Excerpt: ...e motion is GRANTE D as to the request to vacate the current preliminary injunction. The motion is DENIED as to the request for a new preliminary injunction. As discussed below, this matter involves members of the Rhee family: decedent Henry Rhee, his wife Grace Rhee, their sons Thomas and Brian Rhee, and Thomas's wife Judy Ren. The Court refers to these persons by their first names for clarity. No disrespect is intended. EVIDENTIARY MATTERS I. ...

Excerpt: ...imite d insurance coverage to protect against uninsured drivers or driver's whose insurance is insufficient to pay for the injuries or damage caused. Ins. Code, § 11580.2 Insurance protecting against a vehicle with no liability insurance is called “uninsured mot orist” (UM) coverage, and insurance protecting against a vehicle with limited liability insurance coverage is called “underinsured motorist” (UIM) coverage. Recovery under UM...

Excerpt: ... the subject incident g iving rise to this complaint.” (FAC, EX-2 of Exemplary Damages Attachment.) Defendant was so impaired that he had “red/watery eyes, dilated pupils, slow lethargic speech, and difficulty concentrating” when being interviewed by the investigating Officer and failed the sobriety test. (Id.) “Defendant Topps knew from the onset that he must and would subsequently operate or control his vehicle on the public roads and t...

Excerpt: ...rder and orde r for issuance of a Writ of Attachment (“Application”) against defendant Arunpal Sehgal, M.D. (“Defendant”) are GRANTED in the following amounts: Reliant Management Group, LLC's Application is GRANTED in the reduced amount of $100,000; and Riverside Postac ute Care, LLC's Application is GRANTED in the reduced amount of $103,132.88. Plaintiff is ordered to post an undertaking of $10,000. “Under Code of Civil Procedure secti...

Excerpt: ...er v. AT&T Mobilit y, LLC (2011) 196 Cal.App.4th 1545, 1556 [elements] The FAC states facts sufficient to state a cause of action for Negligent Repair See Berkley v. Dowds (2007) 152 Cal.App.4th 518, 527 [Negligence may be alleged in general terms].) The FAC states facts sufficient to state a cause of action for Violation of the UCC (Defendants failed to identify any defects with the pleading of this cause of action). The omission of the allegati...

Excerpt: ...ffs filed an opposition to Defendants' Request to take Judicial Notice of documents apparently related to the prelitigation complaints made by plaintiffs to defendants. (See ROAs 76, 95.) At the same time, Plaintiffs state that “judicial notice is unnecessary if the se are the documents attached to Plaintiff's SAC already filed with the court.” Copies of the same documents are in fact attached to the SAC and were previously judicially notic...

Excerpt: ...“Hirson” an d crossdefendants as “Korpivaara.” Defect/misjoinder of parties. Korpivaara has not shown Niral Patel is an indispensable party. “An agent is not an indispensable party in litigation between his principal and a third party over the subject matter of the a g e n c y .” (Writers Guild of America, West, Inc. v. Screen Gems, Inc. (1969) 274 Cal.App.2d 367, 374.) 1st cause of action, declaratory judgment -partner disassociation...

Excerpt: ...gent m isrepresentation. The FAC fails to state facts sufficient to constitute these causes of action. (See Lazar v. Superior Court (1996) 12 Cal.4th 631, 638, 645 [fraud elements]; Nissan Motor Acceptance Cases (2021) 63 Cal.App.5th 793, 823 [negligent misrepre sentation elements].) The residential purchased agreement (RPA) attached as exhibit A to the FAC shows that at the time defendants made the subject “misrepresentations” on 6/1/22 (FAC...

Excerpt: ...s no defense to a ca use of action if that party has proved each element of the cause of action entitling the party to judgment on the cause of action. Once the plaintiff . . . has met that burden, the burden shifts to the defendant . . . to show that a triable issue of one or more material facts exists as to the cause of action or a defense thereto. The defendant . . . shall not rely upon the allegations or denials of its pleadings to show that ...

Excerpt: ...t all times men tioned, each of DEFENDANTS, except as otherwise alleged or contended, are and have been the partners, joint venturers, alter egos, and/or co -conspirators of each other.” (Compl. ¶ 12.) Further, Plaintiff alleged that “DEFENDANTS were “employers” within the meaning of Government Code section 12926(d) . . . .” (Compl. ¶ 8.) Although not initially raised in the MSA, Defendants now claim that Cedar Mountain and not Madiso...

