Excerpt: ... 40.) The Court does not have any record that Plaintiff has obtained new counsel. Accordingly, Plaintiff is currently proceeding in pro per. In this personal injury action, Defendant served Plaintiff with three separate deposition notices on October 2, 2017, again on November 13, 2017, and finally on December 6, 2017. Each time Plaintiff's counsel contacted defense counsel one to three days prior to the scheduled deposition to advise that Pla...

Excerpt: ...st (collectively “Plaintiffs”). In their complaint filed on 8/08/17, Plaintiffs allege that Elliott and others are responsible for ongoing water damage to their property. The complaint contains causes of action for negligence, “Diversion of Surface and Related Waters,” “Diversion of Waters from Natural Watercourse,” trespass, nuisance and declaratory relief. In its answer, Elliott raised statutes of limitations as a defense, including...

Excerpt: ...ants failed to authorize and cover certain brand name medications prescribed by her physician, as required by the Medi‐Cal health plan agreement. Plaintiff alleges that as a result, she suffered a seizure on September 18. 2015, resulting in a severe burn to her hand. Plaintiff filed her original form complaint on September 18, 2018, alleging four causes of action for breach of contract, fraud, general negligence, and intentional tort. After the...

Excerpt: ...ntiff shall be available by COURTCALL, to participate in oral arguments. Defendants Marisela Montes, Cheryl Carlson, and Jennifer Shafer's (collectively, “Defendants”) demurrer to plaintiff in pro per Arthur Austin's (“Plaintiff”) complaint is UNOPPOSED and is ruled upon as follows. The Court has received Plaintiff's Amended Complaint. However, the Amended Complaint was filed on October 3, 3018, which was not prior to Plaintiff's ...

Excerpt: ... regarding relevant Sacramento County Code sections; Ordinance sections of the Sacramento Regional County Sanitation District and Sacramento Area Sewer District; and a Notice of Utility Lien isunopposedand is granted. FACTS As nearly as the Court can ascertain from Plaintiffs' unintelligible Complaint, Plaintiffs (acting in propria persona) allege that they are the owners of real property at 9123 Linda Rio Drive in Sacramento. According to Plaint...

Excerpt: ...arranty Act and the Magnuson‐Moss Warranty Act. The defendant is FCA US, LLC (LCA). Trial is set to commence on 1/29/19. On 8/03/18, the court entered an order directing FCA to produce one or more persons most qualified (PMQ) for deposition on certain topics, as well as to produce documents responsive to requests in the PMQ deposition notice, no later than 8/31/18. (See Oliva Decl., Exh. 4.) The order also directed counsel to meet and confer in...

Excerpt: ...or obtaining injunctive relief in this case. The Court granted a TRO on April 14, 2016. The Court noted in issuing the TRO that "Although the Declaration of Fry is sparse, the court is understandably concerned about dual‐ tracking, and is giving plaintiffs the benefit of the doubt." After several stipulated continuances of the hearing approved by the Court, on August 2, 2016, Judge Rodda entered a Minute Order granting Plaintiffs' r...

Excerpt: ...laintiff as general manager of GPHA. Plaintiff alleges various oral agreements were entered into by him and Gallagher during his employment negotiations wherein Galagher promised Plaintiff he would receive 10% in equity of GPHA as a “sign‐on bonus” plus 2% of sales. Plaintiff also alleges Gallagher later agreed to provide Plaintiff an additional 10% ownership interest in both companies in exchange for Plaintiff forgiving payroll debt and un...

Excerpt: ...nt General Motors, LLC's demurrer to Plaintiffs James and Christine McMenimen's complaint is ruled upon as follows. Overview This is a lemon law action. Plaintiffs allege that on December 28, 2009, they purchased a 2010 Chevrolet Traverse. Plaintiffs allege that in connection with the purchase, the received an express written warranty, including, “the 3‐year/ 36,000 mile basic bumper‐to‐bumper warranty, a 5‐ year/100,000 mile powertrain...

Excerpt: .../2018 the court partially granted plaintiff MyEcheck, Inc.'s (“MEC”) motion for protective order in connection with defendant Maciora's Requests for Production, Set Four (“RFP”). These RFP sought the production of the “valid and effective” copy of the “UBA contract,” “Tangiers Capital contract,” and “Chicago Ventures contract.” The contracts with these three entities are specifically alleged to be the basis for MEC's cause...

