Search by Keyword:
Start Date:
End Date:
Tip: Wrap text in quotation marks when searching for phrases (e.g. "motion to dismiss").

4 Results

Clear Search Parameters x
Location: Sacramento x
Judge: Ueda, Kara x
2021.06.03 Motion to Set Aside Default 758
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Ueda, Kara
Hearing Date: 2021.06.03
Excerpt: ... Summons on March 5, 2020, indicating Defendant was served by mail and acknowledgment of receipt of service pursuant to CCP § 415.40. (ROA 27.) The Proof of Service indicates the Summons and Complaint was mailed to P.O Box 55, Normantown, West Virginia 25267. (ROA 27.) The date of mailing is not specified in the Proof of Service, but Defendant signed a return receipt indicating the date of delivery was September 27, 2019. (ROA 27, Exh. 1.) Defen...
2021.06.03 Motion to Appoint Receiver 740
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Ueda, Kara
Hearing Date: 2021.06.03
Excerpt: ..., as well as to appoint a receiver to handle the repairs and bring the property into code compliance. The City now moves to appoint Bay Area Receivership Group and its President, Gerard F. Keena II, as the receiver. The “Subject Property” is located at 4003 Washington Avenue, Sacramento, California 95820, and identified by Assessor's Parcel Number 002‐0073‐026‐0000. The Subject Property has a history of substandard conditions dating bac...
2021.06.03 Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement 194
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Ueda, Kara
Hearing Date: 2021.06.03
Excerpt: ...t and a notice with California's Labor and Workforce Development Agency (“LWDA”) regarding his intent to file an action seeking civil penalties under PAGA. (Ly Decl. ¶ 4.) On May 9, 2016, Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint (“FAC”), adding the PAGA claim based on the facts previously alleged in the Complaint. (ROA 7.) Plaintiff filed a Second Amended Complaint on February 23, 2017. (ROA 42.) The operative Complaint alleges claims f...
2021.06.03 Demurrer 914
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Ueda, Kara
Hearing Date: 2021.06.03
Excerpt: ...xistence, not the truth of their contents. (See Professional Engineers v. Dep't of Transp. (1997) 15 Cal.4th 543, 590 [judicial notice of findings of fact does not mean that those findings of fact are true]; Steed v. Department of Consumer Affairs (2012) 204 Cal.App.4th 112, 120‐121 [“[W]hile the existence of any document in a court file may be judicially noticed, the truth of the matters asserted in those documents, including the factual fin...

4 Results

Per page