaintiffs allege D...
2022.11.01 Demurrer, Motion to Strike 235
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Sueyoshi, Richard K
Hearing Date: 2022.11.01
Excerpt: ...cised his First Amendment rights by appealing an adverse employment action taken against him. Plaintiff later resigned his employment. After resigning, Plaintiff publicly criticized CalFire officials and management. (3AC, ¶¶ 17‐ 18.) In April 2018, Plaintiff and South Coast Helicopters ("SCH") entered into an employment contract in which Plaintiff agreed to perform services for SCH as a helicopter pilot and general manager in return for compe...
2022.11.01 Motions to Strike 405
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Sueyoshi, Richard K
Hearing Date: 2022.11.01
Excerpt: ...n (“FedEx”). (Complaint, ¶¶ 9‐ 10, 14.) On February 14, 2022, Plantiffs and Phu were traveling southbound on I‐5. (Complaint, ¶¶ 14.) Phu was traveling behind Plaintiffs. (Ibid.) Near the location of the accident there was an advisory sign advising southbound motorists “CAUTION/WATCH FOR SLOW TRAFFIC.” (Complaint, ¶ 18.) The posted speed limit in the area was 70 mph for passenger vehicles and 55 mph for vehicles towing trailers. ...
2022.10.27 Motion to Quash Subpoena 695
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Sueyoshi, Richard K
Hearing Date: 2022.10.27
Excerpt: ... of motion provides the incorrect address of Department 53. The correct address for Department 53 of the Sacramento County Superior Court is 813 6th Street, Sacramento, California 95814. FACTS/PROCEDURAL HISTORY: On July 6, 2021, Plaintiff filed the operative First Amended Complaint (“FAC”). (ROA 20.) Plaintiff's FAC asserts the following causes of action: (1) harassment against Defendants, (2) failure to prevent discrimination, harassment, o...
2022.10.27 Motion for Attorney Fees 097
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Sueyoshi, Richard K
Hearing Date: 2022.10.27
Excerpt: ...Chui Faising, Timothy Tight, Michael McCarthy, Glenn Wilson, John Mullen, Richard Girard and Diabetic Innovations, LLC, (“Plaintiffs”), jointly and severally, is ruled upon as follows. *** If oral argument is requested, the parties must at the time oral argument is requested notify the clerk and opposing counsel of the specific issues identified below which will be addressed at the hearing. Counsel are also reminded that pursuant to local rul...
2022.10.27 Demurrers, Motions to Strike 467
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Sueyoshi, Richard K
Hearing Date: 2022.10.27
Excerpt: ...8 motor vehicle accident in which he sustained a traumatic brain injury. The 2AC advances causes of action for dependent adult abuse, misrepresentation, concealment, negligent infliction of emotional distress (“NIED”) and wrongful death. In brief, plaintiffs allege that after being admitted to CVSH in September 2018 Ronald continually lost weight and his family's complaints about undernourishment were ignored, resulting in more lost weight an...
2022.10.26 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 321
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Sueyoshi, Richard K
Hearing Date: 2022.10.26
Excerpt: ...at a balance of $3,889.92 is now due. Plaintiff now moves for summary judgment. Plaintiff's separate statement includes the following. Defendant applied to Plaintiff for a credit card and entered in a written credit card account agreement. Defendant agreed to be bound by the terms of the agreement through applying for, receiving and using the subject credit card. Defendant used the subject credit card and Plaintiff complied with its obligations b...
2022.10.26 Motion for Approval of PAGA Settlement 815
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Sueyoshi, Richard K
Hearing Date: 2022.10.26
Excerpt: ...ilarly situated individuals who were employed by Defendant ONEHALLOWEENNIGHT, Inc. in California from January 23, 2016 to January 23 2017 and received a wage statement containing their full social security number. Plaintiff alleges that Defendant violated Labor Code § 226 by printing social security numbers on wage statements. The PAGA settlement calls for Defendant to make a gross payment of $42,500. The settlement provides that attorneys' fees...
2022.10.25 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 503
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Sueyoshi, Richard K
Hearing Date: 2022.10.25
Excerpt: ...fall on the sidewalk. Defendant's instant motion seeks summary adjudication of both causes of action in the Complaint. The Complaint alleges that Plaintiff: “tripped and fell while walking on the public sidewalk at or adjacent to 8698 Kiwi Circle, Elk Grove, California due to an unmarked, uneven, discontinuous, and protruding portion of the sidewalk that constituted a dangerous and defective condition on public property (hereafter referred to a...
