Search by Keyword:
Start Date:
End Date:
Tip: Wrap text in quotation marks when searching for phrases (e.g. "motion to dismiss").

16237 Results

Location: Orange County x
2018.2.22 Demurrer (2)
Location: Orange County
Judge: McCormick, Melissa R
Hearing Date: 2018.2.22
Excerpt: ...aint].” Complaint paragraph 5. This allegation is insufficient to support causes of action for breach of contract, breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, fraud, negligence, and violation of California Business & Professions Code section 17200. There are no allegations of any relationship between Plaintiff and the Leeor Defendants (contractual or otherwise), any misrepresentation by the Leeor Defendants, any duty or breac...
2018.2.22 Demurrer
Location: Orange County
Judge: Wilson, Peter
Hearing Date: 2018.2.22
Excerpt: ...in its minute order of February 9, 2017, shows the court denied the 664.6 motion because it did not find Code of Civil Procedure section 664.6 or the terms of the settlement agreement allowed it to grant the relief requested—i.e., an order requiring the Mahonys to implement the “Norris Plan” within 90 days, without regard to the other portions of the settlement agreement - and that it did so without finally adjudicating whether the Mahonys ...
2018.2.22 Application for Service of Summons 166
Location: Orange County
Judge: Howard, Theodore R
Hearing Date: 2018.2.22
Excerpt: ....App.2d 798, 805); Batte v. Bandy (1958) 165 Cal.App.2d 527, 533 (“Affidavits devoid of averments of facts showing that due diligence was exercised to make service have consistently been held to be insufficient…”). Plaintiff's declaration, paragraph 5, does not provide enough information about what was found at the registered address for the agent for service of process for Creek Systems Inc. (Kevin M. Daly) at 8105 Irvine Center Drive, Sui...
2018.2.22 Demurrer
Location: Orange County
Judge: McCormick, Melissa R
Hearing Date: 2018.2.22
Excerpt: ...viously agreed to dismiss that cause of action. Opposition at 6:18- 20. The indemnity and contribution/apportionment claims alleged in the second, third and fourth causes of action are based on potential liability for alleged construction defects. There can be no indemnity without liability. City of San Diego v. United States Gypsum Co. (1994) 30 Cal.App.4th 575, 587-589. As a result, an indemnity claim requires that the complainant have paid a c...
2018.2.21 Motion to Set Aside Acceptance of Defendant 271
Location: Orange County
Judge: Horn, Frederick
Hearing Date: 2018.2.21
Excerpt: ...rty seeking relief has been diligent, courts have often granted relief pursuant to the discretionary relief provision of section 473 if no prejudice to the opposing party will ensue. [citations omitted]'” Ibid. This provision can be used to set aside any “other proceeding” taken against a party through the mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect of a party or her attorney, and is not limited to judgments or dismissals. See Cod...
2018.2.21 Motion to Reconsider 325
Location: Orange County
Judge: Horn, Frederick
Hearing Date: 2018.2.21
Excerpt: ...7. Because terminating sanctions are a harsh remedy, this court declined to issue terminating sanctions at that time and instead directed that defendant Thai appear for his deposition on 11-7-17. Thai was personally present in court when the court made this order and plaintiff gave written notice of the ruling thereafter. Thai failed to appear on 11-7-17. Plaintiff again moved for terminating sanctions, as well as monetary sanctions. In response,...
2018.2.21 Motion to Compel Enforcement of Subpoena 620
Location: Orange County
Judge: Horn, Frederick
Hearing Date: 2018.2.21
Excerpt: ... Street in Westminster, and any 1031 exchanges that occurred with respect to monies wired by Amerilink Escrow to National Exchange Corporation that plaintiffs believe were connected with BTC's sale of the property to JVS Development, LLC. (Id., Attachment 2.) The court first questions whether BTC, an LLC, is a “consumer” entitled to notice under Code of Civil Procedure §1985.3(a)(2). But given that BTC may fit within the definition of an “...
2018.2.21 Motion for Terminating Sanctions 618
Location: Orange County
Judge: Horn, Frederick
Hearing Date: 2018.2.21
Excerpt: ...r terminating sanctions should not be made lightly. But where a violation is willful, preceded by a history of abuse, and the evidence shows that less severe sanctions would not produce compliance with the discovery rules, the trial court is justified in imposing the ultimate sanction. . . .” Miliekowsky vs. Tenet Healthsystem (2005) 128 Cal.App.4 th 262, 280 On 9-27-17, the Court granted Plaintiff's Motion for an Order Compelling the Person Mo...
