Excerpt: ...e facts of defendan t's oppression, fraud, or malice. (CC § 3294(a).) “Malice” is defined as conduct which is intended by the defendant to cause injury to the plaintiff or despicable conduct which is carried on by the defendant with a willful and conscious disregard of the rights or safety of others. (CC § 3294(c)(1).) “Oppression” is defined as despicable conduct that subjects a person to cruel and unjust hardship in conscious disreg...

Excerpt: ...rmation for individual independent service centers co -defendant/non -parties, but GM does have the duty to make an inquiry into any of its employees that may have information relating to the Vehicle and its repair history. (Civ. Proc. Code § 2030.220.) Merely stating “GM call center advisors with whom Plaintiff may have communicated” does not comply with the requirement to make a reasonable and god faith inquiry. Additionally, vague referen...

Excerpt: ...4) 226 Cal. App. 4th 2 31, 240; See also, 9 U.S.C.A. § 2; Civ. Proc. Code § 1281.4.) "The petitioner bears the burden of proving the existence of a valid arbitration agreement by the preponderance of the evidence, and a party opposing the petition bears the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence any fact necessary to its defense.” (Engalla v. Permanente Medical Group, Inc. (1997) 15 Cal.4th 951, 972 (“Engalla”); Green Tr...

Excerpt: ...er. While the petition was pending, the plaintiff also made a request for documents relating to the petition. The FAC asserts claims based on the failure to allow inspection of the documents requested in October and November 2021 as well as the request to review the recall petition on 8/17/22. (FAC at ¶¶15, 17.) HOA's Request for Judicial Notice The HOA's request for judicial notice is GRANTED as to Item Nos. 13. (Evid. Code §452(d)) The reque...

Excerpt: ... summarily adjudicate claims or defenses as to which no triable issue was raised unless requested in the notice of motion. (Weil & Brown, Cal. Prac. Guide, Civ. Proc. Before Trial, §10:88, citing Homestead Sav. v. Sup.Ct. (Dividend Develop. Corp.) (1986) 179 Cal.App.3d 494, 498 (citing text).) Further, even if the notice of motion could be deemed to set forth a request for summary adjudication in the alternative, the motion is procedurally defec...

Excerpt: ...subdivision (q), suc h that Plaintiff's claims would not expire until June 27, 2023. Emergency Rule 9 provides that “[n]otwithstanding any other law, the statutes of limitations and repose for civil causes of action that exceed 180 days are tolled from April 6, 2020, until Oct ober 1, 2020.” Thus, according to Plaintiff, her Complaint filed on June 22, 2023, is timely. Plaintiff's argument is well -taken. Plaintiff relies on Roe v. Doe (...

Excerpt: ...es to Interroga tories Nos. 4.1, 15.1, 16.1, 17.1 and 50.1 - 50.6. Code of Civil Procedure section 2030.300, states, in part, “(a) On receipt of a response to interrogatories the propounding party may move for an order compelling a further response if the propounding par ty deems that any of the following apply: [¶] (1) An answer to a particular interrogatory is evasive or incomplete . . . [¶] (3) An objection to an interrogatory is without m...

Excerpt: ...o Parikh are MOOT except for sanctions. The motion directed to Fazeli is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Motions Directed to Parikh (ROA 190 and 198) The oppositions indicate Parikh served verified substantive supplemental responses to the at issue discovery on February 7, 2024. (ROA 249 at Exhibit 3; ROA 251 at Exhibit 3.) The court thus deems these motions MOOT, except for the issue of sanctions. (Sinaiko Healthcare Consulting, Inc. v. Pac...

Excerpt: ...pplies? D efendants contend that the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”) applies to this action because the Mutual Agreement to Arbitrate Claims expressly states that “[t]he Federal Arbitration Act (9 U.S.C. § 1 et seq.) (‘FAA') governs this Agreement, which evidences a transaction involving commerce.” (See Gralak Decl., ¶ 10, Exh. A, p. 1, lines 4 -5). Defendants also present evidence that Defendant HEARTLAND operates more than 62 health...

Excerpt: ...Johnson v. Superior Court (2006) 143 Cal.App.4th 297, 305.) “The standard of care in a medical malpractice case requires that physicians exercise in diagnosis and treatment that reasonable degree of skill, knowledge and care ordinarily possessed and exercised by members of the medical profess ion under similar circumstances.” (Munro v. Regents of University of California (1989) 215 Cal.App.3d 977, 983- 984.) Here, the undisputed evidence demo...

Excerpt: ...s or her burden of showing that a cause of action has no merit if the party has shown that one or more elements of the cause of action, even if not separately pleaded, cannot be established, or that there is a complete defense to the cause of action. Once the defendant or cross- defendant has met that burden, the burden shifts to the plaintiff or cross- complainant to show that a triable issue of one or more material facts exists as to the cause ...

Excerpt: ...c denial of the material allegations of the complaint controve rted by the defendant. (2) A statement of any new matter constituting a defense.” CCP §430.20 authorizes a party to object by way of demurrer to an “answer that does not state facts sufficient to constitute a defense.” A defendant raising new matters in an answer must allege ultimate facts sufficient to prove the defense with the same level of detail that a plaintiff is require...

Excerpt: ...he cause of action, even if not separately pleaded, cannot b e established, or that there is a complete defense to the cause of action. Once the defendant or cross- defendant has met that burden, the burden shifts to the plaintiff or cross -complainant to show that a triable issue of one or more material facts exists as to the cause of action or a defense thereto. The plaintiff or crosscomplainant shall not rely upon the allegations or denials of...

