Search by Keyword:
Start Date:
End Date:
Tip: Wrap text in quotation marks when searching for phrases (e.g. "motion to dismiss").

15811 Results

Location: Orange County x
2022.02.08 Motion to Quash Service of Summons 943
Location: Orange County
Judge: Gastelum, John C
Hearing Date: 2022.02.08
Excerpt: ...with EON Reality, Inc., a U.S. corporation.” (Complaint ¶5.) Plaintiff further pleads, “Venue is proper in this Court under California Code of Civil Procedure section 395 because Plaintiff's injury was suffered in this County and the relevant records are maintained in this County.” However, it is unclear from the Complaint itself whether the “contracts” referred to is the employment contract with Defendant, or contracts between EON and...
2022.02.08 Motion to Dismiss for Forum Non Conveniens 845
Location: Orange County
Judge: Schwarm, Walter
Hearing Date: 2022.02.08
Excerpt: ...for good cause allow, may serve and file a notice of motion for one or more of the following purposes: [¶] (1) To quash service of summons on the ground of lack of jurisdiction of the court over him or her. [¶] (2) To stay or dismiss the action on the ground of inconvenient forum. [¶] (3) To dismiss the action pursuant to the applicable provisions of Chapter 1.5 (commencing with Section 583.110) of Title 8.” Global Financial Distributors, In...
2022.02.08 Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Action 677
Location: Orange County
Judge: Schwarm, Walter
Hearing Date: 2022.02.08
Excerpt: ...ions against Defendants (Surf City Auto Group, Inc. (Surf City) and FCA US LLC (FCA)). The Complaint alleged violation of statutory obligations against both Defendants. (Complaint, ¶¶ 198-241.) On 9-29-21 under ROA No. 86, Plaintiff filed a Request for Dismissal, with prejudice as to Defendant—Surf City Auto Group, Inc. Toal v. Tardif (2009) 178 Cal.App.4th 1208, 1219, provides, “In Rosenthal v. Great Western Fin. Securities Corp. (1996) 14...
2022.02.08 Motion for Terminating and Monetary Sanctions 922
Location: Orange County
Judge: Schwarm, Walter
Hearing Date: 2022.02.08
Excerpt: ...d D only as to their pursuant to Evidence Code section 452, subdivision (d). Code of Civil Procedure section 2023.010 states, in part, “Misuses of the discovery process include, but are not limited to, the following: . . . [¶] (d) Failing to respond or submit to an authorized method of discovery. . . [¶] (g) Disobeying a court order to provide discovery.” Section 2023.030 provides, “To the extent authorized by the chapter governing any pa...
2022.02.08 Motion for Summary Judgment 349
Location: Orange County
Judge: Gastelum, John C
Hearing Date: 2022.02.08
Excerpt: ... 1-8 which are to the Declaration of S. SHAH. Defendants' Evidentiary Objections to Plaintiff's Evidence in support of Opposition. The Court OVERRULES all Objections Nos. 1-36 which are Declarations of the R. Steele, Esq. and NILESH. Motion. As to the 1 st COA (fraud, Issue Nos. 1 through 3), the Court finds there are triable issues of material fact. Defendants seek summary judgment on the 1 st cause of action for fraud asserted against SANDEEP o...
2022.02.08 Motion for Summary Judgment 117
Location: Orange County
Judge: Gastelum, John C
Hearing Date: 2022.02.08
Excerpt: ...ent in the Complaint. In the alternative, Plaintiff moves for an order granting summary adjudication as to the following issues: Issue No. 1: There is no triable of issue of material fact and the first cause action for Breach of Contract is with merit because Defendants cannot establish that they were entitled to receive any fees on account of the filing of a Petition for Letters of Administration seeking to have Plaintiff appointed the administr...
2022.02.08 Motion for Summary Adjudication 553
Location: Orange County
Judge: Schwarm, Walter
Hearing Date: 2022.02.08
Excerpt: ... to judgment on the cause of action. Once the plaintiff or cross-complainant has met that burden, the burden shifts to the defendant or cross-defendant to show that a triable issue of one or more material facts exists as to the cause of action or a defense thereto. The defendant or cross-defendant shall not rely upon the allegations or denials of its pleadings to show that a triable issue of material fact exists but, instead, shall set forth the ...
2022.02.08 Motion for Leave to File Amended Answer 981
Location: Orange County
Judge: Schwarm, Walter
Hearing Date: 2022.02.08
Excerpt: ...or hearing on 2-8-22. If the parties have not properly filed a Notice of Settlement, the court requests the parties to appear on 2-8-22 to explain the status of the case. If the case has not settled, then the court issues the tentative ruling set forth below. Defendants' (Thermo Power, Inc. and Ed Lydic) Motion for Leave to File an Amended Answer (Motion), filed on 1-18-22 under ROA No. 38, is GRANTED. Plaintiff's (Blanca Munoz) objections nos. 1...
2022.02.08 Demurrer 841
Location: Orange County
Judge: Gastelum, John C