2022.10.25 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 033
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Sueyoshi, Richard K
Hearing Date: 2022.10.25
Excerpt: ...tiff in pro per available for oral argument at the above‐stated time. Appearance will be by ZOOM and Department 53's Zoom ID is 841 204 6267. To appear on Zoom by telephone, call (888) 475‐4499 or (877) 853‐5257 (toll‐free) and enter the Zoom ID referenced above. Defendants J. Shaffer and the Board of Parole Hearings' (“Defendants”) Motion for Summary Judgment is unopposed and is GRANTED. Plaintiff, an incarcerated person proceeding i...
2022.10.25 Motion to Quash Subpoena 091
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Sueyoshi, Richard K
Hearing Date: 2022.10.25
Excerpt: ...s ruled upon as follows. This is a personal injury action arising from Plaintiff's slip‐and‐fall incident on a sidewalk. The incident occurred on October 20, 2016 at 3341 Power Inn Road, Sacramento, CA (hereinafter "Subject Incident"). (Declaration of Heidi Adams (“Adams Decl.”) ¶ 2). On November 13, 2017, Plaintiff filed a complaint for damages alleging causes of action for dangerous condition of public property (Govt. Code §§ 835, et...
2022.10.25 Motion to Compel Further Responses 903
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Sueyoshi, Richard K
Hearing Date: 2022.10.25
Excerpt: ...y is ruled upon as follows. This is an elder abuse action. Plaintiff Annabelle Smith ("Ms. Smith") was over the age of 65 years old, and was admitted to AHC Sacramento on December 21, 2020 following a surgery to treat an ulcer. (See generally, Compl. (Register of Actions (“ROA”) 1.) Prior to her admission, Ms. Smith was quite healthy for her age and lived independently, although she had type 2 diabetes. Complications arising from her surgery ...
2022.10.25 Motion to Dismiss 327
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Sueyoshi, Richard K
Hearing Date: 2022.10.25
Excerpt: ...��Plaintiff”) opposes. This action arises from a written agreement in which Sigler agreed to provide heating and air conditioning units for a building project at the Mule Creek State Prison. Plaintiff's pleading alleges the following causes of action: breach of written contract, quantum meruit, misappropriation of funds in violation of Business & Professions Code section 7108.5 et seq., enforcement of stop payment notice, and action on bond. (S...
2022.10.25 Motion to Tax or Strike Costs on Appeal 711
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Sueyoshi, Richard K
Hearing Date: 2022.10.25
Excerpt: ..., on February 11, 2020, this Court entered an order granting YAN's motion for summary judgment and entered judgment in favor of YAN. (ROA 152‐153.) La Posta appealed and the Appellate Court reversed. The Appellate Court found judgment was premature because one of the claims pending in the Tribal Action had not been resolved and YAN had therefore not obtained a final determination. As described in the declaration supporting La Posta's costs, on ...
2022.10.20 Motion to Withdraw Counsel 774
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Sueyoshi, Richard K
Hearing Date: 2022.10.20
Excerpt: ... to the hearing, moving counsel shall be available at the hearing, in person or remotely (telephonically or by video conference via Zoom as stated in the introductory notice to today's tentative rulings), in the event opposing counsel appears without following the procedures set forth in Local Rule 1.06(B). Joshua Safran's (“Moving Counsel”) motion to withdraw as counsel for Plaintiff Metro Health Systems (“Metro”) is GRANTED as follows. ...
2022.10.20 Motion to Strike Complaint 288
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Sueyoshi, Richard K
Hearing Date: 2022.10.20
Excerpt: ...or, alternatively, portions thereof, is DENIED. This action (the “Second Action”) is related to a case filed on May 10, 2017, by plaintiffs Baljinder Singh and Ajit Singh against Phanikumar Vadarevu and Sita Vadarevu, husband and wife, case number 34‐ 2017‐00212288 (the “Original Action”). The following procedural history relates to the Original Action. After the Court sustained in part with leave to amend defendants' demurrer, plaint...
2022.10.20 Motion to Seal 058
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Sueyoshi, Richard K
Hearing Date: 2022.10.20
Excerpt: ...ement agreement and that the parties have been unable to execute a Final Settlement Agreement. Defendants move to seal: 1. The Notice of Motion and Motion 2. The Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support Thereof; 3. Declaration of Matthew Borden and Exhibit 1 thereto; 4. Defendants' anticipated Opposition to the Motion and exhibits filed in support' 5. Plaintiffs' anticipated reply and all declarations and exhibits filed in support; 6. Plai...
