Excerpt: ...App.3d 593, 604.) Where a party has been previously granted leave to amend, the amendment may not extend beyond the scope of the court's prior permission. (Harris v. Wachovia Mortgage, FSB (2010) 185 Cal.App.4th 1018, 1023.) The allegations made in paragraphs 7 through 10, when read in conjunction with general allegations and breach of contract allegations within the first cause of action, are sufficient to allege a claim of breach of contract ag...

Excerpt: ...s, not the truth of the plaintiff's allegations or the accuracy of the described conduct. Bader v. Anderson (2009) 179 Cal.App.4th 775, 787. The court assumes the truth of all facts properly pleaded, and accepts as true all facts that may be implied or reasonably inferred from facts expressly alleged, unless they are contradicted by judicially noticed facts. Evans v. City of Berkeley (2006) 38 Cal.4th 1, 6. The court cannot consider extrinsic evi...

Excerpt: ...y is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law”, disposing of the entire action. (Code of Civil Procedure section 437c(c).) This is compared to summary adjudication, which disposes of one or more causes of action. (Code of Civil Procedure section 437c(f)(1).) The analysis for both challenges is the same. There are a few essential points the court focuses on when reviewing such a dispositive motion. The first involves a review of the operative p...

Excerpt: ...ned. The court is unable to rule on objections nos. 1 (to Exhibit No. 3) and 2 (to Exhibit No. 4) as the plaintiff did not file any documents containing the objected to exhibits. Ruling on Request for Judicial Notice Defendant's request for judicial notice is granted under Evidence Code section 452. Ruling on Motion The motion is denied. In the current request, plaintiff appears to seek summary judgment as to both his complaint and the defendant'...

Excerpt: ...ion to strike require clarification here. A demurrer is brought to challenge the legal sufficiency of a pleading. (Bader v. Anderson (2009) 179 Cal.App.4th 775, 787.) The analysis does not look to the truthfulness or accuracy of the allegations within the complaint. (Ibid.) The complaint is read to deem all material facts as true even if the truth of the facts seem improbable. (Gervase v. Superior Court (1995) 31 Cal.App.4th 1218, PLACER COUNTY S...

Excerpt: ...st for judicial notice is denied. Defendant William Palmer demurs to the fifth cause of action alleged in the first amended complaint. A party may demur to a complaint where the pleading does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. Code Civ. Proc. § 430.10(e). A demurrer tests the legal sufficiency of the pleadings, not the truth of the plaintiff's allegations or the accuracy of the described conduct. Bader v. Anderson (2009)...

Excerpt: ... overriding interest will be prejudiced if the record is not sealed; (4) The proposed sealing is narrowly tailored; and (5) No less restrictive means exist to achieve the overriding interest. Cal. R. Ct., rule 2.550(d). In her moving papers, Lubell unequivocally argues that the subject document, an email sent by counsel for plaintiffs and cross‐ defendants Kim Johnson and KD Johnson and Associates, to counsel for Lubell on or about June 28, 202...

Excerpt: ...n (collectively “Chambers”) move for summary adjudication as to the first cause of action for breach of contract, and fourth cause of action for declaratory relief, alleged in their cross‐complaint against cross‐defendants Richard H. Brown and RB Waterfronts, LLC (collectively “Brown”). A party may move for summary adjudication as to one or more causes of action. Code Civ. Proc. § 437c(f)(1). The moving party has the burden of showin...

Excerpt: ...ons The motion is granted. The matters encompassed in defendant Terri Brodsky's request for admissions, set two, nos. 13 through 21 are deemed admitted as to plaintiff Justin Mendoza. Sanctions in the amount of $1,170.00 are imposed upon plaintiff Justin Mendoza. Defendant Terri Brodsky's Motion to Compel Special Interrogatories at to Plaintiff Justin Mendoza and Sanctions The motion is granted. Plaintiff Justin Mendoza shall provide verified res...

Excerpt: ... 20, 2022 AT 8:30 A.M. PLACER SUPERIOR COURT – DEPARTMENT 42 Thursday Civil Law and Motion – Tentative Rulings Page 2 of 5 Ruling on the Motion In the current request, plaintiff seeks summary judgment or summary adjudication against all defendants other than Kimberly Sheetz. A motion for summary judgment in an unlawful detainer action may be brought at any time after the answer is filed upon five days' notice. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1170.7.) A ...