Hearing Date: 2022.02.08
Excerpt: ...e of Civil Procedure section 1286.2 permits a court to vacate an arbitration award if “[t]he award was procured by corruption, fraud or other undue means” and if “[t]he arbitrators exceeded their powers and the award cannot be corrected without affecting the merits of the decision upon the controversy submitted.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 1286.2, subd. (a)(1), (4).) Corruption, Fraud, or Other Undue Means: This ground applies either to fraud p...
2022.02.08 Motion to Quash Service of Summons 004
Location: Orange County
Judge: Gastelum, John C
Hearing Date: 2022.02.08
Excerpt: ...ts with the state that the assertion of jurisdiction does not violate ‘traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice.'” (Vons Companies, Inc. v. Seabest Foods, Inc. (1996) 14 Cal.4 th 434, 444, abrogated on other grounds by Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court (2017) 137 S.Ct. 1773.) “When a defendant moves to quash service of process on jurisdictional grounds, the plaintiff has the initial burden of demonstrating facts jus...
2022.02.07 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication
Location: Orange County
Judge: Scott, Nathan
Hearing Date: 2022.02.07
Excerpt: ...ase may negate the duty element of a negligence action”]; see also Def. SSUF #17-21.) But plaintiff met his shifted burden to show triable issues of material fact whether defendant acted with gross negligence, liability for which cannot be released. (See Jimenez v. 24 Hour Fitness USA, Inc. (2015) 237 Cal. App. 4th 546, 554 [a “release cannot absolve a party from liability for gross negligence], 558 [“deliberately” arranging gym equipment...
2022.02.07 Demurrer 624
Location: Orange County
Judge: Gooding, Martha K
Hearing Date: 2022.02.07
Excerpt: ... Proc. §§ 284- 285. Phillips, Spallas & Angstadt LLP associated in as counsel of record for the Thompsons in their capacity as defendants, but not as cross-complainants. (ROA 180.) Ertz generally and specially demurs to all five causes of action in the FACC. First, Ertz contends all five causes of action are “ambiguous and vague as to time in light of the alleged settlement agreement” mentioned in the FACC. Ertz argues that all the claims f...
2022.02.07 Demurrer 891
Location: Orange County
Judge: Hoffer, David A
Hearing Date: 2022.02.07
Excerpt: ...430.10(e) and (f). ““A constructive trust is an involuntary equitable trust created by operation of law as a remedy to compel the transfer of property from the person wrongfully holding it to the rightful owner. [Citations.] The essence of the theory of constructive trust is to prevent unjust enrichment and to prevent a person from taking advantage of his or her own wrongdoing. [Citations.]” [Citation.] Imposition of “[a] constructive tru...
2022.02.07 Demurrer, Motion to Strike
Location: Orange County
Judge: Scott, Nathan
Hearing Date: 2022.02.07
Excerpt: ...esting the suspect outside the house if the suspects leaves the house on police orders. (See People v. Trudell (1985) 173 Cal.App.3d 1221, 1229-1230.) Trudell also found the suspect left the house voluntarily. Taking the complaint's allegations to be true, as we must, here the officers lacked probable cause. Under California law, a police officer lacks immunity for false imprisonment when the arrest lacks probable cause. (See Cornell v. City & Co...
2022.02.07 Motion for Discovery Protective Orders 221
Location: Orange County
Judge: Gooding, Martha K
Hearing Date: 2022.02.07
Excerpt: ...ause “the discovery seeks information, facts, legal contentions, names of witnesses, and documents that are ‘embraced by' the pending Appeal.” CCP section 916 provides that “the perfecting of an appeal stays proceedings in the trial court upon the judgment or order appealed from or upon the matters embraced therein or affected thereby, including enforcement of the judgment or order, but the trial court may proceed upon any other matter em...
2022.02.07 Motion for Summary Adjudication 258
Location: Orange County
Judge: Hoffer, David A
Hearing Date: 2022.02.07
Excerpt: ...riation of likeness under Civ. Code § 3344. Section 3344 provides in relevant part: (a) Any person who knowingly uses another's name, voice, signature, photograph, or likeness, in any manner, on or in products, merchandise, or goods, or for purposes of advertising or selling, or soliciting purchases of, products, merchandise, goods or services, without such person's prior consent, or, in the case of a minor, the prior consent of his parent or le...
2022.02.07 Motion to Strike 587
Location: Orange County
Judge: Strickroth, Michael J
Hearing Date: 2022.02.07
Excerpt: ...rants Plaintiffs leave to amend the complaint. IT IS ORDERED THAT Plaintiffs shall file and serve an amended complaint within fourteen (14) days of notice of this ruling. STANDARD OF LAW “The court may, upon a motion . . . or at any time in its discretion, and upon terms it deems proper: (a) [s]trike out any irrelevant, false, or improper matter inserted in any pleading[;] . . . [and/or] (b) [s]trike out all or any part of any pleading not draw...
