Excerpt: ...an ad litem William Ferrell, alleges that Plaintiff (a “dependent adult” within the meaning of the Welfare & Institutions Code) was raped, sexually assaulted, sexually harassed, abused, and sexually battered by Defendant Rafael Moya (“Moya”), while Plaintiff was a patient confined to the lockdown unit at Defendant Imperial Care Center LLC (“ICC”). Plaintiff alleges that the rape occurred on March 12, 2022. Plaintiff alleges that Defen...

Excerpt: ...service on Sherman. According to the proof of service, Sherman's registered agent (Rijesh Desai) was served by registered mail, sent to an address on Riverside Drive in Los Angeles. On October 17, 2023, Sherman filed this motion to quash service of summons. No opposition has been filed. LEGAL STANDARD C.C.P. §415.10 provides the requirements of personal service of summons and the complaint as follows: “A summons may be served by personal deliv...

Excerpt: ...EMENT COMPANY v. MARB CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, an entity; ML PLUMBING, an entity; MICHAEL LEVENDOSKY, an individual; and ROES 1 -50 inclusive 7 TENTATIVE RULING – COMPEL RESPONSES BACKGROUND ALL MOTIONS Plaintiffs filed a Complaint against Defendants on 9/1/2022 alleging three causes of action for: (1) General Negligence; (2) Negligent Hiring, Supervision, or Retention of Employee; and (3) Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress. On 11/17/20...

Excerpt: ...Park, LLC and Jeff Kwatinetz (hereafter, “Plaintiffs”), filed this motion to (1) compel Defendant and Cross - Complainant Azealia Banks (“Banks”) to appear at deposition for seven additional ho urs, (2) appointment of a discovery referee at Banks's expense, and (3) imposition of monetary sanctions against Banks in an amount not less than $10,000. The motion is unopposed.[1] II. DISCUSSION & LEGAL STANDARD a. Further Deposition Plaintiffs ...

Excerpt: ...: (1) Motion to Compel Leo Ramsey's Responses to Demand for Production of Documents, Set One is GRANTED. Verified written responses are ordered to be served by Ramsey on Plaintiff's counsel on or before May 24, 2024, together with legible copies of responsi ve documents. (2) Request for monetary sanctions is GRANTED in the amount of $2,500 I. BACKGROUND¿¿¿ ¿¿¿ A. Factual ¿¿¿ ¿¿ On November 3, 2022, Plaintiff, Maurice Stephenson (“Pla...

Excerpt: ...: (1) Motion to Compel Leo Ramsey's Responses to Demand for Production of Documents, Set One is GRANTED. Verified written responses are ordered to be served by Ramsey on Plaintiff's counsel on or before May 24, 2024, together with legible copies of responsi ve documents. (2) Request for monetary sanctions is GRANTED in the amount of $2,500 I. BACKGROUND¿¿¿ ¿¿¿ A. Factual ¿¿¿ ¿¿ On November 3, 2022, Plaintiff, Maurice Stephenson (“Pla...

Excerpt: .... It is, of course, a bit of a dated term.) Plaintiff then brought these motions to compel and a motion to deem admitted. In opposition, defendant states that this was just a mistake caused by the fact that the lawyer who had been handling the case apparently messed up, but has since left the firm. Defendant contends that this is an anomaly, and that responses were served on 3/15/24, but plaintiff would not accept them as timely. In reply, plaint...

Excerpt: ...STANDARD California Code of Civil Procedure section 1048 states: “When actions involving a common question of law or fact are pending before the court, it may order a joint hearing or trial of any or all the matters in issue in the actions; it may order all the actions consolidated and it may make such orders concerning proceedings therein as may tend to avoid unnecessary costs or delay.” Under California Rules of Court, rule 3.350, subdivisi...

Excerpt: ...ON Plaintiffs Alexa and Kim Gallegos (Gallegos Plaintiffs) and Plaintiff Angel Sanchez (Sanchez) are requesting an order from the Court to consolidate LASC Case Nos. 21STCV41026 (hereinafter “Gallegos Matter”) and 21STCV42588 (hereinafter “Sanchez Matter”). The two cases arise from a single motor vehicle collision on November 20, 2019. Sebastien Gallegos (Decedent) and Angel Sanchez were passengers in a vehicle driven by Eugene Oh. The ve...

Excerpt: ...h 21, 2021, Plaintiff Walters Wholesale Electric Co. (“Plaintiff Walters”) filed an action to foreclose mechanic's lien and to enforce stop payment notice (“Walters Action”) against Defendants Tobias Eugene Vargas (“Vargas”), Fred & Jamison LLC (“Jamison”), Evertrust Bank (“Bank”), and Inland Development Company. (“Inland”). On March 29, 2023, Plaintiff Walters filed the operative First Amended Complaint (“Walters FAC”...

Excerpt: ...t. If requested by the parties, the court may retain jurisdiction over the parties to enforce the settlement until performance in full of the terms of the settlement. (CCP, § 664.6(a).) “Because of its summary nature, strict compliance with the requirements of section 664.6 is prerequisite to invoking the power of the court to impose a settlement agreement.” ( Sully-Miller Contracting Co. v. Gledson/Cashman Construction, Inc. (2002) 103 Cal....

Excerpt: ...mental Cross- Complaint FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND: Plaintiff Excelsior at the Americana at Brand Homeowners' Association (Excelsior HOA) alleges that it is a California mutual benefit non-profit corporation which is owned by and composed of its members and owners within the community known as The Excelsior at Americana (Excelsior). Plaintiff alleges that there are 100 owner members, and that defendant Paul Van Richter is the trustee of th...

