Excerpt: ...angerous condition on the floor of the store at the time of the incident. Second, that Plaintiffs are unable to prove that a dangerous condition on the floor of the store caused their fall. The Court notes that Plaintiff Allen Franz has been dismissed from this lawsuit without prejudice, because said Plaintiff passed away after filing the lawsuit, and no steps were taken under Code of Civil Procedure §377.31 to substitute in a successor plaintif...

Excerpt: ...ust be accepted as true for the purpose of ruling on the demurrer. Del E. Webb Corporation v. Structural Materials Co. (1981) 123 Cal.App.3d 593, 604. Absent court orders or other items subject to judicial notice, or items attached as exhibits to the complaint, the court may not consider the contents of pleadings or other exhibits when ruling on a demurrer. Day v. Sharp (1975) 50 Cal.3d 904, 914, and Sosinsky v. Grant (1992) 6 Cal.App.4th 1746, 1...

Excerpt: ...to allow the matters to be heard together and it would allow the Court to have a fuller record. The Defendants' arbitration motions were pending in the case for some three months' time. Judicial notice is taken of the records of the case in relation to these matters. (See Evidence Code § 452(d); see Dillard v. McKnight (1949) 34 Cal.2d 209, 218 (“a trial court is bound to take judicial notice of its own records in the same action”); Nichols ...

Excerpt: ...of Service on Summons and Complaint, service on Saif Almarri was by substituted service on his wife. Service was not complete until 10 days after mailing, or May 9, 2019. Because the hearing was set for May 30, 2019, service had to be completed by May 7, 2019. Thus, Almarri did not receive adequate notice. There is No Showing of a Contract The documents attached to the declaration of Dr. Leaf are an e- mail thread and a general proposal of what i...

Excerpt: ...by Defendant Horner On 5/9/19, Defendant Horner filed a bankruptcy petition, which triggers an automatic stay. So the question arises whether the court may rule on the two motions below. Here, Plaintiffs had already obtained a judgment for possession and writ of possession prior to Defendant's bankruptcy filing. So prior to the bankruptcy filing, it had already been established, as a matter of law, that Defendant had no legal or equitable right t...

Excerpt: ...3d 311, 318. A demurrer challenges only the legal sufficiency of the affected pleading, not the truth of the factual allegations in the pleading or the pleader's ability to prove those allegations. Cundiff v. GTE Cal., Inc.(2002) 101 Cal.App.4 th 1395, 1404-05. Questions of fact cannot be decided on demurrer. Berryman v. Merit Prop. Mgmt., Inc. (2007) 152 Cal.App.4 th 1544, 1556. Because a demurrer tests only the sufficiency of the complaint, a c...

Excerpt: ...ded by statute. (Gov't Code § 815(a).) City further argues that the liability of a public entity for injury caused by the dangerous condition of public properly is exclusively governed by Government Code Section 835, which Plaintiff has already alleged in her first cause of action for premises liability. City correctly argues that Plaintiff's premises liability cause of action alleges liability based on the dangerous condition of public property...

Excerpt: ...ting of the pecuniary loss suffered by the heirs. [Citations.]' [Citation.]” Quiroz v. Seventh Ave. Center (2006) 140 Cal.App.4th 1256, 1263. Defendants argue that Plaintiff's wrongful death claim fails because Plaintiff has not pleaded a causal link between the decedent, Bertil Osbeck's (“Decedent”), injury and his death. Defendants contend that because wrongful death claims are statutory in nature, specificity in the pleadings is required...

Excerpt: ...ense and hardship, and courts carefully weigh the propriety of such an appointment in exercising their discretion to appoint a receiver. Hoover v. Galbraith (1972) 7 Cal.3d 519, 528. The “provisional remedy of receivership is utilized sparingly and only upon a compelling showing of need” for the receiver. IFS Indus., Inc. v. Stephens (1984) 159 Cal.App.3d 740, 756. A court may appoint a receiver only on a ground specified by statute. Marsch v...

Excerpt: ... the present motion, as well as $21,646 in expert witness fees. Plaintiff seeks the award pursuant to Civil Code §3426.4. Defendants oppose the motion, not because they do not believe Plaintiff is entitled to fees under Civil Code §3426.4, but because the amounts sought by Plaintiff are unreasonable. Under Civil Code §3426.4, where there is “willful and malicious misappropriation…the Court may award reasonable attorney's fees and costs to ...

Excerpt: ... prior to that conference regarding the status of the settlement administration. Plaintiffs should suggest a date for the status conference. The final report must include all information necessary for the Court to determine the total amount actually paid to class members. Plaintiffs shall also submit, at least 10 days prior to the conference, a [Proposed] Amended Judgment directing Defendant (or the Claims Administrator on Defendant's behalf) to ...

Excerpt: ...e likelihood that the party seeking the injunction will ultimately prevail on the merits of its claim and (ii) the balance of harm presented, i.e., the comparative consequences of the issuance and nonissuance of the injunction. Fleishman v. Superior Ct. (2002) 102 Cal.App. 4 th 350, 355-56. The moving party bears the burden of presenting facts establishing the requisite reasonable probability of prevailing on the merits of its claims. Id. at 356....

