Excerpt: ...dgment on the plea dings with respect to the Second Amended Complaint (SAC) filed by Plaintiff Jane Doe 7030. Standard for Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings A defendant may make a motion for judgment on the pleadings on the ground that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against that defendant. (Code Civ. Proc., § 438, subd. (c)(1)(B)(ii); Stevenson Real Estate Servs., Inc. v. CB Richard Ellis Real E...

Excerpt: ...d until nea rly 9:00 p.m. on April 8, 2024 —i.e., nearly a week late and after the close of business on the same day Smith's reply was due. Plaintiff provides no explanation or justification for failing to timely serve the opposition, and the late filing of the opposi tion has deprived Smith of its opportunity to file anything more than an untimely, truncated opposition. The court therefore exercises it discretion to refuse to consider the o...

Excerpt: ...h violation, in addition to any other penalty established by law (H&S Code §25249.7(b)(1)). These violations may be enforced by, inter alia, persons in the public interest. (H&S Code §25249.7(c) -(d).) If there is a settlement of an action brought by a person in the pub lic interest, the plaintiff shall submit the settlement to the court for approval upon noticed motion, and the court may approve the settlement only if the court makes all of th...

Excerpt: ...e demurrers a re virtually identical and assert the same challenges to the FAC. As such, the demurrers will be addressed together with any significant distinctions highlighted. Defendants' challenge both the first cause of action for medical negligence and the second c ause of action for fraud on the ground “[Defendants are] . . improper doe defendant[s]. (Code of Civil Procedure section 474.)” (Demurrers, p. 3, lines 5, 9.) Whether a defen...

Excerpt: ...e Amended Complaint of Plaintiff, Randell Young is CONTINUED to May 13, 2024, at 8:30 a.m. in Department N15. Defendants Seabreeze Management Company, Inc.; Estela Alday; Heidi Speare; Eric James; Fred Olsen; and Todd Hunter are ORDERED to serve all demurrer and mo tion to strike moving papers and reply papers upon Plaintiff Randell Young properly by mail service on or before April 16, 2024, and file a proof of service on or before April 19, 202...

Excerpt: ...the sixth ca use of action, the court finds that Plaintiff has alleged a special relationship that supports a cause of action for constructive trust. Further, that cause of action is not barred by the statute of limitations as Code Civ. Proc. §340.1 applies rather than Code Civ. Proc. § 338. Accordingly, the demurrer to that cause of action is overruled. On the seventh cause of action for breach of fiduciary duty, the court finds that Plaint...

Excerpt: ...pp.4th 1451, 1479.) The 2ndAC omits breach of fiduciary duty claims premised on fraud. Thus, the 2ndAC does not “clearly and affirmatively” show that the claim is barred by the statute of limitations based upon the dates alleged and is therefore not subject to demurrer. (See Marshall v. Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher (1995) 37 Cal.App.4th 1397, 1403.) Burtin raises additional new arguments in his Reply attempting to show that the first cause of ac...

Excerpt: ... to amend. “To establish a prima facie case of harassment, [Plaintiff] must show that: (1) she is a member of a protected class; (2) she was subjected to unwelcome harassment; (3) the harassment was based on her protected status; (4) the harassment unreasonably interfered with her w ork performance by creating an intimidating, hostile, or offensive work environment; and (5) defendants are liable for the harassment.” Galvan v. Dameron Hospital...

Excerpt: ...blic funds and , thus, does not eliminate the claim presentation requirement. Meet and Confer The Court finds Defendants adequately attempted to meet and confer with Plaintiff. Legal Standard “The party against whom a complaint or crosscomplaint has been filed may obje ct, by demurrer or answer as provided in Section 430.30, to the pleading on any one or more of the following grounds … [¶] The pleading does not state facts sufficient to co...

Excerpt: ...tiffs”), filed a Complaint against Defendants IVY Cottages, Inc. and Carmen Rodriguez (“Defendants”). (ROA 2.) The Complaint alleges 14 causes of action for: 1. Failure to Pay All Wages Earned; 2. Failure to Provide Rest Breaks; 3. Failure to Provide Meal Periods; 4. Failu re to Indemnify; 5. Failure to Provide Accurate Wage Statements; 6. Failure to Pay Wages Owed Every Pay Period; 7. Failure to Pay Wages When Employment Ends; 8. PAGA Pen...

Excerpt: ...dgment on the plea dings with respect to the Second Amended Complaint (SAC) filed by Plaintiff Jane Doe 7030. Standard for Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings A defendant may make a motion for judgment on the pleadings on the ground that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against that defendant. (Code Civ. Proc., § 438, subd. (c)(1)(B)(ii); Stevenson Real Estate Servs., Inc. v. CB Richard Ellis Real E...

Excerpt: ...2 agains t the subject property, 2. the Statement of Information filed on 12/20/22 by Canyon Plaza, LLC, 3. the Statement of Information filed on 12/20/2022 by Canyon Plaza Management, LLC, and 4. the Statement of Information filed on 1/20/23 by Jakosky Properti es, Inc. The court GRANTS the request to take judicial notice of the Grant Deed (Exhibit 1). (Evid. Code § 452(h).) The court however DENIES the request for judicial notice as to the ...

Excerpt: ...use of action. The 2nd cause of action premises negligence on a breach of statutory duties: The CARES Act, the FFCRA, and Health & Safety Code section 1342.2. (See FAC ¶ 118.) The 9th cause of action alleges a violation of Section 1342.2 But “the CARES Act do es not grant a private right of action to a provider of COVID -19 diagnostic testing to enforce § 3202.” (Saloojas, Inc. v. Aetna Health of California, Inc. (9th Cir. 2023) 80 F.4th 10...