2022.10.20 Motion for Terminating Sanctions 459
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Sueyoshi, Richard K
Hearing Date: 2022.10.20
Excerpt: ...the District of Nevada (Case No. 21‐50397‐ nmc) is unopposed and granted. Factual and Procedural Background WHI commenced this action on September 24, 2019 against Elise Akers (“Akers”); Akers Bookkeeping and Taxes; RPR Customs, Inc.; and Akers Payroll Services. In essence, Plaintiff alleges Akers, in her role as bookkeeper for WHI, embezzled over $200,000 of WHI's money. On October 28, 2019, Akers Bookkeeping and Taxes, and Akers Family ...
2022.10.19 Motion to Strike (SLAPP) 009
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Sueyoshi, Richard K
Hearing Date: 2022.10.19
Excerpt: ...e on defendants' anti‐SLAPP motion (Code Civ. Proc., § 425.16). The trial court only had jurisdiction to thereafter entertain a motion brought by defendants for attorneys fees and costs.” (Law Offices of Andrew L. Ellis v. Yang (2009) 178 Cal.App.4th 869, 881.) A plaintiff cannot avoid fees by dismissing the action after an anti‐SLAPP motion is filed in the event the motion would have been granted. The Court retains jurisdiction to enterta...
2022.10.19 Demurrer 973
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Sueyoshi, Richard K
Hearing Date: 2022.10.19
Excerpt: ...he Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing, Promissory Estoppel, Negligence, Concealment, False Promise, Fraud, Negligent Misrepresentation, and Wrongful Foreclosure. The complaint arises from Plaintiff's attempt to obtain a loan modification from Defendant. Defendant demurs to the complaint on numerous grounds. It argues that Plaintiff fails to allege any facts showing that the HBOR applies because there are no allegations regarding the ...
2022.10.19 Demurrer 667
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Sueyoshi, Richard K
Hearing Date: 2022.10.19
Excerpt: ...en discovered. (Comp. ¶ 1.) The second paragraph alleges that the corporate defendants were doing business in California. (Id. ¶ 2.) The third paragraph alleges that the “Defendants, and with the permission of each other Defendant, negligently conducted themselves, and did negligently own, lease, operate, control, entrust, maintain, and repair a certain motor vehicle so as to cause the same to strike and injure Plaintiff on or about December ...
2022.10.18 Motion for New Trial 903
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Sueyoshi, Richard K
Hearing Date: 2022.10.18
Excerpt: ...lina's Additional Facts and Supporting Evidence (“AMF”) (Seeds Decl., ¶ 2, Exh. A) is granted. Lexington's request for judicial notice of portions of the record incorporated by reference (Barron Decl., ¶ 20) is granted. This is an action for bad faith following an adverse verdict against Plaintiffs Elaine McDonald and Silva Trucking, Inc. (“Plaintiffs”) in an underlying action. Plaintiffs had a primary insurance policy with Carolina in ...
2022.10.18 Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Proceedings 413
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Sueyoshi, Richard K
Hearing Date: 2022.10.18
Excerpt: ...e Song‐Beverly Warranty Act and for fraudulent inducement. (See Complaint.) Plaintiff allegedly purchased a new 2017 Nissan Pathfinder (the “Vehicle”) from an unidentified “Seller” that was manufactured by Defendant. (Complaint, ¶¶ 4‐6.) Plaintiff alleges the vehicle failed to conform to warranties provided by Defendant. (Complaint ¶¶ 7‐35.) Plaintiff alleges there was a purchase agreement for the Vehicle that is in Defendant's ...
2022.10.18 Motion to Compel Further Responses 193
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Sueyoshi, Richard K
Hearing Date: 2022.10.18
Excerpt: ...fecting former non‐exempt employees of Defendant. Plaintiff seeks to compel a further response to Special Interrogatory No. 1, which requests Defendant identify nonexempt employees during the PAGA period. (Anderson Decl., ¶ 6, Exh. 1.) Plaintiff also requests sanctions in the amount of $7,060 for 5 hours of work incurred to prepare this motion at a rate of $700 per hour, an additional anticipated 5 hours for the reply and attending the hearing...
