Excerpt: ...admitted 16/21 Days: ok Proof of Service Filed: ok Address: See below: Moving papers appear to be sent to the proper address because an Opposition was submitted, and no objections were made to the address that moving papers served the instant motion on. However, the Opposition may not have been properly served on moving party. Plaintiff emailed its Opposition to [email protected]; however, in the moving papers, moving party lists its email as v...

Excerpt: ...c. dba Servpro of Eagle Rock – South Glendale (“Plaintiff”) Responding Party: Defendants, Transform Anything Inc. dba Visionary Staging, a California corporation (“Transform”); Karen Thornton (“Thornton”), indiv (collectively “Defendants”) Proof of Service Timely Filed (CRC Rule 3.1300(c)): ok 16/21 Court Days Lapsed (CCP 1005(b)): NO – Under CCP §1005(b), moving papers must be filed at least 16 court days before the hearing....

Excerpt: ...on Way”) Proof of Service Timely Filed (CRC Rule 3.1300):ok 16/21 Court Days Lapsed (CCP 1005(b)):ok Proper Address: ok Opposition submitted late but the Court will still consider the Opposition. No Reply submitted as of Monday 3/1/2022 at Noon. RELIEF REQUESTED: Defendant, Haig Ghazarian, dba Haig Engineering & Construction, moves for an order sustaining a general demurrer to Plaintiff's fraud cause of action in Plaintiff's Third Amended Compl...

Excerpt: ...c)): ok 16/21 Court Days Lapsed (CCP 1005(b)): ok Proper Address: ok The Court has reviewed moving, opposing, and reply papers to both motions. RELIEF REQUESTED Defendant, NCCI, moves the Court for an order quashing and or modifying the Deposition Subpoenas for Production of Business records (“Subject Subpoenas”) served by Plaintiffs Pavel Lyubovny and Michael Chtivelman upon the custodians of record for: 1) California Board of Equalization (...

Excerpt: ...tively “Defendants””) Proof of Service Timely Filed (CRC Rule 3.1300(c)): ok 16/21 Court Days Lapsed (CCP 1005(b)): ok Proper Address: ok Oppo submitted by two Defendants ( Oppo submitted by Hratchia is late but the Court will consider it); Reply also submitted RELIEF REQUESTED Plaintiff, Yegiyants and 10415 Commerce, move for leave to file and serve a Fourth Amended Complaint. BACKGROUND Plaintiffs' Third Amended Complaint (“TAC”) alle...

Excerpt: ...“TAI”) Responding Party: Plaintiff, E R Restoration and Construction, Inc. dba Servpro of Eagle Rock – South Glendale (“Plaintiff”) Oppo and Reply submitted Proof of Service Timely Filed (CRC Rule 3.1300(c)): ok 16/21 Court Days Lapsed (CCP 1005(b)): Yes Proper Address: The email address on the proof of service is different than the email address noted by the Court; however, Plaintiff submitted Opposition, so it does not appear as if th...

Excerpt: ...an individual, RONDA ARMATRADING, an individual, and DOES 1 - 100 TENTATIVE RULING ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Moving Party: Defendants, Peter Shin, M.D.; Frank Figuero, N.P.; Arbi Ayvazian, D.O.; and Antoinette R. Donofrio, P.A. Responding Party: No Opposition Correct Address (CCP §§ 1013, 1013(a)): ok. 75/80 days' notice (CCP §437(c)): ok RELIEF REQUESTED: Defendants, Peter Shin, M.D.; Frank Figueroa, N.P.; Arbi Ayvazian, D.O....

Excerpt: ...3.1300): ok 16/21 Court Days Lapsed (CCP 1005(b)): ok RELIEF REQUESTED : Order compelling Defendant to provide further responses to Plaintiff's Special Interrogatories, Set One. Special Interrogatories: 6, 13, 14, 15, 22. Sanctions in the amount of $3,129 BACKGROUND Plaintiff purchased a 2018 Kia Forte from Car Pros Kia Glendale in Glendale, California on February 6, 2020. Plaintiff alleges Plaintiff has delivered the subject vehicle for repair t...