Excerpt: ... Enforcement case since October 25, 2017 as a result of the accumulation of trash, junk and debris. City alleges that the Subject Property was the subject of eight previous Code Enforcement cases regarding similar issues. City now seeks a preliminary injunction prohibiting the maintenance of the Subject Property as a nuisance. “To obtain a preliminary injunction, a plaintiff ordinarily is required to present evidence of the irreparable injury o...

Excerpt: ...n Brewing Company are the Lessees and Sublessors, respectively according to the terms of the leases. (Declaration of Frenn, Ex. A) Defendants are the sublessees. However, the First Amended Complaint alleges that "Lockdown Brewing Company LLC" is the party to the master lease and the sublease. Defendants therefore contend that "Lockdown Brewing Company LLC" is not the real party in interest because it is not a party to the lease or...

Excerpt: ... court's tentative ruling system, as required by Local Rule 1.06, and does not provide the correct address for Dept. 53/54. Moving counsel is directed to contact plaintiff in pro per and advise him/her of Local Rule 1.06 and the court's tentative ruling procedure and the manner to request a hearing, along with the correct address for Dept. 53/54. If moving counsel is unable to contact plaintiff prior to hearing, moving counsel is ordered to appea...

Excerpt: ...is faced with yet another serial discovery motion. On May 16, 2018, the Court previously granted Plaintiffs' motion to compel Defendant to produce this specific PMQ and also to produce the documents requested in the PMQ deposition notice. (ROA 115) On July 9, 2018, Plaintiffs deposed the PMQ regarding Plum's organizational structure but the PMQ did not bring all the documents requested in the deposition notice. Specifically Plaintiffs claim that ...

Excerpt: ...nses. DGS opposes on several grounds, including that the motion is actually one for further responses and, therefore, is untimely given the 45‐day rule in CCP § 2031.310. That section provides, in relevant part: (a) On receipt of a response to a demand for inspection, copying, testing, or sampling, the demanding party may move for an order compelling further response to the demand if the demanding party deems that any of the following apply: (...

Excerpt: ...ing and created unnecessary work for the Court. Defendant initially noticed this motion for October 31, 2018 but included the incorrect law and motion department on the notice. It then apparently filed the identical motion and noticed it for hearing on November 13 and 14 in this department. Defendant wrote a letter to the Clerk requesting that the Clerk drop the November 13, hearing, but never requested that the Clerk drop the October 31, 2018 he...

Excerpt: ...f action pled in the third amended complaint. Defendant argues that a declaration is not a proper pleading given that CCP § 422.10 provides that the “pleading allowed in civil actions are complaints, demurrer, answers, and crosscomplaints.” He also argues that a declaration is only allowed as an attachment to a complaint as a verification for a verified complaint. (CCP § 446.) Plaintiff's opposition argues that the attachment is mislabeled ...

Excerpt: ...inator was directed to provide the tentative ruling to plaintiff G. Daniel Walker. Appearance is required on November 14, 2018 (this date). Plaintiff G. Daniel Walker shall be available, by COURTCALL, to participate in oral argument on the continuance date. Defendants Mike Marlin's, et al.'s motion to declare Plaintiff a vexatious litigant is ruled upon as follows. Defendants' request for judicial notice is granted. Incarcerated Plaintiff G. Dani...

Excerpt: ...ck and experienced some residual dizziness. Plaintiff was also involved in a motor vehicle accident on March 10, 2016 when he was rear‐ended by a vehicle driven by Lyubov Ponomar in which he suffered injuries to his head and neck and experienced dizziness. Defendants Robert Goff and Airgas, LLC issued six subpoenas seeking Plaintiff's entire medical and billing history from 2006 to present from the medical providers with whom Plaintiff treated ...

Excerpt: ...intiffs were able to file a complete reply. In this personal injury action arising from a July 24, 2015, motor vehicle accident, Plaintiffs propounded their request for production of documents (set two) on Defendant Andrew Moreno. At issue on this motion are Requests 69 and 70 which asked Defendant for all documents relating to any video surveillance, including any sub rosa surveillance, taken of Plaintiffs at any time since July 24, 2015. Defend...