Excerpt: ...oving party in fact served the instant motion and supporting papers more than 21 days prior to filing them. (Code Civ. Proc., §§ 128.5, subd. (f)(1)(B), 128.7, subd. (c)(1); Smith, Smith & Kring v. Superior Court (1997) 60 Cal.App.4th 573, 577 -578 [statements in brie fs are argument, not evidence]; Hart v. Avetoom (2002) 95 Cal.App.4th 410, 413 -415 [motion initially served must be the same as the one eventually filed]; Galleria Plus, Inc. v...

Excerpt: ...2024 at 9:0 0 a.m. The parties must file a Joint Status Report at least a week before the hearing, and may request a continuance if arbitration is not yet complete. The court concludes that there exists a valid agreement to arbitrate the individual claims asserted b y plaintiff in his Tenth Cause of Action for Violation of California Business & Professions Code §§17200, et seq. and that no grounds exist to bar enforcement of the agreement. CCP...

Excerpt: ...arty may move for an order compelling responses to interrogatories at any time “[i]f a party to whom interrogatories are directed fails to serve a timely response.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 2030.290, subd. (b).) By failing to serve timely responses, Plaintiffs waived “any r ight to exercise the option to produce writings under Section 2030.230, as well as any objection to the interrogatories, including one based on privilege or on the protectio...

Excerpt: ...nspection of the judgment -roll, i.e., the face of the record as opposed to extrinsic evidence. (Trackman v. Kenney (2010) 187 Cal. App. 4th 175, 181.) This distinction may impact the procedural mechanism available to attack the judgment or order, when the judgment or order may be attacked, and how the party challenging the judgment or order proves that the judgment is void. (Pittman v. Beck Park Apartments Ltd. (2018) 20 Cal. App. 5th 1009, 1020...

Excerpt: ...d system” conducted by local bar associations (as opposed to private alternative dispute resolution providers) and has its own rules and limitations. (See Aguilar v. Lerner (2004) 32 Cal.4th 974, 984; Greenberg Glusker Fields Claman & Machtinger LLP v. Rosenson (2012) 203 Cal.App.4th 688, 693 [Legislature created MFAA as “separate and distinct arbitration scheme applicable to disputes between clients and attorneys over legal fees, costs, or b...

Excerpt: ...3310(E)) pro vides in relevant part, (a) A lawyer who has formerly represented a client in a matter shall not thereafter represent another person* in the same or a substantially related matter in which that person's* interests are materially adverse to the interests o f the former client unless the former client gives informed written consent. (b) A lawyer shall not knowingly represent a person in the same or a substantially related matter in whi...

Excerpt: ...oanCare's Evidence should be OVERRULED. DMI moves on the grounds that during the Phase 1 of trial “LoanCare testified that it has no accounting records and for that reason, Judge Schwarm did not order LoanCare to account.” (Notice, 2:5 -7.) Specifically, during the Phase 1 of trial, DMI sought to compel an accounting against LoanCare based on its second cause of action for Accounting alleged in it Cross -Complaint filed on 2 -25 -21. (Penn...

Excerpt: ... sustained. Evidentiary object ions nos. 4 through 6 are overruled. Evidence Submitted With Reply The court exercises its discretion to consider the evidence submitted with Plaintiffs' reply. Andry may address the evidence during the hearing. (Jay v. Mahaffey (2013) 218 Cal.App.4th 1522, 1537 -1538.) Merits Plaintiffs served Andry with a notice of taking a remote deposition and requests for production of documents at deposition. The notice li...

Excerpt: ...nterroga tories 42-45, 58 -61, 74 -77, and 89, which generally seek (1) the contact information of three students who allegedly assaulted Plaintiff and (2) the names and contact information of “Students E -M,” who were thirdparty witnesses to the alleged incident(s). The Court grants the motion as to the first category of information but denies the motion without prejudice as to the second category. Code of Civil Procedure section 2017.010 s...

Excerpt: ...tober 24 , 2024 at 9:00 a.m. The parties must file a Joint Status Report at least a week before the hearing, and may request a continuance if arbitration is not yet complete. The court concludes that there exists a valid agreement to arbitrate the individual clai ms asserted by plaintiff and that no grounds exist to bar enforcement of the agreement. CCP §1281.2. Defendant has shown the existence of a signed arbitration agreement dated November ...