Excerpt: ...nd GRACE J. AQUINO RELIEF REQUESTED: Plaintiff, TBF Financial I, LLC, moves this Court: · For summary judgment in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendants Allwest Nursing Services, Inc. and Grace J. Aquino, or · In the alternative for summary adjudication · Costs for the suit incurred therein, and such other relief as may be just Causes of Action in Complaint 1. Breach of Contract 2. Breach of Guaranty PRELIMINARY MATTER As a preliminary matt...

Excerpt: ... As Trustee of the BERNARD E. FRANCOIS LIVING TRUST; SETH ROSENBERG; DEBORAH LOUGHMAN; JOHN MILLER; and DOUGLAS ZINKE v. EISNERAMPER, LLP; OPUS FUND SERVICE (USA) LLC; and DOES 1 - 20 TENTATIVE RULING ON DEFENDANT'S DEMURRER & MOTION TO STRIKE Moving Party: Defendant, EisnerAmper, LLP (“Defendant” or “Eisner”) Responding Party: Plaintiffs [Opposition simply states “Counsel for Plaintiffs” so presumably counsel represents all Plaintiff...

Excerpt: ...100 TENTATIVE RULING ON DEFENDANT'S DEMURRER N.B., the numbers for each cause of action in the caption of the complaint do not match the numbers of the causes of action in the body of the complaint. The Court will refer to the causes of action as referenced in the body of the complaint. Moving Party: Defendant, CRC Insurance Services, Inc. d/b/a Tapco Insurance Services, Inc. (erroneously sued as Tapco Underwriters, Inc.) (“Defendant” or “T...

Excerpt: ... 100 TENTATIVE RULING ON DEFENDANTS' DEMURRER & MOTION TO STRIKE N.B., the numbers for each cause of action in the caption of the complaint do not match the numbers of the causes of action in the body of the complaint. The Court will refer to the causes of action as referenced in the body of the complaint. Moving Party: Defendants, Linda Kevorkian and Linda Kevorkian Insurance Agency, Inc. Responding Party: Plaintiff, Armkar Entertainment Inc. 16...

Excerpt: ..., it was not served on the email address listed for Defendant) 75/80 Days Under 437c(2), notice of the motion and supporting papers shall be served on all other parties to the action at least 75 days before the time appointed for hearing. If the notice is served by mail, the required 75-day period of notice shall be increased by 5 days if the place of address is within the State of California. (CCP §437c(2).) Here, Plaintiff mailed notice of the...

Excerpt: ...mely (Oppo and reply submitted) RELIEF REQUESTED · Defendants, HomeSure Protection of California, Inc. and Cinch Home Services, Inc. (“Defendants”) demur to the First Cause of Action of Breach of Contract and Second Cause of Action for Fraud in Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint (“FAC”). o Made on the grounds that the first and second causes of action fail to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. · Defendants move thi...

Excerpt: .... However, Defendant's Opposition was not timely filed. In relevant part under CCP §1005(b), “all papers opposing a motion so noticed shall be filed with the court and a copy served on each party at least nine court days, and all reply papers at least five court days before the hearing.” The instant motion is scheduled to be heard on 1-21-2022. Opposition was supposed to be submitted by January 7, 2022; however, Opposition was not submitted ...

Excerpt: ...ddress for Plaintiff is to be clarified at the instant hearing. Defendant filed a proof of service noting that Defendant served Plaintiff's Counsel Eric Jun at the following address: Zwicker & Associates, 199 S Los Robles Ave, Pasadena, CA 91101. However, in eCourt, Plaintiff's counsel's address is listed as: Zwicker & Associates, P.C., 700 No Brand Blvd, Suite 500, Glendale, CA 91203. Also, how does Defendant know if the same attorney that previ...

Excerpt: ...ess: ok Oppo and Reply submitted RELIEF REQUESTED¿¿¿ · Defendant, Carmen Yaralian specially appears to move to quash service of the Summons and Complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction because she was never served with process. This motion is made pursuant to CCP §418.10(a) on the grounds Defendant was not properly served and the address where she was purportedly served does not exist. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Joanne Kim alleged three causes ...

