Excerpt: ...e of the continued hearing was provided by the Court Clerk to Plaintiff, but not as to Kreizenbeck & Seim Partnership as it had not entered an appearance. A proof of service (“POS”) was filed January 9, 2018, reflecting personal service on January 4, 2018. The POS does not indicate that notice of the continued hearing was served. On January 18, 2018, Plaintiff filed a proof of service reflecting it had mailed a copy of the minute order contin...

Excerpt: ...tiff/Cross‐Defendant moves the Court to strike claims for punitive damages in the second cause of action for conversion and prayer for relief. Cross‐Defendant asserts that as the case arises out of a landlord‐tenant contract that punitive damages are not available. Cross‐Defendant further asserts that the allegations are not specifically pled and are inadequate to support punitive damages under Civil Code section 3294. Cross‐Complainant...

Excerpt: ...l Procedure section 1019.5, forthwith. On 8/7/17, this Court ordered Plaintiff to provide verified responses to form interrogatories, special interrogatories, and demand for production of documents within 30 days plus pay sanctions in the amount of $460 within thirty days. As a result of Plaintiff's failure to comply with that order, Defendant filed a Motion to Dismiss on 10/16/17, which this Court denied, but imposed monetary sanctions. The Cour...

Excerpt: .... No other fees and costs are awarded. The bond is exonerated. The Receiver is to prepare a proposed order and give notice pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1019.5, forthwith. This matter was previously heard on 11/9/17, at which time the court asked Page 2 of 8 2) Receiver advised the court in seeking authorization for the sale to Ms. Cota that it is his general practice, where after review he cannot find a lender willing to fund the n...

Excerpt: ... section 1019.5, forthwith. The gravamen of the First Amended Cross‐Complaint (“FACC”) is as follows: The parties entered into a commercial lease for property equipped for vehicle sales, repair, and service. The lease also contained a purchase agreement for cross‐defendant's purchase of the Suzuki dealership equipment, furniture, and parts inventory in the amount of $100,000. The lease contained a bill of sale, which is allegedly attached...

Excerpt: ...ure section 1019.5, forthwith. Plaintiff seeks to have the Court strike out language that he asserts is surplusage and irrelevant or a sham based on an OSHA report of which the Plaintiff requests that the Court take judicial notice. However, the contents of the report are hearsay and inadmissible to establish that portions of Defendant's answers are a sham. For the following reasons, the motion is denied in part and granted in part. Code of Civil...

Excerpt: ...ying the original files for 17 LazyB. On August 24, 2017 this Court heard an ex parte application filed by Plaintiff seeking an OSC RE: Contempt. The parties stipulated that Plaintiff was to inspect the case file at defendants' counsel's office the next day at 1:00 pm.The Court denied the ex parte application and advised Plaintiff, a pro per litigant, that an ex parte application should be filed for emergencies only in the future, non‐emergenci...

Excerpt: ...f's Department that Plaintiff took four automobiles without their consent and issued 9 checks returned as nonsufficient. As a result he was arrested by the Riverside County Sheriff's Department, although the DA's office did not pursue criminal prosecution. Further that Defendants told other unidentified persons that they made a police report and by making the police report the Balls intentionally and maliciously caused him to suffer emotional dis...

Excerpt: ...leged failure to comply with the terms of a purported settlement agreement. However, this motion does not cite any authority for the showing required to set aside the dismissal, much less make any such showing. In addition, the Court has already found that the parties did not enter into a settlement agreement. See December 1, 2017 Minute Order. ...

Excerpt: ...s further ordered to pay Plaintiff monetary sanctions in the amount of $1,985.00 in payment of the reasonable costs and attorney's fees incurred in connection with this motion. The payment of the sanctions is to be made within twenty (20) days of the date of the hearing on this motion. Plaintiff Jasmine Labuen is to give notice pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1019.5, forthwith. Plaintiff Jasmine Labuen's Complaint alleges that on Octo...

Excerpt: ...s and attorney's fees incurred by Cross‐Defendants in connection with this motion. The sanctions are to be paid to Cross‐Defendants Drake Larson and Pamela Larson within twenty (20) days. Cross‐Defendants Drake Larson and Pamela Larson are to give notice pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1019.5, forthwith. Plaintiffs and Cross‐Defendants Drake and Pamela Larson as Trustees move the Court to quash the Subpoena Duces Tecum (“SDT...

Excerpt: ...n this motion; and 2) sanctions in the amount of $425.00 are to be paid to Plaintiff by Golden Autumn within twenty (20) days of the hearing on this motion. The Department of Fair Employment and Housing is to give notice pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1019.5, forthwith. There is no provision in the Code of Civil Procedure or Rules of Court which provides that a motion is deemed to be meritorious because no opposition was filed. Howev...

Excerpt: ...12/6/17 the County sought and received an entry of default as to Mr. Aiken. Thereafter, on 12/22/17 County filed its motion for preliminary injunction and mailed notice to Mr. Aiken although Mr. Aiken has not entered an appearance in this case. The motion date on the noticed motion was 1/23/18. On 12/26/17 the court on its own motion continued the motion for preliminary injunction to 2/6/18, but only County was provided notice. Accordingly, the C...

Excerpt: ... forthwith. There is no provision in the Code of Civil Procedure or Rules of Court which provides that a motion is deemed to be meritorious because no opposition was filed. However, "[s]ome courts treat a party's failure to file opposition papers as an admission that the motion is meritorious, and therefore refuse to hear oral argument from such party. The purpose is to prevent introduction of legal theories without notice to opposing cou...