Excerpt: ...E HONORABLE MICHAEL W. JONES TENTATIVE RULINGS FOR JANUARY 20, 2022 AT 8:30 A.M. PLACER SUPERIOR COURT – DEPARTMENT 42 Thursday Civil Law and Motion – Tentative Rulings Page 5 of 5 not the truth of the plaintiff's allegations or accuracy of the described conduct. (Bader v. Anderson (2009) 179 Cal.App.4th 775, 787.) The allegations in the pleading are deemed to be true no matter how improbable the allegations may seem. (Del E. Webb Corp. v. St...

Excerpt: ...he class notice is adequate, and (3) certification of the class is proper. In re Cellphone Fee Termination Cases (2010) 186 Cal.App.4th 1380, 1389; Wershba v. Apple Computer, Inc. (2001) 91 Cal.App.4th 224, 234‐235. “[I]f the proposed settlement appears to be the product of serious, informed, non‐collusive negotiations, has no obvious deficiencies, does not improperly grant preferential treatment to class representatives or segments of the ...

Excerpt: ...d with respect to the current motion. See Cal. R. Ct., rule 2.551. Accordingly, the court has not considered the unfiled and unredacted copies of the opposition or declaration of counsel in ruling on this motion. The clerk is directed to return the unredacted copies to Aizen's counsel. Plaintiffs and cross‐defendants seek leave of court to file an amended complaint, amended answer to cross‐complaint, and cross‐complaint. The court may permi...

Excerpt: ... seek to compel non‐party and counsel for defendants Damrell, Nelson, Schrimp, Pallios & Silva to produce documents falling under the attorney‐client privilege. Plaintiffs have not sufficiently shown a basis for production of these privileged documents nor have plaintiffs sufficient shown any waiver of the attorney‐client privilege by PLACER COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT THURSDAY, CIVIL LAW AND MOTION DEPARTMENT 42 THE HONORABLE MICHAEL W. JONES TE...

Excerpt: ...hat a less drastic sanction will not sufficiently address the discovery derelictions. (Deyo v. Kilbourne (1978) 84 Cal.App.3d 771, 796‐ 797.) In light of the extreme effect of terminating sanctions, courts do not impose such a sanction lightly. The purpose of discovery sanctions is to prevent abuse of the discovery process and correct problems presented. (Do v. Superior Court (2003) 109 Cal.App.4th 1210, 1213‐1214.) It is not a weapon to prov...

Excerpt: ... Demurrer The demurrer is overruled. A demurrer is reviewed under well‐established principles. The sufficiency of the pleadings, not the truth of allegations or accuracy of the described conduct, is tested. (Picton v. Anderson Union High School (1996) 50 Cal.App.4th 726, 733.) All properly pleaded facts are assumed to be true as well as those that are judicially noticeable. (Blank v. Kirwan (1985) 39 Cal.3d 311, 318; Gomes v. Countrywide Home L...

Excerpt: ...Rulings Page 7 of 7 Ruling on Request for Judicial Notice Defendants' request for judicial notice is granted under Evidence Code section 452. Ruling on Demurrer The demurrer is sustained with leave to amend. A complaint is subject to demurrer where it is brought by someone other than the real party in interest. (Pillsbury v. Karmgard (1994) 22 Cal.App.4th 743, 753‐754.) A trust is not a separate entity from a trustee, thusly an action cannot be...

Excerpt: ...s: Objection Nos. 2, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 20, 23, 30, 31, 36, 41 and 45 are sustained. The remaining objections are overruled. Ruling on Motion Defendant and cross‐complainant Leopoldo Ayala, individually and as successor trustee of the Leopoldo Rodriguez and Ana Rosa Ayala 2013 Revocable Trust and as successor trustee of the Leopoldo R. Ayala Family Trust of July 14, 1993 (hereinafter “defendant”) moves for summary judgment, or in the alterna...

Excerpt: ...t the truth of the plaintiff's allegations or the accuracy of the described conduct. Bader v. Anderson (2009) 179 Cal.App.4th 775, 787. The court assumes the truth of all facts properly pleaded, and accepts as true all facts that may be implied or reasonably inferred from facts expressly alleged, unless they are contradicted by judicially noticed facts. Evans v. City of Berkeley (2006) 38 Cal.4th 1, 6. However, the court does not assume the truth...