2022.02.07 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 081
Location: Orange County
Judge: Gooding, Martha K
Hearing Date: 2022.02.07
Excerpt: ...) the parties provide no authority to support taking judicial notice of trial exhibits simply because they were admitted in an underlying trial; and (2) in any event, they are not relevant or necessary to the Court's determination of the Motion. Basic Rules for Summary Judgment/Adjudication Under Section 437c of the Code of civil Procedure (“CCP”) a party may move for summary adjudication as to one or more causes of action within an action, o...
2022.02.07 Motion to Compel Arbitration
Location: Orange County
Judge: Scott, Nathan
Hearing Date: 2022.02.07
Excerpt: ...plaintiff's claims. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1281.2; see also Rosenthal v. Great Western Fin. Securities Corp. (1996) 14 Cal.4th 394, 413 [elements]; Duran decl., Ex. A, p. 6.) Plaintiff is equitably estopped from refusing to arbitrate with FCA. (See Felisilda v. FCA US LLC (2020) 53 Cal.App.5th 486.) “‘[A] nonsignatory may compel arbitration only when the claims against the nonsignatory are founded in and inextricably bound up with the obligatio...
2022.02.07 Motion to Compel Arbitration 266
Location: Orange County
Judge: Lewis, Gregory
Hearing Date: 2022.02.07
Excerpt: ...¶ 2, Ex. A.) Parties moving to compel arbitration “may meet their initial burden to show an agreement to arbitrate by attaching a copy of the arbitration agreement purportedly bearing the opposing party's signature.” (Espejo v. Southern California Permanente Medical Group (2016) 246 Cal.App.4th 1047, 1060.) If the opposing party challenges the validity of that signature, however, the moving party must “establish by a preponderance of the e...
2022.02.07 Motion to Compel Arbitration 335
Location: Orange County
Judge: Hoffer, David A
Hearing Date: 2022.02.07
Excerpt: ...s that Defendant did not waive its right to arbitration. The Motion is Defendant's first use of the litigation process, there is no trial date set, and Defendant claims no discovery has taken place. Plaintiffs have not demonstrated any prejudice and the timeline of events does not show any unreasonable delay. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1281.2, subd. (a); Saint Agnes Medical Center v. PacifiCare of Calif. (2003) 31 Cal.4th 1187, 1195; United States v. P...
2022.02.07 Motion to Contest Good Faith Settlement 807
Location: Orange County
Judge: Lewis, Gregory
Hearing Date: 2022.02.07
Excerpt: ... recovery and the settlor's proportionate liability; (2) the amount paid in settlement; (3) the allocation of settlement proceeds among plaintiffs; (4) the recognition that a settlor should pay less in settlement than he would if he were found liable at trial; (5) the financial conditions and insurance policy limits of settling defendants; and (6) the existence of collusion, fraud, or tortious conduct aimed to injure the interests of nonsettling ...
2022.02.07 Motion to Strike Punitive Damages 360
Location: Orange County
Judge: Hoffer, David A
Hearing Date: 2022.02.07
Excerpt: ...ivil Code section 3294. (College Hospital, Inc. v. Superior Court (1994) 8 Cal.4th 704, 721.) These statutory elements include allegations that the defendant has been guilty of oppression, fraud or malice. (Civ.Code, § 3294, subd. (a).) “‘Malice'” is defined in the statute as conduct “intended by the defendant to cause injury to plaintiff, or despicable conduct that is carried on by the defendant with a willful and conscious disregard fo...
2022.02.07 Motion to Vacate and Set Aside Entry of Defaults 335
Location: Orange County
Judge: Lewis, Gregory
Hearing Date: 2022.02.07
Excerpt: ... the Defendants. Pursuant to CCP 473 (b), Defendants had six months or 10/16/22 to move for relief under that statute. Since the motion was filed 1/12/22, Defendants moved for relief under extrinsic mistake. Extrinsic Mistake: “To set aside a judgment based on extrinsic fraud or extrinsic mistake, the moving party must satisfy three elements: ‘First, the defaulted party must demonstrate that it has a meritorious case. Secondly, the party seek...
2022.02.07 Demurrer (3)
Location: Orange County
Judge: Griffin, Craig
Hearing Date: 2022.02.07
Excerpt: ...based upon Civ. Proc. Code § 430.10(e) is overruled. A demurrer challenges the defects appearing on the face of the pleading or from other matters properly subject to judicial notice. Blank v. Kirwan (1985) 39 Cal.3d 311, 318. The issue is the sufficiency of the pleading, not the truth of the facts alleged. Thus, no matter how unlikely or improbable, the allegations made must be accepted as true for the purpose of ruling on the demurrer. Del E. ...

15811 Results

Per page

Pages