Excerpt: ...smiss that case? If so, when? If not, how do the parties propose to resolve that case? 2. The amount of attorneys' fees requested exceeds the “not to exceed” amount approved in the court's a. Counsel's information should be removed from the caption page; b. The caption and other references in the proposed order and judgment to the “class action settlement” should be revised to state “class action and PAGA settlement”; c. The proposed ...

Excerpt: ...he demurrer is S USTAINED as to the second cause of action for medical malpractice. In ruling on a demurrer, a court must accept as true all allegations of fact contained in the complaint. (Blank v. Kirwan (1985) 39 Cal.3d 311, 318.) A demurrer challenges only the legal s ufficiency of the affected pleading, not the truth of the factual allegations in the pleading or the pleader's ability to prove those allegations. (Cundiff v. GTE Cal., Inc. (20...

Excerpt: ...fact the operativ e complaint is the First Amended Complaint. The court also notes that Plaintiff filed two identical oppositions to the Demurrer. In the notice of motion, Defendant argues that Plaintiff lacks standing to bring the action. Defendant also argues that the complaint is uncertain because Plaintiff failed to allege whether the actions are brought on Plaintiff's behalf or on the corporation's behalf and, to the extent that they were b...

Excerpt: ...o his Request for Production of Documents, Set One, is GRANTED. Defendant is ordered to serve further verified responses within 30 days of Plaintiff providing notice of the Court's ruling. The Court denies both parties' requests for monetary sanctions. Demurrer Defe ndant demurs to the sixth cause of action for Whistleblower Violations. Defendant's Demurrer is overruled. “An employer, or any person acting on behalf of the employer, shall not r...

Excerpt: ...hin 15 days. Demurrer Movin g Defendants demur to the fifth and sixth causes of action in the complaint on the ground said causes of action fail to state a claim and are uncertain. “In reviewing the sufficiency of a complaint against a general demurrer, we are guided by long -settle d rules. ‘We treat the demurrer as admitting all material facts properly pleaded, but not contentions, deductions or conclusions of fact or law. [Citation.] We a...

Excerpt: ...nBerg (together , the “Driver Defendants”) also demur to Lyft's complaint. For the following reasons, the demurrers are sustained without leave to amend. Background On August 1, 2022 Cal/OSHA issued three citations to Lyft alleging that Lyft failed to establish, impleme nt and maintain an Injury Illness and Prevention Program and written COVID -19 Prevention Program, and failed to maintain records. Complaint (ROA 2) ¶ 33; State Defendants' R...

Excerpt: ...ealth (together, the “State Defendants”), demur to plaintiffs Uber Technologies, Inc., Uber USA, LLC, Rasier -CA, LLC, Rasier, LLC and Portier, LLC's complaint. Defendants LaShon Hicks, James Jordan, Roberto Moreno and Karen VanDenBerg (together, the “Driver Defendants”) also demur to plaintiffs' complaint. For the following reasons, the demurrers are sustained without leave to amend. Background 5 6 implement and maintain an Injury Illnes...

Excerpt: ...dar days to the notice requirement. (Cal Civ. Proc. Code § 1005(b).) As such, Plaintiff was required to serve her motion on March 21, 2024. Having served her motion for a continuance on April 8, 2024, Plaintiff failed to give defendants the requisite notice. Furt her, the court finds that Plaintiff has not offered sufficient evidence to substantiate a six -month continuance. While her LMFT therapist states that “it might be beneficial to cur...

Excerpt: ...tiary objections to the De claration of Robert Dale Beaver are OVERRULED. Plaintiff's request for judicial notice of Orange County Ordinance 2183 and the Court's 04 -0722 minute order is GRANTED. (Evid. Code, § 452(b), (d).) Steven and Robert purchased the Pine Place property in 1 988 as joint tenants. Steven subsequently moved out in 1989 or 1990. Robert claims that in 1992, he and Steven agreed that Steven would grant Robert his entire interes...

Excerpt: ... the weight and credibility of these matters, and rules as follows: Plaintiff Pure Dermatology's motion for preliminary injunction is denied. “A trial court may grant a preliminary injunction upon a showing that (1) the party seeking the injunction is likely to preva il on the merits at trial, and (2) the ‘interim harm' to that party if an injunction is denied is greater than ‘the [interim] harm the [opposing party] is likely to suffer if t...