Excerpt: ...e motion, the court must treat all of the defendant's allegations as being tru e, and the motion should be denied if the defendant's pleading raises a material issue or sets up an affirmative matter constituting a defense. (Id. at p. 331; accord, Sebago, Inc. v. City of Alameda (1989) 211 Cal.App.3d 1372, 1380; see also, Engine Manuf acturers Assn. v. State Air Resources Bd. (2014) 231 Cal.App.4th 1022, 1034.) Here, the answer of Plaintiff/Cross ...

Excerpt: ... procedures, including enforcement proced ures, for each discovery method. The issue here is that Genera moves to compel a non- party to produce further documents pursuant to a subpoena. Non -party discovery is governed by CCP §§ 1985, et seq. and 2020.010, et seq. Where a non- party refuses to co mply with a deposition subpoena, the requesting party must move under the appropriate code section seeking enforcement of said subpoena, and not CCP ...

Excerpt: ...forth below. The motion as to the RFP is DENIED. As an initial matter, t he court notes the motion was improperly filed as one motion, when it is actually three motions to compel further responses to discovery. Form Interrogatories With the exception of Form Rog 200.6 discussed below, the court finds Plaintiff's responses to the at issue Form Rogs are code compliant. It appears Defendant is not satisfied with the responses and believes additio...

Excerpt: ...y concedes that supplementation is warranted for Nos. 1 -31 and 34, and the Motion demonstrates that this is so. It does not suffice to merely claim that an interrogatory is “premature,” or to just point to records without complying with C.C.P. § 2030.230. Nor does it appear that C.C.P. § 2030.230 applies for many of thos e responses. The Motion is therefore GRANTED for Nos. 1 -31 and 34. For Nos. 32 and 33, the Motion is GRANTED IN PART. W...

Excerpt: ... verbatim in the petition or attached thereto. (C.R.C. 3.1330.) The burden then shifts to the resisting party “to demonstrate that an arbitration clause cannot be interpreted to require arbitration of the dispute.” (Buckhorn v. St. Judge Heritage Medical Group (2004) 121 Cal.App.4th 1401, 1406.) Any reasonable doubt as to whether a claim falls within the arbitration clause is to be resolved in favor of arbitration. (Villacreses v. Molinari (2...

Excerpt: ...e of a valid Arbitration Agreement, before arbitration can b e compelled. (See 9 U.S.C. §2 and C.C.P. §1281.2). “If a party to a civil action asks the court to compel arbitration of the pending claim, the court must determine in a summary proceeding whether an ‘agreement to arbitrate the controversy exist.'” (Iyere v. Wise Auto Group (2023) 87 Cal.App.5th 747, 754.) “Because the existence of the agreement is a statutory prerequisite to ...

Excerpt: ...oses of motions for summary judgment and summary adjudication : . . . (2) A defendant . . . has met his or her burden of showing that a cause of action has no merit if the party has shown that one or more elements of the cause of action, even if not separately pleaded, cannot be established, or that there is a compl ete defense to the cause of action. Once the defendant or cross- defendant has met that burden, the burden shifts to the plaintiff o...

Excerpt: ...Blank v. Kirwan (1985) 39 Cal.3d 311, 318.) Defendant demurs to the second cause o f action for negligent infliction of emotional distress on the grounds the cause of action is uncertain and does not plead facts sufficient to state a cause of action. To plead negligent infliction of emotional distress (“NIED”), Plaintiffs must plead 1) the defendant was negligent, 2) the Plaintiff suffered serious emotional distress, and 3) Defendant's negl...

Excerpt: ...second and third causes of action (each a “COA”) in the Complaint. But the supporting Separate Statement presents evidence only for those 2 issues. (See ROA 168.) The Motion as presented thus fails to support the request for summary judgment. The alternative request for summary adjudication on Issues 2 and 3 fail here, because Plaintiffs have presented adequate evidence in their Opposition to defeat the Motion. Plaintiffs have shown a clear r...

Excerpt: ...ems proper: (a) Strike out any irrelevant, false, or improper matter inserted in any pleading.” (Civ. Proc. Code § 436(a).) Regarding punitive damages under Civ. Code § 3294: “(a) In an action for the breach of an obligation not arising from contract, where it is proven by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant has been guilty of oppression, fraud, or malice, the plainti
¯, in addition to the actual damages, may recover damages f...

Excerpt: ...50(d). However, again, Plainti
¯ did not make an issue of this in the reply brief, and the court may consider the merits of a case absent a proper separate statement when the case involves a single simple issue” with minimal evidentiary support, such as here. (Gilbertson v. Osman (1986) 185 Cal. App. 3d 308, 316.) The court will proceed on the merits, but cautions defense counsel to comply with code requirements in the future. “(p) For purpo...

Excerpt: ... contract. Under Code of Civil Procedure section 1032, attorney's fees are recoverable as costs when authorized by contract, statute or law. (Code Civ. Proc. § 1033.5(a)(10)(A)-(C).) As set forth in the Statement of Decision (“SD”), the Court found against the Defendants on two claims: Sexual Assault (First Cause of Action) and Sexual Battery pursuant to Civil Code section 1708.5 (Second Cause of Action). In plainti
¯s' closing brief, Tina ...