Excerpt: ...t been proper service of process. ( Ruttenberg v. Ruttenberg (1997) 53 Cal.App.4th 801, 808.) “When a motion to quash is properly brought, the burden of proof is placed upon the plaintiff to establish the facts of jurisdiction by a preponderance of the evidence.” ( Aquila, Inc. v. Sup. Ct. (2007) 148 Cal.App.4th 556, 568.) The plaintiff has “the burden of proving the facts that did give the court jurisdiction, that is the facts requisite to...

Excerpt: ...n April 20, 2021, alleges that Plaintiffs, Michael Buck, and John Gonzalez (“Plaintiffs”), are members and leaders of the Peace Apostolic Church, Inc. (the “Church”). Plaintiffs allege that after the death of the Church's pastor, the C hurch's de facto officers or directors, Tamara Swancy-Prince (“Prince”) and Priscilla Woods Brown (“Brown”), improperly spent church funds and engaged in other misconduct. Plaintiffs allege that Def...

Excerpt: ...e defendant.” (Bolkiah v. Superior Court (1999) 74 Cal.App.4th 984, 991.) Plaintiff meets this burden. “[I]n deciding whether service was valid, the statutory provisions regarding service of process should be liberally construed to effectuate service and uphold the jurisdiction of the court if actual notice has been received by the defendant.” (Gibble v. Car -Lene Research, Inc. (1998) 67 Cal.App.4th 295, 313.) “ ‘Personal service usual...

Excerpt: ... a California resident was not killed, as the accident did not happen with the borders of California nor on California roads, and the accident did not happen because of a tire purchased or manufactured in California (see Ford, infra), the motions are granted and the request for jurisdictional discovery is denied. Background This case arises from a June 4, 2020 car accident that happened in Virginia wherein the subject tire separated from the vehi...

Excerpt: ...rvice of Summons and Complaint. Discussion Defendant argues that service of the Summons and Complaint must be quashed due to lack of personal jurisdiction for failure to serve Summons and Complaint. “A defendant . . . may serve and file a notice of motion for one or more of the following purposes: (1) To quash service of summons on the ground of lack of jurisdiction of the court over him or her. . . .” CCP § 418.10(a). A court lacks jurisdic...

Excerpt: ... Rules of Court, Rule 3.1308(a)(1) whereby notice of intent to appear is requested. Unless the Court directs argument in the Tentative Ruling, no argument is requested and any party seeking argument should notify all other parties and the court by 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing of the party's intention to appear and argue. The tentative ruling will become the ruling of the court if no argument is received. Notice may be given eithe...

Excerpt: ...t directs argument in the Tentative Ruling, no argument is requested and any party seeking argument should notify all other parties and the court by 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing of the party's intention to appear and argue. The tentative ruling will become the ruling of the court if no argument is rec eived. Notice may be given either by email at [email protected] or by telephone at (818) 260 - 8412. ALLEGATIONS: Matthew C. Mo...

Excerpt: ...on a credit card debt. Plaintiff served Defendant, and when no response was made, the Court entered default judgment on February 17, 2023. This hearing is on Plaintiff's motion to set aside the default judgment. Plaintiff represents it recently learned Defendant was not a resident of the State of California and was not properly served. Plaintiff asks the Court to vacate the default judgment due to Plaintiff's counsel's mistake, inadvertence and e...

Excerpt: ...Civil Procedure section 1294(a). Defendants move for a discretionary stay. “Even when the statutes do not call for an automatic stay on appeal, the trial and appellate courts both have the power to issue discretionary stays.” ( Daly v. San Bernardino County Bd. of Supervisors (2021) 11 Cal.5th 1030, 1039 ( Daly).) Both the moving papers and opposition argue based on the following four factors used for discretionary stays in federal court: “...

Excerpt: ...nst Defendants Artyun Aladjian, individually and dba J&H Auto Wrecking, and all in possession. The property at issue is located at 9415 Glenoaks Boulevard, Sun Valley, CA 91352. Plaintiff alleges that on April 1, 2006, it entered into a 5 -year term tenancy pursuant to a written agreement with Defendants. Plaintiff served a 30 -day notice to quit on Defendants, such that the expiration of the notice was set for August 10, 2023. Plaintiff seeks po...

Excerpt: ...by Defendant Nancy Ming Ling Chen's (“Defendant”) German Shepherd Mix dog. Plaintiff alleges that she was jogging past Defendant on a public street when Defendant was unable to control her dog and, without warning or provocation, the dog viciously attacked and bit Plaintiff. The complaint, filed February 23, 2024, alleges causes of action for: (1) negligence; and (2) strict liability. B. Motion on Calendar On April 3, 2024, Defendant filed a ...

Excerpt: ... (“Defendant”) property located at 6555 Foothill Blvd., Tujunga, CA 91042 on December 24, 2020, when she tripped and fell on a floor mat. Plaintiff alleges that she sustained bodily injuries. The complaint, filed November 16, 2022, alleges causes of action for: (1) premises liability; (2) general negligence. B. Relevant Background and Motion on Calendar On April 19, 2024, Plaintiff filed the motion to strike Defendant's improper supplemental ...

Excerpt: ...23, Defendants served written discovery on Plaintiff. (Lee Decls., ¶2.) On February 13, 2024, Defendants filed motions to compel Plaintiff's responses to Form Interrogatories and Demand for Production of Documents. No opposition has been filed. Legal Standard A party must respond to interrogatories within 30 days after service. (Code Civ. Proc., § 2030.260, subd.(a).) If a party to whom interrogatories are directed does not provide a timely res...