Search by Keyword:
Start Date:
End Date:
Tip: Wrap text in quotation marks when searching for phrases (e.g. "motion to dismiss").

1411 Results

Location: Placer x
2023.06.06 Demurrer 595
Location: Placer
Judge: Hirashima, Trisha
Hearing Date: 2023.06.06
Excerpt: ...30.10, subds. (e), (f).) A demurrer tests the legal sufficiency of the pleadings, not the truth of the allegations or the accuracy of the described conduct. (Bader v. Anderson (2009) 179 Cal.App.4th 775, 787.) The allegations in the pleadings are deemed true no matter how improbable they may seem. (Del E. Webb Corp. v. Structural Materials Co. (1981) 123 Cal.App.3d 593, 604.) However, the court does not assume the truth of contentions, deductions...
2023.05.30 Motions to Compel Further Responses 047
Location: Placer
Judge: Hirashima, Trisha
Hearing Date: 2023.05.30
Excerpt: ...urther meet and confer efforts. The court continues this motion to July 18, 2023 at 8:30 a.m. in Department 42 to be heard together with plaintiffs' ten other motions to compel further responses. The parties are directed to further meet and confer in good faith towards resolution of these discovery disputes. If the parties' further meet and confer efforts are unsuccessful, it is the court's 6 intention to appoint a discovery referee pursuant to C...
2023.05.30 Motion to Amend FAC 065
Location: Placer
Judge: Hirashima, Trisha
Hearing Date: 2023.05.30
Excerpt: ... to claim punitive damages against a health care provider. The court may grant such leave if plaintiff establishes through supporting and opposing affidavits "there is a substantial probability that the plaintiff will prevail on the claim pursuant to Section 3294 of the Civil Code." (Code Civ. Proc„ S 425.13, subd. (a).) To support punitive damages, plaintiffs must allege ultimate facts supporting a finding by clear and convincing evidence of o...
2023.05.30 Motion for Reconsideration 843
Location: Placer
Judge: Hirashima, Trisha
Hearing Date: 2023.05.30
Excerpt: ...ington has brought regarding the court's December 13, 2022 order. The court denied the first motion without prejudice on January 24, 2023 due to procedural deficiencies. The court denied the second on March 21, 2023 due to procedural deficiencies and also noted the motion would be denied on the merits as well. Plaintiff's opposition is untimely filed. The court exercises its discretion to consider all briefing in this matter. The court observes m...
2023.05.30 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 501
Location: Placer
Judge: Hirashima, Trisha
Hearing Date: 2023.05.30
Excerpt: ...oc., S 438, subd. (g); Southern California Edison Co. v. City of Victorville (2013) 217 Cal.App.4th 218, 227.) A defendant may move for judgment on the pleadings when the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. (Code Civ. Proc., S 438, subd. The grounds for the motion must appear on the face of the challenged pleading or be based on facts which the court may judicially notice. (Code Civ. Proc., S 438, subd. (d)....
2023.05.25 Motion to Strike TAC 656
Location: Placer
Judge: Jones, Michael W
Hearing Date: 2023.05.25
Excerpt: ...re irrelevant to allegations made in the TAC. The court grants the motion as to these sections and exhibit without leave to amend. The motion is denied as to paragraph 44. Defendants' Demurrer to the Third Amended Complaint (TAC) The demurrer is overruled. A demurrer tests the legal sufficiency of the pleading, not the truth of the plaintiff's allegations or accuracy of the described conduct. (Bader v. Anderson (2009) 179 Cal.App.4th 775, 787.) T...
2023.05.23 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 229
Location: Placer
Judge: Hirashima, Trisha
Hearing Date: 2023.05.23
Excerpt: ...now ton"). On Deck's request for judicial notce is granted. A party is entitled to bring a motion for summary judgment where there are no triable issues of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. (Code Civ. Proc., S 437c, subd. A plaintiff or cross-complainant has the burden of showing, by affidavit, facts establishing every element necessary to sustain a judgment in its favor. (Code Civ. Proc., S 437c, subd...
2023.05.23 Motion for Monetary Sanctions 755
Location: Placer
Judge: Hirashima, Trisha
Hearing Date: 2023.05.23
Excerpt: ..., plaintiff filed an untimely opposition. The court has not considered this late filing. Defendants' request for judicial notce is granted. However, as to Exhibit 2, the request is granted as to the fact that the declaration was filed and not for the truth of the matters declared therein or of the attachments thereto. Defendants move for monetary sanctions against plaintiff's counsel Chase Meister and the law firm KDH Law. The motion follows a se...
2023.05.23 Motion for Final Approval of Class Action and PAGA Settlement 287
Location: Placer
Judge: Hirashima, Trisha