Excerpt: ...lement Agreement and/or proposed Class Notice is submitted, a redline version showing all changes, deletions, and additions shall be submitted as well. As to the Settlement: 1. The information provided with the motion is still insufficient for the Court to assess whether the settlement is fair, adequate and reasonable to the class, and whether Plaintiff's counsel sufficiently analyzed the value of the claims. Plaintiff's counsel filed two declara...

Excerpt: ...ceeding as a class superior to the alternatives. In turn, the community of interest requirement embodies three factors: (1) predominant common questions of law or fact; (2) class representatives with claims or defenses typical of the class; and (3) class representatives who can adequately represent the class.” (Brinker Restaurant Corporation v. Superior Court (2012) 53 Cal.4th 1004, 1021 [internal quotes and citations omitted].) These elements ...

Excerpt: ... motion for nonsuit under Code of Civil Procedure section 581c or a motion for directed verdict under Code of Civil Procedure section 630 should have been granted. (Code Civ. Proc., § 629.) The purpose of a motion for JNOV is not to afford a review of the jury's deliberations, but to prevent a miscarriage of justice in a case in which the verdict rendered is without foundation. (Oakland Raiders v. Oakland- Alameda County Coliseum, Inc. (2006) 14...

Excerpt: ...so should provide a red-lined version of any revised papers, including the notice to the class. All such documents must have numbered pages, unlike the Addendum to Class Action Settlement filed for this hearing. In addressing Section 14.2 of the settlement agreement, which provides that the attorneys' fees award will include work done by past class counsel, plaintiff explained work done by and payment to The Cooper Law Firm, but nothing as toHaeg...

Excerpt: ...so should provide a red-lined version of any revised papers, including the notice to the class. The moving points and authorities are 22 pages long, far exceeding the 15-page limit of CRC Rule 3.1113(d) and even the 20-page limit of CRC Rule 3.764(c)(2) for motions to certify a class, which usually are contested. The court expressly orders that plaintiff's points and authorities in support of the Motion for Final Approval be limited to no more th...

Excerpt: ... the forum state to justify personal jurisdiction, but the plaintiff has the right to conduct jurisdictional discovery to help develop the facts necessary to sustain this burden. (Mihlon v. Superior Court (1985) 169 Cal.App.3d 703, 710.) As Plaintiff here has requested a continuance for this purpose and may be able to discover facts to assist it in establishing jurisdiction, the requested continuance is granted to permit limited jurisdictional di...

Excerpt: ...an amendment to the settlement agreement rather than any amended settlement agreement. Counsel also should provide a red-lined version of any revised papers. Plaintiff requests the dismissal of this action, but CRC Rule 3.769(h) provides that when a court approves a class action settlement, the court must make and enter judgment. This Rule suggests that in a PAGA case a Judgment should also be entered, consistent with class action settlements, an...

Excerpt: ...default relief, or if the granting of the relief from default will not prejudice the opposing party (other than losing the advantage of the default), only slight evidence will justify an order granting such relief. (Ibid.) Code of Civil Procedure section 473, subdivision (b), permits a court to grant relief from a judgment, dismissal, order or other proceeding taken against a party on the grounds of “mistake, inadvertence, surprise or excusable...

Excerpt: ...ld Co. (2001) 25 Cal.4th 826, 850.) A “party moving for summary judgment bears an initial burden of production to make a prima facie showing of the nonexistence of any triable issue of material fact. . . .” (Ibid.) “A prima facie showing is one that is sufficient to support the position of the party in question.” (Id. at p. 851.) “A court identifies the issues framed by the pleadings, determines whether the moving party's showing has es...

Excerpt: ...” (Weil & Brown, Cal. Practice Guide: Civil Procedure Before Trial (The Rutter Group 2018) ¶ 9:53.1a.) The motion is entitled “Motion to Appeal Judgment.” But, the footer for the motion states: “Motion to Set Aside.” The memorandum of points and authorities also indicates that it is in support of a motion to set aside. To the extent Plaintiff seeks to appeal the court's ruling on Defendants' motion for summary judgment, this motion is ...

Excerpt: ...ubd. (a); see Collin v CalPortland Co. (2014) 228 Cal.App.4th 582, 590.) When an interrogatory cannot be answered completely, it must be answered to the extent possible. (Code Civ. Proc., § 2030.220, subd. (b).) If a timely motion to compel has been filed, the burden is on the responding party to justify any objection or failure fully to answer the interrogatories. (Fairmont Ins. Co. v. Superior Court (2000) 22 Cal.4th 245, 255.) Here, Defendant...

Excerpt: ...from Plaintiff's financial institutions is constitutionally protected private financial information. On the other hand, Defendant has established that to the extent Plaintiff's ATM, bank statements or credit card statements reflect time stamps which show Plaintiff left his work premises from August 2016 to July 2017 and made meal and other purchases, that information would be directly relevant to this action because Plaintiff admittedly did not c...

Excerpt: ...t be admitted or denied or what counts or claims are directed against it. (Khoury v. Maly's of California, Inc. (1993) 14 Cal.App.4th 612, 616.) Here, the basis for the claims asserted is unclear. The parties are alleged to be co-owners of the three properties identified with a 75%/25% respective interest. (Complaint ¶¶ 6-8.) Plaintiff asserts that he should be found to have more than a 75% interest due to “his contributions” (¶ 8) and Mah...