Excerpt: ...onte ntion that it is entitled to insurance coverage for a judgment in an underlying action.” (Dem. at pp. 1 -2.) But defendant has not shown “two exclusions in the insurance policy issued by ANV apply to exclude coverage for Plaintiffs' claim.” (Dem. at p. 1 .) First, the Bankruptcy Exclusion does not bar coverage because it is unenforceable. The Bankruptcy Exclusion purports to exclude coverage for any claim involving “any Wrongful Act ...

Excerpt: ...ntity Plaintiffs argue that the court should not consider the demurrer and the motion to strike because they named K & A Kingdom Holdings, LLC, but K & A Kingdom Holding, Inc. filed the demurrer and motion to strike. However, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 4 73, Defendant submitted a proposed amendment to pleadings noting that the "Inc." shown on its pleadings was in error and asking that its pleadings be amended to reflect...

Excerpt: ... elements of a c ause of action for intentional interference with prospective economic advantage are: “‘“(1) an economic relationship between the plaintiff and some third party, with the probability of future economic benefit to the plaintiff; (2) the defendant's knowledge of the relationship; (3) intentional acts on the part of the defendant designed to disrupt the relationship; (4) actual disruption of the relationship; and (5) economic ...

Excerpt: ...upon a clea r and convincing showing that a defendant is guilty of oppression, fraud or malice. A court order is required to obtain discovery of a defendant's financial condition in actions seeking punitive damages. (Civ. Code, § 3295, subd. (c).) Before a court m ay enter an order permitting discovery of a defendant's financial condition, it must (1) weigh the evidence submitted in favor of and in opposition to motion for discovery and (2) ma...

Excerpt: .... Univ ersity of San Francisco (2024) 100 Cal.App.5th 75 should inform its analysis. In their supplement, “Plaintiffs recognize Berlanga's persuasive force on this Court” and concede that “their arguments may, ultimately, may need to be decided in this District's appellate court.” (ROA 369 at p. 3.) To be clear, Berlanga is not merely persuasive authority in this Court, it is binding. (See Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior Court (1962) ...

Excerpt: ...ional mis representation), 3rd cause of action (Bus. & Prof. Code 17200 violation), 4th cause of action (promissory estoppel), 5th cause of action (“set aside trustee's sale and void/cancel trustee's deed upon sale”), and 6th cause of action (quiet title). 2nd C/A (intentional misrepresentation) A cause of action for intentional misrepresentation requires showing (1) a misrepresentation; (2) knowledge of its falsity; (3) intent to induce reli...

Excerpt: ...mpt at an informal resolution of each issue presented by the motion .”]; Clement v. Alegre (2009) 177 Cal.App.4th 1277, 1293- 1294; Leko v. Cornerstone Building Inspection Services (2001) 86 Cal.App.4th 1109, 1124; see also Thomas Decl., ¶ 6, Exh. D [addressing Defendant's objections on 2/12/24].) Defendant maintains that it is willing to produce a witness as to Matters for Examination Nos. 1 and 2, but objects to Matters Nos. 3 and 4 on vario...

Excerpt: ... reason able particularity subject to any orders that may be appropriate under Section 3426.5 of the Civil Code.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 2019.210.) Plaintiff has failed to demonstrate compliance with this requirement. Contrary to plaintiff's contentions, the first amended complaint (FAC) does not identify the subject trade secret with reasonable particularity. (See Code Civ. Proc., § 2019.210; Perlan Therapeutics, Inc. v. Superior Court (2009) ...

Excerpt: ...must follow the cor rect rules of procedure. (See Rappleyea v. Campbell (1994) 8 Cal.4th 975, 984 -985; Nwosu v. Uba (2004) 122 Cal.App.4th 1229, 1246 -1247). A self -represented litigant is not entitled to any greater consideration than other litigants and attorneys. (See Petr osyan v. Prince Corp. (2013) 223 Cal.App.4th 587, 594 [self -represented litigants are entitled to same treatment as represented parties].) The fact that Defendant is a se...

Excerpt: ...vice of the Complai nt as the Complaint was served on the City on June 15, 2023. Plaintiff does not dispute this assertion in the points and authorities. “The special motion may be filed within 60 days of the service of the complaint or, in the court's discretion, at any la ter time upon terms it deems proper.” (Code Civ. Proc. § 425.16(f).) “In other words, the defendant is only entitled to ‘file[]' such a motion within 60 days of ser...

Excerpt: ...f Court. Movants shall prepare the appropriate order for the court's signature. Demurrer Defendants filed a demurrer to the first amended complaint. The action concerns an alleged breach of an agreement and the unauthorized use of confidential information. Th ere is a choice of law provision in the agreement which states it is to be construed pursuant to New York law. Defendants also suggest that at least one key issue may likely have to be de...

Excerpt: ...e motions t o compel deposition testimony of Ritesh Desai and Dawn Mills are GRANTED but the concurrent motions to compel production of documents are DENIED. MOTIONS TO COMPEL DEPOSITIONS OF VAN ALSTINE, GOMEZ AND CHAMBERLAIN CCP §2025.280 states: “(a) The service of a deposition notice under Section 2025.240 is effective to require any deponent who is a party to the action or an officer, director, managing agent, or employee of a party to att...