Search by Keyword:
Start Date:
End Date:
Tip: Wrap text in quotation marks when searching for phrases (e.g. "motion to dismiss").

231 Results

Clear Search Parameters x
Location: Sacramento x
Judge: Rodda, Steven H x
2018.12.31 Motion to De-Designate Confidential Portion of Deposition 212
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Rodda, Steven H
Hearing Date: 2018.12.31
Excerpt: ...rises out of plaintiff's prior employment with CDCR. Her complaint asserts various causes of action under the Fair Employment and Housing Act (“FEHA”). In 2015 the parties stipulated to a protective order which permits the parties to designate as confidential certain documents including plaintiff's employment, medical, psychiatric and psychological records so as to limit their use and disclosure to this litigation only but it also permits the...
2018.12.31 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 058
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Rodda, Steven H
Hearing Date: 2018.12.31
Excerpt: ... employment dispute involving allegations of discrimination under the FEHA. Sterling's fourth cause of action is for defamation. The County argues that it is entitled to summary adjudication because “the alleged ‘defamation' was nothing more than the internal evaluation of [Sterling]'s work performance” and therefore is inactionable under Jensen v. Hewlett‐Packard Co. (1993) 14 Cal.App.4th 958. Sterling opposes on grounds that the motion ...
2018.10.16 Demurrer, Motion to Strike 086
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Rodda, Steven H
Hearing Date: 2018.10.16
Excerpt: ...to sufficiently allege "malice, oppression, or fraud." The Court notes that Defendant has not demurred to the conversion or negligence causes of action. Plaintiff insists that Defendant acted with malice because she alleges that she had rightful possession of the vehicle and that Defendant hooked up Plaintiff's vehicle with full knowledge that she was inside. At this stage of the pleadings, and taking the allegations as true that: (1)...
2018.10.16 Demurrer 716
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Rodda, Steven H
Hearing Date: 2018.10.16
Excerpt: ...low. The parties still must request oral argument pursuant to Local Rule 1.06 *** If oral argument is requested, the parties must at the time oral argument is requested notify the clerk and opposing counsel of the causes of action that will be addressed at the hearing. The parties are also reminded that pursuant to local court rules, only limited oral argument is permitted on law and motion matters. *** Defendants Janis ("Janis") and Dean...
2018.10.15 Motion to Strike 430
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Rodda, Steven H
Hearing Date: 2018.10.15
Excerpt: ...wise the subject of judicial notice. This is a trip‐and‐fall case. On or about 10/09/17, Laber informed Dr. Katibah that Leo Van Dolson, Jr., M.D. (Dr. Van Dolson) was treating her injured knee in a worker's compensation case. (See Moua Decl., Exh. C.) When the parties initially exchanged expert witness lists on 8/13/18, Laber disclosed Dr. Van Dolson as a non‐retained expert. Dr. Katibah did not designate Dr. Van Dolson at that time. The f...
2018.10.15 Motion to Strike (SLAPP) 530
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Rodda, Steven H
Hearing Date: 2018.10.15
Excerpt: ...ysician whose hospital privileges were in 2014 suspended by defendant Dignity Health in response to allegations by various hospital employees. Shortly thereafter, plaintiff filed his first suit against Dignity Health for defamation, harassment and violation of Health & Safety Code §1278.5, alleging he suffered retaliation for reporting unsafe hospital conditions and/or care. According to plaintiff, when certain hospital staff learned plaintiff w...
2018.10.11 Demurrer 292
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Rodda, Steven H
Hearing Date: 2018.10.11
Excerpt: ...l Rule 1.06(D). Counsel for moving party is directed to contact counsel for opposing party forthwith and advise counsel of Local Rule 1.06 and the court's tentative ruling procedure. If counsel for moving party is unable to contact counsel for opposing party prior to hearing, counsel for moving party shall be available at the hearing, in person or by telephone, in the event opposing party appears without following the procedures set forth in ...
2018.10.11 Demurrer 838
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Rodda, Steven H
Hearing Date: 2018.10.11
Excerpt: ... Emotional Distress, but is OVERRULED as to all other causes of action. This case presents a business dispute. In its complaint, Alhambra alleges that it repurchased its stock from Defendant and Cross‐Complainant Martinez, but the latter breached the Stock Purchase Agreement (“SPA”). In the First Amended CrossComplaint (“FACC”), Martinez alleges that Alhambra is the one that breached the SPA. Martinez's FACC also alleges that he and Alh...
