Search by Keyword:
Start Date:
End Date:
Tip: Wrap text in quotation marks when searching for phrases (e.g. "motion to dismiss").

15917 Results

Location: Orange County x
2024.05.20 Motion to Strike 536
Location: Orange County
Judge: Strickroth, Michael J
Hearing Date: 2024.05.20
Excerpt: ...university emails used by a cademic professionals employed by public institutions. On September 9, 2020, CSI made a public records request to Respondent Regents of the University of California (“UC”), seeking correspondence relating to four articles authored by Petitioner. Petitioner , an assistant professor at UCI, argues such correspondence should not be subject to a CPRA request because the correspondence does not relate to conduct of the ...
2024.05.20 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 742
Location: Orange County
Judge: Fish, Jonathan
Hearing Date: 2024.05.20
Excerpt: ...lems wi th the vehicle or customer did not exist. [Complaint (ROA #2), ¶¶ 10 -17.] If the conditions of the warranties were not met, CLICK APP was required to re -purchase the retail installment sales contract. [Id., ¶¶ 18 -22.] the Arias guaranteed CLICK APP's p erformance: “guarantees the prompt full payment and performance of all indebtedness, obligations, conditions, covenants and agreements.” [Id., ¶¶ 15 -17.] Plaintiff alleges 21 ...
2024.05.20 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 645
Location: Orange County
Judge: Strickroth, Michael J
Hearing Date: 2024.05.20
Excerpt: ...Notice is GRANTED. Defendant's Request for Judicial Notice is GRANTED as to Exhibit 1 and DENIED as to Exhibit 2 as unnecessary to the disposition of the Motion. Defendant's Evidentiary Objections to Plaintiff's Evidence is OVERRULED. Plaintiff's Evidentiary Obje ctions to the Declaration of Karen Broderick is OVERRULED. The Court declines to rule on Plaintiff's Evidentiary Objections to the Declaration of Freddie Vega on the grounds that they ar...
2024.05.20 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 440
Location: Orange County
Judge: Fish, Jonathan
Hearing Date: 2024.05.20
Excerpt: ...o triable issue of material fact and that he is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” (Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co. (2001) 25 Cal.4th 826, 850.) A “party moving for summary judgment bears an initial burden of production to make a prima facie showing of the nonexistence of any triable issue of material fact. . . .” (Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co. (2001) 25 Cal.4th 826, 850.) “A prima facie showing is one that is sufficient to...
2024.05.20 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 325
Location: Orange County
Judge: Strickroth, Michael J
Hearing Date: 2024.05.20
Excerpt: ...rty is entitl ed to judgment. Harman v. Mono General Hospital (1982) 131 Cal.App.3d 607, 613. The First Amended Complaint alleges three causes of action against Moving Defendants: 1) Recovery of Stolen Property Under Penal Code § 496; 2) Medical Battery; 3) Business a nd Professions Code § 17200. The FAC also purports to segregate the defendants in two separate categories, namely the Doctor Defendants and Entity Defendants, defined as all non ...
2024.05.20 Motion for Protective Order 642
Location: Orange County
Judge: Fish, Jonathan
Hearing Date: 2024.05.20
Excerpt: ...me speci fied in Section 2031.260 to respond to the set of demands, or to a particular item or category in the set, be extended. (3) That the place of production be other than that specified in the demand. (4) That the inspection, copying, testing, or sampling be m ade only on specified terms and conditions. (5) That a trade secret or other confidential research, development, or commercial information not be disclosed, or be disclosed only to...
2024.05.20 Motion for Attorney Fees 398
Location: Orange County
Judge: Strickroth, Michael J
Hearing Date: 2024.05.20
Excerpt: ...easonably incu rred by the buyer in connection with the commencement and prosecution of such action.” Civil Code, § 1794, subd. (d). Plaintiff seeks $39,055.50 in attorney's fees representing 78.9 hours billed at $495/hour. There is no dispute between the parties that Pl aintiff is entitled to fees and costs/expenses. The issue in dispute is the amount of attorney's fees. Attorney's fees Courts use the lodestar adjustment method to determine t...
2024.05.20 Demurrer 374
Location: Orange County
Judge: Strickroth, Michael J
Hearing Date: 2024.05.20
Excerpt: ...or nonperformance, (3) defendant's breach, and (4) damage to plaintiff therefrom.'” Wall Street Network, Ltd. v. New York Times Co. (2008) 164 Cal.App.4th 1171, 1178. “If the action is based on alleged breach of a written contract, the terms must be set out verbatim in the body of the complaint or a copy of the written agreement must be attached and incorporated by reference.” Harris v. Rudin, Richman & Appel (1999) 74 Cal.App.4th 299, ...