2018.2.21 Motion for Foreclosure of Transferable Interest 535
Location: Orange County
Judge: Horn, Frederick
Hearing Date: 2018.2.21
Excerpt: ...that time, and none are forthcoming. (See Miller Decl., ¶¶10-15.) This time, unlike the previous motion, AMG does make “a showing that distributions under a charging order will not pay the judgment debt within a reasonable time.” Corps. Code §17705.03(b)(3). Mr. Miller avers that AMG is still an active business listed with the California Secretary of State, but has stopped conducting business, is not generating revenue, and has no money in...
2018.2.21 Application for Court Mtg Re Court's Tentative Ruling 398
Location: Orange County
Judge: Horn, Frederick
Hearing Date: 2018.2.21
Excerpt: ...ey purchased the vehicle from Source Specialists, the written documentation for the sale, attached to the FAC as Exh. 3, shows the purchaser was JBY Enterprises, Inc. In opposition to the demurrer, plaintiffs argue they are the proper plaintiffs as they are the sole owners of JBY, but as JBY purchased the vehicle, JBY is the real-party-in-interest. Plaintiffs elected to operate as a corporation and thus it is the corporation which has standing. T...
2018.2.20 Motion for Discovery 054
Location: Orange County
Judge: Gastelum, John C
Hearing Date: 2018.2.20
Excerpt: ...ar in the action. The defendant is “out of court.” It has no right to participate in the proceedings until either (a) its default is set aside (in which event, it may respond to the complaint), or (b) a default judgment is entered (in which event, it may appeal). (Devlin v. Kearny Mesa AMC/Jeep/Renault, Inc. (1984) 155 Cal.App.3d 381, 385-386.) ...
2018.2.20 Demurrer 204
Location: Orange County
Judge: Gastelum, John C
Hearing Date: 2018.2.20
Excerpt: ...n conjunction: These paragraphs can be interpreted as indicating, both, an Agreement between Ms. Gulsvig and Distext in May of 2016 and a separate conversation in May or June of 2016, involving either Ms. Gulsvig or Mr. Nichols. The Court must assume the truth of these allegations and read the Complaint in whole. (See Blank v. Kirwan (1985) 39 Cal.3d 311, 317). As a result, the Demurrer is OVERRULED. ...
2018.2.20 Demurrer 247
Location: Orange County
Judge: Schwarm, Walter
Hearing Date: 2018.2.20
Excerpt: ...42, 750.) Thus, the opposition on this ground is overruled. The FAC asserts four causes of action against four defendants (Hernan Orozco, Villa Properties Realty, Bryan Pugh and Tony Nguyen), but fails to adequately identify the defendant affected by each cause of action. This failure causes confusion because it impairs the ability of the Defendants to adequately respond to the FAC. That is, it appears that Defendant cannot reasonably determine w...
2018.2.20 Demurrer 878
Location: Orange County
Judge: Schwarm, Walter
Hearing Date: 2018.2.20
Excerpt: ...swer is uncertain. As used in this subdivision, ‘uncertain' includes ambiguous and unintelligible. . . . .” “ ‘The familiar terms “general demurrer” and “special demurrer” do not appear in the statutes. The name “general demurrer” is, however, universally applied to a demurrer raising the fundamental ground: “The pleading does not state fats sufficient to constitute a cause of action.” [Citation.]' [Citations.]” (McKenne...
2018.2.20 Demurrer, Motion to Strike 663
Location: Orange County
Judge: Gastelum, John C
Hearing Date: 2018.2.20
Excerpt: ...ve submitted no argument on the issue in their briefs on appeal. Accordingly, we deem plaintiffs to have abandoned the issue.”].) The Motion to Strike is MOOT in light of the demurrer. Moving party is to give notice. ...
2018.2.20 Motion to Consolidate 872
Location: Orange County
Judge: Gastelum, John C
Hearing Date: 2018.2.20
Excerpt: ...“Sanchez”) was insured by Alliance United Insurance Company (“Alliance”), and Alliance brought a subrogation action in limited jurisdiction against Plaintiff for property damages to Defendant Sanchez's vehicle. (Motion, Theam Decl., ¶ 3.) The instant action is deemed the lead case because it is an unlimited case, while the suit filed by Alliance is a limited case. It appears consolidation of the two cases will enhance trial court efficie...
2018.2.20 Motion for Leave to Amend 259
Location: Orange County
Judge: Gastelum, John C
Hearing Date: 2018.2.20
Excerpt: ...11, 2017, he substituted in as new counsel for OB Sports and discovered the Release executed by Plaintiff, and that he believes Plaintiff's claims, or parts thereof, are barred by the Release, which Plaintiff executed on September 24, 2014. (Motin, Scott Decl, ¶¶ 3-4.) The proposed Amended Answer is attached as Exhibit “A” to Mr. Scott's Declaration. OB Sports has substantially complied with the requirements of CRC 3.1324. The motion is uno...