Excerpt: ...y of the pleadings, not the truth of the plaintiff's allegations or the accuracy of the described conduct. Bader v. Anderson (2009) 179 Cal.App.4th 775, 787. The court assumes the truth of all facts properly pleaded, and accepts as true all facts that may be implied or reasonably inferred from facts expressly alleged, unless they are contradicted by judicially noticed facts. Evans v. City of Berkeley (2006) 38 Cal.4th 1, 6. However, the court doe...

Excerpt: ...rt also determines petitioner's opposition is timely and shall consider the filing. PLACER COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT THURSDAY, CIVIL LAW AND MOTION DEPARTMENT 42 THE HONORABLE MICHAEL W. JONES TENTATIVE RULINGS FOR JANUARY 6, 2022 AT 8:30 A.M. PLACER SUPERIOR COURT – DEPARTMENT 42 Thursday Civil Law and Motion – Tentative Rulings Page 7 of 10 Objections Petitioner's objections are sustained in their entirety. Ruling on Motion The motion is denied...

Excerpt: ...– DEPARTMENT 42 Thursday Civil Law and Motion – Tentative Rulings Page 3 of 10 Ruling on Motion In the current request, plaintiff seeks $4,805.82 in costs/expenses and $80,430.00 in attorneys' fees under Civil Code section 1794(d). Plaintiff seeks the award as the prevailing party after accepting defendants' Code of Civil Procedure section 998 offer. Turning first to the costs and expenses sought by plaintiff, the request is granted in its en...

Excerpt: ... of the pleadings, not the truth of the plaintiff's allegations or the accuracy of the described conduct. Bader v. Anderson (2009) 179 Cal.App.4th 775, 787. The court assumes the truth of all facts properly pleaded, and accepts as true all facts that may be implied or reasonably inferred from facts expressly alleged, unless they are contradicted by judicially noticed facts. Evans v. City of Berkeley (2006) 38 Cal.4th 1, 6. However, the court does...

Excerpt: ...rty has not exhausted less intrusive means of discovery. Liberty Mutual Ins. Co. v. Superior Court (1992) 10 Cal.App.4th 1282, 1287‐1288. When a plaintiff seeks to depose a corporate president or other official at the highest level of corporate management, and that official moves for a protective order to prohibit the deposition, the trial court should first 2 determine whether the plaintiff has shown good cause that the official has unique or ...

Excerpt: ...ies”. Motions for reconsideration are restricted to circumstances where a party offers some fact or circumstance not previously considered, and some valid reason for not offering it earlier. Gilberd v. AC Transit (1995) 32 Cal.App.4th 1494, 1500. A motion for reconsideration must be accompanied by an affidavit or declaration from the moving party which states what application was made previously, when and to what judge the application was made,...

Excerpt: ...unction when it appears from the complaint that the plaintiff is entitled to the demanded relief and the plaintiff would suffer irreparable injury if the enjoined action were allowed to proceed. Code Civ. Proc. § 526(a). In making this determination, the court looks to (1) a balancing of the hardships of the parties and (2) a showing by the plaintiff of a reasonable probability of prevailing on the merits. Baypoint Mortgage Corp. v. Crest Premiu...

Excerpt: ...p.4th 1399, 1405. Under both federal and state law, a threshold question for any petition to compel arbitration is whether there exists an agreement to arbitrate. Cruise v. Kroger Co. (2015) 233 Cal.App.4th 390, 396. It is the moving party that carries this initial burden of proving, by a preponderance of the evidence, the existence of a valid arbitration agreement. Engalla v. Permanente Medical Group, Inc. (1997) 15 Cal.4th 951, 972. “‘[A] p...

Excerpt: ...d Dist. 2010) 189 Cal.App.4th 1399, 1405.) Under both federal and state law, a threshold question for any petition to compel arbitration is whether there exists an agreement to arbitrate. (Cruise v. Kroger Co. (2d Dist. 2015) 233 Cal.App.4th 390, 396.) It is the petitioner that carries this initial burden of proving, by a preponderance of the evidence, the existence of a valid arbitration agreement. (Engalla v. Permanente Medical Group, Inc. (199...

Excerpt: ...ary judgment, or alternatively summary adjudication of each cause of action alleged against him by plaintiffs Angelica Amaya (“Amaya”) and California Renewable Energy Program, LLC (“CRE”), as well as the prayer for punitive damages. Summary judgment may be granted where there is no triable issue as to any material fact, and moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Code Civ. Proc. § 437c(c). Defendants moving for summary j...