Excerpt: ...ly found tha t defendant Cutler is subject to the Page 5 of 21 Court's personal jurisdiction in its November 17, 2023 Minute Order and that Defendant has not met his burden for reconsideration. A motion for reconsideration must be filed within 10 days of service of n otice of entry of the order in question. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1008(a).) However, “the trial court retains the inherent authority to change its decision at any time prior to the en...

Excerpt: ...ust be such that the mo ving party could not, with reasonable diligence, have discovered or produced it at the trial.” (New York Times Co. v. Sup.Ct. (Wall St. Network, Ltd.) (2005) 135 Cal.App.4th 206, 212 -213.) The party seeking reconsideration must also provide a satisfactory explanation for failing to present the information at the first hearing; i.e., a showing of reasonable diligence. (Garcia v. Hejmadi (1997) 58 Cal.App.4th 674, 690; C...

Excerpt: ...party desiri ng to obtain discovery by a second physical examination or mental examination must obtain leave of court. (Code Civ. Proc., § 2032.310(a).) The motion must be accompanied by a meet and confer declaration. (Code Civ. Proc., § 2032.310(b).) The Court “shal l” grant the motion only upon a showing of good cause. (Code Civ. Proc. §2032.320(a).) The within action arises from an auto accident that occurred on 8/20/20. The complaint w...

Excerpt: ...re, the motion is d enied, without prejudice, for the same reasons as set forth in the Court's March 7, 2024 and March 28, 2024 Minute Orders on Defendants' motion to deem the truth of the matters in Request for Admissions, Set One, admitted and motion to compel responses to Demand for Production of Documents, Set One. (See ROAs 90 and 94.) On June 21, 2023, Defendants served written discovery by mail on Plaintiff, including the instant Form Inte...

Excerpt: ...ntiff's Motion to Compel further Deposition of HMA's Person Most Knowledgeable: a. Paragraph 4 – 1:19, 20 – 3:6 b. Paragraph 5 – 3:7 -8 c. Paragraph 6 – 3:9 -10 d. Exhibit P e. Exhibit Q 3. ROA# 488, Plaintiff's Amended Motion for Terminating Sanctions or Alternatively, f or Issue and/or Evidentiary Sanctions a. Page 1:15 -16, 19 -27 b. Page 2:2 -8 c. Page 2, fn. 3 d. Page 6, 13 -14, 16 -24, 26 -28 e. Page 7: 1 -2 4. ROA# 486, Amended Dec...

Excerpt: ...int that con tinues to include these two causes of action. It again alleges these causes are against “all” defendants. The striking of these causes of action may not be the most efficient remedy here. The motion to strike is DENIED without prejudice. Demurrer to Se cond Amended Complaint (Champion) Defendant Champion Construction Services, Inc., filed a demurrer to the second amended complaint. The demurrer is SUSTAINED without leave as to t...

Excerpt: ...sponded 7/26/2023. Pl aintiff filed Page 7 of 21 this Motion to Compel Further Responses to RPDS on 8/23/2023. The Court notes that in recent years, an astounding number of cases have been filed against Defendant Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. in OCSC. These cases involve a tremendous amount of time and resources for the Court, its staff, and research attorneys. For example, in this case, Plaintiff's motion includes a 195 page separate state...

Excerpt: ... forms part of the defendants' back yard wall. The plaintiffs recently purchased the house and obtained a survey whereupon they discovered that the three -foot area in plaintiff's back yard is actually their property. Plaintiffs submit evidence that their detached garage has experienced repeated water intrusion as a result of dirt being up against the side of their garage to a level approximately 1.5 feet above their garage floor. Plaintiffs all...

Excerpt: ...Defendant Co ldwell Banker Realty's demurrer is OVERRULED as to the fourth cause of action. The demurrer of Defendants Marlene Goren, Shari Ten Eyck, and Ten Eyck Real Estate to the eight cause of action is OVERRULED. The motions to strike the punitive damages allegations are DENIED. Facts/Overview On November 13, 2023, Plaintiff Charles Castro filed the operative Second Amended Complaint against Defendants: • Cies Family Trust, the owner of a...

Excerpt: ...on the same grou nds it now demurs on as to the SAC. The court overruled Defendant's prior demurrer. [ROA #95.] There is a split of authority among case law on the question whether a defendant may demur to an amended complaint on the grounds that were overruled on a dem urrer to the prior complaint. See Bennet v. Suncloud (1997) 56 Cal. App. 4th 91, 96 -97; Pacific States Enterprises, Inc. v. City of Coachella (1993) 13 Cal. App. 4th 1414, 1420,...