2022.10.13 Petition to Compel Arbitration 893
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Sueyoshi, Richard K
Hearing Date: 2022.10.13
Excerpt: ...er to Dealer's Opposition, but did not file any of its own evidence in support thereof. Plaintiff's instant motion seeks: (1) to arbitrate the controversy pursuant to the grievance and arbitration provisions of Retail Installment Sale Contract ("RISC") between the parties, (2) an order for a stay pending the results of arbitration, (3) a request for costs and (4) an order for reasonable attorney's fees with respect to all work performed for the a...
2022.10.13 Motion to Deposit by Stakeholder 233
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Sueyoshi, Richard K
Hearing Date: 2022.10.13
Excerpt: ...ued to Tropical Paradise Pools Spas and Backyard, a California Corporation (“Tropical Paradise”) as principal. (Declaration of Carlos E. Sosa (“Sosa Decl.”) ¶ 2.) The bond was issued pursuant to Business and Professions Code section 7071.6 and is in the penal sum of $15,000. (Ibid.) However, in this particular case, “[t] he maximum liability for all claims is $7,500 as provided for by the bond and by the Code[,] [a]s there are no homeo...
2022.10.13 Motion to Compel Production of Docs 159
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Sueyoshi, Richard K
Hearing Date: 2022.10.13
Excerpt: ...production of all responsive documents corresponding to those Requests; and to compel Defendant to pay monetary sanctions for its abuses of the discovery process. Plaintiff argues that FCA US's responses are deficient and that its objections to Plaintiff's discovery lack merit. Defendant opposes. Trial is currently set for March 21, 2023. In this Lemon Law action, Plaintiff alleges that her 2010 Dodge Charger vehicle, which was manufactured and d...
2022.10.12 Motion to Strike (SLAPP) 828
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Sueyoshi, Richard K
Hearing Date: 2022.10.12
Excerpt: ...xt to each other. Plaintiffs allege that in August 2021, Bender began making defamatory statements about them. (Complaint, ¶¶ 7‐8.) Plaintiffs allege that Bender posted on the Nextdoor website that “Plaintiffs were ‘cooking with chemicals,' [and] stating Plaintiffs' behavior ‘resembles people on drugs.'” (Complaint, ¶ 10.) Bender also agreed “ with others' statements that such conduct related to creating/manufacturing drugs, and ot...
2022.10.12 Motion to Strike (SLAPP) 050
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Sueyoshi, Richard K
Hearing Date: 2022.10.12
Excerpt: ...ively, “Plaintiffs”) per pursuant to CCP § 425.16 is UNOPPOSED and GRANTED. Defendants' request for judicial notice is granted. Factual and Procedural Background This action involves Plaintiffs' repeated attempts to sue the Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District (the “District”) and its employees and attorneys over the past two decades. By way of background, on August 11, 2020, this Court entered judgment against Plainti...
2022.10.12 Motion to Compel Arbitration 831
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Sueyoshi, Richard K
Hearing Date: 2022.10.12
Excerpt: ...fs reside on 19 different spaces at the Community. Among other things, they assert causes of action seeking relief for nuisance under the Mobilehome Residency Law (“MRL”). Defendants move to compel 13 of the 32 plaintiffs to arbitrate their claims based on an arbitration provision contained in their respective lease agreements. The arbitration provision provides as follows: DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROCESS: To ensure speedy resolution of disputes, ...
2022.10.11 Special Motion to Strike 829
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Sueyoshi, Richard K
Hearing Date: 2022.10.11
Excerpt: ... Plaintiff's claims against them were barred by tribal sovereign immunity. (Acres v. Marston (2021) 72 Cal.App.5th 417.) Defendants also had a pending anti‐SLAPP motion which the Court declined to reach because the Court found it was moot as a result of its ruling on the motion to quash. Plaintiff's complaint arises from a previous action in the Tribal Court (the “Tribal Action”) of the Blue Lake Rancheria (“Blue Lake”). The Tribal Acti...
2022.10.11 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 009
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Sueyoshi, Richard K
Hearing Date: 2022.10.11
Excerpt: ... the requirement to submit supporting evidence in a single compendium of evidence. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1350(c).) Further, the parties are reminded that one purpose of the requirements for a separate statement is to ease the burden on the Court. ( Security Pacific Nat. Bank v. Bradley (1992) 4 Cal.App.4th 89, 99.) In achieving this goal, responses to separate statements are required to unequivocally state whether a fact is disputed or und...
