Excerpt: ... Kodaka, I nc., Kodania, Inc., Eiwa International, Inc., Apex Seafood, Inc., Ocean Green Seafood Inc., Blue Marine Seafood, Inc., Jade Equities, LLC, Shujen Ho, aka Jane Ho, and Chingying Chen (collectively, “Responding Defendants”) was electronically served on two s elf-represented litigants, Eiji Ota and Katoko Ota. It does not appear these two self -represented litigants affirmatively consented to electronic service. (Cal. Rules of Ct., Ru...

Excerpt: ...Villageway M anagement, Inc., and that the 90-day period ended on September 4, 2018 —is GRANTED. The court notes that no opposition was filed. 3. Defendants' evidentiary objections nos. 1 -47 to plaintiff's memorandum of points and authorities and response to the summary judgment motion are disregarded. They are not evidentiary objections. 4. Defendants' objection nos. 48 -63 are OVERRULED. 5. Plaintiff filed a document entitled “Objections...

Excerpt: ...iled to fil e an opposition. In reviewing the complaint, it is unclear what causes of action are being alleged and against whom. However, the gravamen of the complaint appears to be rooted in a negligence claim. Defendant's first argument that plaintiff's complai nt fails to plead any of the elements of dangerous condition of public property under Government Code section 835 is well taken. Moreover, Defendant also appears correct in its asserti...

Excerpt: ...lment” against Ford, based on allege d defects in her vehicle, but asserts only economic losses. Under the economic loss rule (the “ELR”), where a purchaser's expectations in a sale are frustrated because the product is not working properly, the remedy is in contract alone, for he has suffer ed only economic losses. (Robinson Helicopter Co., Inc. v. Dana Corp. (2004) 34 Cal.4th 979, 988.) Claims for monetary losses between contractual p...

Excerpt: ...llegations in the complaint, defendants (including these Doe defendants), “distribute and sell their kratom products to residents in California pursuant to a false and misleading marketing campaign.” The complaint further alleges that defendants do not disclose the serious health risks of the product; nor state that the product is the subject of warnings from poison control centers and is known to be not safe for human consumption. And it spe...

Excerpt: ...on letter were attached to the complaint. However, the plaintiff alleged that because the damages were “ongoing and exceeded $10,000” the amount of damages claimed was “omitted” from the form because “that portion was inapplicable.” The city argues that plaintiff 's failure to state the amount claimed is a material defect and the demurrer must be sustained without leave to amend. Without properly seeking judicial notice, the demurrer ...

Excerpt: ...odin (1998) 17 Cal. 4th 599, 615–617; Exxess Electronixx v. Heger Realty Corp. (1998) 64 Cal.App.4th 698, 706– 707.) Civil Code section 1717 applies only in an action “on a contract.” The meaning of “on a contract” has been liberally construed to mean any action involving a c ontract for the purposes of section 1717. (Turner v. Schultz (2009) 175 Cal.App.4th 974, 979– 80.) Here, it is undisputed that Selene is the prevailing party. ...

Excerpt: ... Protectiv e Order as to Requests for Production are DENIED. Interrogatories and Requests for Admission Plaintiffs have not established their burden of justifying their additional discovery. A propounding party may justify propounding additional special interrogatori es or requests for admissions based on the complexity or quantity of issues within the case. (CCP §§ 2030.040(a)(1) and 2033.040(a).) Here, Plaintiffs only offered justifications ...

Excerpt: ...al.App.4th 267, 288 (Kim) [evidence of damages is required for default judgment]; see also ROA No. 356 –Heidary Decl., in passim [one -page conclusory declaration].) There is also no affidavit of notice. (See Code Civ. Proc., § 587; Bae v. T.D. Service Co. of Arizona (201 6) 245 Cal.App.4th 89, 108, fn. 15.) Even if plaintiff had complied with the foregoing requirements, the request for default judgment would still be denied because the operat...

Excerpt: ...th 1236, 12631264, emphasis added.) Here, Petitioner claims injury on January 25, 2023. For claim filing purposes, six months means the longer of six calendar months or 182 days. (City of Pasadena v. Sup.Ct. (Jauregui) (2017) 12 CA5th 1340, 1346, fn. 4; Gonzales v. C ounty of Los Angeles (1988) 199 CA3d 601, 604). Six months from this date is July 25, 2023. Leave to file a late claim must be requested within a “reasonable time” and in no ev...

Excerpt: ...ent: 27 1. D efendant's Notice of Non-opposition (ROA 300, at 5:17) states “over 400” class members opted out. How many class members opted out? The settlement administrator should submit a declaration stating the number of notices sent, the number of opt outs, and the number of class members. 2. How will individual PAGA payments be calculated? In addition, what is the estimated high, low and average PAGA payment? 3. What is plaintiff's expec...

Excerpt: ...ovision in paragraph 1.37 is overbroad. Amended Nordrehaug Decl. (ROA 217) Ex. 1 (Class Action and PAGA Settlement Agreement, ¶ 1.37). 10 11 The release must be fairly tailored to the claims that were or reasonably could have been asserted in the lawsuit based on the facts alleged in the operative complaint, i.e., the second amended complaint filed February 7, 2024 (ROA 239). 3. The Released PAGA Claims provision in paragraph 1.38 is overbroad....