2018.7.25 Motion to Quash Deposition Subpoena 566
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Rodda, Steven H
Hearing Date: 2018.7.25
Excerpt: ... that she began her employment with Defendant SNYIR, Inc. dba Two Men and a Truck Sacramento, in December 2015. In April 2016, she was admitted to the hospital due to health complications related to her pregnancy and her daughter was born three months premature. She alleges that Defendant would not allow her to return to fulltime work after she returned from maternity leave. In July 2016, Plaintiff resigned because she could not afford a baby‐s...
2018.7.25 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 058
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Rodda, Steven H
Hearing Date: 2018.7.25
Excerpt: ...f will be addressed at the hearing and the parties should be prepared to point to specific evidence which is claimed to show the existence or non‐existence of a triable issue of material fact. *** Defendant Cordova Recreation and Park District's (“District”) motion for summary judgment, or in the alternative, summary adjudication is ruled upon as follows. This case arises from allegations of discrimination and retaliation under the FEHA and...
2018.7.25 Motion to Compel Responses, Requests for Admission 526
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Rodda, Steven H
Hearing Date: 2018.7.25
Excerpt: ...f dangerous condition of public property. Plaintiff allegedly was injured while crossing in an unmarked City crosswalk. Plaintiff's responses were untimely. Thus, her objections have been waived. Form Interrogatory 8.8: GRANTED This form interrogatory concerns Plaintiff's loss of future income. It seeks the facts upon which Plaintiff bases her loss of future income, an estimate of the amount, an estimate of how long she will be unable to ...
2018.7.25 Motion to Compel Requests for Admission 526
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Rodda, Steven H
Hearing Date: 2018.7.25
Excerpt: ...pursue on a theory of dangerous condition of public property. Plaintiff allegedly was injured while crossing in an unmarked City crosswalk. Plaintiff's responses were untimely. Thus, her objections have been waived. Defendant moves to compel Plaintiff's further responses to RFA nos. 23, 24, 25, 27, 28, 29, 30, 33, 35, 36 and 37. RFA 23, 24, 25, 27, 28, 29, 30, 33 ‐ GRANTED These RFAs seek Plaintiff's admission regarding the authenti...
2018.7.25 Motion for Terminating Sanctions 692
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Rodda, Steven H
Hearing Date: 2018.7.25
Excerpt: ...because the sanction eliminates a party's fundamental right to a trial, thus implicating due process rights. The trial court should select a sanction that is tailored to the harm caused by the withheld discovery. Sanctions should be appropriate to the dereliction, and should not exceed that which is required to protect the interests of the party entitled to but denied discovery. (Lopez v. Watchtower Bible & Tract Society of New York, Inc. (20...
2018.7.25 Motion for Protective Order 194
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Rodda, Steven H
Hearing Date: 2018.7.25
Excerpt: ...ntiff pleads causes of action under the FEHA and the CFRA. He alleges among other things that the County discriminated against him because he is African‐American and he was disciplined for taking medical leave to care for his wife while non‐African‐American employees were not similarly disciplined. Plaintiff further asserts the County failed to correct its employees' illegal practices after he complained and the reasons offered for the ...
2018.7.24 Motion for Protective Order 330
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Rodda, Steven H
Hearing Date: 2018.7.24
Excerpt: ...and 67 requests for admissions. Madden argues the discovery is excessive, duplicative, beyond the scope of discovery and unduly burdensome. The motion is supported by the Ritchey Declaration, in which counsel purports to authenticate several exhibits. The exhibits, however, are not attached. Madden's failure to file exhibits that it contends substantiate the motion is grounds for a denial. But even if Madden had filed a complete version of the mo...
2018.7.24 Motion to Tax Costs 476
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Rodda, Steven H
Hearing Date: 2018.7.24
Excerpt: ...before the Labor Commissioner, this court entered a judgment in the amount of $50,578.61. On 6/04/18, Taylor filed a memorandum of costs, and WellSpace filed this timely motion to tax. (See Lab. Code § 98.2(k) [“The judgment creditor […in an action on a complaint with the Labor Commissioner], is entitled to court costs and reasonable attorney's fees for enforcing the judgment that is rendered pursuant to this section”].) In ruling upon a m...
2018.7.24 Demurrer, Motion to Strike 422
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Rodda, Steven H
Hearing Date: 2018.7.24
Excerpt: ...ounsel shall file all requests for judicial notice as separate documents pursuant to CRC 3.1113(l).) Plaintiff Sohrab Mansourian's (Mansourian) third amended complaint (TAC) filed without leave of court on 6/19/18 is STRICKEN. This is a dispute between attorney and client. Mansourian was the client. The SAC contains causes of action against one or both Defendants for breach of contract and negligence. Mansourian alleges Defendants misadvised him ...