2024.05.20 Motion to Compel Production 755
Location: Orange County
Judge: Fish, Jonathan
Hearing Date: 2024.05.20
Excerpt: ...udice. Plainti ff served a subpoena on the OCSD requesting “[a]ll documents relating to case number 22 -02462 -KI, decedent Griffin Cuomo, including, but not limited to, the death certificate, autopsy photographs, notes, and any audio/video recordings.” (Gorelik Decl., ¶ 3 , Ex. 2.) OCSD has refused to produce responsive documents, due to its ongoing investigation of Ramy Fahim who has been charged with Decedent's murder. OCSD cites Evid. C...
2024.05.17 Motion for Leave to Intervene
Location: Orange County
Judge: Recio, Sheila
Hearing Date: 2024.05.17
Excerpt: ...�� (Code Civ. Proc., § 387(d)(1)(A).) “Section 387, subdivision (d)(1)(A) provides for mandatory intervention … where ‘[a] provision of law confers an unconditional right to intervene,' wholly apart from the nature and character of the non -parties interest in the litigation or the issue of adequacy of representation.” (Accurso v. In- N-Out Burgers (2023) 94 Cal.App.5th 1128, 1136, fn. 9.) Section 708.430 of the Code of Civil Procedure s...
2024.05.17 Demurrer, Motion to Strike
Location: Orange County
Judge: Recio, Sheila
Hearing Date: 2024.05.17
Excerpt: ...iracy). (Code Civ. Proc., § 430.10(e), (f).) 5th C/A (slander of title) – OVERRULED The fifth cause of action for slander of title alleges the following: While they were married, Plaintiff and Defendant ZENGJIAN CHEN (“Chen”) jointly owned certain real property in the City of Irvine as husband and wife. Defendant Ashanti N. Clark (“Clark”) is a notary in Texas. Defendant Worldwide Signings, Inc. (“WWS”) is a notary agency and Defe...
2024.05.17 Demurrer, Motion to Strike
Location: Orange County
Judge: Scott, Nathan
Hearing Date: 2024.05.17
Excerpt: ...ty (2012) 208 C al.App.4th 1125, 1135.) Any “ambiguities can be clarified under modern discovery procedures.” (Ibid.) Standing/Capacity. The FAXC alleges MSO “is, and at all times mentioned herein was, a California corporation existing under the laws of the State of C alifornia.” (FAXC ¶ 4.) A demurrer “admit[s] all material facts properly pleaded,'” including this one. (Blank v. Kirwan (1985) 39 Cal.3d 311, 318.) The court cannot t...
2024.05.17 Demurrer, Motion to Strike 370
Location: Orange County
Judge: Dourbetas, Nico
Hearing Date: 2024.05.17
Excerpt: ...es th at moving parties spend much paper arguing facts outside of the pleadings and/or the merits of plaintiffs' claims. (Demurrer at 17:17 -19:25, 22:14- 24:6.) However, it is well settled that a demurrer can be used only to challenge defects that appear on the face of the pleading, or from matters outside the pleading properly subject to judicial notice (Blank v. Kirwan (1985) 39 Cal.3d 311, 318), and that plaintiffs' allegations must be accept...
2024.05.17 Motion for Approval of PAGA Settlement 828
Location: Orange County
Judge: Sherman, Randall J
Hearing Date: 2024.05.17
Excerpt: ...sel also mus t provide a redlined version of any revised papers, including the proposed letter to the aggrieved employees. Counsel also should provide the court with an explanation of how the pending issues were resolved, with references to any corrections to the sett lement agreement and the proposed letter to the aggrieved employees, rather than with just a supplemental declaration or brief simply asserting that the issues have been resolved. T...
2024.05.17 Motion for Attorney Fees 601
Location: Orange County
Judge: Knill, Kimberly
Hearing Date: 2024.05.17
Excerpt: ...ed at $495/hour . There is no dispute Plaintiff is entitled to fees and costs/expenses. Defendant contends fees sought are excessive. To support the attorney rates claimed, attorney Haddad listed a sample of median hourly rates for attorneys handling consumer law cases i n Los Angeles, Long Beach, and Anaheim that average $506 per hour. (Haddad Decl., ¶ 26.) The list contains no description of the attorney skill or level of experience, or even t...
2024.05.17 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings
Location: Orange County
Judge: Recio, Sheila
Hearing Date: 2024.05.17
Excerpt: ...§ 452(d); Richtek USA, Inc. v. UPI Semiconductor Corp. (2015) 242 Cal.App.4th 651, 658.) Greenhouse first contends that Woolard's claims here are barred based on the doctrines of res judicata and/or collateral estoppel. More specifically, Greenhouse argues that Woolard's claims are barred because of an order granting Greenhouse's summary judgment motion in Smith v. Eric Michael Woolard, Case No. 2020 -01174210 (the “Smith Action”). Courts ...
2024.05.17 Motion to Compel Further Responses
Location: Orange County
Judge: Recio, Sheila
Hearing Date: 2024.05.17