Hearing Date: 2023.05.23
Excerpt: ...on to determine whether a class action settlement is fair, adequate, and reasonable. (In re Cellphone Fee Termination Cases (2010) 186 Cal .App.4th 1380, 1389.) When reviewing the fairness ofthe settlement, the court is to give due regard to the parties' agreement, ensuring that the agreement is not a product of fraud, overreaching parties, or collusion and that the settlement, as a whole, is fair, reasonable, and adequate. (7-Eleven Owners for F...
2023.05.16 Demurrer 649
Location: Placer
Judge: Hirashima, Trisha
Hearing Date: 2023.05.16
Excerpt: ... Anderson (6th Dist. 2009) 179 Cal.App.4th 775, 787.) The allegations in the pleadings are deemed true no matter how improbable they may seem. (Del E. Webb Corp. v. Structural Materials Co. (2d Dist. 1981) 123 Cal.App.3d 593, 504.) However, the court does not assume the truth of contentions, deductions, or conclusions of facts or law. (Evans v. City of Berkeley (2006) 38 Cal.4th 1, 6.) The unopposed demurrer is sustained as the complaint does not...
2023.05.09 Motion for Attorney Fees 147
Location: Placer
Judge: Hirashima, Trisha
Hearing Date: 2023.05.09
Excerpt: ...lair) and 7.6 hours at an hourly rate of $300 for another (Scott Christensen). A prevailing party in an action on contract is entitled to recover reasonable attorneys' fees where the contract provides for their recovery. (Civ. C'Nle, S 1717, subd. After a trial on stipulated facts, the court found in favor of Heritage Inn on the complaint and cross complaint. The note and other documents underlying this case provide for the 5 recovery of attorney...
2023.05.09 Motion for Attorney Fees 811
Location: Placer
Judge: Jacques, Michael A
Hearing Date: 2023.05.09
Excerpt: ... the hearing on February 17, 2023, the parties appeared and the matter was dropped at petitioner's request. On March 3, 2023, the court dismissed the petition without prejudice at petitioner's request. The prevailing party in a CHRO may be awarded court costs and attorney's fees. (Code Civ. S 527.6, subd. (s).) As Code of Civil Procedure section 527.6 does not define prevailing party, the definition in Code of Civil Procedure secton 1032(a)(4) ap...
2023.05.09 Motions to Compel Further Responses 047
Location: Placer
Judge: Hirashima, Trisha
Hearing Date: 2023.05.09
Excerpt: ...r Farm Group LLC and for monetary sanctions of $2,265 - Mohon to compel further responses with documents to requests for admission, set 1, from 1550 3rd Street LLC and for monetary sanctions of $2,265 - Motion to compel further responses with documents to requests for production and documents, set 1, from 1550 3rd Street LLC and for monetary sanctions of $2,265 5 - Motion to compel further responses with documents to special interrogatories, set ...
2023.05.04 Motion for Summary Adjudication 626
Location: Placer
Judge: Jones, Michael W
Hearing Date: 2023.05.04
Excerpt: ...onal evidence. The court will not consider improperly subm-tted briefing, especially where defendants have had the opportunity but failed to bring a proper request. Since the court has stricken defendants' supplemental opposition, the court will not consider PCWA's substantive arguments in the supplemental reply or declaration filed on April 25, 2023. Ruling on Objections PCWA's objections to defendants' SSLJMF are sustained in their entirety. PC...
2023.05.02 Motion to Set Aside Default, Judgment 029
Location: Placer
Judge: Hirashima, Trisha
Hearing Date: 2023.05.02
Excerpt: ... is void on its face, a defendant may move to set aside at anytime. (Kremerman v. White (2021) 71 Cal.App.5th 358.) "A judgment 'is considered void on its face only when the invalidity is apparent from an inspection of the judgment roll or court record without consideration of extrinsic evidence.' [Citation.) When a default judgment has been taken, the judgment roll consists of 'the summons, with the affdavit or proof of service, the complaint, t...
2023.05.02 Demurrer to SAC 804
Location: Placer
Judge: Hirashima, Trisha
Hearing Date: 2023.05.02
Excerpt: ...Anderson (2009) 179 Cal.App.4th 775, 787.) The allegations in the pleadings are deemed true no matter how improbable they may seem. (Del E. Webb Corp. v. Structural Materials Co. (1981) 123 Cal.App.3d 593, 604.) However, the court does not assume the truth of contentions, deductions, or conclusions of facts or law. (Evans v. City of Berkeley (2006) 38 Cal.4th 1, 6.) The court will not assume the truth of any allegations contradicted by judicially...
2023.04.27 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 474
Location: Placer
Judge: Jones, Michael W
Hearing Date: 2023.04.27