2022.10.11 Demurrer 725
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Sueyoshi, Richard K
Hearing Date: 2022.10.11
Excerpt: ... 54 Cal.App.4th 216, 219; Nordlinger v. Lynch (1990) 225 Cal.App.3d 1259, 1271; Boyle v. City of Redondo Beach (1999) 70 Cal.App.4th 1109, 1114, fn. 2.) “If the complaint states a cause of action under any theory, regardless of the title under which the factual basis for relief is stated, that aspect of the complaint is good against demurrer." (Quelimane Co. v. Stewart Title Guaranty Co. (1998) 19 Cal.4th 26, 38‐39; Bagatti v. Dept. of Rehabi...
2022.10.06 Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Judicial Proceedings 531
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Sueyoshi, Richard K
Hearing Date: 2022.10.06
Excerpt: ... required by Local Rule 1.06. Moving counsel is directed to contact opposing counsel and advise him/her of Local Rule 1.06 and the Court's tentative ruling procedure and the manner to request a hearing. If moving counsel is unable to contact opposing counsel prior to hearing, moving counsel is ordered to appear at the hearing by Zoom or by telephone. Factual Background This action arises out of plaintiff's prior employment by Spyglass, which oper...
2022.10.06 Demurrer 123
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Sueyoshi, Richard K
Hearing Date: 2022.10.06
Excerpt: ...el is directed to contact opposing counsel and advise him/her of Local Rule 1.06 and the Court's tentative ruling procedure and the manner to request a hearing, along with the correct address for Dept. 53/54. If moving counsel is unable to contact opposing counsel prior to hearing, moving counsel is ordered to appear at the hearing by Zoom or by telephone. Moving counsel failed to comply with CRC Rule 3.1110(b)(3)‐(4). Plaintiff's opposition wa...
2022.10.06 Motion for Summary Adjudication 758
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Sueyoshi, Richard K
Hearing Date: 2022.10.06
Excerpt: ... 8 ½" x 11" sheet with hard paper or plastic tabs extending below the bottom of the page bearing the exhibit designation. Plaintiff Erika Paleny's (“Plaintiff”) request for judicial notice is granted. The Court does not rule on Defendants' evidentiary objections filed in support of the reply since they concern evidence deemed immaterial to decision on the motion. (Code Civ. Proc., § 437c, subd. (q).) Factual and Procedural Background This a...
2022.10.06 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 447
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Sueyoshi, Richard K
Hearing Date: 2022.10.06
Excerpt: ...judication. (Compare Code Civ. Proc. (“CCP”) § 437c, subd. (a)(1) with subd. (f)(1).) Judicial Notice Plaintiffs Carrie Ann Whitlow and Terry Whitlow's (“Plaintiffs”) request that the Court take judicial notice of the Court's June 11, 2019 Order denying Kia's demurrer to Plaintiffs' Complaint is granted. The remainder of Plaintiffs' request for judicial notice is denied as irrelevant. Evidentiary Objections The Court declines to rule on ...
2022.10.06 Motion to Enforce Settlement 757
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Sueyoshi, Richard K
Hearing Date: 2022.10.06
Excerpt: ... global settlement following mediation in May 2022 and although plaintiff's attorney filed with the Court on 5/19/2022 a “Notice of Settlement” (which resulted in the 7/12/2022 trial date being vacated), plaintiff subsequently “rescinded her acceptance” of the earlier settlement offer and now refuses to execute a formal “Settlement Agreement and Release.” The Court granted on 9/8/2022 plaintiff's attorney's motion to withdraw. CPS now...
2022.10.06 Motion to Compel Further Responses 333
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Sueyoshi, Richard K
Hearing Date: 2022.10.06
Excerpt: ...ospital despite being “medically and legally eligible to be discharged. The complaint describes defendant Smedley as a “patient care advocate” who has “unreasonably and unlawfully advised” defendant Brennan “to ignore and refuse all safe discharge options offered…by Plaintiff.” In the moving papers, plaintiff argues that while defendant Smedley provided some factual information in his initial response to Form Interrogatory No. 15....
2022.10.06 Motion to Contest Application for Good Faith Settlement 841
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Sueyoshi, Richard K
Hearing Date: 2022.10.06
Excerpt: ...of Good Faith Settlement Between Plaintiffs and Lethesia Guzman and the Estate of David Miranda is DENIED. Having denied the two motions, the Court GRANTS Defendants Lethesia Guzman and the Estate of David Miranda's Application for Determination of Good Faith Settlement. FACTUAL BACKGROUND For purposes of the Court's consideration of this motion, the Court provides the following background. This case involves multiple accidents that occurred in t...