2018.7.23 Motion to Compel Deposition 194
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Rodda, Steven H
Hearing Date: 2018.7.23
Excerpt: ...orney against whom the sanction is sought, and specify the type of sanction sought.” Defendant Garzon has filed a statement of non‐opposition to this motion to compel his deposition, although he contends plaintiff's request for sanctions should be denied for various reasons. In light of the foregoing, plaintiff's motion to compel this deposition is granted. The parties shall meet‐and‐confer to find a mutually agreeable date, time and loca...
2018.7.23 Demurrer 274
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Rodda, Steven H
Hearing Date: 2018.7.23
Excerpt: ...urrer of defendants The Regents of the University of California (“Regents”), Tony Lai, M.D. (“Dr. Lai”), Alla Blinder, D.O. (“Dr. Blinder”) and Paul Kreis, M.D. (“Dr. Kreis”) (collectively “Defendants”) to the Second Amended Complaint (“2AC”) is OVERRULED in part and SUSTAINED in part, without leave to amend, as follows. *** If oral argument is requested in an attempt to obtain leave to amend, plaintiff shall be prepared t...
2018.7.23 Motion for Determination of Good Faith Settlement, to Dismiss 032
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Rodda, Steven H
Hearing Date: 2018.7.23
Excerpt: ...hat its settlement with Plaintiff Elk Grove Milling Inc. (Elk Grove) is in good faith. The settlement requires Airco to pay Elk Grove $67,500. It also requires Airco to cooperate with Elk Grove in the remaining litigation by (1) producing witnesses at deposition and/or trial without a subpoena, (2) providing nonprivileged information and documents not previously provided, and (3) producing employees at a meeting with Elk Grove's counsel, not to e...
2018.7.23 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 625
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Rodda, Steven H
Hearing Date: 2018.7.23
Excerpt: ...but defendant never made any payments on these bills which were subsequently assigned by SCIF to plaintiff for collection. Plaintiff now moves for summary judgment/adjudication on its two causes of action on the grounds that plaintiff has established each element of its causes of action and defendant has no defense. The Court finds that plaintiff has satisfied its initial burden under Code of Civil Procedure §437c(p)(1), which thereby shifts the...
2018.7.20 Demurrer, Motion to Strike 540
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Rodda, Steven H
Hearing Date: 2018.7.20
Excerpt: ... in Welfare & Institutions Code §15610.57)" (TAC, ¶64.) These phrases are included in the wrongful death cause of action. According to Regents, Plaintiff is improperly attempting to base her wrongful death cause of action on the elder abuse statute, when both are separate and distinct causes of action. Regent insists that Plaintiff is "redefin[ing]" the term "neglect" from its common understanding to the statutory Elder Abus...
2018.7.19 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication, to Compel Production 058
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Rodda, Steven H
Hearing Date: 2018.7.19
Excerpt: ...dication of issues is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The court disregards written objections to evidence submitted solely in a separate statement. On summary judgment, a party wishing to object in writing must do so in a stand‐alone document and in the format prescribed in CRC 3.1354(b). The court likewise disregards evidence submitted with the reply, to which Plaintiff Juvoni Sterling (Sterling) has had no opportunity to respond. (See Naz...
2018.7.19 Demurrer 264
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Rodda, Steven H
Hearing Date: 2018.7.19
Excerpt: ...Defendant Greenspoon Marder LLP's (GM) demurrer to the first amended complaint (FAC) is OVERRULED. Overview This is a nonjudicial foreclosure case. The plaintiffs are Rhonda James and Andre Monroe (collectively “Plaintiffs”.) Plaintiffs allege that GM, without having been substituted as trustee under the deed of trust, acted as the foreclosing trustee and caused their home to be sold at auction in February 2018. Plaintiffs allege that they su...
2018.7.18 Motion for Summary Adjudication 454
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Rodda, Steven H
Hearing Date: 2018.7.18
Excerpt: ... Centex Homes and Centex Real Estate Corporation (collectively, “Centex”). Centex opposes. Travelers' Motion for Summary Adjudication of the Second Cause of Action for Breach of Contract is DENIED. Request for Judicial Notice Travelers' Request for Judicial Notice (“Traveler's RJN”), which attaches court orders in other cases (Exhs. 1‐4) and a pleading filed in this action (Exh. 5), and Travelers' Supplemental RJN (“Supp'l RJN”), wh...