Excerpt: ...for Judicial Notice Defendant's request for judicial notice is granted. Plaintiff's request for judicial notce is denied in light of the court's ruling on the objections. Ruling on Motion The motion is granted. The trial court shall grant a motion for summary judgment if "all the papers submitted show that there is no triable issue as to any material fact and the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law." (Code of Civil Procedure...
2023.04.25 Motion to Vacate Judgment 883
Location: Placer
Judge: Hirashima, Trisha
Hearing Date: 2023.04.25
Excerpt: ... statement of damages, and the requests for entry of default and proposed judgment were blank as to damages. The amount of damages awarded in default judgment cannot exceed what was demanded in the operative complaint. Civ. Proc., S 580, subd. A statement of damages is required in a personal injury or wrongful death action or where punitive damages are sought. (Code Civ. Proc„ SS 425.11, 425.115.) Here, a review of the court file reveals the op...
2023.04.25 Motion to Set Aside Dismissal 437
Location: Placer
Judge: Hirashima, Trisha
Hearing Date: 2023.04.25
Excerpt: ... or excusable neglect." (CINIe Civ. Proc., S 473, subd. (b).) A motion to set aside dismissal must be made "within a reasonable time, in no case exceeding six months" from the entry of default. (Ibid.) Here, plaintiff's request is based on various obstacles that have im#ded her ability to litigate this case, including medical issues, caring for her elderly mother, and having limited access to the Internet and a law library. Further, plaintiff's r...
2023.04.25 Demurrer 373
Location: Placer
Judge: Hirashima, Trisha
Hearing Date: 2023.04.25
Excerpt: ...ribed conduct. (Bader v. Anderson (6th Dist. 2009) 179 Cal.App.4th 775, 787.) The allegations in the pleadings are deemed true no matter how improbable they may seem. (Del E. Webb Corp. v. Structural Materials Co. (2d Dist. 1981) 123 Cal.App.3d 593, 504.) However, the court does not assume the truth of contentions, deductions, or conclusions of facts or law. (Evans v. City of Berkeley (2005) 38 Cal.4th 1, 6.) Here, defendant contends the complain...
2023.04.18 Motion to Quash Service of Summons 839
Location: Placer
Judge: Hirashima, Trisha
Hearing Date: 2023.04.18
Excerpt: ...f's request for judicial notce is granted. Plaintiff has the burden to prove the facts establishing proper service upon the defendants. (Summers v. McClanahan (2005) 140 Cal.App.4th 403, 413.) The filing of a statutorily compliant proof of service creates a presumption that service was proper but such a presumption is rebuttable. (Dilla v. Berquist Const. Co., Inc. (1994) 24 Cal.App.4th 1426, 1441—42; Floveyor Int'l, Ltd. v. Superior Court (Shi...
2023.04.18 Motion to Compel Arbitration 875
Location: Placer
Judge: Hirashima, Trisha
Hearing Date: 2023.04.18
Excerpt: ...ion of counsel Daniel Law. The court exercises its discretion and considers all briefing in this matter. Ruling on the Mohon The arbitration statutes evidence a strong public policy in favor of arbitration that is frequently approved and enforced by the courts. (Madden v. Kaiser Foundation Hospitals (1976) 17 Cal.3d 599, 706; Laswell v. AG Seal Beach, LLC (2010) 189 Cal.App.4th 1399, 1405.) under both federal and state law, a threshold question f...
2023.04.18 Motion for Leave to File SAC 323
Location: Placer
Judge: Hirashima, Trisha
Hearing Date: 2023.04.18
Excerpt: ... liberally prov-ded there is no showing of prejudice to the opposing party. (Howard v. County of San Diego (4th Dist. 2010) 184 cal.App.4th 1422, 1428; Douglas v. superior court (4th Dist. 1989) 215 cal.App.3d 155, 158.) Despite the of liberally allowing amendments, whether to grant or deny an amendment is nonetheless "largely within the sound discretion of the trial court" and "its exercise will not disturbed in the absence of a showing of gross...
2023.04.18 Demurrer to SAC 901
Location: Placer
Judge: Hirashima, Trisha
Hearing Date: 2023.04.18
Excerpt: ...llegations may seem. (Del E. Webb Corp. v. Structural Materials Co. (1981) 123 Cal.App.3d 593, 604.) The court, however, does not accept the truth of contentions, deductions, or conclusions of law. 10 (Genesis Environment Services v. San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District (2003) 113 Cal.App.4th 597, 603.) The SAC is reviewed keeping this in mind. A review of the SAC shows plaintiff fails to allege sufficient facts to constitute...
2023.04.11 OSC Re Preliminary Injunction 791
Location: Placer
Judge: Hirashima, Trisha
Hearing Date: 2023.04.11
Excerpt: ...r Lane Riedel's request. Oral argument was requested, and Mr. Riedel's counsel of record appeared at the date and time for hearing on February 28, 2023. The matter was continued to April 11, 2023, supplemental briefing was allowed, and the minutes reflect "briefing schedule per code." California Code of Procedure requires an opposition be supported by nine court days' notice. (Code Civ. Proc., S 1005, subd. (b).) Here, defendant Christopher Lane ...

1411 Results

Per page

Pages