Excerpt: ...ful disobedience." (Conn v. Superior Court (1987) 196 Cal.App.3d 774, 784.) A contempt proceeding is commenced by the filing of an affidavit showing the facts satisfying these four requirements (the "charging allegations"). (Code Civ. Proc., S 1211.) The affidavit frames the issues to be tried. (Reliable Enterprises, Inc. v. Superior Court (1984) 158 Cal.App.3d 604, 616.) The filing of a sufficient affidavit is a "jurisdictional prerequisite" to ...

Excerpt: ...nperformance, (3) defendant's breach, and (4) the resulting damages to plaintiff." (Coles v. Glaser (2015) 2 Cal.App.5th 384, 391.) Plaintiffs allege that the parties entered into a series of contracts: In 2015, Plaintiffs and Defendants entered into a series of contracts related to the opening of a potential Weinerschnitzel franchise including: (1) Advertising Association Agreement, (2) Franchise Agreement, (3) Addendum to the Franchise Agreemen...

Excerpt: ...erein) or from matters outside the pleading which are judicially noticeable under Evidence Code sections 451 or 452. Although California courts take a liberal view of inartfully drawn complaints, it remains essential that a complaint set forth the actionable facts relied upon with sufficient precision to inform the defendant of what plaintiff is complaining, and what remedies are being sought. (Leek v. Cooper (2011) 194 Cal.App.4th 399, 413.) On ...

Excerpt: ...07, 813 [statute requires payment of only those costs and fees that were reasonably incurred].) "[Tlhe Legislature intended the word 'expenses' to cover items not included in the detailed statutory definition of 'costs.'" "Expenses" may "cover such out-of-pocket expenses as filing fees, expert witness fees, marshall's fees, etc., [which] should open the litigation process to everyone." (Jensen v. BMW of North America, Inc. (1995) 35 Cal.App.4th 1...

Excerpt: ...ries on the grounds that the answer is evasive or incomplete. (Code Civ. Proc., S 2030.3W, subd. If a timely motion to compel has been filed, the burden is on the responding party to justify any objection or failure to fully answer the interrogatories. (Fairmont Ins. Co. v. Superior Court (2ff)O) 22 Cal.4th 245, 255.) No. 4 This interrogatory seeks the number of residents who developed sepsis and/or septic shtNk while residing at the facility fro...

Excerpt: ...is required to set the matter for trial within 120 days. Civ. Proc., S 35, subds. (a), "An affidavit submitted in support of a motion for preference under subdivision (a) of Section 36 may be signed by the attorney for the party seeking preference based upon information and belief as to the medical diagnosis and prognosis of any party. The affidavit is not admissible for any purpose other than a motion for preference under subdivision (a) of Sect...

Excerpt: ...ions do not comply with California Rules of Court, rule 3.1354(b) which provides that written objections to evidence must "[i]dentify the name of the document in which the specific material objected to is located," "[state] the exhibit, title, page and line number of the material objected to," and "[qluote or set forth the objectionable statement or material." Plaintiff objects to portions of Defendants' undisputed material facts in their separat...

Excerpt: ...ditional evidentiary matter with the reply should only be allowed in the exceptional case . . . ' and if permitted, the other party should be given the opportunity to respond.” (Jay v. Mahaffey (2013) 218 Cal.App.4th 1522, 1537-1538.) Reply evidence should not address substantive issues in the first instance but only fill gaps in the evidence created by opposition. (Id. at p. 1538.) Here, the court exercises its discretion and declines to consi...

Excerpt: ...Civil Procedure section 2031.310,subdivision (b)(1). To establish “good cause,” the burden is on the moving party to show both: (1) relevance to the subject matter (e.g., how the information in the document would tend to prove or disprove some issue in the case); and (2) specific facts justifying discovery (e.g., why such information is necessary for trial preparation or to prevent surprise at trial). (Glenfed Develop. Corp. v. Superior Court...

Excerpt: ...n employer who drafts an arbitration agreement does not pay its share of required fees or costs to initiate arbitration within 30 days after they are due, the employer is in “material breach” of the agreement, in default of the arbitration, and waives it right to compel arbitration. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1281.97, subd. (a).) In the event of that material breach by the employer, the employee can elect to withdraw her claim from arbitration and ...

Excerpt: ... (4) requests for admissions, set one, nos. 1-54, and 56-58. Separate Statements As noted in this July 21, 2023 rulings, co-Defendant HCI Systems, Inc.'s separate statements fail to comply with California Rules of Court, rule 3.1345. The separate statement is to be “a separate document filed and served with the discovery motion . . .” (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1345(c) [emphasis added].) Here, Defendant's separate statements have the same d...

Excerpt: ... consider this document to be the ordered Second Amended Complaint ("SAC"). This document was sent by express mail to defense counsel on May 3, 2023. (ROA 80, last page.) Plaintiff makes a vague reference to having sent defense counsel a "correction using U.S. Mail Express". ("Plaintiff's Response to Defendant's Motion and Motion to Strike Portions of Plaintiff's Second Amendments to First Complaint" [ROA 97].) Defendant's demurrer to SAC and mot...