Excerpt: ...f the concrete stairs failed, causing him to fall awkwardly and injure his knee, neck, and lower back. By way of this motion, Defendants seek the following relief: a) The appointment of a discovery referee to monitor depositions of defense witnesses, to hear and determine all discovery motions and disputes relevant to said depositions, including those listed below, and to report findings and make recommendations thereon; b) An order prohibiting q...

Excerpt: ...tairs failed, causing him to fall awkwardly and injure his knee, neck, and lower back. Plaintiff previously noticed the depositions of the property maintenance manager, Jon Amaral, the property's principal owner, Peter Afrooz, and the property management company owner, Dick James. During the deposition of Mr. Amaral, defense counsel took the position that Mr. Amaral could not be asked about the prior history of the property, claiming the defe...

Excerpt: ...rminated on March 20, 2017, for filling family prescriptions unsupervised, checking himself out unsupervised, and failing to obtain management sign‐offs for family member prescriptions and register receipts. Plaintiff filed his complaint on April 21, 2017, against Raley's and two other individual defendants who have been dismissed from the action. The Complaint alleges the following three causes of action: (1) FEHA/CFRA retaliation and harassme...

Excerpt: ... in the alternative, summary adjudication of issues is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Regents' request for judicial notice of court documents is GRANTED. Overview This case presents an employment dispute. The plaintiff and former employee is Mona G. Flores, M.D. (“Dr. Flores” or “Plaintiff”). Regents is the defending former employer. In the operative first amended complaint (FAC), Dr. Flores alleges: “7. On or around October 1, 201...

Excerpt: ... court's tentative ruling system, as required by Local Rule 1.06, and does not provide the correct address for Dept. 53/54. Moving counsel is directed to contact plaintiff in pro per and advise him/her of Local Rule 1.06 and the court's tentative ruling procedure and the manner to request a hearing, along with the correct address for Dept. 53/54. If moving counsel is unable to contact plaintiff prior to hearing, moving counsel is ordered to appea...

Excerpt: ...tion is any written or oral statement or other conduct in furtherance of the exercise of defendants' the constitutional right of petition or the constitutional right of free speech which is protected under Code of Civil Procedure §425.16. Defendants' request for leave to file (after the 60‐day deadline in §425.16(f)) an additional special anti‐SLAPP motion to strike the first three causes of action alleged in the 2AC is DENIED for the same ...

Excerpt: ...f here in numerous other pending lemon law cases between GM and other plaintiffs represented by the same firms involved on the instant motion. The Court has informed the parties that it expects them to engage in further meet and confer efforts to agree on a model protective order to be used in each Lemon Law action between the same counsel and involving the same issues. However, the Court is yet again faced with an identical motion due to the par...

Excerpt: ...mons. The Court essentially found that self‐represented Plaintiff Anna Tagintseva's proof of service stating that Defendant was personally served with the summons and complaint was not true. The Court found that the declarations submitted in connection with the opposition to the motion to quash were not credible. Defendant now seeks $1,500 in sanctions pursuant to CCP § 128.7. Here, despite the above, the motion must be denied for failure to c...

Excerpt: ...ments requested in the notice of deposition. Plaintiffs served the notice of deposition for the PMQ on July 18, 2018 noticing the deposition for August3, 2018. The notice sought a PMQ for three subject areas: (1) the general contents of patient charts maintained at the nurse's station for residents at the facility in 2014; (2) the manner in which those charts were maintained; and (3) the manner in which documents in the charts are removed if the ...

Excerpt: ...viduals to explore the relationships between the corporate defendants and the degree of control exerted over the subject facility for purposes of their alter ego, joint venture, etc. theories. Plaintiffs noticed the depositions on June 26, 2018. Defendants objected to the depositions on various grounds including that the witnesses were apex employees. Plaintiffs indicate that Defendants' counsel stated that they should be able to “work somethin...

Excerpt: ...ant has filed separate motions to compel regarding the responses provided by both Plaintiffs. It appears that the discovery propounded to both Plaintiff Khaira and Plaintiff Avala were exactly the same, as were each Plaintiff's responses. Moving Defendant Hill Physicians Medical Group has placed the same responses provided by each Plaintiff at issue in both motions. Indeed, Plaintiffs have filed a “consolidated” opposition to the motions, not...

