Excerpt: ......

Excerpt: ...ngs, LLC Demurrer to Second Amended Complaint The Court considered the moving papers, opposition, and reply. The Demurrer is overruled. Defendants Julio Jones and Sharod “Roddy” White to answer in 20 days. Background Plaintiff SLW Holdings, LLC invested approximately $4,240,000 into two cannabis business ventures based on Defendants Tyrone Freeman, Wolfgang & Associates LLC, Daude Sherrills and Lamarr House fraudulent misrepresentations. The ...

Excerpt: ...es The court has considered the moving papers. No opposition papers were filed. The motions to compel responses are granted. Background This is an action that arises from the alleged failure to pay monies owed pursuant to a contract for renovating a property located at 901 East 12th Street, Los Angeles, CA 90021 (the “Property”). On May 11, 2021, Plaintiff Fire Guard Corporation dba Builtr ight Engineering and Construction (“Plaintiff”) f...

Excerpt: ... No opposition papers were filed. The motion is MOOT and is taken OFF -CALENDAR due to Defendant Anita Wu being dismissed from this action on November 17, 2023. Background This is an action arising from the alleged failure to pay wages. On August 15, 2023, Plaintiff Yang Hai, an individual and on behalf of aggrieved employees (“Plaintiff”) filed a Complaint against Defendants Golden Arcus Int'l Co, Yu Zhou, Anita Wu (“Wu”) ( collectively ...

Excerpt: ...position, and reply papers. The motion is GRANTED. Background This is an action arising the alleged improper access and the unauthorized disbursement of funds from the personal TD Ameritrade account of Plaintiff Jalal Kazemi (“Plaintiff”). (Complaint, ¶ 7.) Plaintiff alleges that the disbursement was orchestrated by Defendants Hooman Kazemi, Heshmat Doorgari, and was done with the negligent oversight of Defendant TD Ameritrade, Inc. (“TDAI...

Excerpt: ...Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint The court has considered the moving papers and opposition. No reply brief was filed. The demurrer filed by Defendant JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. is SUSTAINED with 20 days leave to amend. Background This is an action arising from fraudulent actions pertaining to Plaintiff's business checking account. On September 30, 2022, Plaintiff AC Floor Covering Company, Inc. (“Plaintiff”) filed a Complaint against Defen...

Excerpt: ...s CONTINUED. Background This action arises from an appeal of an order, decision, or award of the Labor Commissioner in State Case Number WCCM729446 (the “Underlying Action”). On September 16, 2021, in this Court, Appellant Jimmy Wang (“Appellant”) filed a Notice of Appeal indicat ing that he was appealing the decision of the Labor Commissioner in the Underlying Action and attached the order, decision, or award of the Labor Commissioner as...

Excerpt: ...s, Set One, and to Produce Responsive Documents; Request for Monetary Sanctions in the Amount of $2,822.50 The Court considered the moving papers, opposition, and reply. The motion is GRANTED. Plaintiff is ordered to provide further responses to Defendant's First Set of Requests for Production of Documents, Requests Nos. 13, 15- 18, and 21-22, and to produce responsive documents thereto within 30 days. Plaintiff and his counsel of record are orde...

Excerpt: ...the demurrer and motion to strike filed by Defendant Aracely Santoyo is CONTINUED to Tuesday, June 4, 2024 at 8:30 AM in this department so that the parties can engage in meet and confer discussions. Defendant has not satisfied the meet and confer requirement pursuant to CCP §§ 430.41 and 435.5. Background This is an action arising from the alleged wrongful possession of a mobilehome. On October 11, 2023, Plaintiff Judith Collie (“Plaintiff�...

Excerpt: ...ed Complaint The court considered the moving, opposition, reply, and sur -reply papers. The court SUSTAINS defendant Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles's demurrer to First Amended Complaint, with 20 days leave to amend. Moving Party: Defendants The State Bar of California, Craig Eugene Holden, and Robert A. Hawley Responding Party: None (1) Demurrer to First Amended Complaint The court considered the moving and opposition papers....

Excerpt: ...sponses to Supplemental Interrogatory, Set No. Two, and Supplemental Request for Production of Documents, Set No. Two, from Plaintiff Brian Rucker and Order for Sanctions in the Amount of $960 Against Plaintiff and/or His Attorneys of Re cord; and (2) Motion to Compel Responses to Supplemental Interrogatory, Set No. Two, and Supplemental Request for Production of Documents, Set No. Two, from Plaintiff Valentina Malofiy and Order for Sanctions in ...

Excerpt: ...of Cross-Complainant Shan C. Kou to Requests for Production, Set One; and Requests for Sanctions for $3,310. (1983) 2. Motion to Compel Response of Cross-Complainant Shu C. Kou to Requests for Production, Set One; and Requests for Sanctions for $3,310. (1129) The court considered the moving, opposition, and reply papers. 1. Motion to Compel Response of Cross-Complainant Shan C. Kou to Requests for Production, Set One is GRANTED. Requests for Sanc...