Excerpt: ... the “four corners” of the pleading (which includes exhibits attached and incorporated therein) or from matters outside the pleading which are judicially noticeable under Evidence Code §§ 451 or 452. Although California courts take a liberal view of inartfully drawn complaints, it remains essential that a complaint set forth the actionable facts relied upon with sufficient precision to inform the defendant of what plaintiff is complaining, ...

Excerpt: ...ne [ROA # 1024 ], and Exhibits B, C, I, J, K, L, M, and N to the Wayne Declaration [ROA # 1025 -1032], are sealed. Statement of Law “Unless confidentiality is required by law, court records are presumed to be open.” (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 2.550(c); In re Marriage of Tamir (2021) 72 Cal.App.5th 1068, 1079.) “A record must not be filed under seal without a court order. The court must not permit a record to be filed under seal based sol...

Excerpt: ...ses of action and grant ed as to the 11th cause of action. Defendants' objections are sustained as to nos. 1, 6, 7, 11, 16, and 17 - 19 and overruled as to nos. 2 - 5, 8 - 10, and 12 - 15. Plaintiff's request for judicial notice is granted. A “party moving for summary judgment be ars an initial burden of production to make a prima facie showing of the nonexistence of any triable issue of material fact…” (Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co. (...

Excerpt: ...pposition t o this Motion was filed before that admonition. A. Legal Standard Where the statutory requirements are met, the court may, upon motion, enter judgment pursuant to the terms of a settlement agreement. (CCP §664.6). Before enactment of CCP § 664.6, whe n a settlement broke down, the party seeking to enforce it either had to (a) file a separate lawsuit for breach of contract or (b) seek leave to file a supplemental pleading (to alle...

Excerpt: ...cords are sought by a subpoena duces tecum and who is a party to the civil action in which this subpoena duces tecum is served may, prior to the date for production, bring a motion under Section 1987.1 to quash or modify the subpoena duces tecum.” (Code Civ. Pro c., § 1985.3, subd. (g).) “Personal records” include “any copy of books, documents, other writings, or electronically stored information pertaining to a consumer and which are ma...

Excerpt: ...relevant, false, or improper matter inserted in any pleading or strike out all or any part of any pleading not drawn or filed in conformity with the laws of this state, a court rule, or an order of the court. Code Civ. Proc. § 436. “Irrelevant” matters include: allegati ons not essential to the claim, allegations neither pertinent to nor supported by an otherwise sufficient claim or a demand for judgment requesting relief not support by the...

Excerpt: ...otice of this ru ling. If a timely motion to compel has been filed, the responding party has the burden to justify any objection or failure fully to answer the discovery requests. (Coy v. Sup.Ct. (Wolcher) (1962) 58 Cal.2d 210, 220 -221 [re: interrogatories]; Kirkland v. Su perior Court (2002) 95 Cal.App.4th 92, 98 [burden shifts to objector after good cause shown for RFPs]; Costco Wholesale Corp. v. Superior Court (2009) 47 Cal.4th 725, 733 [pa...

Excerpt: ...ential to justify oppositio n may exist but cannot, for reasons stated, be presented, the court shall deny the motion, order a continuance to permit affidavits to be obtained or discovery to be had, or make any other order as may be just.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 437c(h).) “When lack of diligence results in a party's having insufficient information to know if facts essential to justify opposition may exist, and the party is therefore unable to p...

Excerpt: ...ion to strike is filed but before the demurrer or motion to strike is heard if the amended pleading is filed and served no later than the date for filing an opposition to the demurrer or motion to strike.”].) On April 10, 2024, Defendant The Summit At Turtle Ridge Communi ty Association WITHDREW its Demurrer and Motion to Strike. Defendant MLG Assessment Recovery LLC's Demurrer remains on calendar but it is MOOT since Plaintiff timely filed...

Excerpt: ...to control the conduct of its m inisterial officers and of all other persons connected with its proceedings in furtherance of justice.” Doe v. Yim (2020) 55 Cal.App.5th 573, 581. California Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 1.9 provides in pertinent part: “(a) A lawyer who has formerl y represented a client in a matter shall not thereafter represent another person in the same or a substantially related matter in which that person's interest...