2018.7.17 Motion to Tax Costs 106
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Rodda, Steven H
Hearing Date: 2018.7.17
Excerpt: ...provide sufficient notice of the motion. The motion was untimely by 2 calendar days. The City, however, has substantively opposed the motion. Therefore, any defect in notice has been waived. Legal Standard On a motion to tax costs the burden of proof shifts between the parties. If the items in the cost bill appear to be proper and reasonable, the burden is on the party seeking to tax costs to show they were not reasonable or necessary. (Ladas v. ...
2018.7.17 Demurrer, Motion to Strike 766
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Rodda, Steven H
Hearing Date: 2018.7.17
Excerpt: ...‐ year/100,000 mile powertrain warranty which, inter alia, covers the engine and transmission, and subsequently received a 10‐year/120,000 mile extended coverage plan (e.g. extended warranty) which covers engine in connection with the excessive oil consumption. Plaintiff alleges that during the warranty period, the vehicle contained/developed multiple defects, including the engine's inability to properly utilize engine oil. Plaintiff alleges ...
2018.7.17 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 170
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Rodda, Steven H
Hearing Date: 2018.7.17
Excerpt: ...t Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC's (“Ocwen”) motion for judgment on the pleadings is ruled upon as follows. Ocwen's request for judicial notice is granted. In taking judicial notice of the recorded land documents, the court accepts the fact of their existence, not the truth of their contents. (Herrera v. Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co. (2011) 196 Cal.App.4th 1366, 1375.) Overview This is a nonjudicial foreclosure action. Plaintiffs allege that Ocwen...
2018.7.17 Motion to Compel Production of Docs 560
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Rodda, Steven H
Hearing Date: 2018.7.17
Excerpt: ...ded responses. The motion, however, is not moot. A motion is "made" when it is filed and served. (CCP § 1005.5.) Because Plaintiff made the motion before Defendant served the amended responses, Plaintiff is entitled to a ruling. Defendant, however, need not reserve the discovery responses. The Court makes no determination regarding the sufficiency of Defendant's amended responses. Both parties' requests for sanctions are DENIED. ...
2018.7.17 Motion to Stay Action 538
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Rodda, Steven H
Hearing Date: 2018.7.17
Excerpt: ...made an offer to repair. Declaration of P. Elizabeth Arias (“Arias Decl.”), Ex. 6.) Defendant agreed to request from the manufacturer/installer to increase the size of the weep holes in certain windows to accommodate a larger volume of water draining out of the window channel. (Id .) Defendant's offer stated that “Ms. Dosty will need to acknowledge that the larger weep may, in the event of a storm/wind event, permit wind driven water back t...
2018.7.16 Motion to Compel Deposition, Production 986
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Rodda, Steven H
Hearing Date: 2018.7.16
Excerpt: ...On 5/02/18, Stone Lake's counsel indicated by email that the date of the deposition might present a conflict. (Id., Exh. B.) Morales' counsel responded, “[t]hat is going to be a problem, as we do not intend to change the date.” (Id.) No trial date has been set, and the discovery cutoff is not approaching. Stone Lake did not serve any written objections to the deposition or move for a protective order. The day before the deposition, however, S...
2018.7.16 Motion to Vacate Judgment and Stay of Execution 760
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Rodda, Steven H
Hearing Date: 2018.7.16
Excerpt: ...oration”) (collectively “Judgment Debtors”) to vacate the judgment entered against them on 4/11/18 is DENIED. Judgment Debtors' alternative request for a stay of enforcement is GRANTED; bonds to be posted within 14 days. Overview The Trucking Corporation appears to be a dissolved California Corporation operating as an interstate carrier. (See Carey Decl., Exh. A.) Chand owns/owned the Trucking Corporation. The procedural history in this mat...
2018.7.13 Motion to Compel Arbitration 888
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Rodda, Steven H
Hearing Date: 2018.7.13
Excerpt: ...noted below that will be addressed at the hearing. Counsel are also reminded that pursuant to local rules, only limited oral argument is permitted on law and motion matters. *** Both the moving and reply memorandum of points & authorities fail to comply with CRC Rule 3.1113(d) and (e). Factual Background This putative class action was filed by plaintiff Gibbons, alleging defendant MFL violated the California Consumer Credit Reporting Agencies Act...