Excerpt: ...hi (2008) 158 Cal.App.4th 1120, 1126.) The challenge is limited to the “four corners” of the pleading (which includes exhibits attached and incorporated therein) or from matters outside the pleading which are judicially noticeable under Evidence Code sections 451 or 452. Although California courts take a liberal view of inartfully drawn complaints, it remains essential that a complaint set forth the actionable facts relied upon with sufficien...

Excerpt: ...titions to correct arbitration award, are denied. Procedural Issues The court treats Tear Drip's second petition to correct arbitration award (ROA 126) as a response to Oakshire's petition to confirm award. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1285.2.) The court notes that both sides failed to file timely responses. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1290.6 [response shall be served and filed within 10 days after service of the petition]; see Law Finance Group, LLC v. Key (20...

Excerpt: ...equests at issue. (See ROA 53, 55, 57, 64, 68.) For all of the motions at issue, Defendant's separate statements also failed to include the text of Plaintiffs' initial responses and thus failed to comply with California Rules of Court, rule 3.1345. Rule 3.1345(c)(2) requires the separate statement to include the text of each response, answer, or objection, and any further responses or answers. The separate statement is supposed to provide all the...

Excerpt: ...urt may: (a) Strike out any irrelevant, false, or improper matter inserted in any pleading. (b) Strike out all or any part of any pleading not drawn or filed in conformity with the laws of this state, a court rule, or an order of the court. “The grounds for a motion to strike shall appear on the face of the challenged pleading or from any matter of which the court is required to take judicial notice.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 437, subd. (a).) “...

Excerpt: ...t information for the court to determine when the 45-day period expired. Specifically, the court was not provided with the method of service of GM's verification. Depending on the method of service, it is possible that the motion was timely filed on July 5, 2023. Merits On receipt of the response to a document demand, the demanding party may move to compel a further response if any of the following apply: (1) a statement of compliance is incomple...

Excerpt: ...o nos. 1 and 3. Defendant filed a reply declaration of Mark Kimball in support of its reply. “The general rule of motion practice . . . is that new evidence is not permitted with reply papers . . . ‘[T]he inclusion of additional evidentiary matter with the reply should only be allowed in the exceptional case . . . ' and if permitted, the other party should be given the opportunity to respond.” (Jay v. Mahaffey (2013) 218 Cal.App.4th 1522, 1...

Excerpt: ...cessor in interest to The Bank of New York, National Association, as Trustee f/b/o holders of Structured Asset Mortgage Investments II Inc., Bear Stearns ALT-A Trust 2005-10, Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2005-10) (collectively, “Moving Parties”) demur, and in the alternative, move for judgment on the pleadings, to the sixth cause of action for violation of Business and Professions section 17200 on the ground that Plaintiff Ariel...

Excerpt: ...agraph 9 and Exhibit 3 Abdullah's objections to Joseph Dib's declaration:  Sustained: Paragraphs 6-31 and Exhibits A-C  Overruled: Paragraph 4 Abdullah's objections to Monica Dib's declaration:  Sustained: Paragraphs 6-9, 11-14 and Exhibits 2-3  Overruled: Paragraph 10 and Exhibits 1-4 Merits California courts “may exercise jurisdiction on any basis not inconsistent with the Constitution of this state or of the United States.” (Co...

Excerpt: ...osition subpoenas on Pan's insurance company. Yassa sought testimony from State Farm's custodian of records and person most knowledge authenticating two letters he had received from State Farm and describing facts and conclusions supporting the latter. (Meunch Decl., Exhs. A and B.) Applicable Law Any party to the action or the witness may bring a motion to quash a subpoena and may request the court to quash it entirely, modify it, or direct comp...

Excerpt: ...1.) “Where a complaint is based on a written contract which is set out in full, a general demurrer to the complaint admits not only the contents of the instrument but also any pleaded meaning to which the instrument is reasonably susceptible.” (Aragon-Haas v. Family Security Ins. Services, Inc. (1991) 231 Cal.App.3d 232, 239.) The Employment Protection Agreement stated in its recitals that it was only “intended to impose obligations on the ...

Excerpt: ...e nonparty deponent unless the nonparty deponent agrees to accept service by mail or electronic service at an address or electronic service address specified on the deposition record.” (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1346.) Michael Bakkers did not show that the notice or moving papers were properly served on nonparty Nigel Burns. (See Proof of Electronic Service and Overnight Mail [ROA 305].) Accordingly, the unopposed motion is denied. MOTION TO ...

Excerpt: ...howing good cause justifying the discovery sought by the inspection demand pursuant to Code Civ. Proc., § 2031.310, subd. (b)(1).) To establish good cause, the burden is on the moving party to show both: (1) relevance to the subject matter (e.g., how the information in the document would tend to prove or disprove some issue in the case); and (2) specific facts justifying discovery (e.g., why such information is necessary for trial preparation or...

Excerpt: ...buyer in connection with the commencement and prosecution of such action.” Defendant General Motors, LLC does not dispute that Plaintiff is the prevailing parties under the Song- Beverly Act, as reflected in their settlement agreement. Plaintiff's right to seek an award of attorney fees and costs is a term of the settlement agreement. (See Barry Decl., Exh. 7, at p. 2 of 5.) To recover attorney's fees, a prevailing party bears the burden of dem...