2018.2.20 Motion to Amend Judgment 839
Location: Orange County
Judge: Schwarm, Walter
Hearing Date: 2018.2.20
Excerpt: ...C v. Airborne Turbine Ltd. Partnership (2013) 222 Cal.App.4 th 815-816, states, “The trial court is authorized to amend a judgment to add judgment debtors. [Citation.]The judgment may be amended to add additional judgment debtors on the ground that a person or entity is the alter ego of the original judgment debtor. [Citation.] It is an equitable procedure based on the theory that the court is not amending the judgment to add a new defendant bu...
2018.2.20 Motion to Compel Responses 165
Location: Orange County
Judge: Schwarm, Walter
Hearing Date: 2018.2.20
Excerpt: ...ginal of the response to them on the propounding party . . . .” Code of Civil Procedure section 2030.270, subdivision (a), explains, “The party propounding interrogatories, and the responding party may agree to extend the time for service of a response to a set of interrogatories . . . .” Code of Civil Procedure section 2030.290 states, in part, “If a party to whom interrogatories are directed fails to serve a timely response, the followi...
2018.2.20 Motion to Compel Responses 646
Location: Orange County
Judge: Schwarm, Walter
Hearing Date: 2018.2.20
Excerpt: ...g party . . . .” Code of Civil Procedure section 2030.270, subdivision (a), explains, “The party propounding interrogatories, and the responding party may agree to extend the time for service of a response to a set of interrogatories . . . .” Code of Civil Procedure section 2030.290 states, in part, “If a party to whom interrogatories are directed fails to serve a timely response, the following rules apply: . . . [¶] (b) The party propou...
2018.2.20 Motion to Set Aside Default, Judgment 914
Location: Orange County
Judge: Schwarm, Walter
Hearing Date: 2018.2.20
Excerpt: ...resulting default entered by the clerk against his or her client . . . or (2) resulting default judgment or dismissal entered against his or her client, unless the court finds that the default was not in fact caused by the attorney's mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or neglect. The court shall whenever relief is granted based on an attorney's affidavit of fault, direct the attorney to pay reasonable compensatory legal fees and costs to opposing c...
2018.2.20 Motion to Strike 926
Location: Orange County
Judge: Gastelum, John C
Hearing Date: 2018.2.20
Excerpt: ...smiss an action pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 581 exists even after a section 425.16 motion is filed by the defendant and a hearing is held but prior to the court ruling on the motion. (Kyle v. Carmon (1999) 71 Cal. App. 4th 901, 908–09.) Although the Court lacks jurisdiction to rule on the merits of the Motion, the “the trial court has discretion to determine whether the defendant is the prevailing party for purposes of attorne...
2018.2.2 Petition to Abate Substandard Property, Appoint Receiver 499
Location: Orange County
Judge: Chaffee, David R
Hearing Date: 2018.2.2
Excerpt: ...S's of Brian Silver, Esq., and Sky High Holistic and Elevated Dreams Collective Inc. Please update the proofs of service to aid the Court moving forward. It is noted that, attorney/trustee, Brian Silver's caption page indicates an appearance “pro se”. However, the introductory language in certain of the papers (see Silver's Opp. f. 1/17/18, at 1:22) indicate that Mr. Silver is appearing as trustee of the Charles Silverstein Trust, and for Tob...
2018.2.2 Petition to Abate Substandard Housing, Motion to Appoint Receiver (2)
Location: Orange County
Judge: Moss, Robert
Hearing Date: 2018.2.2
Excerpt: ...rd E. Willis could: (1) fully abate the noticed code violations, or (2) retain another real estate agent and present evidence that an agreement to sell the subject Costa Mesa property had been entered into an escrow at least opened. (See, 9-15-17 Minute Order.) Based on the evidence presented, the subject Costa Mesa home has not been brought back into compliance with the code and there is no evidence of entry into a real estate sales agreement fo...
2018.2.2 Petition to Abate Substandard Housing, Motion to Appoint Receiver
Location: Orange County
Judge: Moss, Robert
Hearing Date: 2018.2.2
Excerpt: ...Cal.App.3d 675, 679 to 680. Regarding defendant Just Mortgage Inc., petitioner and this defendant shall meet and confer as to whether petitioner will voluntarily dismiss Just Mortgage, Inc. If the petitioner will not do so voluntarily, the court will entertain a dispositive motion on that issue. Next, at petitioner's request, Eric P. Beatty is appointed as receiver. See, Health & Safety Code § 17980.7(c)(2). In addition, petitioner City of Santa...

16237 Results

Per page

Pages