2018.7.13 Motion for Protective Order, to Compel Deposition and Doc Requests 446
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Rodda, Steven H
Hearing Date: 2018.7.13
Excerpt: ... Lynn Arens. However, neither declaration complies with the requirements of Code of Civil Procedure §2015.5. The Lui Declaration does not affirmatively establish it was executed pursuant to California's penalty of perjury laws or alternatively was executed in this state. The Arens Declaration was not executed under penalty of perjury at all, merely averring it was executed in California. As such, neither declaration is admissible and thus, the c...
2018.1.5 Motion to Stay or Dismiss Action 822
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Rodda, Steven H
Hearing Date: 2018.1.5
Excerpt: ...n fails to comply with CRC Rule 3.1110(b)(3)‐(4). Factual Background Plaintiff Intelligent Highway Solutions, Inc. (“IHSI”) filed this suit on 9/28/2017, claiming that TCA committed a variety of wrongful conduct in connection with several agreements which were intended to assist IHSI with expanding its business, including but not limited to financing for the acquisition of other assets. IHSI, a Nevada corporation with its principal place of...
2018.1.5 Motion to Dismiss Complaint 894
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Rodda, Steven H
Hearing Date: 2018.1.5
Excerpt: ...' premises in Sacramento. Moving defendants previously demurred to the complaint but as a result of the required meet‐and‐confer process, plaintiffs volunteered to amend their complaint prior to the Court's ruling. Pursuant to the Court's 10/31/2017 order, the demurrer was dropped as moot and the amended complaint was to be filed by 11/13/2017. Defendants now seek dismissal of this action against them on the ground that plaintiffs have failed...
2018.1.5 Motion to Compel Production of Docs 624
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Rodda, Steven H
Hearing Date: 2018.1.5
Excerpt: ...r Maciora's motion to compel plaintiff's further responses to requests for production of documents is DENIED IN ITS ENTIRETY, as follows. Defendant failed to comply with CRC Rule 2.111(3) and Rule 3.1110(b)(3). This is securities fraud case which was filed on 10/31/2016. No trial date has been set. Defendant in pro per recently served a set of three (3) requests for production on plaintiff, in response to which the latter asserted various objecti...
2018.1.4 Motion to Dismiss 354
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Rodda, Steven H
Hearing Date: 2018.1.4
Excerpt: ...mons has been filed to date. Legal Standard Pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure § 583.210, “the summons and complaint shall be served upon a defendant within three years after the action is commenced against the defendant. For the purpose of this subdivision, an action is commenced at the time the complaint is filed.” (Code Civ. Proc. § 583.210(a) (emphasis added).) With respect to a party named in an original complaint, the action is deeme...
2018.1.4 Motion to Strike 963
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Rodda, Steven H
Hearing Date: 2018.1.4
Excerpt: ...he merits, and is granted, with leave to amend. Plaintiff alleges claims for assault and battery, among others, arising out of his being tackled and detained by security personnel at a Goodwill store in Redding. The Complaint alleges that "Defendant employers knowingly employed unfit employees with a conscious disregard of the rights and safety of others, and/or performed, ratified or approved" of the security guard's conduct in attac...
2018.1.4 Motion to Require Undertaking, for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 003
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Rodda, Steven H
Hearing Date: 2018.1.4
Excerpt: ...This motion is based upon the grounds that Plaintiff is not a resident of the State of California, and that HCD has a reasonable possibility of obtaining judgment in its favor. This motion is based on the provisions of Section 1030 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. CCP 1030 provides that upon a defendant's motion, the trial court is required to order an out‐of‐state plaintiff to file an undertaking to secure recoverable costs and...
2018.1.4 Motion to File Complaint 804
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Rodda, Steven H
Hearing Date: 2018.1.4
Excerpt: ...er Verified Complaint for Damages (“Complaint”), alleging eleven (11) causes of action for: alleged Disability Discrimination, Discrimination Based on Gender, Hostile Work Environment, Failure to Engage in Interactive Process, Failure to Reasonably Accommodate, Failure to Prevent Harassment and Retaliation, Wrongful Termination, Negligent Retention, Assault and Battery, and Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress. According to the Reply,...
2018.1.4 Motion to Compel Production of Docs 625
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Rodda, Steven H
Hearing Date: 2018.1.4
Excerpt: ...ause the motion was not opposed. Although CRC 3.1348(a) purports to authorize sanctions if a motion is unopposed, the Court declines to do so, as the specific statutes governing this discovery (CCP 2030.290(c), 2031.300(c)) authorize sanctions only if the motion was unsuccessfully made or opposed. Any order imposing sanctions under the CRC must conform to the conditions of one or more of the statutes authorizing sanctions. Trans‐Action Commerci...