Excerpt: ...OR SANCTIONS ¿¿¿ Moving Party:¿ Defendants, Milestone Retirement Communities, LLC (“Milestone”) and Milestone Management (CA) – Kingston, LLC (“Kingston, LLC”), erroneously sued herein as Kingston Bay Senior Living Responding Party: Plaintiff, Victoria Rico Opposition submitted, but no Reply submitted Proof of Service Timely Filed (CRC Rule 3.1300(c)): ok 16/21 Court Days Lapsed (CCP 1005(b)): ok RELIEF REQUESTED¿¿¿ · Defendants...

Excerpt: ...tion and sale of real property and on second cause of action for breach of contract. Moving and opposing papers were timely filed and served. BACKGROUND Plaintiff, Leslie A. Carmell, and Defendant, Michael E. Cooper are the owners of the real property, a single-family home located at 4018 Vista Court, La Crescenta, CA 91214 identified as APN 2571-006-030 (“Property”), and Plaintiff and Defendant hold title as tenants-in- common. Plaintiff and...

Excerpt: ...iv; CALIFORNIA RECEIVERSHIP GROUP, BC v. LEVON H. BARDAKJIAN, as Co-Trustee of the Levon and Sylvia Bardakjian Family Trust dated July 24, 2004; SYLVIA R. BARDAKJIAN, as Co-Trustee of the Levon and Sylvia Bardakjian Family Trust dated July 24, 2004; LEVON H. BARDAKJIAN, an Indiv.; SYLVIA R. BARDAKJIAN., an Indiv; 1001 LAS LOMAS LLC, a California Limited Liability Company; CITY OF DUARTE, a California municipal corporation; ROES 1 through 20, incl...

Excerpt: ...g Party: Plaintiff, Production Resources Group, LLC (“Plaintiff”) Oppo untimely, Reply Timely 16/5: ok Address: Uncertain – Defendant e-served the Plaintiff at [email protected]. eCourt lists Plaintiff's email address as [email protected]. However, Opposition did not object stating the demurrer was not served on the proper address. Opposition Untimely “Notwithstanding any other provision of this section, all papers opposing a mot...

Excerpt: ... §12c and §1005(b): ok Proof of Service Timely Filed (CRC, Rule 3.1300): ok Correct Address (CCP §1013, §1013a): Uncertain – Proper address must be clarified at the hearing . The instant motion was served on Cross-Defendant Paul Barbu at P.O. Box 393 Verdugo City, California 91406. Further, the Requests for Admissions, Set One, were served at P.O. Box 393 Verdugo City, California 91406. However, eCourt lists Cross-Defendant Paul Barbu with ...

Excerpt: ...e Opposition is timely, it is possible that the Opposition was not properly served on the Plaintiff . The Opposition lists that it served Plaintiff at [email protected]. However, on eCourt Plaintiff's email address is noted as [email protected]. RELIEF REQUESTED Plaintiff moves for an order to strike Defendant General Motors, LLC's objections and compel further responses to Plaintiff's Request for Production of Documents (“RFP”), Set One, Nos...

Excerpt: ..., and DOES 1-10 TENTATIVE RULING ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER Moving Party: Defendant, Colliers International of Greater Los Angeles, Inc. (“Colliers”) Responding Party: Defendant, Arrowhead Ranch, LLC (“AR”) No Opposition 16/+5 lapse: ok Proper Address: No – Moving party alleged service on Bruce T. McIntosh, attorney for Defendants and Cross-Complainants Pasadena Group, Arrowhead Ranch, and Steven Schultz (hereinafter, “Br...

Excerpt: ...(CCP 1005(b)): Confirm at the hearing when the proof of service for the instant motion was served. The month on the proof of service is illegible on the last page of the moving papers. Interesting to note, it appears as if the notice of the motion could have been sent on 5/13/2021, which would be odd because the default was not entered until 10/26/2021. This would mean that the notice to set aside the default was sent before the default was enter...