Excerpt: ...eply are sustained. Plaintiff moves for summary judgment with respect to her claim for breach of contract as alleged against defendant Ashley Sutton. Summary judgment may be granted where there is no triable issue as to any material fact, and moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Code Civ. Proc. § 437c(c). A plaintiff moving for summary judgment bears the initial burden of showing that there is no defense to her action, and sh...

Excerpt: ... motion was heard. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1008, subd. (b); Hennigan v. White (3d Dist. 2011) 199 Cal.App.4th 395, 405.) Defendant has not set forth new or different facts, circumstances, or law that could not have been presented when the initial motion was heard. Motions for statutory relief from default must be made within six months. (Code Civ. Proc., § 473, subd. (b).) This time period is jurisdictional, and the court may not consider a motion ...

Excerpt: ... (f). A demurrer tests the legal sufficiency of the pleadings, not the truth of the allegations or the accuracy of the described conduct. Bader v. Anderson (2009) 179 Cal.App.4th 775, 787. The allegations in the pleadings are deemed true no matter how improbable they may seem. Del E. Webb Corp. v. Structural Materials Co. (1981) 123 Cal.App.3d 593, 604. No extrinsic evidence may be considered in ruling on the demurrer. Ion Equipment Corp. v. Nels...

Excerpt: ...ants' Motion for Monetary Sanctions and Punitive Damages Defendants' motion for monetary sanctions and punitive damages against plaintiffs' counsel pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 128.5 is denied. Defendants do not demonstrate compliance with the safe harbor provisions of the statute. Code Civ. Proc. § 128.5(f)(B). The court does not find that plaintiffs' filing of a memorandum of costs in this action was done in bad faith, frivolous...

Excerpt: ...was issued on October 21, 2021, narrowing the scope to four (4) separate categories of records for conduct prior to May 30, 2019 related to minor J.W., who plaintiff alleges sexually assaulted her. The parent of J.W. again objects to the production of any documents. The documents sought here are student educational records, which are confidential under both federal and state law. (20 U.S.C section 1232g(b)(1); Education Code section 49076.) Absen...

Excerpt: ...he motion is denied. The trial court shall grant a motion for summary judgment if “all the papers submitted show that there is no triable issue as to any material fact and the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” (Code of Civil Procedure section 437c(c).) The moving party bears the initial burden of establishing that one or elements of a cause of action cannot be established or there is a complete defense to the cause o...

Excerpt: ...s exist to obtain the information than to depose opposing counsel; (2) the information sought is relevant and not privileged; (3) the information is crucial to the preparation of the case.” 5 Spectra‐Physics, Inc. v. Superior Court (1988) 198 Cal.App.3d 1487, 1494. This standard has also been applied when the attorney to be deposed is a former opposition counsel. Nemirofsky v. Seok Ki Kim (N.D. Cal. 2007) 523 F.Supp.2d 998. Although not bindi...

Excerpt: ...s and telephone number, as well as the next hearing dates set in the matter. Motion to Compel Arbitration Defendants move to compel arbitration. The arbitration statutes evidence a strong public policy in favor of arbitration that is frequently approved and enforced by the courts. Madden v. Kaiser Foundation Hospitals (1976) 17 Cal.3d 699, 706; Laswell v. AG Seal Beach, LLC, et al (2010) 189 Cal.App.4th 1399, 1405. Under both federal and state la...

Excerpt: ...curred on November 2, 2021. Defendants failed to appear at trial, which according to the minutes proceeded in defendants' absence at 11:39 a.m. The current motion was filed on December 1, 2021. 2 Defendants note a family court hearing scheduled during the same time as the unlawful detainer trial. Defendants had previously requested permission to appear by video at the trial because of the conflicting hearings. Notably, defendants did not request ...

Excerpt: ...leading in the furtherance of justice and on such terms as may be just. Code Civ. Proc. §§ 473(a)(1), 576. Leave to amend is generally exercised liberally so long as there is no showing of prejudice to the opposing party. Howard v. County of San Diego (2010) 184 Cal.App.4th 1422, 1428; Douglas v. Superior Court (1989) 215 Cal.App.3d 155, 158. Courts must apply a policy of great liberality in permitting amendments to the complaint “at any stag...