2018.1.4 Motion to Compel 475
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Rodda, Steven H
Hearing Date: 2018.1.4
Excerpt: ... (Form Interrogatories, Requests for Production of Documents, Requests for Admission, and Special Interrogatories) is denied. This motion is continued to January 4, 2018 at 2:00 p.m. in this department to allow for the in‐custody plaintiff to receive a copy of the tentative ruling. The Clerk shall fax a copy of this minute order to the litigation coordinator, who shall deliver a copy to plaintiff forthwith. An appearance is required by all part...
2018.1.4 Motion for Sanctions 819
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Rodda, Steven H
Hearing Date: 2018.1.4
Excerpt: ...roduction to Plaintiff, Set One. A request for sanctions shall, in the notice of motion, identify every person, party, and attorney against whom the sanction is sought, and specify the type of sanction sought. CCP 2023.040. The notice of motion does not comply with this section in that it does not specify the type of sanction sought. However, because plaintiff has responded to the requests made for specific sanctions such as terminating, evidence...
2018.1.4 Demurrer 222
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Rodda, Steven H
Hearing Date: 2018.1.4
Excerpt: ...h Causes of Action, for negligent misrepresentation and breach of contract respectively. Plaintiff alleges that he reached a “tentative agreement” with Defendants wherein he would “be allowed to purchase” a parcel of Defendants' real property (the “Golden Gate Property”) “over a period of months.” (Comp. ¶ 8.) Plaintiff paid $4,000 earnest money into an escrow account with Stewart Title. (Compl. ¶ 9.) The “Beechum Defendants...
2018.1.4 Demurrer 024
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Rodda, Steven H
Hearing Date: 2018.1.4
Excerpt: ...that he fell down in his home, was taken by ambulance to “the Defendants,” and that during his stays at various hospital‐ and skilled nursing‐facilities, he developed multiple pressure ulcers, infections, and experienced malnourishment and dehydration arising from the acts and omissions of various “Defendants,” including but not limited to the Defendant demurring here. The demurring Defendant was substituted in as “Doe 1” on Novem...
2018.1.3 Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement 789
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Rodda, Steven H
Hearing Date: 2018.1.3
Excerpt: ..., unopposed joint Motion For Preliminary Approval Of Class Action Settlement is GRANTED. (Code of Civil Procedure § 382, California Rules of Court, Rule 3.769.) The instant coordinated case involves three separate actions: Colvin v. Graphic Packaging International, Inc., Orange County Superior Court, Case No. 2015‐ 00781730‐ CU‐OE‐CXC filed on April 8, 2015 (the "Colvin Action"), Zasonski v. Graphic Packaging International, Inc.,...
2018.1.3 Motion to Compel Deposition 665
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Rodda, Steven H
Hearing Date: 2018.1.3
Excerpt: ... Cities as a subcontractor on the Contra Costa Project, and alleges that the directors and officers of CCMI participated in the diversion of funds. Plaintiff alleges that the defendants, including Janco, knew that monies were owed to Bay Cities, but knowingly consented to the diversion of progress payments from Bay Cities for their own benefit. On Oct. 26, 2017 Janco's counsel served a Notice of Taking Deposition of the Person Most Qualified ...
2018.1.2 Motion for Summary Judgment 625
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Rodda, Steven H
Hearing Date: 2018.1.2
Excerpt: ... involving a motor vehicle accident. On December 3, 2014, Mr. Kitay was temporarily suspended from practicing law, and Plaintiffs retained a new attorney ‐ defendant Lora Grevious (“Ms. Grevious”) ‐ who substituted into Plaintiffs' case shortly thereafter. (UMF nos. 5, 6, 7.) On December 30, 2014, Plaintiffs moved to continue the trial date, and the motion was granted. (UMF nos. 8, 9.) On May 19, 2015, the Court issued a tentative ruling ...
2018.1.2 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 353
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Rodda, Steven H
Hearing Date: 2018.1.2
Excerpt: ...the Pleadings is DENIED in part and GRANTED with leave to amend in part. In May 2004, Plaintiffs Brian T. Maley and Terese Weber‐Maley (together, “Plaintiffs”) executed a promissory note (“Note”) in favor of Wells Fargo in the amount of $343,200 secured by a deed of trust (“DOT”) recorded against the property located at 181 Briggs Ranch Drive, Folsom California (the “Property”). (Compl. ¶9, Ex. 1.) In March 2016, the DOT was as...

231 Results

Per page

Pages