Excerpt: ...stems, f/k/a T riumph Structures – Los Angeles, Inc., a California corporation and Triumph Group, Inc. “The party moving for summary judgment bears the burden of persuasion that there is no triable issue of material fact and that he is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. That is because of the general principle that a party who seeks a court's action in his favor bears the burden of persuasion thereon. (See Evid. Code, § 500.) There is ...

Excerpt: ... granting petitioner's writ of administrative mandamus. Judgment (ROA 600). The judgment states petitioner shall recover its costs against the California Department of Insurance as to the petition for writ of administrative mandamus in accordance with Government Cod e section 11523 and Civil Procedure Code sections 1094.5(a) and 1095 in an amount to be determined. Id. Petitioner filed its costs memorandum on September 25, 2023 (ROA 607) seeking ...

Excerpt: ...First Set of Form Interrogatories, is GRANTED. Code of Civil Procedure section 2030.290 states, in part, “If a party to whom interrogatories are directed fails to serve a timely response, the following rules apply: (a) The party to whom the interrogatories are dire cted waives any right to exercise the option to produce writings under Section 2030.230, as well as any objection to the interrogatories, including one based on privilege or on the p...

Excerpt: ...tion to co mpel arbitration is simply a suit in equity seeking specific performance of that contract. Little v. Pullman (2013) 219 Cal.App.4th 558, 565. The petitioner bears the burden of proving the existence of a valid arbitration agreement by the preponderance of the evidence, and a party opposing the petition bears the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence any fact necessary to its defense. Id. Defendant has carried its burden...

Excerpt: ...e of C ivil Procedure section 2025.290 provides that depositions in civil cases are generally limited to seven hours of testimony. However, a party is only entitled to ask questions at deposition which are “reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admiss ible evidence.” (Code Civ. Proc. § 2017.010.) At this time, Defendant has not shown it is necessary for the Court to enter an order preemptively limiting Defendant's deposition. How...

Excerpt: ...ns for lack of specific jurisdiction, the plaintiff has the initial burden of demonstrating, by a preponderance of the evidence, facts justifying the exercise of jurisdiction. Ziller Electronics Lab GmbH v. Superior Ct. (1988) 206 Cal.App.3d 1222, 1232 -33; Sacrament o Suncreek Apts., LLC v. Cambridge Advantaged Props. II, L.P. (2010) 187 Cal.App.4th 1, 9. The plaintiff must do more than allege jurisdictional facts; the plaintiff must provide af...

Excerpt: ...lack of specific jurisdiction, the plaintiff has the initial burden of demonstrating, by a preponderance of the evidence, facts justifying the exercise of jurisdiction. Ziller Electronics Lab GmbH v. Superior Ct. (1988) 206 Cal.App.3d 1222, 1232 -33; Sacramento Sun creek Apts., LLC v. Cambridge Advantaged Props. II, L.P. (2010) 187 Cal.App.4th 1, 9. The plaintiff must do more than allege jurisdictional facts; the plaintiff must provide affidavit...

Excerpt: ...d without prejudice. As discussed further below, the May 2, 2024 hearing on defendants' motion to compel arbitration is continued to August 29, 2024. Defendants have moved to compel arbitration of this coordinated proceeding. Plaintiffs oppose, including based on plaintiffs' contention that the transportation worker exemption in section 1 of the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) applies and exempts this case from arbitration. Defendants' motion to co...

Excerpt: ...face, purp ort to be a contract between the plaintiff and plaintiff's employer —a fact that defendants' counsel had confirmed in an e -mail to the plaintiff's counsel. Defendants' counsel attempted to disavow that concession during oral argument, essentially on the gr ound it was not a judicial admission, and in any event, it was made before counsel had all the facts. That argument is unpersuasive. Even if the arbitration agreement were enforc...

Excerpt: ...ay of the case rests within the discretion of the court. The alleged acts occurred between December 2018 and March 2019. The children were pre -teens. They are now around 16 years old. The civil complaint was filed July 21, 2020. Evans filed an answer June 11, 2021. A jury trial has been scheduled for February 3, 2025. In the criminal case, a pre -trial conference is set for May 22, 2024, and trial is set for June 6, 2024. Bail is set at $1 mil...

Excerpt: ...any irrelevant , false, or improper matter inserted in any pleading (b) Strike out all or any part of any pleading not drawn or filed in conformity with the laws of this state, a court rule, or an order of the court.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 436.) Health & Safety Code sec tion 1430 is part of the Long Term Care Act, which “is a ‘detailed statutory scheme regulating the standard of care provided by skilled nursing facilities to their patients....

Excerpt: ...e meet and confer, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure S ection 435.5. The Court notes that Defendant failed to adequately meet and confer before filing this Motion. The Court will exercise its discretion to consider the merits of the Motion at this time but admonishes Def endant that the future failure to comply with all applicable statutes and rules may result in a motion being taken off calendar in the future or sanctions, where appropriate. ...

Excerpt: ...nd unintelligible. ” (Cal. Code Civ. Proc., § 430.10, subds. (e) & (f); see Cal. Code Civ. Proc., § 430.50, subd. (a) [demurrer may be taken to whole pleading or to any of the causes of action stated therein].) “A person against whom a complaint or cross -complaint has been fi led may, within 30 days after service of the complaint or crosscomplaint, demur to the complaint or cross -complaint.” (Cal. Code Civ. Proc., § 430.40, subd. (a)....