Excerpt: ...A's motions are GRANTED as follows. Background For many years, Plaintiff Jimboy's Marketing, Inc. (“JMI”) acted as an area franchisor for Jimboy's Tacos restaurants under a Master Franchise Agreement with non‐party Jimboy's Tacos, Inc. JNA is the successor to Jimboy's Tacos, Inc. In 2012, JMI and JNA entered into a Transition Agreement, in which JMI assigned to JNA 38 franchised restaurants and other assets collectively valued at approximat...

Excerpt: ... are litigating over damages. Defendants learned in discovery that Plaintiff obtained treatment from Greater Sacramento Surgery Center (“GSSC”) from Philip J. Orisek, M.D. (“Orisek”). They also discovered that MedFin Manager, LLC purchased the lien on Plaintiff's account. Thereafter they sought to obtain discovery from Orisek the amount MedFin paid Orisek on Plaintiff's account. The meet and confer correspondence indicates that Orisek's c...

Excerpt: ...]his Motion is made on the grounds that the Complaint on which the Lis Pendens is based does not contain a real property claim." Notice, p. 1, ll. 23‐24. In the instant matter, STGC requests that this court expunge that Notice of Pendency of Action recorded with the Sacramento County Clerk Recorder concerning the real property owned by Barbara Borkowski, located at 2121 Magnum Court, Elverta, CA 95626, on the basis that the Notice of Penden...

Excerpt: ...tially unlawful and/or wasteful matters. By way of background the Court sustained Defendant's demurrer to her cause of action for violation of the California Whistleblower Protection Act (“WPA”) on the basis that she had not sufficiently alleged any protected activity. Defendant argued that Plaintiff could not amend the complaint without violating the attorney‐client privilege. The Court recognized that relevant case law indicates that wher...

Excerpt: ... Cause (“OSC”), the Court stayed the receivership through October 31, 2018, to give Mrs. McGuire the opportunity to remedy the Property's nuisance violations herself. For the reasons that follow, the Court will continue the stay until January 11, 2019. However, if Mrs. McGuire does not demonstrate concrete steps to remedy the Property's nuisance violations as detailed infra, the Court hereby gives notice that it shall entertain a motion to li...

Excerpt: ...irected to contact opposing counsel and advise him/her of Local Rule 1.06 and the court's tentative ruling procedure and the manner to request a hearing. If moving counsel is unable to contact opposing counsel prior to hearing, moving counsel is ordered to appear at the hearing in person or by telephone. The court did not consider the declarations filed in opposition to this demurer since such extrinsic evidence is beyond the permissible scope of...

Excerpt: ...yquiengco's (“Plaintiff”) complaint is unopposed and is ruled upon as follows. Defendants' request for judicial notice of the Notice of Trustee's Sale is granted. In taking judicial notice of the recorded land document, the Court accepts the fact of their existence, not the truth of their contents. (Herrera v. Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co. (2011) 196 Cal.App.4th 1366, 1375.) Factual and Procedural Background In August 2005, Plaintiff obtained...

Excerpt: ...ul acts including stealing and misusing Plaintiffs' assets and property, breaching their fiduciary duties as Plaintiffs' officers and members, and secretly forming DCM to directly compete with Plaintiffs. Plaintiffs filed their complaint on March 9, 2018, alleging causes of action for: (1) violation of Penal Code § 502, (2) violation of the Uniform Trade Secrets Act (the “UTSA”), (3) common law misappropriation of trade secrets, (4) unfair c...

Excerpt: ...ineers v. Dep't of Transp. (1997) 15 Cal.4th 543, 590 [judicial notice of findings of fact does not mean that those findings of fact are true]; Steed v. Department of Consumer Affairs (2012) 204 Cal.App.4th 112, 120‐121 [“[W]hile the existence of any document in a court file may be judicially noticed, the truth of the matters asserted in those documents, including the factual findings of the judge who was sitting as the trier of fact, is not ...