Excerpt: ... ADAMAS motion to c ompel Defendant CHRISTIAN ESPANA (“Espana”) to provide further, verified responses, without objections to Plaintiff's Request for Production of Documents, Set Two, Nos. 19, 20, 21, 24, and 25. Sanctions was not requested. Both Motions: While the motions a re framed as seeking further responses, Plaintiff does not argue that Defendants' responses are deficient. Rather, Plaintiff argues that Defendants, in their responses,...
2024.05.17 Motion for Reconsideration 118
Location: Orange County
Judge: Dourbetas, Nico
Hearing Date: 2024.05.17
Excerpt: ...gland Decl., reading “when Sunyata used the second fraudulent transfer to claim the right to evict us” is SUSTAINED (relevance, improper legal argument). Defendants' remaining evidentiary objections are OVERRULED. The Court lacks jurisdiction to reconsider it s 1-30- 24 order, as a judgment of dismissal has since been entered as to these defendants. (Safeco Ins. Co. of Illinois v. Architectural Facades Unlimited, Inc. (2005) 134 Cal.App.4th 1...
2024.05.17 Motion for Sanctions 539
Location: Orange County
Judge: Claster, William D
Hearing Date: 2024.05.17
Excerpt: ...024 (ROA 66), but not filed until April 25. Turning to the merits, Plaintiffs' complaint repeatedly alleges that they (and other consumers) purchased goods or services from “the ‘cisco.com' webpage operated by Cisco,” which the complaint defines as the “Website.” (See, e.g ., Compl. ¶ 1.) Cisco contends this allegation is frivolous because it is impossible to purchase goods or services from the Website, as defined. “A claim is fac...
2024.05.17 Motion for Summary Judgment 422
Location: Orange County
Judge: Servino, Deborah C
Hearing Date: 2024.05.17
Excerpt: ...e is no triable iss ue of material fact and that he is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” (Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co. (2001) 25 Cal.4th 826, 850.) A “party moving for summary judgment bears an initial burden of production to make a prima facie showing of the non existence of any triable issue of material fact. . . .” (Ibid.) “A prima facie showing is one that is sufficient to support the position of the party in question.�...
2024.05.17 Motion to Compel Arbitration
Location: Orange County
Judge: Recio, Sheila
Hearing Date: 2024.05.17
Excerpt: ...l. file d in related case], ¶ 2.) In the Spring of 2021, Defendant Honarkar sought an infusion of capital into his real estate portfolio. (Id. at ¶ 4.) Plaintiff Makhijani and Defendant Honarkar, through their respective corporate entities, agreed to form a new bu siness venture whereby Plaintiff would contribute capital to three newly formed LLCs, while Defendant Honarkar would contribute his ownership interest in the various entities holding...
2024.05.17 Motion to Compel Further Responses 271
Location: Orange County
Judge: Servino, Deborah C
Hearing Date: 2024.05.17
Excerpt: ...ubd. (a)(1).) If a timely mo tion to compel has been filed, the burden is on the responding party to justify any objection or failure to fully answer the interrogatories. (Fairmont Ins. Co. v. Superior Court (2000) 22 Cal.4th 245, 255.) No. 7 asks for the identity of all individuals who served on ACSR's Quality Assurance Committee for a certain timeperiod. ACSR objects based on Evidence Code section 1157. Subject to certain exceptions, the “pr...
2024.05.17 Motion to Compel Production of Docs 749
Location: Orange County
Judge: Servino, Deborah C
Hearing Date: 2024.05.17
Excerpt: ...2031.300, subd. ( b).) By failing to serve timely responses, the party to whom the demand is directed waives “any objection to the demand, including one based on privilege or on the protection for work product under Chapter 4 (commencing with Section 2018.010).” (Code Civ. Proc., § 2031.300, subd. (a).) Merits On September 15, 2023, Plaintiff served first sets of request for production of documents directed to Defendants March, Asante -Bayr...
2024.05.17 Motion to Strike FAC 062
Location: Orange County
Judge: Servino, Deborah C
Hearing Date: 2024.05.17
Excerpt: ...aws of this state, a court rule, or an order of the court. “The grounds for a motion to strike shall appear on the face of the challenged pleading or from any matter of which the court is required to take judicial notice.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 437, subd. (a).) “[J]udges re ad allegations of a pleading subject to a motion to strike as a whole, all parts in their context, and assume their truth.” (Clauson v. Superior Court (1998) 67 Cal.App...
2024.05.17 Demurrer to Complaint 982
Location: Orange County
Judge: Knill, Kimberly
Hearing Date: 2024.05.17
Excerpt: ...pled. (¶¶ 1 -49.) Additional facts can be sought through discovery. Fifth Cause of Action for Fraudulent Inducement – Intentional Concealment Defendant challenges the fraudulent inducement by concealment cause of action on grounds it fails to plead the requisite transac tion Civil Code section 1793.2(a) provides: “Every manufacturer of consumer goods sold in this state and for which the manufacturer has made an express warranty shall: . . ....

15917 Results

Per page

Pages