2022.10.06 Motion to Quash Deposition Subpoena 763
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Sueyoshi, Richard K
Hearing Date: 2022.10.06
Excerpt: ...rd and remains viewable by the public. The same is true for the various account numbers found in the attachments to the Fernandez Declaration in opposition. Both counsel are reminded that such personal, private information should pursuant to CRC Rule 1.201 be redacted prior to filing with the Court. Factual Background Plaintiff is the sole surviving child of Curtis Mackey (the “Decedent”). Defendant is the Trustee of the Curtis Mackey, Jr. Tr...
2022.10.06 Petition to Confirm Arbitration Award 525
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Sueyoshi, Richard K
Hearing Date: 2022.10.06
Excerpt: ...reply and finding no petition from respondent to vacate and/or correct, the Court now issues the following tentative ruling. Petitioner Swift Financial LLC's petition to confirm contractual arbitration award is ruled upon as follows. Although the notice of hearing provided notice of the Court's tentative ruling system as required by Local Rule 1.06(D), the notice does not comply with that rule in that it refers Local Rule 2.47 [pertaining to the ...
2022.10.05 Motion to Strike, Demurrer 661
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Sueyoshi, Richard K
Hearing Date: 2022.10.05
Excerpt: ... A motion to strike is appropriate to strike out any irrelevant, false or improper matter asserted in any pleading and the Court may strike out all or any party of any pleading not drawn or filed in conformity with the law. (See Code Civ. Pro. § 436 (a)‐(c).) A motion to strike challenges portions of a cause of action that are substantively defective on the face of the complaint. (PH II, Inc. v. Superior Court (1995) 33 Cal.App.4th 1680, 1682�...
2022.10.05 Motion to Strike 113
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Sueyoshi, Richard K
Hearing Date: 2022.10.05
Excerpt: ...laint against ADC alleging various causes of action arising out of her employment with ADC as a dental hygienist. She alleges various wage and hour claims under the Labor Code in addition to causes of action under FEHA. ADC thereafter filed a cross‐complaint against David Miller, Plaintiff's father. ADC alleges that its causes of action arise out of the same transaction, occurrence or series of transactions or occurrences as Plaintiff's claims....
2022.10.05 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 041
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Sueyoshi, Richard K
Hearing Date: 2022.10.05
Excerpt: ...n the Anatolia housing development which is subject to Defendant's conditions, covenants and restrictions (CC&Rs). Plaintiff alleges Defendant issued a Notice of Intent to Record Assessment Lien on January 30, 2020, claiming there were delinquent assessments, late fees, collection fees and a current assessment. Plaintiff alleges Defendant's lien was incorrect and that she had timely paid all assessments and that Defendant failed to credit her pay...
2022.10.05 Demurrer 455
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Sueyoshi, Richard K
Hearing Date: 2022.10.05
Excerpt: ... Wigle's vehicle and Plaintiff. The first cause of action for declaratory relief is asserted against the insurance company defendants and seeks a declaration regarding the parties' rights under the subject insurance policies. Plaintiff appears to allege that the insurance company defendants have engaged in bad faith as it related to Wigle. Wigle demurs to the first cause of action on the basis Plaintiff has misjoined the insurance company defenda...
2022.10.05 Demurrer 395
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Sueyoshi, Richard K
Hearing Date: 2022.10.05
Excerpt: ...hether the complaint is well‐pled. In this action, Plaintiff alleges causes of action against Defendant for conversion, violation of Business & Professions Code § 17200, fraudulent misrepresentation and intentional interference with contract. Plaintiff alleges that it specializes in recovering and supplying refrigerants. (Comp. ¶ 11.) Plaintiff alleges it utilizes a unique piece of equipment called “El Machino” which it constructs through...
2022.10.04 Motion to Compel Discovery Responses 839
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Sueyoshi, Richard K
Hearing Date: 2022.10.04
Excerpt: ...n was necessary. The Court finds the bulk of the issues should have been resolved during the meet and confer process and the failure of the parties to do so is suggestive that neither party made a reasonable effort to resolve this dispute. The parties are admonished that if there are similar circumstances in the future, the Court may direct the parties to meet and confer further before hearing a discovery motion. In this particular instance, the ...

657 Results

Per page

Pages