Excerpt: ...ass action lawsuit based on his contention that Defendants' policies and practices violated California law, including the failure to provide meal and rest periods, failure to provide accurate wage statements, failure to keep accurate records of hours worked, and failure to pay final wages. See generally Exhibit B. Plaintiff further alleged Defendants' policies and practices resulted in derivative violations and penalties and resulted in u...

Excerpt: ...us, as is the case with attorneys, self‐represented litigants must follow correct rules of procedure. (Nwosu v. Uba (2004) 122 Cal. App. 4th 1229, 1246‐1247; see also Rappleyea v. Campbell (1994) 8 Cal. 4th 975, 984.) Plaintiff's Request for Judicial Notice of the two prior orders denying motions to disqualify the City Attorney is granted. The motion is denied on both procedural and substantive grounds. The motion is procedurally defectiv...

Excerpt: ... Duke (“Duke”). OSP owns commercial real property on J. Street. OSP is manager‐managed. Duke was the initial manager of OSP. Duke owns 12.5% of OSP, while Plaintiffs own the remaining 87.5%. Plaintiffs allege that in May 2018, they discovered that Duke misappropriated almost $40,000 in unauthorized “leasing commissions” and “construction management fees.” In June 2018, Plaintiffs executed an Action by Written Consent (“Written Con...

Excerpt: ...v. General Motors, LLC is granted. In this Lemon Law action, Plaintiff alleges that the Vehicle, a 2010 Chevrolet Equinox, suffers from Oil Consumption Engine Defects including, but not limited to, “excessive oil consumption; improper burning/consumption of abnormally high amounts of oil; premature failure of the engine balance chains; premature failure of the fuel pump plunger seal; fuel leaks into the crankcase; rough running of the engine; e...

Excerpt: ... makes in its concurrent demurrer to the fourth cause of action. The court incorporates its concurrent ruling rejecting SKR Group's arguments and continues to reject them here. The Individual Managers make one additional argument in support of their demurrer. They argue that Plaintiff James Saunders only alleges them to be SKR Group's on‐site managers acting within the course and scope of their employment. Citing authority for the propo...

Excerpt: ...ving age living in his residence. (Comp. ¶ 16.) He alleges that on April 25, 2017, Plaintiff was in an automobile collision. (Id. ¶ 19.) Plaintiff filed a claim with National General and was asked whether any adults of driving age lived in the same residence as him and he responded that an adult of driving age had recently moved in. (Id. ¶ 21.) National General's representative informed him that his policy was terminated and that no coverage w...

Excerpt: ...Deed), the third for Breach of Contract, the fourth for Breach of Implied Contract, the fifth for Breach of Fiduciary Duty, the sixth for Breach of Fiduciary Duty, the seventh for Fraud ‐ Concealment, the eighth for Fraud ‐ Concealment, the ninth for Fraud Intentional Misrepresentation, the tenth for Fraud ‐ Intentional Misrepresentation, the eleventh for Negligence, the twelfth for Negligence, the thirteenth for Violation of B&P §17200, a...

Excerpt: ...e Court ordered Plaintiff to provide further responses without objections to the requests for production no later than May 25, 2018. Sanctions were not awarded. There has been no other discovery order in this action. Defendant now seeks terminating and monetary sanctions for the failure to comply with the Court's order. Plaintiff opposes the motion on the basis that she has provided supplemental responses since the motion was filed indicating tha...

Excerpt: ...s to compel arbitration of this uninsured motorist action and to have the Court appoint an arbitrator pursuant to Insurance Code § 11580.2(f) and CCP § 1281.2. Insurance Code §11580.2(f) requires that an underinsured motorist policy contain a provision requiring arbitration by a single neutral arbitrator. The Court shall order the parties to arbitrate a controversy “if it determines that an agreement to arbitrate the controversy exists…”...

Excerpt: ...sel on 7/26/18 that Dhanraj was not available, and counsel agreed to reschedule the deposition for 8/30/18. (Id., ¶¶ 3‐4, Exhs. B, C.) S360 served a second deposition notice, but on 8/28/18, Dhanraj's counsel again advised that Dhanraj would not appear. (Id., ¶¶ 4‐5, Exhs. C, F.) For the second time, counsel agreed on a date to depose Dhanraj, this time on 9/26/18. (Id., ¶¶ 5‐6, Exhs. F, G.) On 8/29/18, counsel for S360 served an amen...