Excerpt: ...s are deemed true no matter how improbable they may seem. Del E. Webb Corp. v. Structural Materials Co. (1981) 123 Cal.App.3d 593, 604. Defendant argues that the 60‐day notice attached to the complaint fails to comply with the California Tenant Protection Act of 2019 (“TPA”). Defendant is correct that the 60‐ day notice fails to comply with the requirements of Civil Code section 1946.2, which contrary to plaintiffs' arguments was in effec...

Excerpt: ...established or there is a complete defense to the cause of action. (Id. at 437c(p)(2).) Only when this initial burden is met does the burden shift to the opposing party to establish a triable issue of material fact. (Ibid.) In reviewing a motion for summary judgment, the trial court must view the supporting evidence, and inferences reasonably drawn from such evidence, in the light most favorable to the opposing party. (Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfie...

Excerpt: ...moving for summary judgment bear the burden of persuasion that one or more elements of the causes of action in question cannot be established, or that there is a complete defense thereto. Code Civ. Proc. § 437c(p)(2); Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co. (2001) 25 Cal.4th 826, 850. If the moving party carries its initial burden of production to make a prima facie showing that there are no triable issues of material fact, the burden shifts to the op...

Excerpt: ...d it is entitled to judgment in its favor. Code Civ. Proc. § 437c(p)(1); Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co. (2001) 25 Cal.4th 826, 850. If the moving party carries its initial burden of production to make a prima facie showing that there are no triable issues of material fact, the burden shifts to the opposing party to make a prima facie showing of the existence of a triable issue of material fact. Id. Plaintiff alleges claims of breach of contra...

Excerpt: ... of the court. (Code of Civil Procedure section 436(a),(b).) In this instance, defendants seek to strike the prayer for damages and attorneys' fees alleged against them, asserting these allegations are improper since the claims against them do not warrant such relief. The court agrees. A review of the complaint shows the causes of action alleged against defendants include cancellation of instrument; PLACER COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT THURSDAY, CIVIL LA...

Excerpt: ...y; (2) the diligence or lack of diligence in seeking discovery and the reasons discovery was not completed; (3) any likelihood that permitting the reopening of discovery would interfere with the currently set trial date; and (4) the length of time that has elapsed between the prior trial date and the currently set trial date. (Code of Civil Procedure section 2024.050.) In this instance, the moving party has not made a sufficient showing to suppor...

Excerpt: ...there is a complete defense to the cause of action. (Id. at 437c(p)(2).) Only when this initial burden is met does the burden shift to the opposing party to establish a triable issue of material fact. (Ibid.) In reviewing a motion for summary adjudication, the trial court must view the supporting evidence, and inferences reasonably drawn from such evidence, in the light most favorable to the opposing party. (Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Company ...

Excerpt: ... a reasonable belief that she would prevail on the issue of plaintiff's injuries when defendant denied RFAs nos. 9 and 18. Defendant, however, has not made a sufficient showing to support such a finding. To the extent defendant relied on the expert opinion of Dr. Peter Sfakianos, the evidence presented to the court shows Dr. Sfakianos identified soft tissue injury as a result of the collision. In light of this evidence, it was not reasonable for ...

Excerpt: ...inst defendant. Nor can it be read that the alter ego allegations are applicable to other causes of action as the moving defendant is only named in the fifth causes of action. In light of these deficiencies, the demurrer is sustained in its entirety. A second amended complaint may be filed and served by December 17, 2021. Defendant Kara Schacke's Motion to Strike the First Amended Complaint (FAC) The motion is granted without leave to amend. A mo...

Excerpt: ...sufficiency of the pleading, not the truth of the allegations or accuracy of the described conduct. (Bader v. Anderson (2009) 179 Cal.App.4th 775, 787.) The allegations in the pleading are deemed to be true no matter how improbable the allegations may seem. (Del E. Webb Corp. v. Structural Materials Co. (1981) 123 Cal.App.3d 593, 604.) The court reviews the FAC‐C keeping these principles in mind. Turning to the second cause of action, a breach ...

Excerpt: ...laration of Kristian Knapp, the court has also considered the untimely declaration in ruling on this motion. Moving defendants seek a protective order in response to plaintiff's demand for inspection of the gymnasium and cafeteria, and plaintiff's separate demand served on codefendant ShowBiz Event Lighting (“ShowBiz”) for inspection of certain identified sound equipment. Moving defendants ask that the inspection be limited to a weekday, betw...